I left the meeting at 11.15 P.M. Not a minute too soon..As I calmly washed my hands in the washroom. ,a sudden and unexpected thought raced through my mind.
Snowhite and The Seven Effing Dwarfs
Imagine if I'd given voice to that during a public meeting.
How inexcusable!
But the fact is ,after a four hour talk marathon there is always the possibility the roof will cave
Our job is to discuss and decide town business with utmost civility and restraint. We must agree to disagree while being mindful of the feelings of others.
Refrain from casting aspersions on the motives of colleagues.
Generally speaking, behave like paragons of virtue and pillars of society.
Last night was a surfeit.
Presentations to the young people who painted park picnic tables
were followed by six delegations.
Many heavy decisions needed to be made.
$1.4 million dollars to increase the soccer field inventory was a decision that hung in the balance.
With the Mayor absent, the vote had previously tied.
The soccer people were out in force to support their cause.
The argument expounding the merits of artificial turf was repeated several times.
We've done it twice already.
Council was admonished for lagging behind in the supply of fields..
Secure in the company of friends,Councillors on the side of the angels,took jabs at the opposition.
Not the best way to win friends and influence enemies.
Councillor Abel in a flashback to a past he did not share, disparaged political decision making.
He waxed lyrical about the need to care for young people and spoke of hardships when his children were young.
I countered with memories of a time before development charges.
Capital projects were financed by debt.
I had three boys playing hockey, two on rep teams at different times
There was no arena and then there was one... It meant rising at five on Saturdays and Sundays and driving all over to wherever there was space to rent.
Councillor Abel complained I distract him while he is speaking.
I occasionally drum my nails on the table.. He says I only do it when he has the floor.. He could be right. I don't notice I'm doing it much less when.
I begged his pardon .
He was not much mollified.
Of course the dice was cast on the soccer field vote. .
The Mayor had already met several times with soccer executives and Director to discuss the problem and assured the Club the Director was "diligently"working on the solution.
A commitment had been made by the Mayor behind the scenes, with perhaps a few close associates in the know.
Enough to ensure the vote.
The report however revealed difficulties.
Construction now means a quarter of a million dollars more than it would later.
How much later is not known.
Soccer fields are a high priority.in the Master Recreation Plan.
A skateboard park has equally high priority
New soccer facilities have been provided while the need for a skate board park languishes.
Development charges have been collected.
But skateboarders are not the same young people, Councillor Abel is concerned about.
They don't have an adult executive to plead their case
They're a bunch of ragamuffin kids trudging around town in pairs, with a board under one arm or on a shoulder. looking for a place to rock.The same kids who might be carrying a kit bag a couple of years from now.
They find places. They damage property.
Yesterday, I heard about them careening down the incline of Kemano Road, at risk of speeding into the path of oncoming cars on Aurora Heights Drive.
But they are not on our radar. Oh Dear me, no.
Mirror, Mirror on the wall
Who is the fairest of them all
Wednesday, 27 June 2012
Tuesday, 26 June 2012
Poltics...How She Is Played
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Easy Peasy":
Evelyn,
You can view the AYSC financial statements on their website, in plain view for all. There is mention of prior questionable accounting practices there. All under executive and management that are no longer with the club, but have influence with other sporting bodies throughout Aurora and with our town. If you read through all the reports from AYSC you can get a better feel where the club sits now.
Both sides, right? ********************
Absolutely right. Thank you for the information.
I twice published the comment from the AYSC member whose family coached for several generations, were familiar with problems of the past, how things have changed and that the house is being brought into order
I thought it was important for people to know.
I knew something of how things were before. People tell me things.
Not being a member of the Association, there was nothing I could do.
Change had to come from within.
I know people in the community who will be relieved to know things have changed and continue to evolve for the better.
Opportunity for additional soccer fields was lost in 2010 when work on the multi- use field at the Stronach Centre was left unfinished,
Stimulus funds would have paid for two thirds of the "shovel-ready" project.
But there were other priorities for that Council
Had grading been completed while the heavy equipment was on site, soccer fields would have been there.
Two thirds of the cost would have been paid with Federal stimulus funds..It's worth repeating.
After creating public controversy and opposition to the project
because of the estimates, Council's great thrust then had to be to bring the project in at less than the estimates. Even the ball diamond wasn't finished as it should have been.
That's how politics interfere with the job being done properly.
It's happening again.
We just completed, at great expense, another artificial turf facility at St Maximillian Kolbe High School Those things are freaking expensive.
Our funds, the board's facility.
A good deal.
With hardly had time to catch our breath, Council is being hustled to borrow another $1.4 million for the same purpose.
If the vote goes through, the Mayor will no doubt be a shining hero
to some of his friends.
Not to all.
.
Evelyn,
You can view the AYSC financial statements on their website, in plain view for all. There is mention of prior questionable accounting practices there. All under executive and management that are no longer with the club, but have influence with other sporting bodies throughout Aurora and with our town. If you read through all the reports from AYSC you can get a better feel where the club sits now.
Both sides, right? ********************
Absolutely right. Thank you for the information.
I twice published the comment from the AYSC member whose family coached for several generations, were familiar with problems of the past, how things have changed and that the house is being brought into order
I thought it was important for people to know.
I knew something of how things were before. People tell me things.
Not being a member of the Association, there was nothing I could do.
Change had to come from within.
I know people in the community who will be relieved to know things have changed and continue to evolve for the better.
Opportunity for additional soccer fields was lost in 2010 when work on the multi- use field at the Stronach Centre was left unfinished,
Stimulus funds would have paid for two thirds of the "shovel-ready" project.
But there were other priorities for that Council
Had grading been completed while the heavy equipment was on site, soccer fields would have been there.
Two thirds of the cost would have been paid with Federal stimulus funds..It's worth repeating.
After creating public controversy and opposition to the project
because of the estimates, Council's great thrust then had to be to bring the project in at less than the estimates. Even the ball diamond wasn't finished as it should have been.
That's how politics interfere with the job being done properly.
It's happening again.
We just completed, at great expense, another artificial turf facility at St Maximillian Kolbe High School Those things are freaking expensive.
Our funds, the board's facility.
A good deal.
With hardly had time to catch our breath, Council is being hustled to borrow another $1.4 million for the same purpose.
If the vote goes through, the Mayor will no doubt be a shining hero
to some of his friends.
Not to all.
.
Monday, 25 June 2012
Whatsit ?
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The Time Has
Come":
What a rude awakening! It's as if Aurora was under siege. We've mislaid a Museum and a Park. And now our kids are getting shafted. Will it never end?
***********************
Bless your heart!There's nothing rude about it.
It didn't just start.
It's not about to end.
It's the ordinary everyday business of municipal oversight.
Despite Numbered Policies, Provincial Regulations, Master Plans, Official Plans, Strategic Plans and Precedents, we are a human community like any other.
Competing interests compete. Every day and all the time. The struggle to survive and do well is ongoing. For some it's harder than others.
Nine people from different backgrounds sit around a table,with different skill levels, trying to make decisions that are fair to all.
It's better if everybody at the table can agree that's why we are there. If the common objective is acknowledged, half the battle is won.
There really isn't room or time for jabs at each other.
Nowadays with televised meetings and I hope,the internet to bring it all into people's homes, not much can be hidden.
We are not compelled to see things from the same angle. If we listen to each other, we have a better chance of gaining a wider perspective.
If our audience understands more of the particulars, we can enjoy the tension together.
Council's job is to exercise judgement. Professional advice is not the whole answer.
Last week, I watched Bill Moyers interview an author of a book about the American economic system and how it has failed. He wasn't a Republican but when he was asked what he thought of President Obama's handling of the financial crisis he had this to say;
"The President is an academic. He trusts the experts"
He raised his hands, as if that said it all. I think it did.
I believe he meant the President does not trust his own judgement.
There are opinion-makers who believe Councillors, being elected without experience, must trust the experts and simply do what they're told.
I am not one . I have known too many "experts" They vary.
Decisions we make are matters of judgement.
After we have heard from the competing interests, ad I applied what we know and listen to each other, it all comes down to comes down to the tightrope of making a judgement.
Judgement is individual.
When you've done it often enough and made a few mistakes while you were at it, you get good at it.
It's like learning to ride a bike.You fall off a few times and then you get it .
If you never do it and rely completely on " experts " the decisions will not stand up to scrutiny.
You will never find your balance.
There will be no place to hide. .
What a rude awakening! It's as if Aurora was under siege. We've mislaid a Museum and a Park. And now our kids are getting shafted. Will it never end?
***********************
Bless your heart!There's nothing rude about it.
It didn't just start.
It's not about to end.
It's the ordinary everyday business of municipal oversight.
Despite Numbered Policies, Provincial Regulations, Master Plans, Official Plans, Strategic Plans and Precedents, we are a human community like any other.
Competing interests compete. Every day and all the time. The struggle to survive and do well is ongoing. For some it's harder than others.
Nine people from different backgrounds sit around a table,with different skill levels, trying to make decisions that are fair to all.
It's better if everybody at the table can agree that's why we are there. If the common objective is acknowledged, half the battle is won.
There really isn't room or time for jabs at each other.
Nowadays with televised meetings and I hope,the internet to bring it all into people's homes, not much can be hidden.
We are not compelled to see things from the same angle. If we listen to each other, we have a better chance of gaining a wider perspective.
If our audience understands more of the particulars, we can enjoy the tension together.
Council's job is to exercise judgement. Professional advice is not the whole answer.
Last week, I watched Bill Moyers interview an author of a book about the American economic system and how it has failed. He wasn't a Republican but when he was asked what he thought of President Obama's handling of the financial crisis he had this to say;
"The President is an academic. He trusts the experts"
He raised his hands, as if that said it all. I think it did.
I believe he meant the President does not trust his own judgement.
There are opinion-makers who believe Councillors, being elected without experience, must trust the experts and simply do what they're told.
I am not one . I have known too many "experts" They vary.
Decisions we make are matters of judgement.
After we have heard from the competing interests, ad I applied what we know and listen to each other, it all comes down to comes down to the tightrope of making a judgement.
Judgement is individual.
When you've done it often enough and made a few mistakes while you were at it, you get good at it.
It's like learning to ride a bike.You fall off a few times and then you get it .
If you never do it and rely completely on " experts " the decisions will not stand up to scrutiny.
You will never find your balance.
There will be no place to hide. .
Easy Peasy
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Priorities
May Be Skewed":
"Now we know 30% of AYSC membership don't even live in Aurora."
No, we have one person speculate that the rep teams are comprised of that percentage. That supposition doesn't include the more numerous house league teams.
