This has not been like other days.
A call came through. My brother's son died last night in his sleep in a hotel in Vancouver.
He was there to accept an award on behalf of his company.
He was in his mid-forties. A strong, healthy man
I was trying to remember the last time I saw him. At his Dad's life memorial.
My mind was a blank.
Then it cleared.
I got the word on Remembrance Day 2003, at the Cenotaph ,to say he was in hospital and had almost died.
He was still with me at the time of the election. ..very aware.... enough to share.
He lived a short time longer.
On the day, I remember sitting in a restaurant , placing an order with my own, my sister and my niece Susan.
Thinking once more.... incredibly ....this is what it's like.
Family gather and talk ...normally ....like a loved one hadn't just drawn his last breath.
Like there wasn't a great weight of sadness sharing the space.
My brother was younger than I was but ill and in his seventies.
None of us would have wished what his life had become, to continue a day longer.
But Craig was half his father's age.
His life was still waiting .
Friday, 31 January 2014
All has been revealed
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Politics,,,The Art of Satisfying the greatest N...":
Mayor Dawe inherited a gong show, and has done quite a good job of trying to run this town regardless of some of the councillors still at the table! Unfortunately when you work with clowns, the circus continues!
***********
Yes sir...I think that sums up the Mayor's attitude just about right.
He 'inherited a gong show"
What do you do when the voters give you a gong show to work with.
Neuter it wherever you can. Degrade it ...reduce it to zero....without authority or respect.
Form alliances to assist in the strategy.
That would be wherever and whenever, there is no camera. Cameras have a way of reading between the lines.
People have an intuition about things not being quite what they should be,
The comment will certainly assist their comprehension.
Now they know ....Council are just a bunch of clowns.
Our fearless but valiant leader has succeeded despite the circus that surrounds him.
Hey Ho,,,the Merry oh.
What will he do for a sequel, I wonder ?
Will that comment be his first endorsement for a second term as Mayor?
Mayor Dawe inherited a gong show, and has done quite a good job of trying to run this town regardless of some of the councillors still at the table! Unfortunately when you work with clowns, the circus continues!
***********
Yes sir...I think that sums up the Mayor's attitude just about right.
He 'inherited a gong show"
What do you do when the voters give you a gong show to work with.
Neuter it wherever you can. Degrade it ...reduce it to zero....without authority or respect.
Form alliances to assist in the strategy.
That would be wherever and whenever, there is no camera. Cameras have a way of reading between the lines.
People have an intuition about things not being quite what they should be,
The comment will certainly assist their comprehension.
Now they know ....Council are just a bunch of clowns.
Our fearless but valiant leader has succeeded despite the circus that surrounds him.
Hey Ho,,,the Merry oh.
What will he do for a sequel, I wonder ?
Will that comment be his first endorsement for a second term as Mayor?
Litigation Proceeds
A statement of claim was filed by the Town in the court on Wednesday.
It is a public document.
I can tell you what it claims.
I cannot comment.
The town is asking the court to uphold the Town's right to purchase Block 208 at the same purchase price and terms as in the Minto agreement with the YCDSB)
Should the court not award specific performance of the contract, the Town is alternatively seeking
damages in the amount of $4 million being the estimated difference between the price the Town could have purchased Block 208 and the current market value of such piece of property.
Talk about that among yourselves.
Aye,,,there lies the rub
The Town filed suit on Minto Development on Wednesday
It's a public document . More later.
On Wednesday, a Public Planning meeting outlined an area within the Promenade Study to be eligible for grants and loans from the town treasury for renovations and repairs to private property
that will lead to revitalization and realizing the Vision of the Promenade Study.
Right now I want to talk about Julian Fantino ,the Honorable Minister of Seniors and Veteran's
Affairs.
First time Mr. Fantino applied for the Police Chief's job ...he didn't get it.
He became Chief of the London Police Department. Signed a five year contract but never moved to that city. Didn't honor the contract.
When he didn't get the job in York, the Italian Press quoted him that the "Region wasn't ready for an Italian "
Well now he is the Minister for Seniors and Veteran's Affairs.
In a truly outstanding and extraordinary reaction , a spokesperson for Veterans have demanded his resignation
No Canadian Institution is more supportive of government,duty,respect and protocol.
When Legions were what they were intended to be, no politics were permitted within the premises,
Remaining veterans of the Second World War must be substantially reduced.
Their memory of the horror, the sacrifice and how lives were changed .will be no less
Canadians fought and died in Italy. Those who came home left a part of themselves.
In the campaign against Hitler's ally. Benito Mussolini
To name a person without experience to any Cabinet post was questionable wisdom.
To name an Italian to phase out Veterans Affairs is typical Harper. Totally without sensitivity.
If a way was being sought to reduce history to zero, they could not have found better,
Julian Fantino is not about much more than himself
It's a public document . More later.
On Wednesday, a Public Planning meeting outlined an area within the Promenade Study to be eligible for grants and loans from the town treasury for renovations and repairs to private property
that will lead to revitalization and realizing the Vision of the Promenade Study.
Right now I want to talk about Julian Fantino ,the Honorable Minister of Seniors and Veteran's
Affairs.
First time Mr. Fantino applied for the Police Chief's job ...he didn't get it.
He became Chief of the London Police Department. Signed a five year contract but never moved to that city. Didn't honor the contract.
When he didn't get the job in York, the Italian Press quoted him that the "Region wasn't ready for an Italian "
Well now he is the Minister for Seniors and Veteran's Affairs.
