It's taking time for some readers to understand what this blog is about.
I occupy a seat at the Council table. I have an opportunity to participate in town business as she is being conducted.
I can keep people who choose to read my posts informed in a way never possible before.
I've been doing it snce August 2007.
Numbers of viewers and visitors are recorded daily.
A spike in numbers reflects increased interest. It can be as high as sixty.
Controversy sends numbers zooming. It's the nature of things.
I don't create the drama I just relate it.
Last night was a for instance. Council refused to deal with an agenda of twenty-six items,204 pages and awards of ten million dollars of contracts.
It was general committee. Recommendations were made for Council approval next week.
We had a tie vote on one project. $1.4 million for additional soccer fields identified as a need in the Master Recreation Plan, adopted by the last Council.
Once a Master Plan is approved, it's staff responsibility to proceed with plans to implement.
Developer charges are collected for needs identified in the plan. Regulations require needs to be identified to justify collecting developer charges.
By the time a report is presented to Council months of work by many people, has already been done to determine estimates to accomplish one or other of the objective of the Council adopted Master Plan .
The Strategic Plan about to be approved will have the same implications.
Council will likely adopt it. It cost $80.000.for a consultant to prepare .
It will be the work plan for the Executive Leadership Team for twenty years. If Council directs anything else to be done, a consultan will have to be retained because staff are too busy with their own work.
Last night's proposal for $1.4 million worth of soccer fields is an example of how the system works.
Within the plan, a cost of $278,000 was identified as necessary as a result of timing.
If the project could wait until 2.c developers are further advanced with their plans, theoretically that amount could be saved.
The vote was four to four.The Mayor was absent.
The count could change by the time it gets to Council
The decision is not as simple as it may seem.
Developer charges will pay ninety per cent of the cost..
We can't use the funds for other purposes.
Cash-in-lieu of parks reserves can provide the rest.
But more used for one project,is less available for the next and the need for economy is ever present.
If the plan is not approved , month's of man hours in planning will have been wasted.
Costs do not decrease with time.
Shelving the plan will not necessarily result in savings.
Site preparation, a large part of the cost, would be less if the job had been completed when the baseball diamond was built.
A big stink was made then about that price tag being $1.6 million.
Former Councillor MacEachern knew places where baseball diamonds were built for half that amount.The price tag came in under a million.
Plaudits claimed for the politicians. .
The tricky thing is this ;playing fields have to be flat .
We live high in the hills. We enjoy fabulous scenery when the view is unimpeded .
When it comes to creating sports fields, we literally have to move mountains.Prep work takes months.There's no way around it. Humps, bumps and lumps are everywhere.
A man made mountain when the Stronach Centre increased with construction of the diamond. Prep work of the entire site was not done.
There was an understanding from our Federal M.P. Lois Brown. the project would qualify for a stimulus grant .No application was made.
This post was to be about another $450,000 contract approved to be awarded last night.
I will tell about that tomorrow. .
"I don't create the drama..."
ReplyDeleteNot *all* of it, no.
All council meetings should be shown if Council really wants to increase residents' interest and input. They talk a lot about participation but communications are a disaster.
ReplyDeleteReading Mayor Dawe's letter in the Auroran, I realized that I must have zigged when I should have zagged. I was under the impression that it was more or less agreed that the youth facility would be included in the new town building to be erected on the site of the old Library. Have I goofed?
ReplyDeleteEvelyn:
ReplyDeleteYou are far too modest when you say that you don't create the drama, you just relate it.
At times you wax lyrical with your prose. At others you tend to overshoot the mark.
You are certainly a part of the drama, not merely a reporter.
Do reporters normally sue a sitting mayor and five fellow councillors, for good reason I might add?
At times you are a fresh breeze blowing aside the cobwebs. At others you can confuse some of us.
But, be it as it may, keep doing what you do and let the rest of us try and figure out what you are saying.
8:04, that "building" is only an idea floated by Councillor Buck. As of now, there's no there there.
ReplyDelete"I don't create the drama...|"
ReplyDeleteOh, Ev, you are a card! *wink*
Hi I am Scott Lee, an analyst, consultant, speaker, strategist and writer on topics related to digital content technology.
ReplyDeleteInteresting post!
prom dresses