Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The Clock Keeps Ticking":
Could someone please explain to me how the Hillary-McIntyre Park Founding Committee and the accompanying Consultants' Study that apparently was authorized by Council at a cost of $25,000 has morphed into something that the CAO is recommending by way of a Negotiation Strategy for the Purchase of properties associated with the said Park.
Has the town passed the necessary By-Law to create a new park?
In light of the fact that a total cost figure of some $22 million has come to light and that the town is supposed to finance half of this, the remainder by fund-raising (presumably from senior levels of government), my question is what is the basis for all of this.
The Cost-Benefit Study is simply many pages of thousands of words, pictures and schematic plans, but from the standpoint of practicality it provides very little.
Unless and until the residents and taxpayers of Aurora have pledged their unqualified support for this project, including paying the bills, Council should receive the material and file it and forget it.
***********************
From the standpoint of substance, there is none of that either
Neither is there an explanation I can offer at this time.
I have forwarded a query to our new Director of Legislative and Corporate Services, who is also the town solicitor. to explain how Item 9 has appeared on the Agenda for Council on February 11th 2014.
We are currently without a Statutary Office of Clerk of the Municipality required by provincial
legislation.
He was responsible to ensure town affairs were conducted within provincial legislative requirements and also in keeping with the town's own legislative Bylaws.
Council recently decided the position of Director was no longer required. We could save money by doing without.
No Bylaw to rescind the appointment has yet been presented.
During this term we have seen similar scenarios to the one raised above.
Council deliberates ,opposing arguments dominate, then a resolution is presented and passed in
the opposite direction.
One hesitates to call it trickery, yet one can hardly call it clear and succinct.
Be that as it may:
Council in General Committee does not make decisions.
Decisions are recommended to Council to be formally and legally enacted.
At Council, motions are subject to further debate, or what passes for same in Aurora ,
and also to a recorded vote if requested.
There is no confusion left about who voted how.
No doubt about the decision or direction to staff.
No unexpected surprises to catch an unwary Councillor unaware.
No precipitate staff report to force forward an objective not yet decided.
Former Mayor Timpson used to refer to his time in the Mayor's Office as the
"Timpson Administration"
George used to carry the Chain of Office in its case wherever he went. There was speculation he wore it in pyjamas.
Perhaps we now know the tenor of the "Dawe Administration"
Now you see it.
Now you don't.
Like that feline in CATS. Whenever something was discovered that was amiss, it wasn't to be seen.
ReplyDelete" McCafferty's not there "
{ I might have the cat's name wrong }
You state quite clearly:
ReplyDelete"From the standpoint of substance, there is none of that either.
Neither is there an explanation I can offer at this time."
This must assume many hours of discussion and debate about a matter that is both without substance and explanation.
Is it really possible for a group of adults to waste their time while pretending to attend to the interests of the people who elected them?
If there were sufficient corners in the council chamber each councillor should have to go and sit in one for at least an hour, dunce caps optional.
13:54
ReplyDeleteI think what we've been seeing is some good theatrical performances. We’ll get to see who the Oscar will go to shortly. I already have my nominations in.
I believe Councillors Abel and Humphreys chair the Heritage Advisory committee. Need I say anymore ?
ReplyDeleteMore about the HAC meetings will be disclosed on Tuesday.
DeleteDespite all the rhetoric about the need to rush this project, I think its supporters plan to just keep going for the ' vision '. It isn't like investors are lined up for the great opportunities offered.
ReplyDeleteI thought committees were supposed to reduce the work of Council ?
ReplyDeleteThose we have seem determined to throw grenades onto the table. Not just the little stuff like those 3 trees. Trails Committee comes up with really weird stuff and this heritage mess looks like it sprang for another committee. It all gets fuzzy by the time the public hear about an issue.
Off= topic
ReplyDeleteMacleans,ca
John Geddes
How Canada's health wait list times are the worst among 11 prosperous countries
ReplyDeleteI see on the Agenda for Council for February 11 By-Laws to appoint a Clerk and a Deputy Clerk.
Is it normal for a two month time lapse for a Council to fill these two positions, the first being a statutory requirement under the Municipal Act?
@10:10
ReplyDeleteThat Bus Fuss came via the C of A.
Yet another ' new ' reporter in the Banner says the Heritage thing is going ahead. It also has someone quoted as saying the value is ' under-market ' That should finish the darn thing.
ReplyDelete