Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Everybody's
Dong It.....Doing it .....doing it.":
here are the facts, right from
Canada Pipe web site , looks like your right again according to the manufacturer
, the only thing that can improve the life span of the pipe is an external
treatment of polyethylene, not internal , is this what you mean by Region
Mentality at its finest
IRON PIPE - THE HISTORY AND THE FACTS
In
1664, King Louis X1V of France commissioned the construction of a cast iron
watermain, which lasted more that 342 years in service.
Cast iron watermain
pipe was first used in North America, circa 1800, in the Philadelphia water
systems.
There are currently over 23 cities in North America with cast iron
pipe still in service after 150 years (before the invention of electricity and
the automobile).
There are over 622 towns/cities in North America with cast
iron watermain in service after 100 years.
Nine or more reasons for watermain
failure are related to strength. Ductile Iron Pipe is the strongest watermain
pipe available, by a very large margin.
Ductile iron is machined for engine
parts such as crankshafts and connecting rods, plus various brake and steering
components, due to its strength and reliability.
Ductile Iron Pipe has the
largest available inside diameters vs. all other watermain pipe products
currently available, and therefore has the greatest hydraulic capabilities in
the industry.
In 1922, cement mortar lining of cast iron watermain was first
used to protect the interior wall of the pipe and improve water quality.
Cast
or Ductile iron Pipe corrodes only as a function of its underground environment,
hence the extremely long life in so many installations.
Soil evaluation
technology today can determine whether or not ductile iron pipe requires special
corrosion protection.
Since 1958, polyethylene encasement has been used
successfully to prevent the corrosion of iron watermains in some of the most
corrosive locations in North America.
The success of polyethylene encasement
has created the adoption of standards by ANSI, AWWA & ASTM (U.S.), plus ISO
8180 (International) and individual standards for Great Britain, Japan, Germany
and Australia
*****************
It's amazing what we discover with a click of the mouse.
But the pipe described about is water main .
Sewer mains are concrete or plastic or one other material.
It makes no never mind.
The question is ,why are we cutting into pipes to install fibreglass liner?
We are told it is to stop ground water from infiltrating into the sewer to cut down the volume going to the treatment plant.
You would think before undertaking such a project,a way to prove effectiveness of the method would have been shown
The same outfit gets the contract every year.
You would think if standard pipe has proven to need a firbreglass liner to stop ground water from infiltrating , the manufacturers might have been asked by now to construct a pipe that doesn't allow ground water to inflitrate.
That is, if it is proven ground water is infiltrating.
You would think if ground water filters into a pipe, it would also filter out of the pipe.
That would surely be a greater problem.
You would think municipalities wouldn't keep spending between seven hundred thousand and a million dollars each year for a process not proven to be effective.
But we are.
We don't even know if ground water is getting into the pipe.
In the sixties, people would quite simply have regarded the exercise as a huge boon-doggle.
Nobody would have accepted the rational offered.
See how we have evolved?
We ask questions.
We don't get answers.
But the money goes out the door anyway.
Is this the same outfit that does the same work for less in Newmarket?
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteA Canadian senator receives an all inclusive remuneration of $132,300 per year. That's about a quarter of one now defunct penny per capita.
I know it isn't much, but quarters of pennies soon add up into nickels and dimes.
How be if Mike Duffy were stripped of his senator status and sent back to PEI for life as a form of penance?
There is some rather confusing stuff in the Auroran. The trio seem to have banded together but I fail to see the purpose of their exercise. Are they expecting taxpayers to get involved in the largely simplistic matters of the Soccer Dome & Lucid? Because it is not going to generate any attention. The Jazz Fest, the Centre & the past shenanigans from the previous Council hold interest. But we are really focusing on the budget - not the attention-seeking devices of a few pissed off councillors. If they have problems, deal with them at the table instead of in the newspapers where Flo is the star right now.
ReplyDelete