In a truly outstanding and extraordinary reaction , a spokesperson for Veterans have demanded his resignation
No Canadian Institution is more supportive of government,duty,respect and protocol.
When Legions were what they were intended to be, no politics were permitted within the premises,
Remaining veterans of the Second World War must be substantially reduced.
Their memory of the horror, the sacrifice and how lives were changed .will be no less
Canadians fought and died in Italy. Those who came home left a part of themselves.
In the campaign against Hitler's ally. Benito Mussolini
To name a person without experience to any Cabinet post was questionable wisdom.
To name an Italian to phase out Veterans Affairs is typical Harper. Totally without sensitivity.
If a way was being sought to reduce history to zero, they could not have found better,
Julian Fantino is not about much more than himself
Politics,,,The Art of Satisfying the greatest Number
You Should Know Better has left a new comment on your post "Whose Town is it ?":
"Do you think maybe the Mayor owes somebody for something and this is a payback?"
Do you think you should be publishing comments that may be libellous?
*****************
If I thought the comment was about corruption. I would agree it should not be published.
But this is about political currency, not the coin of the realm.
I think the Mayor had many individuals working hard for him in the last election who contributed
to his success.
No factor contributed more to his victory than the defeat of his pre-deccessor.
Not for a minute would I argue a debt owing in that direction.
I think we might assume there were people with expectations.
It doesn't mean " payback" in the sense of corruption.
In political terms, it means fulfilling the commitment , whatever that was understood to be.
I've known all the Mayors of Aurora in the last half century. I have made various assessments of their competence.
But I have never seen anything to indicate any one of them might have sought or accepted a
"payback" such as suggested in the comment above.
Did I help the Mayor to be elected?
Yes I did.
Did I get what I expected ?
No, I didn't .
Does it mean nobody did ?
No.
I think a shrinking circle may get all they hoped for....at the expense of the rest of us.
Is there not something nefarious about that?
Not at all,not at all.
Ir's just a politician who has no idea what people expect.
And sadly, didn't learn.
"Do you think maybe the Mayor owes somebody for something and this is a payback?"
Do you think you should be publishing comments that may be libellous?
*****************
If I thought the comment was about corruption. I would agree it should not be published.
But this is about political currency, not the coin of the realm.
I think the Mayor had many individuals working hard for him in the last election who contributed
to his success.
No factor contributed more to his victory than the defeat of his pre-deccessor.
Not for a minute would I argue a debt owing in that direction.
I think we might assume there were people with expectations.
It doesn't mean " payback" in the sense of corruption.
In political terms, it means fulfilling the commitment , whatever that was understood to be.
I've known all the Mayors of Aurora in the last half century. I have made various assessments of their competence.
But I have never seen anything to indicate any one of them might have sought or accepted a
"payback" such as suggested in the comment above.
Did I help the Mayor to be elected?
Yes I did.
Did I get what I expected ?
No, I didn't .
Does it mean nobody did ?
No.
I think a shrinking circle may get all they hoped for....at the expense of the rest of us.
Is there not something nefarious about that?
Not at all,not at all.
Ir's just a politician who has no idea what people expect.
And sadly, didn't learn.
Whose Town is it ?
Missing from the previous list is the Fab Lab project contemplated for the old library building.
There is one already in Markham with support from the Region , with our taxes and all and in partnership with York Region.
We don't know how well the concept is working out down there.
But no matter, every municipality should apparently have one of their own.
With such fabulously successful entrepreneurs for advisors ,no doubt the Midas touch will grace our efforts
When Kathy Van Nostrand called last week to invite me for coffee and five minutes , the time on the phone stretched beyond that while I was subjected to the hard sell.
Each member of Council was similarly approached.
Except of course the Mayor,whose office was committed even before the project had legs.
Kathy kept referring to "we " in her references.
I kept asking who are "we".? You and who?
She kept dodging the question.
"their " use of the town funds, $25,000 . to determine feasibility was referenced .
The Probus Presentation ,circulated by the Manager of Special Projects , to consider before dealing next Tuesday with the 100 page report written by himself plus the consultant study.
The Probus Presentation sets out the financial feasibility formula
Town to fund 50% of the cost,
Donations and fund-raising to fund 50% of the cost.
Even as I write it, I can scarce believe they put that in writing.
The sense of unreality grows as Councillors are individually lobbied and pressured from inside and out.
There is one already in Markham with support from the Region , with our taxes and all and in partnership with York Region.
We don't know how well the concept is working out down there.
But no matter, every municipality should apparently have one of their own.
With such fabulously successful entrepreneurs for advisors ,no doubt the Midas touch will grace our efforts
When Kathy Van Nostrand called last week to invite me for coffee and five minutes , the time on the phone stretched beyond that while I was subjected to the hard sell.
Each member of Council was similarly approached.
Except of course the Mayor,whose office was committed even before the project had legs.
Kathy kept referring to "we " in her references.
I kept asking who are "we".? You and who?
She kept dodging the question.
"their " use of the town funds, $25,000 . to determine feasibility was referenced .
The Probus Presentation ,circulated by the Manager of Special Projects , to consider before dealing next Tuesday with the 100 page report written by himself plus the consultant study.
The Probus Presentation sets out the financial feasibility formula
Town to fund 50% of the cost,
Donations and fund-raising to fund 50% of the cost.
Even as I write it, I can scarce believe they put that in writing.
The sense of unreality grows as Councillors are individually lobbied and pressured from inside and out.
