Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Riddle Me
THis":
Whose Policy? Staff? Aurora? Region? And what are the
consequences if Council does not adhere to it?
**********
A policy may be recommended by staff.
Once adopted by Council it becomes a corporate policy.
A variance from the policy is a decision for Council to make.
Everyone is expected to abide by the policies.
But if Councillors don't know the policies , they can easily be led astray.
We have had a workshop on policies pending for months.
Staff asked immediately before the last election, for authorisation under certain policies to be transferred from Council to staff.
I argued it would be an excellent project for the new Council and provide much needed grounding on what is council's responsibility andwhat is staff's
I did a lot of spitting into the wind in the last term.
This term, not so much.
Other than the people choice at election time, there are no obvious consequences for not adhering to policies.
But that bespeaks everyone being familiar with the policies and the policies themselves making sense.
At the beginning of last term, the person in charge of corporate communications presented an annual report .
The Mormac twins grilled her about what was meant by "corporate communications" When those two didn't like the answer, they just kept asking the question over and over. Until I shouted 'Stop it"
Corporate communications meant communicating decisions made by the corporation.
The answer didn't suit the Deadly Duo.
It wasn't long before corporate communications became the publicity arm of the incumbent Mayor's office.
Nothing was allowed to appear that didn't show her name..
Communications staff were required to attend Council meetings for furtive purpose that didn't sit well.
It wasn't long after it ceased to be Corporate Communications the division changed hands, as well as its purpose. .
That's how it is now.
Management has changed once more.
The division has four staff. It still functions as publicity arm for the incumbent Mayor.
He has no idea why that should not be.
It suits him fine.
Sunday, 23 September 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Wouldn't it be remarkable if Everyone on Council voted ' No ' on a big ticket item? But, then, I couldn't understand all that garbage about giving the Auroran the contract. That should have been dusted away in a few minutes.
Strange. No one has commented to support the dual sidewalk paving or to correct grammar errors. Not since the Auroran contract when there were no supporters of the Banner position.
Post a Comment