It's Friday night and twenty-five past nine.
I've eaten , washed the dishes , had tea and shortbread and opened the agenda package Stephanie brought in the house when she came home from work.
A couple of nights ago she came in laughing with a thousand piece jigsaw puzzle in her hand.
"Grannie did you tell people about the puzzle we did during the power outage"
Packaged and mailed, without a note or card, To Stephanie C/O Evelyn Buck, it was thoughtful and kind and very well received.
Thank you.
The agenda package is not so well- received.
The operating budget is part of the package. We will be working on it from 9.30 a.m.
The Mayor has called a special closed meeting for nine o-clock to authorize staff direction
on a property matter.
There's another closed meeting to deal with another property matter at 6.00 p.m. next Tuesday.
Item 1 on Tuesday's general committee meeting there's a 107 page report related to a decision to be made at the closed meeting to be held at 6.00p.m.
I haven't read the 107 page Report. But I can share the recommendation from the C.A.O.
that starts the report.
That Report CAO 14-001 be received and
That Report CAO 14-001 be forwarded to the February 4, 2014 General Committee meeting for consideration. together with the following recommendations:
That Council receive the attached "Hillary-McIntyre Park Cost Benefits Study" completed by Sierra Planning and Management and Carl Bray and Associates: and
That, Staff be authorized to negotiate the terms of agreements of purchase and sale for Horton
Place ( 5342 Yonge Street). Readman House (16356 Yonge Street) and Hillary House
(15372 Yonge Street) properties for Council approval; and
That, staff report back to Council pertaining to: a) the details of the process of developing a master plan for the properties that will guide the long term development and opeations of the three properties, and b) the outcome of the negotiations o purchase the three properties and to obtain authority to execute any such agreements.
The report that follows this recommendation,as noted above. is 107 page long.
It is the first item of a meeting that starts at 7.00p.m.
The closed meeting with the confidential attachment to Report No. CAO 14-001 for Council 's attention , is scheduled for 6.00p.m. An hour earlier.
The closed session agenda notes time of the meeting;
After New Business Section of the General Committee agenda .
That would normally be after Council had actually received the report and discussed it.
Now.... if the juxtaposition of times of meetings and decisions has you confused ...you are not alone.
I am too. It feels like a hustle.
But then,,, I am but a part-time Councillor with little status in the scheme of things.
Nothing much is expected of a Councillor and they are paid accordingly.
Save for cost of living, Council remuneration has not seen an adjustment since 2003.
The economy was said to be unable to support it.
On the other hand, the Mayor's salary increased by Bylaw in December , by $9 thousand
and full benefits ..... about forty per cent increase.
The Mayor has been provided all employee benefits.
Menial Councillors can enjoy the same benefits but only if they pay what it costs.
I wasn't at the meeting when the Bylaw was passed. I had a bad bout of bronchitis that deprived me of speech......a temporary affliction.
The Bylaw was likely not called for discussion.
It would pass unnoticed.
Why am I writing about it now?
It's 11pm. It's been a full day. As it will be tomorrow.
My mind is choc-a-bloc with millions flowing unimpeded from the town's treasury, based on expertise of almost anyone except the town's elected representatives
Save for one exception. The Mayor.
Hurrah! Progress! We shall have our Heritage Park!
ReplyDeleteYou know Ev? After reading this post I think that you should put forward a motion for the Town to provide some medical attention to whoever on council even contemplates this idea. This motion would provide additional quality of life to these councillors and the residents of this Town.
ReplyDeleteI can't believe they are going to be so stupid right before an election. The Town can't support its current commitments.
ReplyDeleteThe list of questions for candidates just grows & grows.
Mind how you go throughout the day. Aurora is a skating rink,
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteAs I recall when this Heritage Park concept was first discussed by Council, following proposals from financially interested parties, a potential cost was mentioned as being in the order of $10,000,000. Where this number came from I do not know.
Now with Report CAO14-001, the very first of the new year, staff is being authorized to negotiate the terms of agreements of purchase and sale for three properties.
