Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The
Meaning Of Ethics":
Could someone please explain these 'Tweat '
things? and how we are getting them? I know zip about computers but Ballard
claims to be an expert in communications. Could this be someone else using the
heading? Surely he should not be this stupid? We should be careful unless
someone is certain of the source of these items.
************
Sorry I can't explain the "tweating" thing .
The exchange between Councillor Ballard and Deborah Kelly have been forwarded to me exactly as they appeared on Councillor Ballard's domain. It's like a transcript.
I'm not even sure domain is the right word for the address to send and receive Councillor Ballard's "tweats". I should stop with the quotes, I think.
If anyone was trying to pin this demonstration of imbecility on to the Councillor, I think we might have heard loud protestations by now.
My reader ponders in disbelief that a Councillor could be so "stupid"
Well, we have the evidence provided by himself. It's a pattern.
He has already referred to Aurora citizenry as "rubes" in connection with the high culture offered at the occupied museum facility in Church School.
Don't forget, the exchange that started this thread was between himself and Deborah Kelly, managing- editor of a group of Metroland newspapers, one of which failed to win the competition for the $30,000. annual contract with the town.
The subject of exchange between the two professional associates, being Conflict of Interest and Ethics. .
Council had an e-mail from a Metroland person the day before yesterday.
Ii contained information I did not know before.
It seems a hot-shot ad salesman with the Era Banner approached the town in 1993 and sold the idea of The Aurora Notice Board ..
There was no other newspaper in town at the time so, of course, they got the business without a competition. They have had it ever since.
Things changed. A new newspaper emerged. It was small. But it grew.It was published by man who cut his teeth on local news.He understood what people wanted and had before Metroland gained a monopoly and provided it in spades.
Twice, it made a failed bid for the town's business..
Now, it has succeeded.
Squawking ,accusations and threats of retribution have resulted, courtesy of Councillor Ballard, from the managing editor of the newspaper that lost the competition, against one Councillor who voted with the majority vote of seven to two.
This time Gaertner and Ballard were the stand-out duo.
Chris Watts, our resident media wizard could perhaps give us a primer on tweating.
Yup. That lady is going to have to explain to her bosses how she managed to let that lucrative contract slip through her fingers. Right now, she is taking it out on others especially Evelyn. So far, she has not looked into her own mirror for the source of her fury.
ReplyDeleteI see nothing wrong with your reading them if they are sent to you. Too good to resist. But sharing might have to wait until a pro wades in on further distribution. "cause we do have ethics on your Blog - well, we try.
ReplyDeleteHere's a bad thought. What if Ballard can't get anyone to read his Blog and actually WANTS us to read all this crap on Evelyn's Blog? I think we should stop with the Tweats. Infiltration possibilities . Just saying , but watch out.
ReplyDeleteThis Is Your Blog!
ReplyDeleteSean Pearce, former reporter of the Banner, must be watching this and laughing his head off. Good on him. I hope he has a decent boss now who allows decent stories.
ReplyDeleteA gift horse. Count the teeth. Tweating could be dangerous for one's health.
ReplyDeleteIt would be really hard to swallow for the Banner lady that the only people in town who wanted the renewal of the Banner contract were the 3 Stooges. No one posted any support on the Blogs - maybe one guy, but the Auroran was a shoe-in. Doesn't say a lot for net-working which I understand she was an expert in while lecturing others on becoming leaders. CRASH!
ReplyDeleteI was just told that the Former occupied the seat usually used by the Banner reporter at the last council meeting. Is it possible that Ms Kelly has hired her to cover local affairs? The last reporter, who was at the Newmarket hearing, was just a month into the job and could have been replaced by the Former. Apparently she was taking notes during the meeting but that does not mean anything.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete