The contributions of each man will be recorded in history.
Accuracy will depend on who writes it.
It's no small feat to be chosen leader of a political party.
It's a tad more awkward to be chosen Mayor of a City like Toronto.
No shortage of ammunition was provided and hurled from every direction at the Man who would be Mayor.
Little support for his candidacy was evident in the Toronto media.
Despite that , or because of it, the people of Toronto made their choice.
Excessive power used to pound a person into the ground, like a splayed out wooden tent peg, inevitably triggers a sense of fair play in most.
Toronto citizen reaction yesterday, proved it once again.
Support for the Mayor was unguarded and unmistakable.
In contrast, the mean spirits seemed almost to be cowering in
sheltered spots.
Clayton Ruby who argued the case against the Mayor pro bono initially had nothing to say, Later he pronounced the panel of three learned ,well-respected judges made several errors in law.
It will have to proven before we know it for a fact. The opportunity to do so is not guaranteed.
The initial decision in the application, noted no case law established under the Conflict of Interest Act
The decision was said to be establishing case law.
Well, now there's more case law.
That contradicts the first case law.
The Judges did not address costs. But they said that if the 2 parties could not agree, they would hear arguments. I think Mayor Ford's lawyers will try to get their costs even if he was covered by insurance. Maybe someone else can explain to me how that works?
ReplyDelete