It's a funny thing about writing. Sometimes you have to read  your stuff  back to yourself to spot something  obvious. .
In the last two posts I set down what happened at the end of  Tuesday's  Committee Meeting   Councillor MacEachern  tore apart  documentation submitted by Leisure Services Director  to support her intention to refer the matter elsewhere.
The material  was in  support of a recommendation to prepare specifications and call tenders for servicing a community park and construction of  a baseball diamond as promised at the time of the last budget.
When the Councillor finished her diatribe,the Mayor picked up  the theme and  the issue  was referred to the attention of the Chief Administrative Officer
A year ago,  the night of the 2008  budget,  the Baseball Association came to Council to plead for desperately needed  facilities  to be  included in the budget. The Mayor directed  Leisure Services Director to proceed with designs the very next day.  There was  joy and  laughter and applause from the audience. They  left the council chamber believing their worries were over and the Mayor was their champion.
Under the direction of Councillor Mac Eachern, the  project had been eliminated from the  previous budget.
The Director has done nothing but follow direction since.
But neither he nor I have understood the subliminal message. Not until I read the last Blog. Current  direction is for the Chief Administrative Officer to report on the issue.  On the basis of what ?
Well... of course... I have seen the light... on the basis  that this council does not intend  to run the gauntlet of  hostile public opinion  by  going forward with the project after they deliberately  created the false  impression it was an outrageous price and would be a horrendous burden on the taxpayer.
They want  a report from  staff  to give them an out  from  making a decision that might cost them support in the next election. If the Mayor can flim-flam the Baseball Association once, she can do it again.
Council must maintain their image as diligent keepers of the public purse.
In  fact, the opposite is true.
If we do not spend the money .... taken from developers for the purpose ... there's a good chance, it will have to be given back.  York Region has  had to do that  because of a miscalculation of  need.
Add to that, our current  round of calculations  for development charges cannot be supported by the same level of service as the last. Because we  failed to fulfill a  need we forecast in  2003. We cannot claim a level of service that is not our level of service.
Talk about shooting ourselves in both feet.
Saturday, 11 April 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 

1 comment:
First the diamond is 600K now it's 1.7M. Then apparently we need to buy property for the diamond except we already own land for it. Then we promise to start building it and then it gets deferred. Now we're not sure if we want to build it at all because it's so expensive but we can't spend the money on other town needs because we have to retun it.
Geesh! Why didn't council start with something a little easier like solving world hunger before moving straight into baseball fields?
Post a Comment