****************
That's an easy one. Tomorrow when the office opens, I will call and inquire when the last audited statement was filed with the Town.
I've never seen one before. I understand they are required to meet the town's requirements to receive the town' s resident user fee.
A small percentage of non-residents is permitted for minor sports organizations to be eligible.
It's some time since I had that discussion with the Director so I am a little hazy on details.
At the time, AYSC was registered non-profit and had to file audited financial statements with another level of government.
There was some question about whether or not they had filed the required statement with the town, or whether the statement claimed to have been filed was the required statement for the other level of government.
I was assured the required statement with the town was eventually filed. I never actually saw it. I accepted the Director's assurance..
It's several years ago.
The question never arose again.
Until now.
"Now we know 30% of AYSC membership don't even live in Aurora."
No, we have one person speculate that the rep teams are comprised of that percentage. That supposition doesn't include the more numerous house league teams.
****************
That's an easy one. Tomorrow when the office opens, I will call and inquire when the last audited statement was filed with the Town.
I've never seen one before. I understand they are required to meet the town's requirements to receive the town' s resident user fee.
A small percentage of non-residents is permitted for minor sports organizations to be eligible.
It's some time since I had that discussion with the Director so I am a little hazy on details.
At the time, AYSC was registered non-profit and had to file audited financial statements with another level of government.
There was some question about whether or not they had filed the required statement with the town, or whether the statement claimed to have been filed was the required statement for the other level of government.
I was assured the required statement with the town was eventually filed. I never actually saw it. I accepted the Director's assurance..
It's several years ago.
The question never arose again.
Until now.
What Cause?
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The
Less You Know":
The Town does not pay the taxes (except the York Region portion perhaps)that you cite. It simply writes off the receivable. However, it looks good for your cause.
*************
Here's what I know about the Legion and taxes.
Business complained to the government about unfair competition from Legions in the catering business because they do not pay property tax..
The Federal government is responsible for Veteran's Services. The Province is responsible for property taxes.
So,which ever one was responsible made the decision to pass the decision on the Legion paying taxes, to the Regions to decide.
York Region decided there should be no change.
It means the Region gets its cut of Legion taxes, paid to them by the town.
The Board of Education gets its cut of Legion taxes from the Town
On the books, Legion taxes are shown as paid. The Town takes funds from general revenue and pays the Region and the Board of Education and of course, receives no share itself.
In effect, local business provides employment, contributes to the local economy, pay taxes and a share of Legion taxes who are competing with them for local business.
These facts I have learned from speaking to people in the know in the municipal tax business. I have that access.
In the meantime old soldiers do die and veterans are fewer on the ground. Legion services were scant recognition of the sacrifices made by Canadians during World War 1 and 2.
If you weren't there you have no idea.
I am not citing things for ' my cause" I am providing information
to people who might have an interest but never a reason to ask.
I think it's good for people to be informed about town business.
I don't know a reason to be coy about it .
In Aurora ,we have two buildings on Legion property whose taxes we are carrying.
They have water and sewers, fire and police protection. Garbage pick-up and snow plowing and lit road access to their property. Soon they will have sidewalks on both sides of their street. I'm not sure if they are billed for water and sewer service but I do know they don't pay for any of the rest of it.
The Town does not pay the taxes (except the York Region portion perhaps)that you cite. It simply writes off the receivable. However, it looks good for your cause.
*************
Here's what I know about the Legion and taxes.
Business complained to the government about unfair competition from Legions in the catering business because they do not pay property tax..
The Federal government is responsible for Veteran's Services. The Province is responsible for property taxes.
So,which ever one was responsible made the decision to pass the decision on the Legion paying taxes, to the Regions to decide.
York Region decided there should be no change.
It means the Region gets its cut of Legion taxes, paid to them by the town.
The Board of Education gets its cut of Legion taxes from the Town
On the books, Legion taxes are shown as paid. The Town takes funds from general revenue and pays the Region and the Board of Education and of course, receives no share itself.
In effect, local business provides employment, contributes to the local economy, pay taxes and a share of Legion taxes who are competing with them for local business.
These facts I have learned from speaking to people in the know in the municipal tax business. I have that access.
In the meantime old soldiers do die and veterans are fewer on the ground. Legion services were scant recognition of the sacrifices made by Canadians during World War 1 and 2.
If you weren't there you have no idea.
I am not citing things for ' my cause" I am providing information
to people who might have an interest but never a reason to ask.
I think it's good for people to be informed about town business.
I don't know a reason to be coy about it .
In Aurora ,we have two buildings on Legion property whose taxes we are carrying.
They have water and sewers, fire and police protection. Garbage pick-up and snow plowing and lit road access to their property. Soon they will have sidewalks on both sides of their street. I'm not sure if they are billed for water and sewer service but I do know they don't pay for any of the rest of it.
The Time Has Come
The deluge I anticipated has not materialized.
I am re-printing the comment below because it signifies so well
how things have changed. It provides insight and information we could never have had or been able to use without social media.
I have known Aurora Youth Soccer Club is serving a far larger area than Aurora. I did not know the extent. The name is a mis-nomer.
I've heard of people ousted from the executive for daring to speak against their policies.
I knew about the glossy magazine because I receive a copy. . I have a sense of what these things cost and the revenue raised from advertising.
I have an idea of membership dues and know they mean millions of dollars are being handled by the club.
I knew about rental of a suite of offices because a request was made to the town to lend money to adapt them for the club's use.
I knew about the office staff, the foreign tournaments and the expensive coaches because it was all proclaimed in the magazine.
None of it resembles in the slightest any other minor sports organization in town that struggles to keep dues reasonable.
There has never been an argument with staff , the club is anything but a thriving business.
But when it came to resisting demands for increased facilities, arguments were limited because there were no percentages.No concerns expressed by parent members.
That has changed.Things always have to get worse before they get better.
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Incoming Deluge":
Evelyn,
I am from a soccer family and coached for many years with AYSC. We have watched the club grow and change over the years. We have seen expensive programs and fancy soccer schools and high profile coaches command most of the clubs budget for years. The previous board of directors and management staff promoted a Doors Open policy for the club to include anyone who wished to sign up to the club, not just Aurora residents. Almost a if you come, we will build it mentality, and developed a fine friendship with our past mayor. Field space became difficult to acheive with the growth of the competetive division of the club. We have 10 age divisons, both boys and girls that support 2 or even 3 representative teams that all need lit full size fields to play on. If you had to poll all the competitive teams, you would find over 30% of the players are non residents.
We field as many teams as towns and cities 5 times our size. So that is a club problem, and not a town issue at all. The current AYSC does NOT support the glossy magazine and the shinanigans that went along with it. It would be in councillors best interest to realize that the current folks running the AYSC are completely different from the past management. Thank God. If the club actually reigned in on its number of rep teams, we may see the need for fields dropping in the near future. Time for the club to look really hard in the mirror before running to the town for more fields.
I am re-printing the comment below because it signifies so well
how things have changed. It provides insight and information we could never have had or been able to use without social media.
I have known Aurora Youth Soccer Club is serving a far larger area than Aurora. I did not know the extent. The name is a mis-nomer.
I've heard of people ousted from the executive for daring to speak against their policies.
I knew about the glossy magazine because I receive a copy. . I have a sense of what these things cost and the revenue raised from advertising.
I have an idea of membership dues and know they mean millions of dollars are being handled by the club.
I knew about rental of a suite of offices because a request was made to the town to lend money to adapt them for the club's use.
I knew about the office staff, the foreign tournaments and the expensive coaches because it was all proclaimed in the magazine.
None of it resembles in the slightest any other minor sports organization in town that struggles to keep dues reasonable.
There has never been an argument with staff , the club is anything but a thriving business.
But when it came to resisting demands for increased facilities, arguments were limited because there were no percentages.No concerns expressed by parent members.
That has changed.Things always have to get worse before they get better.
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Incoming Deluge":
Evelyn,
I am from a soccer family and coached for many years with AYSC. We have watched the club grow and change over the years. We have seen expensive programs and fancy soccer schools and high profile coaches command most of the clubs budget for years. The previous board of directors and management staff promoted a Doors Open policy for the club to include anyone who wished to sign up to the club, not just Aurora residents. Almost a if you come, we will build it mentality, and developed a fine friendship with our past mayor. Field space became difficult to acheive with the growth of the competetive division of the club. We have 10 age divisons, both boys and girls that support 2 or even 3 representative teams that all need lit full size fields to play on. If you had to poll all the competitive teams, you would find over 30% of the players are non residents.
We field as many teams as towns and cities 5 times our size. So that is a club problem, and not a town issue at all. The current AYSC does NOT support the glossy magazine and the shinanigans that went along with it. It would be in councillors best interest to realize that the current folks running the AYSC are completely different from the past management. Thank God. If the club actually reigned in on its number of rep teams, we may see the need for fields dropping in the near future. Time for the club to look really hard in the mirror before running to the town for more fields.
Priorities May Be Skewed
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Let
Both Sides Be Heard":
If the fund is in deficit, can they still spend it in anticipation? Not on my budget but Council appear to have different rules. The current crop came in to cut & reduce spending limits established by the past one. They should keep that in mind. Clock's ticking & taxpayers are watching & listening.
**************
The fund is in deficit. Development charges are paid when building permits are issued. Funds will be available at that time.
In the meantime, at last accounting, there were $13 million in the Cash-in-lieu of parks reserve fund which can be borrowed .
Cash -in-lieu we take when new construction does not create a need for new facilities:; that is commercial or industrial buildings. It generates a slush fund.
Development charges are calculated on facilities needed as a result of the new growth. It could be vehicles and equipment and buildings for fire and works.
It can't be for general maintenance .
Municipalities used to be able to use 100% of the funds for new facilities. The regulations now allow only 90% to be used. 10%
has to come from town resources. The cash-in-lieu fund can be used but we haven't.
We can also encourage users to pay the 10% . Minor Hockey has added a surcharge to memberships to pay for new ice facilities.
AYSC are paying the 10% for the artificial turf field at Sheppard's Bush.
It cost $600ks. The parks department saved $400ks by doing much of the work to put it in place.
I didn't hear the same deal was made for the field at St Max High . So, probably not.
Here's the thing, $1.4 million is recommended for still more soccer facilities without reference to other needs that might take priority.
Now we know 30% of AYSC membership don't even live in Aurora. The club fields many more rep teams than other towns twice our size. And that's what creates pressure on existing fields.And the club is a commercial operation demanding more and more public facilities be provided so they can grow their operation.
I think we have to ask ourselves, what other facilities are we not providing while this club gets everything it asks for using house league kids, squeezed off the fields to make way for multiple rep teams, as the excuse for their demands.