Thursday, 30 January 2014
Hush !! Hush !! Sweet Charlotte
Yesterday Councillors received an e-mal from the specials project manager of the CAO's office.
It was noted time had elapsed since Council received the original presentation of the Hillary -
McIntyre theme park.
In preparation for next Tuesday's meeting , something known as The Prpbus Presentation " was
enclosed
A Pdf disclosed a succession of beautiful colored photos of heritage houses nestled in the midst of forests of high rises resplendent in the glory of night life in the city.
The last item of the presentation was funding.
It's a simple formula.
50% from the town.
50% from donations and fundraising.
Doesn't say who would be responsible for that,
Figures vaunted are $11 million from the town.
To be matched by donations and fund-raising.
WTF!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Council just decided to provided the Historical Society $50, thousand to cover their 2014 program.
Apparently it couldn't be raised from donations or fund-raising.
At the bottom of the employee e-mail to Councillors is the advisory clause that the communication is confidential. Not to be shared with any person.
This term of office continues to be a journey of discovery
All kinds of unexpected, uninvited , inexplicable confidences are thrust upon me
Usually behind closed doors.
Now in an e-mail from an employee.
***********
The list of contemplated mega $million projects keeps one's mind in a spin.
***************
The Province issued invitations to universities for "expressions of interest" for an outreach
program to accommodate 1000 students.
That's not a secret.
We are advised by those wiser than we , the offer of free real estate to a university could make us the newest university town in Ontario.
Whamo!!! It's in the Strategic Plan.
Of course it would not be free to us.
No time to waste confiding in stakeholders or seeking their input.
********
In the 2C development , 14.5 acres of land have been assigned service allocations and put out for bids to the development industry.
Ninety-two homes can be built on forty foot lots.
Value is what the top bidder/builder is willing to pay.
The land abuts the Stew Burnett Park.
The information is already in the public domain.
I can't tell you anything else. You are not entitled to know.
*********
The six acre unrequited school site on Mavrinac Boulevard has been valued by the owner at $6 million.
The town thinks we should get it at the price of raw land.
What do you think it would take to compel a developer to sell land worth $6million to the town for $2 million ?
You are not wrong.
But you are not entitled to know or have any input into that decision either.
****************
The list grows.
The joint works/ parks facility decision is pending at $26 million .
Youth Space needs are underway at $6 million.
The town hall renovation space was $6 million.
$300,000. was spent preparing .
Cancelled it at the point of awarding the contract.
*************
So here we are in an election year.
Don't they come wound fast.?
Now they're going to ask you what you think.
It was noted time had elapsed since Council received the original presentation of the Hillary -
McIntyre theme park.
In preparation for next Tuesday's meeting , something known as The Prpbus Presentation " was
enclosed
A Pdf disclosed a succession of beautiful colored photos of heritage houses nestled in the midst of forests of high rises resplendent in the glory of night life in the city.
The last item of the presentation was funding.
It's a simple formula.
50% from the town.
50% from donations and fundraising.
Doesn't say who would be responsible for that,
Figures vaunted are $11 million from the town.
To be matched by donations and fund-raising.
WTF!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Council just decided to provided the Historical Society $50, thousand to cover their 2014 program.
Apparently it couldn't be raised from donations or fund-raising.
At the bottom of the employee e-mail to Councillors is the advisory clause that the communication is confidential. Not to be shared with any person.
This term of office continues to be a journey of discovery
All kinds of unexpected, uninvited , inexplicable confidences are thrust upon me
Usually behind closed doors.
Now in an e-mail from an employee.
***********
The list of contemplated mega $million projects keeps one's mind in a spin.
***************
The Province issued invitations to universities for "expressions of interest" for an outreach
program to accommodate 1000 students.
That's not a secret.
We are advised by those wiser than we , the offer of free real estate to a university could make us the newest university town in Ontario.
Whamo!!! It's in the Strategic Plan.
Of course it would not be free to us.
No time to waste confiding in stakeholders or seeking their input.
********
In the 2C development , 14.5 acres of land have been assigned service allocations and put out for bids to the development industry.
Ninety-two homes can be built on forty foot lots.
Value is what the top bidder/builder is willing to pay.
The land abuts the Stew Burnett Park.
The information is already in the public domain.
I can't tell you anything else. You are not entitled to know.
*********
The six acre unrequited school site on Mavrinac Boulevard has been valued by the owner at $6 million.
The town thinks we should get it at the price of raw land.
What do you think it would take to compel a developer to sell land worth $6million to the town for $2 million ?
You are not wrong.
But you are not entitled to know or have any input into that decision either.
****************
The list grows.
The joint works/ parks facility decision is pending at $26 million .
Youth Space needs are underway at $6 million.
The town hall renovation space was $6 million.
$300,000. was spent preparing .
Cancelled it at the point of awarding the contract.
*************
So here we are in an election year.
Don't they come wound fast.?
Now they're going to ask you what you think.
Tuesday, 28 January 2014
Perception is the reality
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Let's Talk":
No, 20:50, what's "too bad" is your bias.
*************
One person's bias is another person's perspective.
*************
One person's bias is another person's perspective.
Monday, 27 January 2014
A Day in the Life Of
The bronchitis is back. Got a prescription today.
Two tablets every twelve hours.
Have to wait until ten o'clock so the repeat isn't during the night.
In the meantime, talking brings on coughing.
I have two puffers. They seem such silly things. I can't believe I'm doing it right.
When I was on my way out, a man saw me brushing the snow off my car, stopped and said
"Here let me do that . Get in the car and make yourself comfortable."
