- Anonymous said...
- Hey anonymous. Was it Phyllis' fault when Tim had to throw Evelyn out of council chambers?
12 November, 2010 7:52 AM*******************************I am more than happy to tell that story again. The issue at hand was removal of Number 1 John West Parkway as address for the Aurora Town Hall.I recently learned something new about the address. Developers have the right. to name streets. Councils have the right to refuse a name. The council of the day did not. Every street in the development bore the name of a sitting Councillor.It was ever thus. . Streets must be named.Nigel Kean, an erstwhile losing candidate for the office of Mayor, moved and Phyllis Morris also a losing candidate for the office of Mayor, seconded , The Town Hall address be changed.The driveway into the parking lot be called Municipal Drive, so that John West's name could be removed . It had been there fourteen years.Mr. Kean had tried to change the street name in a previous bid.
- Got nowhere with that.In the 2003/6 term he lost no time trying again.John West was a sitting member of Council. He had served several terms as Mayor, a term as School Board Trustee and several terms as Councillor. Before political service ,his reputation was for helping wherever help was needed.He had been elected several times before and several times since the street was given his name.
- The community had clearly endorsed the honour.
Lifelong friends and supporters who rallied to his cause in every election,.rallied again to oppose what they perceived to be a humiliation of someone who had served his community well. They delegated against the proposal while seeking to understand.To no avail. Notice had been given. The motion came forward. Neither mover Nigel Kean nor seconder Phyllis Morris chose to speak to the motion.When a motion comes forward without an argument to support it, that's a strategy .It means the mover and seconder are sure of sufficient votes for the motion to pass .
- They know beforehand.No rule that requires a mover or a seconder to speak to a motion.If no argument is presented in favour, an opposing rationale is limited.I chose to argue the strategy. I said it was clear a majority of Councillors were complicit in the effort to change the address.
- Councillor Vrancic objected. He declared "I did not do that"
Mayor Jones accepted the point of order and requested I withdraw the word "complicit"I refused. The word perfectly suited the circumstance. Mayor Jones gave the option; I must withdraw the word or leave the Council Chamber.I chose not to withdraw the word. The word I used was the word I meant. I believed five Councillors agreed to the motion beforehand.I considered it within my rights as a councillor to make that observation and not within the authority of the presiding member to expel me from the Council Chamber for doing so.After the fact, I gathered research to support my understanding of the right of an elected representative to speak frankly and freely and resolved never again to comply with an order to withdraw any comment of mine based on a firm and honest belief.Nor would I agree with any order from the Presiding member to vacate the chair to which I had been elected.Councillors Kean and Morris were apparently quite excited about the outcome. They thought I would be unable to take my seat without tendering the required apology.It was never thus.Circumstances envisaged to allow an elected representative to be removed from theirplace, is if the member is drunk and disorderly or out of control for any other reason, has made an accusation of criminal wrong-doing and the resulting uproar is preventing the business of the council from continuing.The two eventually acknowledged the reason for changing the town hall address was because it gave a candidate a financial advantage of free advertising during an election.I never did withdraw my contention that five Councillors were complicit in making a decisionwithout offering the community a reason.During this term , now outgoing Mayor Phyllis Morris has attempted several times. in public and in camera meetings , to compel me, urged by outgoing Councillor MacEachern, to apologise or withdraw a reference made within my authority as an elected representative.As recently as the special meeting on November 9th.Without success.I didn't have a blog or readership when Tim made his infamous ruling during the 2003/6 term.But I have it now.
Way to go Evelyn! I love these stories. I am sure that Tim would laugh about this now and concede your point of view.
ReplyDelete