We have a serious problem with kids and skate boards.
Thirty five years old now at least, skateboarding is not a fad.
Serious damage is caused to public property because they don't have a place to do what they do. .
Is it time to provide a real skate board park? What would it cost? Where should it be? How long has it been in the master recreation plan with development charges collected and the need shoved aside because they're not organized like other minor sports ?
They don't have an in with the Mayor.
And Oh Yes, they're unlikely to be able to muster several hundred votes at election time to buy and sell the politicians.
If the fund is in deficit, can they still spend it in anticipation? Not on my budget but Council appear to have different rules. The current crop came in to cut & reduce spending limits established by the past one. They should keep that in mind. Clock's ticking & taxpayers are watching & listening.
**************
The fund is in deficit. Development charges are paid when building permits are issued. Funds will be available at that time.
In the meantime, at last accounting, there were $13 million in the Cash-in-lieu of parks reserve fund which can be borrowed .
Cash -in-lieu we take when new construction does not create a need for new facilities:; that is commercial or industrial buildings. It generates a slush fund.
Development charges are calculated on facilities needed as a result of the new growth. It could be vehicles and equipment and buildings for fire and works.
It can't be for general maintenance .
Municipalities used to be able to use 100% of the funds for new facilities. The regulations now allow only 90% to be used. 10%
has to come from town resources. The cash-in-lieu fund can be used but we haven't.
We can also encourage users to pay the 10% . Minor Hockey has added a surcharge to memberships to pay for new ice facilities.
AYSC are paying the 10% for the artificial turf field at Sheppard's Bush.
It cost $600ks. The parks department saved $400ks by doing much of the work to put it in place.
I didn't hear the same deal was made for the field at St Max High . So, probably not.
Here's the thing, $1.4 million is recommended for still more soccer facilities without reference to other needs that might take priority.
Now we know 30% of AYSC membership don't even live in Aurora. The club fields many more rep teams than other towns twice our size. And that's what creates pressure on existing fields.And the club is a commercial operation demanding more and more public facilities be provided so they can grow their operation.
I think we have to ask ourselves, what other facilities are we not providing while this club gets everything it asks for using house league kids, squeezed off the fields to make way for multiple rep teams, as the excuse for their demands.
We have a serious problem with kids and skate boards.
Thirty five years old now at least, skateboarding is not a fad.
Serious damage is caused to public property because they don't have a place to do what they do. .
Is it time to provide a real skate board park? What would it cost? Where should it be? How long has it been in the master recreation plan with development charges collected and the need shoved aside because they're not organized like other minor sports ?
They don't have an in with the Mayor.
And Oh Yes, they're unlikely to be able to muster several hundred votes at election time to buy and sell the politicians.
Define Bizarre
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Political
Imperative ? Not":
The Director also attended secret meetings in the company of the Mayor with the Center. To pretend he is not a main player is totally bizarre. Even if his seat at the table is not occupied, his presence is real and palpable.
*****************
Who are we hearing from now?
Someone else who attended secret meetings with the Centre Board the Mayor and the Director?
That would have to be a member of the Centre board I think.
Who is pretending the Director is not a principle in the matter of negotiations?
Not I
Who was the principle in the original negotiations? Nobody knows.
Files are destroyed.
The Director has been directed by this Council to carry out negotiations for a new arrangement with the Centre board.
It may well prove to be unproductive from some perspective.
But the only bizarre aspect is the original unsustainable agreement this Council has continued to honour with the centre board.
The Director also attended secret meetings in the company of the Mayor with the Center. To pretend he is not a main player is totally bizarre. Even if his seat at the table is not occupied, his presence is real and palpable.
*****************
Who are we hearing from now?
Someone else who attended secret meetings with the Centre Board the Mayor and the Director?
That would have to be a member of the Centre board I think.
Who is pretending the Director is not a principle in the matter of negotiations?
Not I
Who was the principle in the original negotiations? Nobody knows.
Files are destroyed.
The Director has been directed by this Council to carry out negotiations for a new arrangement with the Centre board.
It may well prove to be unproductive from some perspective.
But the only bizarre aspect is the original unsustainable agreement this Council has continued to honour with the centre board.
What Do You Know
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "That
Damned Elusive Pimpernel":
I bet you still have staff on the payroll who are swearing to support the old regime.
With what is going on around the South-East corridor I have no doubt a Heritage staffer is still engaged on the Ex-Mayors behalf.
********
What's going on in the south-east corridor. Pray tell.
We have one heritage planner on staff. I am fairly certain she is not engaged on anybody's behalf let alone the ex-Mayor.
*********
Mississauga Mayor Hazel McCallion apparently has a court date for June 26th 2012 , for the Conflict of Interest charge filed against her
to be heard.
************
I bet you still have staff on the payroll who are swearing to support the old regime.
With what is going on around the South-East corridor I have no doubt a Heritage staffer is still engaged on the Ex-Mayors behalf.
********
What's going on in the south-east corridor. Pray tell.
We have one heritage planner on staff. I am fairly certain she is not engaged on anybody's behalf let alone the ex-Mayor.
*********
Mississauga Mayor Hazel McCallion apparently has a court date for June 26th 2012 , for the Conflict of Interest charge filed against her
to be heard.
************
The Less You Know
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Political
Imperative ? Not":
Should the user pay?
This has been a question often asked but never satisfactorily answered.
A long-time neighbour has paid property taxes on their home for over forty years. They are childless. And yet a large portion of the tax they pay goes toward the cost of education. Is this fair?
What about the family four houses over with four children, all in university now. Their property taxes are about the same as those of the childless couple. But their four children travelled through the public school system, each for 13 years, counting kindergarten. So they received a huge benefit in comparison to the neighbour. Is this fair?
A similar question can be applied to municipal facilities, be they soccer fields, swimming pools, parks and roads. Is it possible to assess a user fee for these? Would such fees be fair?
It seems that this is a question without an equitable answer.
*******************
There is an answer. Not equitable though.
For a number of years the Province has been absorbing increases in education taxes Their intention was to reduce the burden of taxes for education . In response to demands from municipal politicians. It means the Province has complete authority.
No noticeable reduction in taxes occurred though because council is advised the intent was to leave more room for the municipality to tax for other programs.
It seems Councillors are all so well off they can't imagine taxes being a hardship. Doesn't matter how the assessment base grows or senior leels of government hand over as share of this and that, we just keep jacking the taxes up.
We are putting money into reserve funds so that people who live here twenty ,thirty or forty years from now won't have to pay as much in taxes for what it costs to maintain the facilities built for them by us.
There are user fees for most municipal facilities. Except when waived for people who make a request. Usually a group claiming to be special or a charitable or non-profit organization.
It means a higher total for the charity by the amount of the user fee or more money in the pockets of a non-profit organization.
Some groups pay no fees. The tennis club, lawn bowling club, men's soccer club.
The Legion is on the books as paying taxes. They don't. It's a transfer from town revenues to cover their regional and education taxes and forfeit our own share.
The Legion has two buildings on the property and they lease part of the parking lot for school buses which are privately owned.
The town bought a portion of their property from them a number of years ago to use for soccer fields.
Then somebody came up with the brilliant idea for a public private partnership to erect a bubble to accommodate soccer year -round.
Taxes on that are $50,000 a year for the twenty year term of the agreement which relieves the private operator of all taxes.
So the town pays those taxes as well.
An agreement with the Legion allowd access to the bubble across their parking lot. I hear they put chain across it to prohibit
access.
Now you know a bit more than you did before. Sometimes it seems you may be better off not knowing.
Should the user pay?
This has been a question often asked but never satisfactorily answered.
A long-time neighbour has paid property taxes on their home for over forty years. They are childless. And yet a large portion of the tax they pay goes toward the cost of education. Is this fair?
What about the family four houses over with four children, all in university now. Their property taxes are about the same as those of the childless couple. But their four children travelled through the public school system, each for 13 years, counting kindergarten. So they received a huge benefit in comparison to the neighbour. Is this fair?
A similar question can be applied to municipal facilities, be they soccer fields, swimming pools, parks and roads. Is it possible to assess a user fee for these? Would such fees be fair?
It seems that this is a question without an equitable answer.
*******************
There is an answer. Not equitable though.
For a number of years the Province has been absorbing increases in education taxes Their intention was to reduce the burden of taxes for education . In response to demands from municipal politicians. It means the Province has complete authority.
No noticeable reduction in taxes occurred though because council is advised the intent was to leave more room for the municipality to tax for other programs.
It seems Councillors are all so well off they can't imagine taxes being a hardship. Doesn't matter how the assessment base grows or senior leels of government hand over as share of this and that, we just keep jacking the taxes up.
We are putting money into reserve funds so that people who live here twenty ,thirty or forty years from now won't have to pay as much in taxes for what it costs to maintain the facilities built for them by us.
There are user fees for most municipal facilities. Except when waived for people who make a request. Usually a group claiming to be special or a charitable or non-profit organization.
It means a higher total for the charity by the amount of the user fee or more money in the pockets of a non-profit organization.
Some groups pay no fees. The tennis club, lawn bowling club, men's soccer club.
The Legion is on the books as paying taxes. They don't. It's a transfer from town revenues to cover their regional and education taxes and forfeit our own share.
The Legion has two buildings on the property and they lease part of the parking lot for school buses which are privately owned.
The town bought a portion of their property from them a number of years ago to use for soccer fields.
Then somebody came up with the brilliant idea for a public private partnership to erect a bubble to accommodate soccer year -round.
Taxes on that are $50,000 a year for the twenty year term of the agreement which relieves the private operator of all taxes.
So the town pays those taxes as well.
An agreement with the Legion allowd access to the bubble across their parking lot. I hear they put chain across it to prohibit
access.
Now you know a bit more than you did before. Sometimes it seems you may be better off not knowing.
Sunday, 24 June 2012
Balance in All Things
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Political
Imperative ? Not":
"Unless of course, you take the matter in hand, as you have before, and let Councillors know what you think of the plan."
How exactly is that different from the "Incoming Deluge" (which you maligned) in favour of the proposal?
***********
The incoming deluge has not yet materialized. Instead an informative comment was received which shed a more in- depth light on the issue than presented to Council.
When a pressure group organizes to influence a Council decision in their favour, as is their right, there is only one way to counter-act the pressure.
It is for citizens at large to be alerted to the vested interest decision being contemplated by Council and provide the opportunity to get their oar in the water fast.
All is fair in love and war and pressure from citizens for extravagant expenditures that pander to special interests
and counter pressure from the opposition.
The social media provides for timely intervention and I exult in being the messenger .
