Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "I Nearly Forgot":
Councilor , what exactly are you saying here , that the amount of water sold to contractors is not deducted from the amount sold to metered customers, In other words are you saying that the Town is selling the same water twice ,once to the contractors and once to the metered customer.
Please clarify
***********************
Being involved in town affairs a long time means you learn a thing or three along the way.Enough to know what questions to ask if something doesn't make sense.
Water meters have always been a source of irritation. Water is in the ground. It is ours to take.Costs involved are pumping it out of the ground, storing , treating .and distributing it.
I figured at the time we did it, the real purpose of metering was to impose rates for sewage treatment.
When meters were installed,I pointed out, not all water used found it's way into sewers.
Eventually the sewer rate changed to take that into account. But of course we have no way of knowing if the reduction was adequate. Sewers are not metered.
Then an item appeared on the bill called "miscellaneous". Eventually it was identified as storm water pond surcharge.There are no storm water ponds in my neighbourhood. Then it was explained as a means to restore water quality to Lake Simcoe.
Lake Simcoe is large. Many towns surround it including Barrie. Are they all paying a surcharge on water. And what does it have to do with supplying water and treating sewage.
We don't take water from the lake and we don't pump treated sewage into it.
Then the question occurred about homes not receiving a water bill, not paying the surcharge the night before Council passed the bylaw to increase the rates again in 2011 almost 11%. After increasing them 12% in 2010.
I thought, that's outrageous. Water is a necessity of life. What other cost of living is allowed to increase by that much without a full and satisfactory explanation.
And that's not happening.
Last year, they increased "water loss" from 8%to 12%. No reason offered.
On April 27th 2010 ,I asked about the town's water use.The CFO responded it was metered and charged to the department budget.
This year we discovered that is not true.
Councillor Thompson learned in a private conversation , consideration is now being given to metering town uses.
When I don't receive full information, or I receive incorrect answers. I tend to become edgy and obsessive. I think,somebody is taking me for a fool. New questions spring to mind.
The question about the town selling water and where the revenue shows up occurred to me last Friday.
The town has always sold water to haulage contractors. To fill swimming pools. Top up wells. Forty years ago the Province provided grants to farmers to create ponds on their property. I imagine they might need topping up as well in a drought.
Developers need tanker trucks to wash down streets and keep irrigate new sod.
So I asked . Where does that revenue go.
An insert accompanies the quarterly bill. It indicates water rates are not subsidized from the town levy.
It says nothing about the town levy being subsidized from water rates.
I believe that 's happening.
Obviously, I am not an accountant. There may well be more methodology for calculating rates than I understand.
But Council has made decisions to increase water rates for the past two years based on information which was neither complete nor accurate.
I have not been able to change that.
The majority rules.
But I can make sure of one thing. If I think consumers are being overcharged for water rates. they will know about it or I am not doing my job.
I made a commitment to look after their interest. They took me up on that and elected me. I took an oath of office and I will keep it.
I make no apology for that.
Dear Evelyn:
ReplyDeleteUntil all this water rates business blew up recently I had not paid too much attention to our quarterly water bill. I knew that during the summer when we watered our lawn and flower beds we used more water than in the winter.
I have the current water bill in front of me for the period ending May 30, 2011 - 3 months.
The rate per unit for water (cubic meter) is $1.4359. If we use 75 units our bill for water is $107.69.
The levy based on number of units for residential storm sewers, number of units being a single house, and therefore 1.00, is a flat $12.33.
Obviously there is no direct relationship between water rates and storm sewer levy.
I know that our water consumption will increase dramatically for the June/August period. But we are still one residential unit.
Can anyone explain how the storm sewer rate came to be determined? I assume that for an apartment building the water consumption will be calculated based on metering on each of the apartments. Is an apartment building one residential unit or 30, if there are 30 units in the building? What will its residential storm sewer charge be?
Now that the question has been raised perhaps the appropriate person at town hall can provide an explanation that is understandable.