Thank you, Chris Moffat
IT BEARS REPEATING
Tim the Enchanter has left a new comment on your post "Let's Talk":
I am not involved with the Aurora Historical Society.
I am neither a supporter nor a detractor.
I do not have the facts or the inclination to express an opinion as to the quality of AHS management.
I shall leave that to others.
But I am a taxpayer.
I did not decide to give my money to the AHS.
The Town of Aurora did. (by Town I mean our council and staff)
The Town is responsible to me, as a taxpayer, for the manner in which my money is distributed.
The Town is responsible for placing the necessary conditions on any agreement involving the use of my money complete with goals and objectives that are clearly explained and not subject to interpretation.
It is NOT within the Town's mandate to use my money to ensure the continued financial viability of the AHS or any other special interest group.
However it is the Town's responsibility to ensure that the recipient of my money fulfills the agreed upon mandate by obtaining the information necessary to perform an accurate and honest performance evaluation.
If a review indicates that the AHS has not kept their end of the bargain then it is the Town's responsibility to me, the taxpayer, to discontinue funding.
If the AHS loses funding then it can be left to its members and interested parties to discuss and point fingers among themselves.
However, speaking as a taxpayer, there is no such thing as "shared blame".
The Town, and only the Town is responsible.
That there appears to be continued debate surrounding the existence of a museum, or lack of same, is the fault of the Town and no one else.
Either an agreement was made to construct or house a museum or it was not.
That there appears to be continued debate on the subject of artifact ownership is the fault of the Town and no one else.
Either the agreement includes the definition of artifact ownership or it does not.
Defenders of the Town might counter by saying that those that are not directly involved in the matter don’t appreciate the difficulties.
That one can't lay blame without having all the facts.
That there many interested parties exerting their influence.
That pressure has been brought to bear.
That new councils bring new perspectives and attitudes.
However.
These seemingly reasonable excuses are completely without merit.
The Town is not duty-bound to sign agreements with the AHS or ANY special interest group.
"We made the best deal we could under the circumstances" doesn't apply.
Compromise is not necessary.
There is no 'rock. There is no 'hard place'.
No 'devil' - no 'deep blue sea'.
The Town need only worry about the interests of the one party that matters - the taxpayer.
The grand-standing and constant squabbling that results from poorly constructed agreements is the sole responsibility of the Town.
I am not involved with the Aurora Historical Society.
I am neither a supporter nor a detractor.
I do not have the facts or the inclination to express an opinion as to the quality of AHS management.
I shall leave that to others.
But I am a taxpayer.
I did not decide to give my money to the AHS.
The Town of Aurora did. (by Town I mean our council and staff)
The Town is responsible to me, as a taxpayer, for the manner in which my money is distributed.
The Town is responsible for placing the necessary conditions on any agreement involving the use of my money complete with goals and objectives that are clearly explained and not subject to interpretation.
It is NOT within the Town's mandate to use my money to ensure the continued financial viability of the AHS or any other special interest group.
However it is the Town's responsibility to ensure that the recipient of my money fulfills the agreed upon mandate by obtaining the information necessary to perform an accurate and honest performance evaluation.
If a review indicates that the AHS has not kept their end of the bargain then it is the Town's responsibility to me, the taxpayer, to discontinue funding.
If the AHS loses funding then it can be left to its members and interested parties to discuss and point fingers among themselves.
However, speaking as a taxpayer, there is no such thing as "shared blame".
The Town, and only the Town is responsible.
That there appears to be continued debate surrounding the existence of a museum, or lack of same, is the fault of the Town and no one else.
Either an agreement was made to construct or house a museum or it was not.
That there appears to be continued debate on the subject of artifact ownership is the fault of the Town and no one else.
Either the agreement includes the definition of artifact ownership or it does not.
Defenders of the Town might counter by saying that those that are not directly involved in the matter don’t appreciate the difficulties.
That one can't lay blame without having all the facts.
That there many interested parties exerting their influence.
That pressure has been brought to bear.
That new councils bring new perspectives and attitudes.
However.
These seemingly reasonable excuses are completely without merit.
The Town is not duty-bound to sign agreements with the AHS or ANY special interest group.
"We made the best deal we could under the circumstances" doesn't apply.
Compromise is not necessary.
There is no 'rock. There is no 'hard place'.
No 'devil' - no 'deep blue sea'.
The Town need only worry about the interests of the one party that matters - the taxpayer.
The grand-standing and constant squabbling that results from poorly constructed agreements is the sole responsibility of the Town.
Sunday, 26 January 2014
Let's Talk
You can't tell a volunteer organization to fold.
I believe there is no longer any justification for a grant of taxes.
It is also obvious a structure as old as Hillary House is in constant need of maintenance .
Some projects a lot more expensive than others. Not do-able by volunteers.
Since the Historical Society seems to be willing to transfer ownership, I suggest they transfer it to Ontario Heritage Foundation.
The Sheppard house is maintained in good condition by that organization. They have tenants.
High Tor farm is in the hands of Ontario Heritage Foundation. There are no buildings . No practical use being made of it.
I doubt that was the purpose envisioned by the donor.
I believe there is no longer any justification for a grant of taxes.
It is also obvious a structure as old as Hillary House is in constant need of maintenance .
Some projects a lot more expensive than others. Not do-able by volunteers.
Since the Historical Society seems to be willing to transfer ownership, I suggest they transfer it to Ontario Heritage Foundation.