If pressure is sufficiently intense, the most well-meaning politicians will buckle. They need to hear strong representation from the community with support to follow their best judgement.
When a one-side argument fills the air waves and channels of communication, it sounds like the only argument.of what the people want.
Getting the other side of an argument is called balance .
I stand consistently for balance. The former Mayor was wont to refer to it slightingly as " modus operandi "
It's something else I do not apologise for.
"Unless of course, you take the matter in hand, as you have before, and let Councillors know what you think of the plan."
How exactly is that different from the "Incoming Deluge" (which you maligned) in favour of the proposal?
***********
The incoming deluge has not yet materialized. Instead an informative comment was received which shed a more in- depth light on the issue than presented to Council.
When a pressure group organizes to influence a Council decision in their favour, as is their right, there is only one way to counter-act the pressure.
It is for citizens at large to be alerted to the vested interest decision being contemplated by Council and provide the opportunity to get their oar in the water fast.
All is fair in love and war and pressure from citizens for extravagant expenditures that pander to special interests
and counter pressure from the opposition.
The social media provides for timely intervention and I exult in being the messenger .
If pressure is sufficiently intense, the most well-meaning politicians will buckle. They need to hear strong representation from the community with support to follow their best judgement.
When a one-side argument fills the air waves and channels of communication, it sounds like the only argument.of what the people want.
Getting the other side of an argument is called balance .
I stand consistently for balance. The former Mayor was wont to refer to it slightingly as " modus operandi "
It's something else I do not apologise for.
Political Imperative ? Not
Thanks for your email. Our staff check the fields regularly, so, if you could advise on the specific field (s) that need work it would be a big help.
I know that when I was an AYSC coach, the fields owned by the public board (for example Aurora High & Williams) were usually the ones that needed the most TLC.
Mr ..... and I have met with the AYSC executive on a number of occasions to discuss the availability of fields and he has been working diligently on filling that need. Indeed, the approval for multi-use field is coming before Council on next Tuesday and you are most welcome to come to the meeting and express your views.
Indeed, any member of the public is welcome to come to any Council meeting and express their views on any subject. To suggest that the AYSC has not been allowed to express their views to Council is incorrect. In fact, I have encouraged a number of groups, including the AYSC, to come to Council so that we are aware of your plans. I continue to encourage this
*****************
I have re-printed this e-mail for a purpose.
I've no doubt the Mayor responds to all citizens e-mails. As he should . Councillors do not always receive copies.
I was already frankly suspicious of skullduggery .
The Mayor notes " the Director and myself have already met with AYSC executive a number of occasions to discuss the availability of fields and the Director has been working diligently on filling that need"
He refers to approval coming before Council on Tuuesday and urges the club supporter to come to Council and express her views
Shades of the campaign fought by the Culture Centre Board and the circuitous route taken at the Council table
by the machinations of the Mayor, Councillors Humphryes and Thompson.That vote was supported by Councillors Gallo Gaertner and Ballard.
Nobody made a comment then about strange bedfellows.
Several indices can be taken from the Mayor's e-mail.
First the frequent meetings between the Mayor and the Club have borne fruit. The Director has been working diligently to solve the problem of a shortage of fields.
There is recommendation to Council for expenditure of $1.4 million dollars of funds from a reserve fund in deficit, for a second artificial turf surface within a year.
Whether or not these facilities are a priority at this time had not been determined nor was direction given by Council to proceed along these lines.
The issue has never been brought forward.A significant step bypassed.
It seems the decision to recommend, supported by four members of Council and the Mayor, could be deemed to have been made out of sight and sound of Council.
In the Mayor's office.
It's a theory I have formulated from another recent recommendation to Council that the town budget $100,000 for a sequicentennial celebration. .
Instinct stirred. The recommendation seemd to be initiated by the Director.The angry, frustrated reaction of the Mayor belied the fact and bolstered my suspicion.
When all was said and done, only the Mayor and Councillor Pirri supported the recommendation. I believe Councillor Pirri spends more time at the town hall than any other Councillor. He may have been a party to pre-discussion.
A hint of political connotation in a previous recommendation was noted In a public meeting. Eyes met and I knew.
The Director is extremely conscientious about the line he may not cross. He never intervenes in political debate. Never answers a question unless directed to do so by the presiding member.
He received his training, at the hands of a veteran Clerk in another municipality. Was banished from Council meetings for a period in his early days, for speaking without permission to do so.
Ironically and unfortunately,politicians without experience may corrupt the process, unwitting of the line that may not be crossed by either side.
It is not an unwritten law. A clause in the Code of Righteous Conduct sets out clearly that the administration is employed by the Town and takes direction through resolutions of Council.
No single member of Council, including the Mayor,has authority to direct the administration.
The former Mayor corrupted the process.but good. There was no hesitation to dominate.The administration offered no resistance
There were no illusions. it was her way or the highway.
I do not suggest history is repeating itself.
But ...the Mayor's e-mail to the soccer club supporter clearly indicates personal involvement in resolving a problem presented as a shortage of facilities.
No doubt kudos are earned from the executive of the Club through successful intervention on their behalf.
Except .... Council's authority cannot be protected by abuse of the authority of the Mayor's office.
The current administration is clearly comfortable with the Mayor's participation in their side of the town's business.
They are accustomed to that face.
It appears he may not be the only Council member who find security therein. As long as they form a majority, there is safety in numbers.
The community on the other hand, may take no comfort in the situation.
If a recommendation to spend $1.4 million to meet the demands of the Aurora Youth Soccer Club is the result of complicity of friends in the right places,,there can never be assurance of even-handed decision making.
There is an absence of integrity of process.
After reading the e-mail,there is no doubt of how the Mayor's vote will break the tie at Tuesday's Council meeting.
Unless of course, you take the matter in hand, as you have before, and let Councillors know what you think of the plan.
It is readily agreed the Aurora Youth Soccer Club is a private business. It does not function like other hand-to-mouth minor sports organization in town.
The third comment in the post below verifies resident members of the club have issues with Club policies.
By no means are they satisfied resident needs are prioritized.
Private soccer schools,numerous rep teams in every class,.
expensive coaches ,glossy magazines and associated shenanigans, 30% non-residents membership, all swallowing up a disproportionate share of club resources are cited as the problems creating excessive demands for more facilities from the town.
Residents who already know something of the history of this club will be glad to realize there's a fresh wind blowing through the corridors of that power structure. .
Aurora Councillors would be wise to take something from this exchange.
How the tie vote resolves itself on Tuesday will be interesting to watch.
You're welcome.
Saturday, 23 June 2012
We May Be Streaming Next Week
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "First
Letter..My Response..The MAYOR'S RESPONSE":
It is unfortunate that meetings of General Committee are not recorded for public viewing. If they are, where does one obtain access to same?
Minutes of Council and General Committee meetings are no doubt factually correct but do not reflect the discussion and debate that occurs. And unless there is a request for a recorded vote the voting by individual councillors is never known. Another most unsatisfactory situation.
Evelyn, you are the only source of much that transpires at meetings of our elected representatives. And occasionally you make a mistake. A video recording is the only faithful and accurate source of information.
In this age of communication and technology wizardry, why can't the town provide this service, and probably at very little cost, through their Communications Department?
It is extremely frustrating to watch from the sidelines while the expenditure of millions of taxpayer dollars is being discussed, debated and voted on, without a clue as to who said what.
Can you please bring this matter before the next Council meeting on June 26? Thank you.
******************
Stephanie,Cheyene and Abigail have taken Mickie the dog out for walk. When they come back I will ask Stephanie about making the print larger.
I asked about getting Council on utube during Tim Jones' last term in office. I was told the proper term is streaming the meetings.
I have asked several times since and on Tuesday night we had a gigantic screen on the floor behind the Council table.
There was a message on the monitors about visitors in the chamber being able to get a password if they would like to participate.
I have no idea what that meant. Can't for the life of me think why people on hand during a Council meeting would need a password
or how they could participate.
The agenda was huge There was a report on the program. The screen had to do with making the new service.available but there were so many items to deal with and so many not dealt with, we didn't deal with it.
I hope it means people at home will be able to follow Council and Council in committee at a time of their choosing on their own computer ..
People who are not on the internet will not be able to avail themselves. It's a six months trial and the first two months will be during the summer recess. The trial is to cost $7,500 for six months.
We should be able to get a full explanation of how it works on Tuesday at Council .
I expect it to be approved. It's just too bad the first two months will be limited opportunity to put it to the test.
It is unfortunate that meetings of General Committee are not recorded for public viewing. If they are, where does one obtain access to same?
Minutes of Council and General Committee meetings are no doubt factually correct but do not reflect the discussion and debate that occurs. And unless there is a request for a recorded vote the voting by individual councillors is never known. Another most unsatisfactory situation.
Evelyn, you are the only source of much that transpires at meetings of our elected representatives. And occasionally you make a mistake. A video recording is the only faithful and accurate source of information.
In this age of communication and technology wizardry, why can't the town provide this service, and probably at very little cost, through their Communications Department?
It is extremely frustrating to watch from the sidelines while the expenditure of millions of taxpayer dollars is being discussed, debated and voted on, without a clue as to who said what.
Can you please bring this matter before the next Council meeting on June 26? Thank you.
******************
Stephanie,Cheyene and Abigail have taken Mickie the dog out for walk. When they come back I will ask Stephanie about making the print larger.
I asked about getting Council on utube during Tim Jones' last term in office. I was told the proper term is streaming the meetings.
I have asked several times since and on Tuesday night we had a gigantic screen on the floor behind the Council table.
There was a message on the monitors about visitors in the chamber being able to get a password if they would like to participate.
I have no idea what that meant. Can't for the life of me think why people on hand during a Council meeting would need a password
or how they could participate.
The agenda was huge There was a report on the program. The screen had to do with making the new service.available but there were so many items to deal with and so many not dealt with, we didn't deal with it.
I hope it means people at home will be able to follow Council and Council in committee at a time of their choosing on their own computer ..
People who are not on the internet will not be able to avail themselves. It's a six months trial and the first two months will be during the summer recess. The trial is to cost $7,500 for six months.
We should be able to get a full explanation of how it works on Tuesday at Council .
I expect it to be approved. It's just too bad the first two months will be limited opportunity to put it to the test.
First e-mail..My Response..The Mayor;s Response and still another e-mail SE
The following are e-mails received and sent in the order presented. I have published all because of how the picture changed as information came forward.
Aurora Youth Soccer Club is not like any other minor sports association I have ever seen.
Looks like they might have established another nice friendship in the Mayor's office.
