The Mayor has informed a confidante Mr. Whitehurst will be resuming his appointment with the Arts and Culture Committee soon. Mr. Whitehurst has been on a "Leave of absence" from the committee while being paid as "Administrative Assistant"
We learned about the Leave of Absence from the record of attendance on the Leisure Services Advisory Committee Report. His   absence was noted with information  about "a leave of absence." On the next report, the  absence was again noted by " endorsed leave of absence".Councillor Evalina MacEachern is chairman of that Committee.
A leave of absence is not taken. It is requested and must be granted.  I know of no such request. I did ask once if Mr. Whitehurst had accepted  the  paid appointment and if so, had he resigned from the Arts and Culture Committee which would clearly be required. . .
The Mayor was outraged by my question. She said Mr. Whitehurst's family had endured much because of publicity over the issue. Mr. Whitehurst. she declared , is a dear friend   and a fine individual. he was also known to be a supporter and helped in the mayor's election campaign.
I had previously and privately asked the Clerk if he had received or seen Mr. Whitehurst's resignation. He had not. Then I   asked the question publicly because of the controversy created by the appointment.  People who had expressed  concern were entitled to know the answer..
The Clerk later advised he had referred the question for a legal opinion.  As yet none has been forthcoming. The clerk has since retired.  Reference to "Leave of Absence" may be thought  to have solved the problem. I don't think so.
Mr. Whitehurst accepted  the  paid appointment. It was  recommended by a committee of which he was a member. There is no record of his resignation from the committee nor of a request for a leave of absence. If  Leave  had been granted  it would have been after the fact.and without council involvement would have been invalid.  I doubt it would meet the test.
Statements have been made that the post is full-time and pays $120,000 a year. That's not accurate. It is an interim position. Hours are up to twenty a week. The pay is $60 an hour, $1200 a week for twenty hours.
There's another odd thing. Museum curator, Kathy Malloy  was also  a member of the committee. She resigned. herv post as curator . It seems  Mr. Whitehurst was   taking her place as a resource person
.  For thirty years , the town has made a grant to the Aurora Historical Society to help pay the curator salary. . Jackie Stewart held the post and was a valuable resource to the town's planning department  in research of heritage homes.  Jackie would help anyone  who had an inquiry over and above being curator of the museum collection.
.
The museum had been closed for three years when Jackie retired. The  town had   hired a full-time Heritage planner, Michael Seaman. He came from Markham and has since departed for  Oakville.
The museum has been closed five years now. The collection still  in storage. The new curator hired by the Historical Society.  is assigned to Hillary House Museum which is not a Town facility. The $50,000 town grant is still being paid.
Through the efforts of  Ms Malloy , while she was a member of the Arts and Culture Committee, a substantial grant was obtained for  renovations to  Church Street School from  the federal government. When Ms Malloy  resigned to take a position in Markham, the town ended up paying the Historical Society an additional $10,000  for her work in obtaining the grant.
Everywhere we turn, the town doles out money and taxpayers  get the short end of the stick.
Helen Roberts, President of The Aurora Historical Society  was  publicly supportive of Mr. Whitehurst and  enunciated in a letter to the editor, the eminent  suitability of his appointment to the paid position.
The 2009 budget proposed for the Arts and Culture Centre at Church Street School is half a million dollars. It is new expenditure. and in  addition to the $50. thousand  grant. Four full-time employees will work office hours. When I asked the consultant what new programs  Aurora residents might expect,  to justify the additional burden on their taxes, none were identified.Councillor Gaertner is Chair of that Committee.
When the Aurora Historical Society decided last year to withdraw from a legal commitment they made to the town to provide museum services , Ms. Roberts suggested the Society should receive a budget from the town on the same basis as the library. It seems  that's exactly what is about to happen.without of course  being identified as such.
                                           
                                                        * * * * * * * * * *
A prompt  response  to this post asks me to list my contribution  in the past to the town's progress.
The past  is past , Now is the present. I have never claimed  sole credit  for our accomplishments as a community.     I  always regarded   council and staff  as a team . Worthwhile things can not be accomplished, one without the other.
In 1976  we provided the Historical  Society with  a home for the   museum collection in  Church Street School. Having a location  made the Society  eligible for a $40,thousand dollar annual grant  for rent.  It partially covered the cost of operating the building.
.
During John West's administration, the grant was turned back to the society . It  allowed  them to hire a curator, who was Jackie Stewart.
Jackie was added to the town's payroll in order  to be part of the town's  benefit program. I could never get John to admit    sleight of hand over how  the grant to the Society from the province became a grant to the Society from the Town.   . At some further  point the provincial  grant must have come to an end and the town started  ponying up $50 thousand dollars a year from property taxes without the public ever being aware of the fact. There was never any question of value received.
Now ,if my  respondent  would like  to  offer a rational for  why a friend and supporter of the Mayor should be appointed to a paid position while holding an appointed position  and explain how that  fits  with the  terms of The Code of Conduct, I am certain  readers  would be interested .I would   post  that.
Calling me names contributes nothing to the public debate .
"There is always a time of reckoning. Dirty stuff acquires an aroma. Dogs find it and dig it up."
ReplyDeleteThe whole incident with Morris/Whitehurst, with a little MacEachern thrown in, frankly stinks. I love it when those that created the useless "Code" will be the first judged by it. Generally speaking, those who pretend to represent ethical behaviour are those who lack it the most. Gimme a break, this mayor lead the charge to create a code of ethics years ago and still she has no idea what it means. This is the absolute worst time for the introduction of a four year term, having this administration. The voters are not fooled, preparations are well underway to rid this chair and her cronies. We need people who care about this Town more than themselves and there are plenty of them stepping up. The next two years should be fun!
ReplyDeleteI have to thank you for stating things as you see them. Each of us is entitled to our own opinion. Other people are quick to judge what you say but at least YOU SAY IT. Openness and transparency - you've got that in spades.
ReplyDeleteIt's helpful to see it all set out on the net too. It's a good point of reference. Too bad our Mayor doesn't communicate half as well as you.
Come to the hip town of aurora where you can snuggle up to the mayor, and create your own job. I don't understand why you never talk about this at a council meeting. it's disgracefull at best. I can't wait for election time.
ReplyDelete