Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Here's
A Couple Of Thoughts":
In the past day or so, I heard that a top
by-law enforcement person was no longer doing that job & that Council was
not informed. So I will stick a reluctant toe into this dangerous pond & ask
just what staff employment Council is responsible for handling. Has it all been
handed to top staff people with no input from Council? These are people who work
for the town of Aurora. Why are other Staff given the right to deal with their
disposition? Who works for whom? Is there a captain on board?
*************
Council is responsible for appointments of the Executive leadership team.
Except for the solicitor. The CAO has authority to choose the solicitor.
Council is not informed when people come and go.
Can't say I am satisfied with the system.
In the last term I heard of someone fired
Didn't hear why. Actually, was refused the why. .
Heard he received sufficient severance to pay off his mortgage and buy a new car and he walked into a new job with better pay in a neighbouring municipality within a month.
Sounded plausible. They guy was a long term employee. Never heard any complaints about him.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
"Cowardice asks the question...is it safe? Expediency asks the question...is it politic? Vanity asks the question...is it popular? But conscience asks the question...is it right? And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but one must take it because it is right." ~Dr. Martin Luther King
Posts
Evelyn Buck
Other Links
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(880)
-
▼
September
(60)
- Hey Ho,,, Away We Go
- Cowardy,Cowardy Custard
- By Their Deeds, Ye Shall Know Them
- What Are You Implying
- The Common Denominator
- Flags and Such
- Mulcair in Macleans
- Further To The Last Post
- Round and Round It goes. Where it stops .nobody kn...
- Policies Are Not Cast In stone
- Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Rid...
- Riddle Me THis
- The Many Twists and Turnes of Politics.
- E-Mails Are Better
- Tuesday's Meeting
- Numbers Are Easy To FInd
- No Points Scored
- FYI
- 14% De Facto
- I didn't know you could get the Times' columns for...
- I Will Stay The Course
- Sentiments
- Pat It and Prick It and Mark it as Spam
- Comment Noted
- It's All New To Me
- The Process ??
- Yes Virginia , He really is what he appears to be
- Oh What A tangled Web We Weave, When Frst We ...
- A Clarion Call
- The Meaning Of Ethics
- Ideas Spill Over
- I Was Wrong And I Proclaim My apology. .
- Look What The Wind Blew In
- A Gate Closed
- Public Thinking
- Let The Wind Blow Hard..Let The Wind Blow Strong
- For other uses, see Badger (disambiguation). ...
- It Made Me Laugh
- Heard Right
- And The Beat Goes On
- A Weird And Wonderful Week
- Here's A Couple Of Thoughts
- Councillors Are Not Alone At The Trough
- I Had A Call
- An Expression Of Interest
- The Things One Hears
- Judgement Versus Rigid Formula
- Not Everyone Is So Fortunate
- Work Is Required On The Rules
- The Notice Board Contract
- About The Rules
- The D M Was There. He paid
- No...I do not know that.
- When Is A Publication Not a Local Newspaper?
- And Whereas
- Thank You For This
- Well I never
- Pish Tosh
- Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "A C...
- A Choice Of Words.
-
▼
September
(60)
4 comments:
Welcome to the big league Ev. The "why" is an HR issue and no matter who you are, you should not need to know. Sometimes things are private.
If he was paid severance, it must have been a "without cause" issue. So, it was nothing to do with something against the rules.
10:17 AM If I am thinking of the same individual, that severance was only paid after a legal tussle. He had simply taken too much garbage and still had to fight to get any severance. So please do not assume " a without cause ". Such an assumption rules out your conclusion and weakens your attempted put-down of Evelyn.
11:22 AM If the person that you are thinking about is indeed the case, then even your comments prove out my point. Severance is not paid if there was "cause". If there was clearly an issue of cause it would be open and shut. Regardless, why should coucillors be told why someone was dimissed if it was an HR issue? We are not living in the 1960s, there is a thing called Work Standards.
This reads as though someone took a swing at Evelyn & whopped him/herself in the nose. About time!
Post a Comment