***************
I am a resident of Aurora and a volunteer and parent of two children that
play soccer at the Aurora Youth Soccer Club. My daughter Christina plays on a
competitive team and my son plays on a house league team. We have lived in
Aurora for 10 years and have been associated with the AYSC for over 7 years. We
are proud that our kids can play soccer in Aurora. We have noticed over the
years that several fields are in disrepair and that there is a need for more
fields . Further, I understand that a lot of the fields are in such disrepair
that we could no longer host the Aurora competitive tournament in July. The
girls were always very proud to be the host this tourney in Aurora. I have been
told that the AYSC has requested for more fields to deal with these issues and
that the AYSC has not been allowed to demonstrate this need to the Aurora
council. Given that the club has 4,000 kids playing soccer I would have thought
the AYSC would be able to be heard by council.
There are lots of benefits to soccer …one of which it will keep my kids in
shape and off the streets in their young teenage years. It is a great outing in
the summer and I would not want any kids in a Aurora to not be able to
experience this great sport.
Unfortunately, I cannot make the council meeting on Tuesday due to soccer
games. But, I hope that you will hear the AYSC’s proposals at the next council
meeting. Thank you all for making Aurora a great place to live.
************
Thank you for your e-mail and your
expression of appreciation for the facilities Aurora provides for young people
to play soccer.
I myself am proud of the service provided
to young players. I know parks staff take great pride in providing the best
fields in the Region.
A few years ago, we added our first
artificial turf to our inventory at Sheppard's Bush.
This year we entered into
an agreement with St Maximillian Kolby High School and another artificial
turf facility has been built on their property at our expense.
I believe you have been misinformed about
the condition of our soccer fields.
We have an agreement with an operator of a
bubble which provides space to your organisation
Over the term of the agreement
Aurora taxpayers will have paid taxes to York Region and the Board of Education
in excess of a million dollars for a year round facility that benefits the
Aurora Youth Soccer Association.The bubble is erected on town owned land.
I am not aware the Association has been
denied an opportunity to address Council on the issue of providing further
additional fields this year.
The association continues to grow despite your
assertion of a shortage of fields.
They offer professional services including
coaching and tournaments in distant lands. They publish a magazine. They have
private office facilities and a corporate staff
complement.
You note in your e-mail, you anticipate
Aurora Youth Soccer Association will be heard by Council on Tuesday.
I look forward to the delegation.I expect
yours may be the first of a flood of e-mails suggesting the town may be failing
youth soccer in Aurora.
I assure you it is not the case
*******************
E-mail response from the Mayor.
I know that when I was an AYSC coach, the fields owned by the public board (for example Aurora High & Williams) were usually the ones that needed the most TLC.
Mr Downey and I have met with the AYSC executive on a number of occasions to discuss the availability of fields and he has been working diligently on filling that need. Indeed, the approval for multi-use field is coming before Council on next Tuesday and you are most welcome to come to the meeting and express your views.
Indeed, any member of the public is welcome to come to any Council meeting and express their views on any subject. To suggest that the AYSC has not been allowed to express their views to Council is incorrect. In fact, I have encouraged a number of groups, including the AYSC, to come to Council so that we are aware of your plans. I continue to encourage this
******************************
Anonymous comment to the post on both sides should be heard.
Anonymous comment to the post on both sides should be heard.
I am from a soccer family and coached for many years with AYSC. We have watched the club grow and change over the years. We have seen expensive programs and fancy soccer schools and high profile coaches command most of the clubs budget for years. The previous board of directors and management staff promoted a Doors Open policy for the club to include anyone who wished to sign up to the club, not just Aurora residents. Almost a if you come, we will build it mentality, and developed a fine friendship with our past mayor. Field space became difficult to acheive with the growth of the competetive division of the club. We have 10 age divisons, both boys and girls that support 2 or even 3 representative teams that all need lit full size fields to play on. If you had to poll all the competetive teams, you would find over 30% of the players are non residents.
We field as many teams as towns and cities 5 times our size. So that is a club problem, and not a town issue at all. The current AYSC does NOT support the glossy magazine and the shinanigans that went along with it. It would be in councillors best interest to realize that the current folks running the AYSC are completely different from the past management. Thank God. If the club actually reigned in on its number of rep teams, we may see the need for fields dropping in the near future. Time for the club to look really hard in the mirror before running to the town for more fields.
Off Wth The Raggle Taggle Gypsies OH!
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Let
Both Sides Be Heard":
Isn't it funny who you are often voting along with lately...
************
Let's take a look at that and determine what ,if anything, there is to make of it.
I do not nor have I ever discussed Council business prior to a meeting. I am not averse. The opportunity does not present.
What I say and how I vote is decided in the course and at the end of a debate.
I arrive at an issue with a strong leaning. I make my case, listen to the opposing argument, respond if opportunity presents and cast my vote.
If my argument has influence, that's gratifying. It's mine and everyone else's reason for being there.
Two people speaking along the same lines, lends strength to an argument. One picks up allies wherever one finds them.
I don't make deals beforehand. I don't need support and I don't want to renege.
I don't count votes.Once the question is decided it makes little difference where the numbers were..
Staff reports are clear and direct. I don't them to be defined.
.I spend very little time at the town hall. I steer clear of inordinate influence.
If I need clarification. I ask and receive . Explanations are, clear, succinct and fulsome.
I never ask anyone how I should vote.
Sometimes I make mistakes. I seldom dwell on them. I don't feel
compelled to wear sackcloth and ashes.
Expectations of myself is to do the best I can
Votes on Council are often unanimous which are not notable. It simply means the issue is not contentious.
A tie vote is interesting. It only happens when a members is absent.
The question is left hanging about how it will go when the decision must be made. A tie vote is not a decision.
But if a tie vote happens at a council meeting , it raises the question of re-consideration.
There is a tendency to "team" around the Mayor. It's not unnatural. Councillors hang out together.at various events. They mainly hear views compatible to their own. Doesn't mean they won't change their mind if they hear something they didn't think of before..
There is a a distinct possibility of that if they have to hear from someone who has been around since Methuselah
They do listen.
Aurora Council is not split into factions.
Not have enough time is available for informal exchange before we go on stage ,in the public eye, under the microscope and are compelled to make decisions as we speak. .
The almighty thrust towards vaunted openness and transparency comes at a price. That price is not being able to exchange ideas informally and out of the glare of publicity where everyone has to demonstrate rapier skills or die.
So people meet in bars and coffees shops in smaller numbers and form conclusions and alliances hard to renege.
I watch it, I recognise it. It does not disturb me because however uncomfortable they make things for themselves, Councillors do vote for what they believe is right.
I include all Councillors.
If Councillors Gallo, Gaertner and Ballard find themselves voting with me , I sincerely hope it causes them no embarrassment because it disturbs me not a whit.
Isn't it funny who you are often voting along with lately...
************
Let's take a look at that and determine what ,if anything, there is to make of it.
I do not nor have I ever discussed Council business prior to a meeting. I am not averse. The opportunity does not present.
What I say and how I vote is decided in the course and at the end of a debate.
I arrive at an issue with a strong leaning. I make my case, listen to the opposing argument, respond if opportunity presents and cast my vote.
If my argument has influence, that's gratifying. It's mine and everyone else's reason for being there.
Two people speaking along the same lines, lends strength to an argument. One picks up allies wherever one finds them.
I don't make deals beforehand. I don't need support and I don't want to renege.
I don't count votes.Once the question is decided it makes little difference where the numbers were..
Staff reports are clear and direct. I don't them to be defined.
.I spend very little time at the town hall. I steer clear of inordinate influence.
If I need clarification. I ask and receive . Explanations are, clear, succinct and fulsome.
I never ask anyone how I should vote.
Sometimes I make mistakes. I seldom dwell on them. I don't feel
compelled to wear sackcloth and ashes.
Expectations of myself is to do the best I can
Votes on Council are often unanimous which are not notable. It simply means the issue is not contentious.
A tie vote is interesting. It only happens when a members is absent.
The question is left hanging about how it will go when the decision must be made. A tie vote is not a decision.
But if a tie vote happens at a council meeting , it raises the question of re-consideration.
There is a tendency to "team" around the Mayor. It's not unnatural. Councillors hang out together.at various events. They mainly hear views compatible to their own. Doesn't mean they won't change their mind if they hear something they didn't think of before..
There is a a distinct possibility of that if they have to hear from someone who has been around since Methuselah
They do listen.
Aurora Council is not split into factions.
Not have enough time is available for informal exchange before we go on stage ,in the public eye, under the microscope and are compelled to make decisions as we speak. .
The almighty thrust towards vaunted openness and transparency comes at a price. That price is not being able to exchange ideas informally and out of the glare of publicity where everyone has to demonstrate rapier skills or die.
So people meet in bars and coffees shops in smaller numbers and form conclusions and alliances hard to renege.
I watch it, I recognise it. It does not disturb me because however uncomfortable they make things for themselves, Councillors do vote for what they believe is right.
I include all Councillors.
If Councillors Gallo, Gaertner and Ballard find themselves voting with me , I sincerely hope it causes them no embarrassment because it disturbs me not a whit.
Let Both Sides Be Heard
About the $1.4 million project not recommended for approval at next Tuesday's Council meeting.
Location is west of the Stronach Recreation Centre.It's completion of a sports campus. It could have been done when the baseball diamond was constructed in 2010. with a two-thirds stimulus grant from the Federal government. The administration had other priorities and an application was not made.
BTW, Frank Stronach paid two million for his name to be on a facility constantly referred to by an acronym. If I were a rich man solicited to pay for my name to be on a public facility, the practice of using acronyms would not entice me.
But I digress.
The site has a mountain of soil, It started when the centre was constructed, Hills had to be leveled for the baseball diamond and the mountain grew.
Hard estimates for a diamond on that site,were over a million. In large part due to contours of the site. A great hullabaloo was created when the estimate was presented. A previous estimate for a diamond without an identified site, was $600,000.Former Councillor MacEachern, chairman of the Recreation Advisory Comittee undertook to determine cost of a ball diamond elsewhere was much less.
After public opposition was established ,the master plan priorities came to the fore. The imperative became how to satisfy needs and at the same time convince self-generated opposition that the forces of all things righteous were triumphant in beating back the forces of extravagance.
Only in politics, you say.
The project was truncated and we are now dealing with the consequences.
The mountain of soil and leveling of hills are a large part of the cost to complete the sports campus.
A storm water management pond that can and should be relocated is on site.
Future development west will accommodate drainage of the site. The mountain of soil could be used to fill the pond. Saving the cost of exporting it..
Land would increase for recreation purpose.
