Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Am I
Qualified to Judge.":
It's like providing additional lighting to an
area that has indicated no desire for it based on traffic of an occasional deer
or three and the possibility of cyclists using the bicycle lanes being installed
in an area that has indicated no desire for them. Aurora wants to be Big Time
without showing any reason for spending the money.
The Mayor's comment was
that not going with the expensive new lighting plan would be showing a dual
standard of service. We residents moved here for just that reason. Lots of space
and mostly maintained by the people who live here.
***********
On Tuesday the Mayor flew into a temper tantrum at a query of Councillor Gaertner and echoed by myself.
A recommendation was received to increase the price of a design contract by $15,000; from $51,740, $66,735.
The increase was for an improved lighting design.
Councillor Gaertner's question was ; "Is that Urban Standard ?"
The answer was "Yes'
My follow-up was "Why? That's not an urban neighborhood."
The Mayor, in outrage, instantly accused us both of suggesting the people in that neighbourhood are "not as good" as people in urban neighbourhoods and don't deserve to have improved standards of lighting.
Hunter's Glen is not an urban neighbourhood. o more than seventy -five lots were created in the development. . Lots sizes range from two and a quarter to four acres.
That is not an urban neighbourhood.
In my home subdivision, we had seven hundred and fifty lots. One hundred times as many.
That's an urban neighbourhood.
Yesterday I went down and counted the lots on the stretch of road
to be re-constructed. I counted driveways, then realised some of them were circular so I had counted twice. Fox point is a bulb in the south side that allows three lots to access the road.
The highest number I saw on Hunter's Glen was twenty- eight. It means not more than thirty-one homes.
The new budget for construction of urban lighting for thirty homes is $289,000 . Consultants design fees are $66,735.
Add the two figures together and cost of road lighting for approximately thirty homes is $355,735.00
The total project is estimated at $2 million dollars.
Both shoulders of the road are to be paved for bicycle paths. They will go from Yonge Street, where there are no paths, and end at Steeplechase Drive, where there are no paths.
There are thirty homes on that stretch of road.
The report is signed jointly by the Director of Environment and Infrastructure, absent on three weeks vacation, and the Chief Administrative Officer.
Neither of whom live within the Municipality.
And defended in a rage by the Mayor of the Municipality.
The Report will come before Council on Tuesday for approval. Councillor Gallo had questions in committee and professed himself satisfied with the answer received.
Councillor Pirri offered the information about lots of wild life in the area; improved lighting would give drivers a better opportunity to see animals on the road, he said.
When Hunter's Glen was developed as little disturbance as possible was made to land contours.
Lots were created by how a level site for a house could be obtained without disturbing the land.
The original road ran north of Bloomingtion and curved around out on to Bayview. No-one other than a resident, or having business with a resident, has a need to be there.
It is an exclusive neighbourhood.
It is a nature preserve to every kind of native wildlife. Some houses are second and third homes for the owners.
The wooded areas, slopes and inclines and a completely natural area surrounded and protected by homes makes the neighbourhood truly unique.
A hidden treasure.
A Wonderland.
So well hidden apparently and so little understood, it is not even familiar to those who should certainly know better.
Sometimes Councillor Pirri gets the wrong end of the stick. He should come into the Elder-developed property and/or phone and just ask us how many deer we have hit in the past few decades. Skunks, coons, and rabbit, sure. But then they get hit on streets in Old Aurora all year round, don't they?
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteWhat do the residents of the Hunter's Glen area think about this?
If I lived in that lovely, private enclave I would not want to be an "Urban Standard." I would want to retain my status as "Estate Residential."
Possibly the mayor should join Clr. Ballard running around Machell Park with his head tucked underneath his arm.
The Director of Environment and Infrastructure and the CAO should stop signing stupid reports and, rather, demonstrate that they have the capability to sift the mouse shit from the wheat before they even consider an idea for a report.
If they don't, they should be replaced.
"In my home subdivision, we had seven hundred and fifty lots. One hundred times as many.
ReplyDeleteThat's an urban neighbourhood."
Actually, Regency Acres is a suburban neighbourhood.
If you make those streets lovely, wide, and brightly lit, they will be just perfect for drag-racing goof-balls from the entire region. No one from any of the houses would take much notice if the races were spaced to avoid a pattern. Just saying, is all.
ReplyDeleteThis is a no-brainer. Compare the traffic flow- from the police dept.-for that road with the flow on ,say, Murray or Kennedy Street W.- and then decide if it is urban. When Mayor Dawe said people 'looked ' at the plan & did not complain, why would they? It was his party.
ReplyDeleteCanada Politics
ReplyDeleteAndy Radia
" Duffy says he'll pay back housing allowance"
ReplyDeleteCheck Toronto Star where Ford seeks costs re: conflict of interest.
4:12 PM
ReplyDeleteIt was the university-educated, qualified staffer who was bandying the divisive terminology of urban/ non urban.