The Sheppard house is maintained in good condition by that organization. They have tenants.
High Tor farm is in the hands of Ontario Heritage Foundation. There are no buildings . No practical use being made of it.
I doubt that was the purpose envisioned by the donor.
RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARTIFACTS
John C. has left a new comment on your post "Jack And The Beanstalk":
Where did the 1400 missing artifacts go.I think David might have been right to raise concerns and that was quite some time ago.
*********************
The artifacts were the responsibility of the Historical Society. Storage had to be found when the old School was closed for renovations.
Bits and pieces picked up here and there indicate the collections had to be stashed in several places.Hillary House, basements, attics, rental storage.
I recall something about school desks disposed of because they were not authentic Aurora artifacts .
There likely just wasn't a place to put them.
The school was closed for seven years. And for four more there was no museum. The Society is a volunteer agency. Members come and members go. Presidents change.
Under the circumstances , it's not surprising the collection is not complete.
There certainly isn't anyone to blame.
There may be still a stash hidden in an attic or a basement.
I'm not speaking with any certainty
Just looking forward to getting things back on track.
Where did the 1400 missing artifacts go.I think David might have been right to raise concerns and that was quite some time ago.
*********************
The artifacts were the responsibility of the Historical Society. Storage had to be found when the old School was closed for renovations.
Bits and pieces picked up here and there indicate the collections had to be stashed in several places.Hillary House, basements, attics, rental storage.
I recall something about school desks disposed of because they were not authentic Aurora artifacts .
There likely just wasn't a place to put them.
The school was closed for seven years. And for four more there was no museum. The Society is a volunteer agency. Members come and members go. Presidents change.
Under the circumstances , it's not surprising the collection is not complete.
There certainly isn't anyone to blame.
There may be still a stash hidden in an attic or a basement.
I'm not speaking with any certainty
Just looking forward to getting things back on track.
Saturday, 25 January 2014
Micro Managing versus Micro Manipulation
A presentation was made to Council by a lovely young lady about" Outreach " from the Historical Society.
The program takes forty minutes to present. . Teachers are said to be enthusiastic.
The Historical Society has been receiving a grant of $50,000. from the town for over forty years.
It provided curator services and the museum until 2003. The grant continued when museum closed in 2003.
The Historical Society has withdrawn from responsibility for the museum and divested itself of the collection.
The town has reclaimed space for a museum, owns the collection and must provide in the 2014 budget for the service
The Culture Centre Board has heretofore been receiving town funds for heritage and culture programming.
No more heritage programming necessary. No interest in participating.
Grants to Historical Society and Culture Centtre for service no longer provided must be terminated.
The town has a full-time heritage planner. Expertise relates. Dual function suggests.
The presentation on the "Outreach program" by the lovely young lady indicates the Historical Society has a different idea.
The Outreach Program duplicates museum service.
The Historical Society's grant should end.
They comprise a hundred members. Less than half attended a recent meeting.
They own and operate Hillary House.,a federal heritage site.
Self-sufficiency should be their goal.
Continual dependence on taxation should not.
Psshaw!!
The program takes forty minutes to present. . Teachers are said to be enthusiastic.
The Historical Society has been receiving a grant of $50,000. from the town for over forty years.
It provided curator services and the museum until 2003. The grant continued when museum closed in 2003.
The Historical Society has withdrawn from responsibility for the museum and divested itself of the collection.
The town has reclaimed space for a museum, owns the collection and must provide in the 2014 budget for the service
The Culture Centre Board has heretofore been receiving town funds for heritage and culture programming.
No more heritage programming necessary. No interest in participating.
Grants to Historical Society and Culture Centtre for service no longer provided must be terminated.
The town has a full-time heritage planner. Expertise relates. Dual function suggests.
The presentation on the "Outreach program" by the lovely young lady indicates the Historical Society has a different idea.
The Outreach Program duplicates museum service.
The Historical Society's grant should end.
They comprise a hundred members. Less than half attended a recent meeting.
They own and operate Hillary House.,a federal heritage site.
Self-sufficiency should be their goal.
Continual dependence on taxation should not.
Psshaw!!
Jack And The Beanstalk
Kathy Van Nostrand called yesterday. Wanted a few minutes of my time to discuss the merits of spending millions of taxpayer resources acquiring properties on Yonge St for speculation.
The lady was very comfortable advising me of the town's best interest. Of how youth needs could be met . Notwithstanding millions currently being spent for that specific purpose.
There was a hint a museum would be part of the project. Notwithstanding the twon alreay spent millions on Church Street School for that precise purpose.
We must save the Horton house she said. John's only going to live in it for another years.A developer will scoop it up and build condos. You wouldn't want that to happen.
Kathy Van Nostrand scooped up an old house on Wellington Street and spruced it up for professional use.
Actually John could recover the value and protect the heritage by transferring ownership to the Ontario Heritage Foundation
When Sheppards Bush was donated, it was agreed the "donor" continue to occupy for five
years and he negotiated for longer still.
The last argument was it would be a good investment .The town could buy and realize substantial profit by selling it for a higher price down the line.
In the first place, speculation is not the function a municipality.
Speculation in general is frowned upon. Not quite kosher. It's the reason Capital Gains Tax was introduced half way through the last century.
Ms Van Nostrand kept referring to "we" and "us" during the conversation.
I kept asking about "we" and "us" She kept dodging.
Town funds appear to have been used by the group.
Things became even more puzzling.
The Mayor is part of the group. His office was listed in support even
before council had any idea what was afoot.