Cost of moving the mountain and works to stabilize the pond is estimated to be $278,000.
Cost of another artificial turf field is the big ticket item.
Staff time has already been expended in detailing plans and estimates .
The sports campus would be completed, A worthy objective
Development charges and Cash in Lieu reserve funds would fund much of the work.
But the DC fund is in deficit.
Artificial turf is a huge investment. There are advantages But it would be the second funded this year.
In time, we don't know when, the storm water pond will be relocated and a quarter of a million dollars for the project will have been unnecessary.
We are currently negotiating with Ontario Real Estate, an agency of the government, for a lease for fields on provincial lands.
So, the issue becomes a matter of judgement; whether the need is pressing? What the competing needs are for available resources?
Votes to proceed last Tuesday were Councillors Abel,Thonpson,Humphryes and Pirri. Voting not to proceed at this time were myself, Gallo,Gaertner and Ballard.
A tie vote is a defeated vote.But the decision is still to be made.
The tie-breaker would have been the Mayor's vote.
The community influenced the vote on spending $100.000 on a year long celebration of the sesquicentennial.
The community can influence this decision too.
Pressure has already started for the project to proceed
Let the other side be heard.
Let the judgement be even-handed.
Location is west of the Stronach Recreation Centre.It's completion of a sports campus. It could have been done when the baseball diamond was constructed in 2010. with a two-thirds stimulus grant from the Federal government. The administration had other priorities and an application was not made.
BTW, Frank Stronach paid two million for his name to be on a facility constantly referred to by an acronym. If I were a rich man solicited to pay for my name to be on a public facility, the practice of using acronyms would not entice me.
But I digress.
The site has a mountain of soil, It started when the centre was constructed, Hills had to be leveled for the baseball diamond and the mountain grew.
Hard estimates for a diamond on that site,were over a million. In large part due to contours of the site. A great hullabaloo was created when the estimate was presented. A previous estimate for a diamond without an identified site, was $600,000.Former Councillor MacEachern, chairman of the Recreation Advisory Comittee undertook to determine cost of a ball diamond elsewhere was much less.
After public opposition was established ,the master plan priorities came to the fore. The imperative became how to satisfy needs and at the same time convince self-generated opposition that the forces of all things righteous were triumphant in beating back the forces of extravagance.
Only in politics, you say.
The project was truncated and we are now dealing with the consequences.
The mountain of soil and leveling of hills are a large part of the cost to complete the sports campus.
A storm water management pond that can and should be relocated is on site.
Future development west will accommodate drainage of the site. The mountain of soil could be used to fill the pond. Saving the cost of exporting it..
Land would increase for recreation purpose.
Cost of moving the mountain and works to stabilize the pond is estimated to be $278,000.
Cost of another artificial turf field is the big ticket item.
Staff time has already been expended in detailing plans and estimates .
The sports campus would be completed, A worthy objective
Development charges and Cash in Lieu reserve funds would fund much of the work.
But the DC fund is in deficit.
Artificial turf is a huge investment. There are advantages But it would be the second funded this year.
In time, we don't know when, the storm water pond will be relocated and a quarter of a million dollars for the project will have been unnecessary.
We are currently negotiating with Ontario Real Estate, an agency of the government, for a lease for fields on provincial lands.
So, the issue becomes a matter of judgement; whether the need is pressing? What the competing needs are for available resources?
Votes to proceed last Tuesday were Councillors Abel,Thonpson,Humphryes and Pirri. Voting not to proceed at this time were myself, Gallo,Gaertner and Ballard.
A tie vote is a defeated vote.But the decision is still to be made.
The tie-breaker would have been the Mayor's vote.
The community influenced the vote on spending $100.000 on a year long celebration of the sesquicentennial.
The community can influence this decision too.
Pressure has already started for the project to proceed
Let the other side be heard.
Let the judgement be even-handed.
Incoming Deluge
Council has received the start of a likely deluge of e-mails filled with misinformation about condition and shortage of soccer fields
and disappointment that Council may not approve an expenditure of $1.4 million dollar at Tuesday's council meeting.
The vote was tied. The Mayor was absent, Depending on community input the vote could change one way or another on Tuesday.
The new facility would be our third artificial turf surface the second in a year. A new one has just been completed at St Maximilian Kolbe high school.
Built on school property, at our expense, it adds significantly to the field inventory. Artificial turf means the play season is extended by months. It can be played in all weathers and accommodates more games in a day. Maintenance is substantially less . It costs a million dollars to build.
The first one was built at Sheppard's Bush. $400,000 was saved using the skills of parks department employees.
The soccer program is provided by Aurora Youth Soccer Club. Our correspondent informs us there are 4 thousand youth members with parent volunteers. .A tournament in July will not be hosted this year because of a shortage of soccer fields.
The club operates out of privately rented facilities, has a full staff complement and professional coaches .Teams participate in tournaments world wide. A glossy magazine is published annually.
It's not like any minor sports association I know.
My son coached soccer in Barrie for a while. He told me the kids played on sand.
My daughter coached baseball in Newmarket. They brought a team to play a game in Aurora . The baseball diamond was picture perfect. like manicured. They didn't get to play it because the Aurora team didn't show and the game was forfeited.
I know the town parks department take tremendous pride in what they do. Facilities provided are second to none.
A few years ago, a fence around soccer fields in the vicinity of schools was recommended to prevent abuse and misuse. Council shot them down.
After a downpour, soccer fields cannot be used without causing damage that takes weeks to repair.They are not allowed to be used in these circumstances.
I know that. Management of Aurora Youth Soccer Club know these things better than anyone else.
AYSC has the same right as anyone to input to Council to approve a new facility.
But to misinform parent volunteers to pressure politicians to approve a $1.4 million dollar expenditure on the basis of misinformation and in the face of serious concerns is not acceptable..
I have a sense Aurora Youth Soccer Club has serviced a far greater area than Aurora for many a long year..
Parents should perhaps turn their attention to continued growth of the Club that squeezes their children out more than a shortage of tax supported facilities.
And Oh Yes! We have that money pit bubble behind the Legion that provides year-round access to soccer facilities
Erected on Town land, over the term of the much touted public/private partnership agreement of twenty years , it will have cost the taxpayers of Aurora a million dollars
We pay taxes to the Region and the Board of Education on their behalf.. The use became commercial as soon as the bubble was erected. The agreement provided the operators would pay no taxes. So the town is stuck paying taxes not anticipated when the agreement was signed. It seemed somebody anticipated. else why the clause about non-payment.
Management of the Aurora Soccer Club Association are aware of these factors. They lobbied for that Soccer Bubble Agreement.
They apparently enjoy a substantial benefit from the deal.
.
and disappointment that Council may not approve an expenditure of $1.4 million dollar at Tuesday's council meeting.
The vote was tied. The Mayor was absent, Depending on community input the vote could change one way or another on Tuesday.
The new facility would be our third artificial turf surface the second in a year. A new one has just been completed at St Maximilian Kolbe high school.
Built on school property, at our expense, it adds significantly to the field inventory. Artificial turf means the play season is extended by months. It can be played in all weathers and accommodates more games in a day. Maintenance is substantially less . It costs a million dollars to build.
The first one was built at Sheppard's Bush. $400,000 was saved using the skills of parks department employees.
The soccer program is provided by Aurora Youth Soccer Club. Our correspondent informs us there are 4 thousand youth members with parent volunteers. .A tournament in July will not be hosted this year because of a shortage of soccer fields.
The club operates out of privately rented facilities, has a full staff complement and professional coaches .Teams participate in tournaments world wide. A glossy magazine is published annually.
It's not like any minor sports association I know.
My son coached soccer in Barrie for a while. He told me the kids played on sand.
My daughter coached baseball in Newmarket. They brought a team to play a game in Aurora . The baseball diamond was picture perfect. like manicured. They didn't get to play it because the Aurora team didn't show and the game was forfeited.
I know the town parks department take tremendous pride in what they do. Facilities provided are second to none.
A few years ago, a fence around soccer fields in the vicinity of schools was recommended to prevent abuse and misuse. Council shot them down.
After a downpour, soccer fields cannot be used without causing damage that takes weeks to repair.They are not allowed to be used in these circumstances.
I know that. Management of Aurora Youth Soccer Club know these things better than anyone else.
AYSC has the same right as anyone to input to Council to approve a new facility.
But to misinform parent volunteers to pressure politicians to approve a $1.4 million dollar expenditure on the basis of misinformation and in the face of serious concerns is not acceptable..
I have a sense Aurora Youth Soccer Club has serviced a far greater area than Aurora for many a long year..
Parents should perhaps turn their attention to continued growth of the Club that squeezes their children out more than a shortage of tax supported facilities.
And Oh Yes! We have that money pit bubble behind the Legion that provides year-round access to soccer facilities
Erected on Town land, over the term of the much touted public/private partnership agreement of twenty years , it will have cost the taxpayers of Aurora a million dollars
We pay taxes to the Region and the Board of Education on their behalf.. The use became commercial as soon as the bubble was erected. The agreement provided the operators would pay no taxes. So the town is stuck paying taxes not anticipated when the agreement was signed. It seemed somebody anticipated. else why the clause about non-payment.
Management of the Aurora Soccer Club Association are aware of these factors. They lobbied for that Soccer Bubble Agreement.
They apparently enjoy a substantial benefit from the deal.
.
The Times We Live In
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "That
Damned Elusive Pimpernel":
5:41, maybe Cllr Buck will feel sorry for you and delete your comment. Such stupidity must be really embarrassing for you
**********************
It's the thing about being anonymous , nobody needs to feel embarrassed about anything they write because nobody knows who they are. The only name known is mine.
Here's what I know. At least two people in Aurora bear the same name.
One is the treasurer of the Culture Centre. The other is not.
The latter was born and grew up in Aurora.
I remember her leaning over the side of her mother's shopping cart in Larry Rubin's beautiful brand new I.G.A.store on Yonge Street.
It was the first in- store bakery supermarket and the place was filled with the smell of freshly baked bread just out of the oven.
Jean Strange was behind the counter in the coffee shop. She made the best tuna salad on brown sandwiches, bar none.The coffee shop was meeting place for old codgers.
Heidi was a beautiful round child with a shock of white blonde hair and rosy cheeks on a porcelain skin
Her hair and complexion were likely a gene from her Swiss grandmother whose hair was like a small white cloud enveloping her head. Grandparents came to Canada to help out when Heidi's Dad was starting up St Andrew's gas station. They pumped gas while Fritz did car repairs and provided towing service. night and day and in the winter.
The grandparents lived in the cabin on the north side of the station.
