Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Let
Both Sides Be Heard":
Isn't it funny who you are often voting along
with lately...
************
Let's take a look at that and determine what ,if anything, there is to make of it.
I do not nor have I ever discussed Council business prior to a meeting. I am not averse. The opportunity does not present.
What I say and how I vote is decided in the course and at the end of a debate.
I arrive at an issue with a strong leaning. I make my case, listen to the opposing argument, respond if opportunity presents and cast my vote.
If my argument has influence, that's gratifying. It's mine and everyone else's reason for being there.
Two people speaking along the same lines, lends strength to an argument. One picks up allies wherever one finds them.
I don't make deals beforehand. I don't need support and I don't want to renege.
I don't count votes.Once the question is decided it makes little difference where the numbers were..
Staff reports are clear and direct. I don't them to be defined.
.I spend very little time at the town hall. I steer clear of inordinate influence.
If I need clarification. I ask and receive . Explanations are, clear, succinct and fulsome.
I never ask anyone how I should vote.
Sometimes I make mistakes. I seldom dwell on them. I don't feel
compelled to wear sackcloth and ashes.
Expectations of myself is to do the best I can
Votes on Council are often unanimous which are not notable. It simply means the issue is not contentious.
A tie vote is interesting. It only happens when a members is absent.
The question is left hanging about how it will go when the decision must be made. A tie vote is not a decision.
But if a tie vote happens at a council meeting , it raises the question of re-consideration.
There is a tendency to "team" around the Mayor. It's not unnatural. Councillors hang out together.at various events. They mainly hear views compatible to their own. Doesn't mean they won't change their mind if they hear something they didn't think of before..
There is a a distinct possibility of that if they have to hear from someone who has been around since Methuselah
They do listen.
Aurora Council is not split into factions.
Not have enough time is available for informal exchange before we go on stage ,in the public eye, under the microscope and are compelled to make decisions as we speak. .
The almighty thrust towards vaunted openness and transparency comes at a price. That price is not being able to exchange ideas informally and out of the glare of publicity where everyone has to demonstrate rapier skills or die.
So people meet in bars and coffees shops in smaller numbers and form conclusions and alliances hard to renege.
I watch it, I recognise it. It does not disturb me because however uncomfortable they make things for themselves, Councillors do vote for what they believe is right.
I include all Councillors.
If Councillors Gallo, Gaertner and Ballard find themselves voting with me , I sincerely hope it causes them no embarrassment because it disturbs me not a whit.
No one who reads this blog = with a couple of un-noteworthy exceptions, believes voting is a matter of ' taking sides'. Carry On, Councillor.
ReplyDelete