Ms Van Nostrand assured me prominent supporters.
Yes, I knew about that. Quite the strategy.
Rally support from people who know nothing at all about practical realities and have no
responsibility.
Put the Town's Mayor at the top, tag the President of the Historical Society(less than fifty active members )... with a minute element of credibility and we're off to the races.
Well Really !!!!!!!!!
BTW I wasn't the only one getting the treatment.
The lady was very comfortable advising me of the town's best interest. Of how youth needs could be met . Notwithstanding millions currently being spent for that specific purpose.
There was a hint a museum would be part of the project. Notwithstanding the twon alreay spent millions on Church Street School for that precise purpose.
We must save the Horton house she said. John's only going to live in it for another years.A developer will scoop it up and build condos. You wouldn't want that to happen.
Kathy Van Nostrand scooped up an old house on Wellington Street and spruced it up for professional use.
Actually John could recover the value and protect the heritage by transferring ownership to the Ontario Heritage Foundation
When Sheppards Bush was donated, it was agreed the "donor" continue to occupy for five
years and he negotiated for longer still.
The last argument was it would be a good investment .The town could buy and realize substantial profit by selling it for a higher price down the line.
In the first place, speculation is not the function a municipality.
Speculation in general is frowned upon. Not quite kosher. It's the reason Capital Gains Tax was introduced half way through the last century.
Ms Van Nostrand kept referring to "we" and "us" during the conversation.
I kept asking about "we" and "us" She kept dodging.
Town funds appear to have been used by the group.
Things became even more puzzling.
The Mayor is part of the group. His office was listed in support even
before council had any idea what was afoot.
Ms Van Nostrand assured me prominent supporters.
Yes, I knew about that. Quite the strategy.
Rally support from people who know nothing at all about practical realities and have no
responsibility.
Put the Town's Mayor at the top, tag the President of the Historical Society(less than fifty active members )... with a minute element of credibility and we're off to the races.
Well Really !!!!!!!!!
BTW I wasn't the only one getting the treatment.
Friday, 24 January 2014
20% Logic ..80% Emotion
I tell you because it's true and it's relevant.
Time was a zoning application had to be made for a "group home"to be located .
Every application resulted in uproar in every neighborhood.
It didn't stop until Provincial regulations removed the need for re-zoning.
It was finally understood, people with special needs are people like everyone else with the same right to live in a residential neighborhood .
They are not lesser beings.
****************
The tree bylaw was back on Tuesday with a new barrel load of twaddle.
An hour of general committee ,an hour and a half of Council spent dipping into the stew cooked up by the Environmental Advisory Committee.
The pesky bylaw was sent back to the committee.
Serves them right.
Former Councillor, many times failed candidate for Mayor, Nigel Keane was the original author.
Clear-cutting had not been observed in town . It was election time.
Under the Bylaw, Property owners were compelled to post a sign,notifying neighbors of intention to destroy or injure trees and provide opportunity to prevent the crime.
On receipt of application, staff descend upon the property with arborist. calipers and gear for
documentation.
Trees are identified by type, examined for health, measured for size and pin-pointed for location.
Permit fees are established by numbers of trees . Thousands of dollars are extracted in the process.
Recommendation to grant is made by staff .
Decision to grant ..or not... is made by Council.
Fees are not refunded ,if permit not granted.
An application came from the owner of a tree covered lot. He wanted to build a house.
He notified neighbors, hired experts, paid permit fees and waited.
Bylaw -author -Councillor Kean moved refusal.
The motion was defeated.
Everything needing to be said about lame-brained, idiotic, asinine. time-wasting tree bylaw was said in Kean's motion.
Annual applications to remove trees are in low single digits.
Mostly for heavily wooded building sites.
Such construction is mostly in estate lot subdivisions.
Mostly in the Oak RidgesMoraine and regulated by the OakRidges Moraine Act .
Provincial legislation trumps local bylaws every time
A house built in the Oak Ridge Moraine is subject to site plan approval and simplified subdivision agreement.
Removal of trees is part of the planning process. Not the tree bylaw.
Thousands of trees are planted annually in Aurora Looking down Yonge Street from Newmarket
the town cannot be seen for the trees.
Destruction and injury of trees by a horde of black-hearted villains is not of note.
Never a hint , sign twitch or twinge of wholesale slaughter of verdant companions is seen.
Would we could ,pass a Bylaw outlawing interminable debate on foolish, nonsensical rules and compulsion to punish will-o-the-wisp offenders.
The province has given the Region authority to control tree removal on golf courses.
Town movement into that domain will likely be speedily renounced.
We are a nation of laws.
Time was a zoning application had to be made for a "group home"to be located .
Every application resulted in uproar in every neighborhood.
It didn't stop until Provincial regulations removed the need for re-zoning.
It was finally understood, people with special needs are people like everyone else with the same right to live in a residential neighborhood .
They are not lesser beings.
****************
The tree bylaw was back on Tuesday with a new barrel load of twaddle.
An hour of general committee ,an hour and a half of Council spent dipping into the stew cooked up by the Environmental Advisory Committee.
The pesky bylaw was sent back to the committee.
Serves them right.
Former Councillor, many times failed candidate for Mayor, Nigel Keane was the original author.
Clear-cutting had not been observed in town . It was election time.
Under the Bylaw, Property owners were compelled to post a sign,notifying neighbors of intention to destroy or injure trees and provide opportunity to prevent the crime.
On receipt of application, staff descend upon the property with arborist. calipers and gear for
documentation.