Staff is also being asked to report back to Council pertaining to the details of the process of developing a master plan for the properties that will guide the long-term development and operation of the three properties and the outcome of the negotiations to purchase the three properties and to obtain authority to execute any such agreements.
Council will have before it a Cost Benefit Study.
So far as I am aware Council has not apprised the taxpayers of Aurora about costs, from where the money will come from, the annual operating costs and the potential revenues that will go to defray all costs, both capital and operating.
This is kind of like buying a pig in a poke and does not represent the vaunted transparency and accountability that Council constantly regurgitates.
In my opinion Council must first explain to taxpayers all of the above, so that the town does not find itself in another questionable situation such as that which exists with the Cultural Centre where several millions of dollars were spent to renovate a building originally for the Historical Society and ended up with an acrimonious agreement that sees the town contribute close to $500,000 annually to an organization that can still conduct its affairs behind closed doors even though two members of Council will sit on its Board.
To 00:12
ReplyDeleteThat is such a pathetic little comment -
Just past midnight & your thoughts are all about what you will be ' having '.
Have you no other life ?
Sorry ? I thought Council just ok'ed a feasibility study with a limited budget. One of those guys said at the time that 1 property would be gone if Council did not act promptly. Place is still available. So does that mean he told a whopper ? Just asking
ReplyDeleteI would like to know why a member of the HAC, who is an owner of one of the mentioned properties,did NOT declare a conflict at meetings this was discussed.The Chair apparently let it slide when the member asked if they should.The chair suggested they can add to discussion but not vote.
ReplyDeleteWTF...this smells.
ReplyDeleteWe need to invest in a FabLab that can print $100 bills.
Then all this baloney can be taken with just a half grain of salt.
And the staff nurse that attends all Trails Committee meetings should be upgraded to a doctor, mandatory at all Council/GC meetings, with tranquillizers.
No one is doing the bloody math. We can't afford what's already been committed to other projects.
ReplyDeleteOh, right, maybe this is that new math that Canadian students are flunking on the international tests.
What NEW sources of revenue & Jobs has Aurora developed over the current term.
ReplyDeleteTo 12:15
ReplyDeleteN.B. 'our' versus 'mine' - this visionary concept will be for generations of Aurorans to enjoy...even the petty, small-minded ones.
To 12:15 Yes, it will teach people you can collect millions for a museum and win awards and then scuttle that and create another BS plan without public input.This is bordering on criminal....my opinion.
ReplyDelete9:28 -The “generations” of Aurorans enjoying the park? Besides the ones that would benefit monetarily from the sale of properties, who exactly? We can barely maintain the parks/facilities that we have now. Anyone can put together a business plan and make it look viable it’s done every day. This “park” has been in the works for some time now…If it were truly a viable investment…Don’t you think someone/group would have stepped in all ready? There’s nothing “petty” or “small-minded” about this $10+++ million proposal. I’m just happy that’s it’s still just a proposal and I’m sure the smart council representatives of today will vote to stop this train wreck shortly.
ReplyDeleteEv...how can the Town buy a building funded with public donations aka the Hillary House? I am so confused.I also heard that is plan conflicts with the Places to Grow guidelines.Can you please answer these.The second question is due to info provided by a Provincial staffer.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteto 9:28
Grandiosity is a symptom. There is a specialist in Newmarket.
Too many concerns about resources to fund all the projects on the books. No worries, Aurora taxpayers have bags of money. Tax increases are easy. This Mayor and his sidekick (Abel)will need more when these projects go to construction. Lets call it another tax hike to support the future.
ReplyDeleteWhere else can you find a gold plated building to park the Town's dump trucks and snowplows? The truck mechanics best wear business suits to keep up the image.
Certain Council members have not accepted the hard fact that only those seeking to profit from the town seek out their company. Those who just expected the job to be done competently have long since dispersed. I wonder if it is too late to put a printed sheet of paper on the table before each seat reading:
ReplyDeleteIT'S THE ECONOMY. STUPID