Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Who is
minding the shop?":
While your attentions have been focused
elsewhere, this boondoggle has been draining the Town coffers. While all the
bitching and moaning was going on about the Cultural Centre, I was wondering why
no one was looking at the bubble's operations.
*****************
What do you mean, "no-one was looking at the bubble's operation"?
How did you come to be "wondering" about it if you weren't hearing about it?
One thing has to be understood. The town is managed by an "Executive Leadership Team"
Council receives professional advice from the team.
In matters of finance, the treasurer is the authority.
The advice received was because of the change in use, taxes had to be paid.
There was no change in use. The property was still public and still being used as a soccer field. It was enclosed by the dome and the town had use from May 1st until September 30th each year/
Two treasurers gave the same advice. There was a process but it was extremely complicated and tedious.
From 2003, the town had a succession of treasurer.and interim treasurers . In 2006, we had an interim Chief Admiistrative Officer
to carry us through the process of the sale of hydro.and who in time, evolved into an interim treasurer.
He was former CAO of the Town of Vaughan. I'm not sure about the timeline of signing the Soccer Dome contract. But the Leisure Services Director was confident and has never agreed the property should be taxed .The Town of Vaughan has a similar contract and the property is tax exempt . As does Richmond Hill and Newmarket. .
I accepted the treasurer's advice. I knew no different. The Leisure Services Director's argument was muted.
It wasn't until the circling and the hunt begin again at the General Committee meeting on Tuesday I had a different reaction.
I made a phone call on Wednesday and learned the Club House on town property at the south end of town is tax exempt.
I became convinced at that point all was not right. .
I take my share of responsibility. I don't take all of it.
I had fellow-travelers from 2007 to 2010 with a different objective.
My notice of motion referring the matter to the town solicitor to review and advise.will not be heard until the following Council meeting.
Unless Council feels the issue is urgent enough to waive procedure.
We cannot recover taxes paid already. We should not pay more until the question is resolved.
The issue will be on the table for resolution once and for all.
If there is to be a challenge to a tax issue it will be Council's direction to the legal department .
At this point, I don't think eagerness to hunt down and punish a culprit will take precedence over the town's best interest.
There is plenty of blame to go around,
I have always been curious about what that guy at the Town whose business card says " Retention of Businesses " does with his time. Would it be possible to assign him to one of those 20 work stations and just have him fill out applications all day ? That way, Aurora would be in line for any grant or price reduction without this second guessing and asinine assigning of blame.
ReplyDeleteJust a suggestion.