Recap The Audit Situation

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Council Must Act":

It sounds like opportunistic scare-mongering. After all, you do have it in for the senior management team, don't you

***************
It's always interesting to read varying reactions .
In some people's minds ,the above does not vary.
No matter what;
" Evelyn Buck is at the root of it.  Pay no attention. Simply dismiss"
A politician who takes a  position always takes that risk.
It's natural. It's normal. It's the way the world turns.
The sky does not fall.  
I am diametrically opposed to many positions taken by  senior management.
I recognise no rule that compels me to say I am in favour , if I'm.not.
I have wondered how the Culture Centre Agreement escaped attention of the auditor. Clearly public interest was not served. 
I seldom let opportunity pass to state my position. 
For the sake of the community, I  hope to be  wrong. 
But experience  is sufficient to believe time will permit me to say;
See......
It's more satisfying if I can prevent a decision without merit.
I try.
But mine is one opinion among nine. That is our lot. 
The law requires the annual audit.  It's  purpose is clear.
The  law  requires findings to be publicly stated.
Without fear or favour.
Problems detected must be corrected.
In all my years in town affairs, this is a first, in not receiving a clean audit. 
Potential  for trouble  has been highlighted. Correction has been advised.
To my recollection, specific errors have not been identified.
I may be the only Councillor seriously concerned.
I believe I am not.
The matter is not concluded.

.