Trees are identified by type, examined for health, measured for size and pin-pointed for location.
Permit fees are established by numbers of trees . Thousands of dollars are extracted in the process.
Recommendation to grant is made by staff .
Decision to grant ..or not... is made by Council.
Fees are not refunded ,if permit not granted.
An application came from the owner of a tree covered lot. He wanted to build a house.
He notified neighbors, hired experts, paid permit fees and waited.
Bylaw -author -Councillor Kean moved refusal.
The motion was defeated.
Everything needing to be said about lame-brained, idiotic, asinine. time-wasting tree bylaw was said in Kean's motion.
Annual applications to remove trees are in low single digits.
Mostly for heavily wooded building sites.
Such construction is mostly in estate lot subdivisions.
Mostly in the Oak RidgesMoraine and regulated by the OakRidges Moraine Act .
Provincial legislation trumps local bylaws every time
A house built in the Oak Ridge Moraine is subject to site plan approval and simplified subdivision agreement.
Removal of trees is part of the planning process. Not the tree bylaw.
Thousands of trees are planted annually in Aurora Looking down Yonge Street from Newmarket
the town cannot be seen for the trees.
Destruction and injury of trees by a horde of black-hearted villains is not of note.
Never a hint , sign twitch or twinge of wholesale slaughter of verdant companions is seen.
Would we could ,pass a Bylaw outlawing interminable debate on foolish, nonsensical rules and compulsion to punish will-o-the-wisp offenders.
The province has given the Region authority to control tree removal on golf courses.
Town movement into that domain will likely be speedily renounced.
We are a nation of laws.
Thursday, 23 January 2014
Pride Goes Before A Fall
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Pardon Me for Feeling Proud.":
It's too bad that you don't feel this regularly
****************
You have to be there to understand the pressure when a group of residents decide to pour everything they have into bludgeoning a Council to do what they want.
It's brutal.
One or more inevitably caves. It's always been that way.
Councillor Gaertner has emphatically stated .......We are here to do what the people want.
Some Councillors develop skills at speaking one way and voting another. Switch hitting without
the blink of an eye.
You can feel secure with the majority and find yourself ,without warning, hanging out to dry.
I"m not talking about myself. I've never caved. but there is a penalty and I've paid it.
I'm willing to take the risk for what I think is right. I like to live dangerously. It's the way I'm bent.... or don't bend ...in a manner of speaking.
Yes I was was proud of colleagues at Tuesday's meeting.
The elephant in the room was unmistakeable.
Council came through for the good guys.
Last night, after midnight, I watched a program called Independent Lens on PBS .
The focus was on problems of administering Berkeley University in California.
Robert Reich, Secretary of Labour in the Clinton Administration. was teaching a class about the principles of leadership. He talked about the importance of feedback and the value of having people around willing to be honest when you ask how you're doing.
Pride is not a useful attribute .
Self-respect is essential.
Feedback is critical.
It's too bad that you don't feel this regularly
****************
You have to be there to understand the pressure when a group of residents decide to pour everything they have into bludgeoning a Council to do what they want.
It's brutal.
One or more inevitably caves. It's always been that way.
Councillor Gaertner has emphatically stated .......We are here to do what the people want.
Some Councillors develop skills at speaking one way and voting another. Switch hitting without
the blink of an eye.
You can feel secure with the majority and find yourself ,without warning, hanging out to dry.
I"m not talking about myself. I've never caved. but there is a penalty and I've paid it.
I'm willing to take the risk for what I think is right. I like to live dangerously. It's the way I'm bent.... or don't bend ...in a manner of speaking.
Yes I was was proud of colleagues at Tuesday's meeting.
The elephant in the room was unmistakeable.
Council came through for the good guys.
Last night, after midnight, I watched a program called Independent Lens on PBS .
The focus was on problems of administering Berkeley University in California.
Robert Reich, Secretary of Labour in the Clinton Administration. was teaching a class about the principles of leadership. He talked about the importance of feedback and the value of having people around willing to be honest when you ask how you're doing.
Pride is not a useful attribute .
Self-respect is essential.
Feedback is critical.
Pardon Me for Feeling Proud.
Council made me proud at Tuesday's meeting.
We had been receiving e-mails ,possibly from every resident but one on Wetherfield Court the the last
couple of weeks.
A vehicle parked in the driveway of a residence exceeds the size permitted by the Zoning Bylaw.
An application for a variance to the bylaw was filed with and denied by the Committee of Adjustment.
The Committee is a quasi judicial body ,independent of municipal authority.
Refusal of an application for a variance provides a right to appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board.
It appears neighbors may have opposed the application to the Committee, as they have a right to do.
They were successful in their opposition.
Now they are requesting....forcefully....the town request status at the OMB hearing and support the Committee of Adjustment denial of the variance.
They also insist the town enforce the town's bylaw and compel removal of the offending vehicle.
The vehicle in question is required to transport residents, two of whom require wheelchairs. to get out and about.
Neighborhood indignation at having to suffer the inconvenience of seeing a bus in a driveway that exceeds the size permitted is unbounded.
Among the reasons I have given, in a civil and polite exchange for not being able to accede to their request, is the town's inability to physically compel compliance with the Bylaw.
The process requires prosecution of a charge and appearance in court to argue the merits of the Bylaw.
There's an inherent risk in following that line of action.
A court has the power to strike down a bylaw if restrictions are deemed unreasonable by the court
Conventional municipal wisdom has it that a Bylaw is only as strong as it stands up in court.