So Heidi grew up to be an earth mother, a vegetarian, a writer of long letters to the editor , a ceaseless campaigner for universal love and peace and protection for the environment.
All good things.
A product of her times. .
5:41, maybe Cllr Buck will feel sorry for you and delete your comment. Such stupidity must be really embarrassing for you
**********************
It's the thing about being anonymous , nobody needs to feel embarrassed about anything they write because nobody knows who they are. The only name known is mine.
Here's what I know. At least two people in Aurora bear the same name.
One is the treasurer of the Culture Centre. The other is not.
The latter was born and grew up in Aurora.
I remember her leaning over the side of her mother's shopping cart in Larry Rubin's beautiful brand new I.G.A.store on Yonge Street.
It was the first in- store bakery supermarket and the place was filled with the smell of freshly baked bread just out of the oven.
Jean Strange was behind the counter in the coffee shop. She made the best tuna salad on brown sandwiches, bar none.The coffee shop was meeting place for old codgers.
Heidi was a beautiful round child with a shock of white blonde hair and rosy cheeks on a porcelain skin
Her hair and complexion were likely a gene from her Swiss grandmother whose hair was like a small white cloud enveloping her head. Grandparents came to Canada to help out when Heidi's Dad was starting up St Andrew's gas station. They pumped gas while Fritz did car repairs and provided towing service. night and day and in the winter.
The grandparents lived in the cabin on the north side of the station.
So Heidi grew up to be an earth mother, a vegetarian, a writer of long letters to the editor , a ceaseless campaigner for universal love and peace and protection for the environment.
All good things.
A product of her times. .
Friday, 22 June 2012
A Couple of Odds and Sods
I have had a talk with the Director of Parks and Recreation about the fence around the park on the August week-end.
The rational is as follows ; festival patrons like to buy a beer and take it elsewhere in the park. L.L.B.O require a fence around a beer garden. The five foot high chain link fence is deemed to be that fence.
There is no permit from the town. There is a requirement from the L.L.B.O.
The town puts a fence around Machell Park for the same reason. People like to take their beer to a picnic table in the park while
feasting on ribs. The fence satisfies L.L.B.O. requrements.
There is a difference.
The town's fence at the rib fest, as I recall, is a snow fence. It does not prohibit people from entering without paying an admission fee. It is not a barrier to people wishing to access their own park.
It is clear I am spitting into the wind in my opposition to allowing a
public park to be exploited for private gain.
There are no echoes of support from Council colleagues. The situation therefore will remain unchanged.
Unless residents take matters into their own hands and refuse to be barred from entering their own park by a resident of Snowball.
Or...here's a thought...they call the bylaw department and demand access to the park.
********
I erred in identifying the properties in the vicinity of Hilary House
being touted as potential for something or other in connection with the heritage aspect of Hilary house.
They are not on either side of the doctor's house. They are both due south of the house.
One has had a plan for town houses on it, approved by the town seven years ago and for sale ever since. Obviously not at the right price. The second is John McIntyre's house.
The rational is as follows ; festival patrons like to buy a beer and take it elsewhere in the park. L.L.B.O require a fence around a beer garden. The five foot high chain link fence is deemed to be that fence.
There is no permit from the town. There is a requirement from the L.L.B.O.
The town puts a fence around Machell Park for the same reason. People like to take their beer to a picnic table in the park while
feasting on ribs. The fence satisfies L.L.B.O. requrements.
There is a difference.
The town's fence at the rib fest, as I recall, is a snow fence. It does not prohibit people from entering without paying an admission fee. It is not a barrier to people wishing to access their own park.
It is clear I am spitting into the wind in my opposition to allowing a
public park to be exploited for private gain.
There are no echoes of support from Council colleagues. The situation therefore will remain unchanged.
Unless residents take matters into their own hands and refuse to be barred from entering their own park by a resident of Snowball.
Or...here's a thought...they call the bylaw department and demand access to the park.
********
I erred in identifying the properties in the vicinity of Hilary House
being touted as potential for something or other in connection with the heritage aspect of Hilary house.
They are not on either side of the doctor's house. They are both due south of the house.
One has had a plan for town houses on it, approved by the town seven years ago and for sale ever since. Obviously not at the right price. The second is John McIntyre's house.
That Damned Elusive Pimpernel
My grand-daughter's calico cat still crouches with every muscle taut when he spies a likely prey. His spring however is less than spectacular when he takes off.
I still have one- who- shall- be nameless crouching in wait for every post, ready to heap coals of fire upon my head for all my supposed misdeeds.
Occasionally a reference will be made to a time before her arrival to prove my perfidy.
Yesterday's post was an example of failure during my watch to make the correct decision when the sewer pipe lining program was first proposed.
Another post might trigger a reference to how often mine was the solitary vote in opposition.
The sewer pipe lining program was already in place when I returned to Council in 2003. Like storm water ponds.I challenged the purpose of both.
As I did the economic development department and a host of other items that did not appear to me to justify themselves.
We are now regularly advised how progressive we were. How much more advanced than other municipalities.
Excuse me while I turn aside to smile unseen in irony.
It's something like the Trillium grant the award winning jazz festival got two years ago.They had to get one from the town first to prove they had community support. They joined the festival association which provides awards for excellence and that further bolstered their eligibility for another grant from government last year..
But I digress.
When I came back in 2003, we had a split on Council between "old-timers" and newcomers. Votes divided along those lines.
The old-timers weren't putting up much of a fight. Glowering glances, sombre insinuation and a proclamation of the towering need for a Code Of Righteous Conduct along lines of moral principles of Dark Vadar
EVERYBODY outside the tight little group of newcomers was suspect; including staff.
The first move to clean things up was to create a name for a street that didn't exist. in order to remove the name of a former Mayor from the Town hall address.
For no more noble reason than it was a campaign advantage worth thousands of dollars.
I started this post to underline the disadvantage of a split Council.
It's a contradiction in terms.
It's a failure in leadership.
NOBODY wins.
Not Council, not the administration, not the community.
I also intended to explore the concept that because Councillors are not "experts", they are obliged to accept the advice of "experts" whose purpose it is to provide "expert" advice.
It may be, a mainly newbie Council needs to have a couple of chunks removed from nether regions to discover how much less of a comfort blanket that concept really is.
And since I am zig-zagging between this and that in this post I think I would be further ahead to quit now.
I still have one- who- shall- be nameless crouching in wait for every post, ready to heap coals of fire upon my head for all my supposed misdeeds.
Occasionally a reference will be made to a time before her arrival to prove my perfidy.
Yesterday's post was an example of failure during my watch to make the correct decision when the sewer pipe lining program was first proposed.
Another post might trigger a reference to how often mine was the solitary vote in opposition.
The sewer pipe lining program was already in place when I returned to Council in 2003. Like storm water ponds.I challenged the purpose of both.
As I did the economic development department and a host of other items that did not appear to me to justify themselves.
We are now regularly advised how progressive we were. How much more advanced than other municipalities.
Excuse me while I turn aside to smile unseen in irony.
It's something like the Trillium grant the award winning jazz festival got two years ago.They had to get one from the town first to prove they had community support. They joined the festival association which provides awards for excellence and that further bolstered their eligibility for another grant from government last year..
But I digress.
When I came back in 2003, we had a split on Council between "old-timers" and newcomers. Votes divided along those lines.
The old-timers weren't putting up much of a fight. Glowering glances, sombre insinuation and a proclamation of the towering need for a Code Of Righteous Conduct along lines of moral principles of Dark Vadar
EVERYBODY outside the tight little group of newcomers was suspect; including staff.
The first move to clean things up was to create a name for a street that didn't exist. in order to remove the name of a former Mayor from the Town hall address.
For no more noble reason than it was a campaign advantage worth thousands of dollars.
I started this post to underline the disadvantage of a split Council.
It's a contradiction in terms.
It's a failure in leadership.
NOBODY wins.
Not Council, not the administration, not the community.
I also intended to explore the concept that because Councillors are not "experts", they are obliged to accept the advice of "experts" whose purpose it is to provide "expert" advice.
It may be, a mainly newbie Council needs to have a couple of chunks removed from nether regions to discover how much less of a comfort blanket that concept really is.
And since I am zig-zagging between this and that in this post I think I would be further ahead to quit now.
Thursday, 21 June 2012
What's A Million
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The $450,000
Question":
10 years x 450,000 is 4.5 million, Evelyn, not 10 million. Unless there is a half-million extra in there somewhere that you didn't mention?
**************************
It's not the same every year. Depends on the linear feet or metre being done..
Memory suggests some years have been considerably higher.
And the price was ten per cent higher to begin with.
If we hadn't discovered Newmarket has been getting a price ten per cent less than us, this year's contract would have been $495,000.
Lookit, we saved the taxpayers ten per cent this year with our acuity.
Whatever the total is, this outfit has done better than it should out of Aurora taxpayers.
To discover after ten years of contracts, our neighbour to the north was getting the same service for ten per cent less is a bitter pill to swallow.
The outrage is worth ten million whichever way you slice it.
Add that figure to the amount handed over to the Culture Pirates of Occupied Town Space of Church Street School, with no accountability to the people who pay the taxes and we come up with a figure in excess of a million.
A million here
A million there
Here a Mill
There a Mill
Everywhere a million mill.
Let anybody look me in the eye and tell me our town is fiscally efficient..
Month after month Council retains consultants to do work traditionally the responsibility of public works.
At the same time, we placidly accept that we need to spend $22 million dollars to increase accommodation for the same operation which we continually diminish by contracting work out.
The same rationale suggests a tube inserted into a pipe will prevent ground water from infiltrating into the pipe ,increasing the flow of sludge to its given destination without ever knowing how much ground water there is or how much sludge being diluted.
Now they are going to spend millions, a statement made in all seriousness in a public meeting, to develop a measurement to prove it has been worthwhile to spend billions in York Region to prevent ground water from infiltrating into sewer sludge.
Wouldn't surprise me either to hear the Region got an environmental award from the silly asses at Queen's Park for their environmental initiative. .
We are awfully big on winning awards
It proves how all-fired smart we are..
10 years x 450,000 is 4.5 million, Evelyn, not 10 million. Unless there is a half-million extra in there somewhere that you didn't mention?
**************************
It's not the same every year. Depends on the linear feet or metre being done..
Memory suggests some years have been considerably higher.
And the price was ten per cent higher to begin with.
If we hadn't discovered Newmarket has been getting a price ten per cent less than us, this year's contract would have been $495,000.
Lookit, we saved the taxpayers ten per cent this year with our acuity.
Whatever the total is, this outfit has done better than it should out of Aurora taxpayers.
