A motion to direct Director of Leisure Services to flesh out terms of reference for a museum curator and program . passed by a recorded vote of six to three on Tuesday.
It was not a vote to expend funds.
Facility maintenance and permit space for programs were under direction of the town's Leisure Services Department when Church Street school was in operation.
Before the aggressive demands of a Historical Society spokesperson that the town butt out.
Argument against the motion was slim. Opposition by Councillor Ballard was the motion was not accurate.
It could have been interpreted to mean: the motion was deceptive. The motion was misleading. The motion lied.
It was my motion. I did not take that meaning. I did not demand a retraction and apology on pain of being expelled from the meeting.
I argued $50Ks was included in the 2011 budget for the purpose of retaining a curator, at my request, and council supported.
"It would be my intention to restore the museum to its rightful home" I argued during budget discusssions.
I looked around the table and received confirmation of my re-call.
But the Councillor was adamant.. He requested affirmation of the record from the treasurer.
Wording composed by staff was read from the record. It was imprecise. .
I said the wording was not "accurate". I could have said imprecise. But accuracy was the point in contention. It was their word.
Councillor Gaertner intervened on a point of order to argue my comment was a serious accusation against staff.
Shades of the not too distant past .
In Councillor Gaertner's guided view, it is apparently acceptable to challenge accuracy of a motion presented by myself but not acceptable to apply it to an imprecise phrase used by staff.
It was the same twisted logic that dominated the last council . It continues to support Council Gaertner's view of the supreme righteousness of the remnant cabal and upholds her conviction only she,Councillors Gallo and Ballard are keepers of all truth,logic and virtue. The only ones capable of discerning and applying appropriate rules for all to live by.
The same argument was presented later for the motion to appoint yet a third Integrity Commissioner to enforce a Code of Conduct that requires all members to read and understand it.
Not necessarily for all to have the same understanding. Just enough members to pursue a particular objective.
A scene in Monte Python's movie. "In Search of The Holy Grail" comes to mind.
A small white rabbit leaps out of a cave in a gigantic curve and bites off the head of anyone who dare to pass in "Search of The Holy Grail.
A cool, thoughtful and effective " Whack " Well done.
ReplyDeleteLove the whacks!
ReplyDelete"A small white rabbit leaps out of a cave in a gigantic curve and bites off the head of anyone who dare to pass in "Search of The Holy Grail"
ReplyDeleteshows you how close they paid attention to their constituents who quite clearly tossed the rest of the Riotous Integrity Queens and Kings directly into that Cave of the dreaded Carl Banner
How interesting that Gaertner has the gall to intervene when she is the councillor who accused the town clerk of being a liar over "the minutes" debacle at the beginning of the term.
ReplyDeleteThe "goose and gander" continues.