To discover after ten years of contracts, our neighbour to the north was getting the same service for ten per cent less is a bitter pill to swallow.
The outrage is worth ten million whichever way you slice it.
Add that figure to the amount handed over to the Culture Pirates of Occupied Town Space of Church Street School, with no accountability to the people who pay the taxes and we come up with a figure in excess of a million.
A million here
A million there
Here a Mill
There a Mill
Everywhere a million mill.
Let anybody look me in the eye and tell me our town is fiscally efficient..
Month after month Council retains consultants to do work traditionally the responsibility of public works.
At the same time, we placidly accept that we need to spend $22 million dollars to increase accommodation for the same operation which we continually diminish by contracting work out.
The same rationale suggests a tube inserted into a pipe will prevent ground water from infiltrating into the pipe ,increasing the flow of sludge to its given destination without ever knowing how much ground water there is or how much sludge being diluted.
Now they are going to spend millions, a statement made in all seriousness in a public meeting, to develop a measurement to prove it has been worthwhile to spend billions in York Region to prevent ground water from infiltrating into sewer sludge.
Wouldn't surprise me either to hear the Region got an environmental award from the silly asses at Queen's Park for their environmental initiative. .
We are awfully big on winning awards
It proves how all-fired smart we are..
The $450,000 Question
On Tuesday,Council voted to recommend to Council next Tuesday, approval of a $450,000 contract.
It's a project the soaks up hundreds of thousands of tax dollars each year.
Something about it has never sat well with me.
Sewer lines in Aurora are not antiquated. Since, the Region was created in 1971, sewers throughout the old part of town were replaced and twinned with storm sewers.
Reason was to prevent storm water from finding its way into sanitary sewers and on to the Region's trunk sewer system to be treated as sewage.
For ten years, the Town has been inserting fibreglass liners into a relatively new system to stop infiltration of ground water into the sanitary sewer and increasing flow into the trunk sewer system.
It's duplication of what we did before.
Anyway, on Tuesday, there was the pesky liner thing on the agenda again to approve yet another $450,000. award.
I had heard from a resident, when Nesbit Drive was re-constructed, the contractor was cutting into pristine pipes to insert the liner. Pipes don't suffer wear and tear or exposure to the elements buried down deep in the ground as they are.
I had asked in previous years when the project of re-lining pipes was going to be finished .
The answer was ...never. It is on-going maintenance.
Tuesday night, a new question occurred.
How long have we been doing this ?
Ten years, was the answer.
So, likely ten million dollars or thereabouts have been spent.
The next question was; How effective is the process?
How much ground water has been prevented from infiltrating into the sanitary sewers?
As I heard myself speak the words , I knew the answer.
I was astounded never-the-less.
The answer !... it is not known if the program is effective.
There is no means of measurement .
Aurora is farther advanced than any other municipality in carrying out this program. Which means we started it before anybody else. But we still don't know it works.
Further to that, the fibre glass materila supposed to prvent water from entering the pipes is on the inside of the pipes.
The CAO told Council he had a conversation with the CAO of the Region about that aspect of the program on the day of my question.
The Director of Infrastructure and Environment informed us the Region plans to spend millions to develop a system of measurement to determine how much ground water is diverted from sanitary sewers.
I asked him to repeat that he said millions. He did.
It's kind of like that cockamamie scheme for a treatment facility to remove salt from water. Salt that could not have existed from the beginning.That was just a million dollar boondoggle.
The Region, ten years after the re-lining program started and millions spent, is now going to spend further millions to find a measurement to determine if the millions already spent was wisely spent.
You read that correctly my friends.
Millions of dollars of material inserted into a ,simple system
which could not be improved upon, which has satisfactorily served its purpose for generations, of carrying sewage from homes and businesses, without first having a means to determine if the money would be well spent.
If that isn't a scam, I don't know how anything else would qualify.
Oh, and another thing. The contract for the work,can be extended with a good negotiation of price. We have done that repeatedly.
Staff have discovered, the Town of Newmarket has been using the same contractor for a unit price ten per cent less than that charged to Aurora.
It's a project the soaks up hundreds of thousands of tax dollars each year.
Something about it has never sat well with me.
Sewer lines in Aurora are not antiquated. Since, the Region was created in 1971, sewers throughout the old part of town were replaced and twinned with storm sewers.
Reason was to prevent storm water from finding its way into sanitary sewers and on to the Region's trunk sewer system to be treated as sewage.
For ten years, the Town has been inserting fibreglass liners into a relatively new system to stop infiltration of ground water into the sanitary sewer and increasing flow into the trunk sewer system.
It's duplication of what we did before.
Anyway, on Tuesday, there was the pesky liner thing on the agenda again to approve yet another $450,000. award.
I had heard from a resident, when Nesbit Drive was re-constructed, the contractor was cutting into pristine pipes to insert the liner. Pipes don't suffer wear and tear or exposure to the elements buried down deep in the ground as they are.
I had asked in previous years when the project of re-lining pipes was going to be finished .
The answer was ...never. It is on-going maintenance.
Tuesday night, a new question occurred.
How long have we been doing this ?
Ten years, was the answer.
So, likely ten million dollars or thereabouts have been spent.
The next question was; How effective is the process?
How much ground water has been prevented from infiltrating into the sanitary sewers?
As I heard myself speak the words , I knew the answer.
I was astounded never-the-less.
The answer !... it is not known if the program is effective.
There is no means of measurement .
Aurora is farther advanced than any other municipality in carrying out this program. Which means we started it before anybody else. But we still don't know it works.
Further to that, the fibre glass materila supposed to prvent water from entering the pipes is on the inside of the pipes.
The CAO told Council he had a conversation with the CAO of the Region about that aspect of the program on the day of my question.
The Director of Infrastructure and Environment informed us the Region plans to spend millions to develop a system of measurement to determine how much ground water is diverted from sanitary sewers.
I asked him to repeat that he said millions. He did.
It's kind of like that cockamamie scheme for a treatment facility to remove salt from water. Salt that could not have existed from the beginning.That was just a million dollar boondoggle.
The Region, ten years after the re-lining program started and millions spent, is now going to spend further millions to find a measurement to determine if the millions already spent was wisely spent.
You read that correctly my friends.
Millions of dollars of material inserted into a ,simple system
which could not be improved upon, which has satisfactorily served its purpose for generations, of carrying sewage from homes and businesses, without first having a means to determine if the money would be well spent.
If that isn't a scam, I don't know how anything else would qualify.
Oh, and another thing. The contract for the work,can be extended with a good negotiation of price. We have done that repeatedly.
Staff have discovered, the Town of Newmarket has been using the same contractor for a unit price ten per cent less than that charged to Aurora.
Life Is A Stage
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "It's
taking time for some readers to understand wh...":
Evelyn:
You are far too modest when you say that you don't create the drama, you just relate it.
At times you wax lyrical with your prose. At others you tend to overshoot the mark.
You are certainly a part of the drama, not merely a reporter.
Do reporters normally sue a sitting mayor and five fellow councillors, for good reason I might add?
At times you are a fresh breeze blowing aside the cobwebs. At others you can confuse some of us.
But, be it as it may, keep doing what you do and let the rest of us try and figure out what you are saying.
******************
I didn't say I wasn't part of the drama. I said I don't create it.
It is live drama.. And I do enjoy it.
But it's not theatre as we understand it. Our lines are not writ large upon the page.
We need to compose them as we speak.
Sometimes I do it well. Sometimes not so much. If I take too long, my time, according to rules , will be up and the Mayor will cut me off.
It's not an excuse. The problem is the extent of my background. The degree of history..
Filling in details that only make sense to the people who have shared my experience yet I think are relevant.
I try. I do the best I can. If part of my contribution is encouraging colleagues to get the same satisfaction in participating that I do, I am content.
No Aurora Council I have been a part of, has had Councillors who sat out the questions. Everybody gets into the act.
To some that is a melee. To me, it is as it should be.
We represent thousands. People are watching at home as decisions that affect them are made by nine people who may ask to be re-elected.
Whether decisions are right or wrong, people are entitled to know the reasons and make their judgement about what they might have done in the circumstances.
They watch the play unfold.
Only at the municipal level do politicians have to think on their feet.so to speak, during a debate.
At senior levels,parties have caucus where positions are taken beforehand .behind closed doors, in secret. with members bound by party discipline and single spokespersons.
Among York Region municipalities.only in Aurora is the debate lively,provocative, spontaneous and unpredictable.
Yes it shows flaws in reasoning ,depending on one's perspective. It charts a Councillor's growing confidence in his own voice. It encourages him to risk.It make him real.
I think it's a good thing.
If people want to credit or blame me for it. I can accept that.
Thank you.
Evelyn:
You are far too modest when you say that you don't create the drama, you just relate it.
At times you wax lyrical with your prose. At others you tend to overshoot the mark.
You are certainly a part of the drama, not merely a reporter.
Do reporters normally sue a sitting mayor and five fellow councillors, for good reason I might add?
At times you are a fresh breeze blowing aside the cobwebs. At others you can confuse some of us.
But, be it as it may, keep doing what you do and let the rest of us try and figure out what you are saying.
******************
I didn't say I wasn't part of the drama. I said I don't create it.
It is live drama.. And I do enjoy it.
But it's not theatre as we understand it. Our lines are not writ large upon the page.
We need to compose them as we speak.
Sometimes I do it well. Sometimes not so much. If I take too long, my time, according to rules , will be up and the Mayor will cut me off.
It's not an excuse. The problem is the extent of my background. The degree of history..
Filling in details that only make sense to the people who have shared my experience yet I think are relevant.
I try. I do the best I can. If part of my contribution is encouraging colleagues to get the same satisfaction in participating that I do, I am content.
No Aurora Council I have been a part of, has had Councillors who sat out the questions. Everybody gets into the act.
To some that is a melee. To me, it is as it should be.
We represent thousands. People are watching at home as decisions that affect them are made by nine people who may ask to be re-elected.
Whether decisions are right or wrong, people are entitled to know the reasons and make their judgement about what they might have done in the circumstances.
They watch the play unfold.
Only at the municipal level do politicians have to think on their feet.so to speak, during a debate.
At senior levels,parties have caucus where positions are taken beforehand .behind closed doors, in secret. with members bound by party discipline and single spokespersons.
Among York Region municipalities.only in Aurora is the debate lively,provocative, spontaneous and unpredictable.
Yes it shows flaws in reasoning ,depending on one's perspective. It charts a Councillor's growing confidence in his own voice. It encourages him to risk.It make him real.
I think it's a good thing.
If people want to credit or blame me for it. I can accept that.
Thank you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