I also argued in the e-mail exchange with the residents, the town has no authority to enter private property and remove private property therefrom. In effect, that would be trespassing and theft.
Definitely not a practice to be advocated.
On Tuesday, during public forum , a neighbor argued the property is not private. It is public.for with public funds and operated by a public agency.
The agency referenced is Community Living York South.
Hundreds have reason to be profoundly thankful for Community Living.
Thousands of family members, friends and volunteers support financially and otherwise , Community Living.
Homes may be purchased or bequeathed by family members.
Billions less are spent than the cost of institutional care.
Programs planned by parents may receive partial funding.
Enlightened politicians at every level of government made the difference and transition
to privacy,dignity and normalcy.
19 Wethersfield Court is a private home. Private citizens reside at that address.
Council stood firm on Tuesday night.
Not a one of them buckled .
They made me proud.
We had been receiving e-mails ,possibly from every resident but one on Wetherfield Court the the last
couple of weeks.
A vehicle parked in the driveway of a residence exceeds the size permitted by the Zoning Bylaw.
An application for a variance to the bylaw was filed with and denied by the Committee of Adjustment.
The Committee is a quasi judicial body ,independent of municipal authority.
Refusal of an application for a variance provides a right to appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board.
It appears neighbors may have opposed the application to the Committee, as they have a right to do.
They were successful in their opposition.
Now they are requesting....forcefully....the town request status at the OMB hearing and support the Committee of Adjustment denial of the variance.
They also insist the town enforce the town's bylaw and compel removal of the offending vehicle.
The vehicle in question is required to transport residents, two of whom require wheelchairs. to get out and about.
Neighborhood indignation at having to suffer the inconvenience of seeing a bus in a driveway that exceeds the size permitted is unbounded.
Among the reasons I have given, in a civil and polite exchange for not being able to accede to their request, is the town's inability to physically compel compliance with the Bylaw.
The process requires prosecution of a charge and appearance in court to argue the merits of the Bylaw.
There's an inherent risk in following that line of action.
A court has the power to strike down a bylaw if restrictions are deemed unreasonable by the court
Conventional municipal wisdom has it that a Bylaw is only as strong as it stands up in court.
I also argued in the e-mail exchange with the residents, the town has no authority to enter private property and remove private property therefrom. In effect, that would be trespassing and theft.
Definitely not a practice to be advocated.
On Tuesday, during public forum , a neighbor argued the property is not private. It is public.for with public funds and operated by a public agency.
The agency referenced is Community Living York South.
Hundreds have reason to be profoundly thankful for Community Living.
Thousands of family members, friends and volunteers support financially and otherwise , Community Living.
Homes may be purchased or bequeathed by family members.
Billions less are spent than the cost of institutional care.
Programs planned by parents may receive partial funding.
Enlightened politicians at every level of government made the difference and transition
to privacy,dignity and normalcy.
19 Wethersfield Court is a private home. Private citizens reside at that address.
Council stood firm on Tuesday night.
Not a one of them buckled .
They made me proud.
Guest Post
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The Former Hydro Facility is Ours...We Need it":
Members of Council seem to be well intentioned, but naive. Naive when it comes to expect residents to express an opinion about just about anything, including the two multi-million dollar projects presently under consideration, the joint facility and the Heritage Park.
The public is aroused by an issue or a thing that can be identified as a matter of personal interest, often very small in the broad scheme of things.
During this term a few were able to stoke the fires of something that became huge, out of all proportion to the town. One was the Culture Centre agreement, that saw a virtual mob seize and hold the council chamber hostage to an outpouring of vitriol. This was totally unnecessary and a symptom of irrational behaviour. The same end could have been achieved through civilized intercourse, and ultimately could have resulted in a better and more meaningful agreement.
And who can forget the three-time delegation to Council in connection with the camel in the park? This was total lunacy and wasted hours of Council and staff time, with, in the end, no change taking place. A firmer hand at the tiller should have been able to control this better.
More recently the three trees occupied an inordinate amount of Council and staff time over a matter that had originally been handled with dispatch by the Director of Parks and Recreation. Unfortunately the feelings (rights?) of a few neighbours hijacked a simple administrative matter and created an expensive mountain where the smallest of molehills had existed. This should never have been permitted, and in the end the first decision was also the last, the only logical one.
Trees seem to be a sacrosanct subject, as witness the ad nauseam discussion about numbers and size and public and private property, including golf courses. A golf course is designed for whatever degree of difficulty is desired in combination with a pleasing aesthetic. Usually these represent investments of several millions of dollars and the operators of these facilities are aware of the need to care for the grasses and the ponds and the trees. They usually have experts either on staff or in a consulting capacity. For a town council to dictate to the owners of a golf course how many trees may be removed and of what size yearly is really none of the town's business and the inclusion of golf courses in the new tree by-law is simply wrong.
The town is embarking on another ill advised project, a downtown Heritage Park on Yonge Street involving a potential real estate site of some 4.2 acres that contains a National Heritage building, in dubious condition and a couple of other houses, one of which has been boarded up and empty for 20 years. It is suggested that this project could be feasible if at least half the funding ($5-$6 million) could be dug out of the provincial and/or federal government. Considering the state of the finances of these two I doubt they will be sending over a cheque via courier anytime soon. And if Aurora is going to have to finance what could be a $20 million joint facility it may find it difficult to find its half.
The point of all of this is that the populace of Aurora, as is the case pretty well everywhere, is not interested in this sort of stuff. People want their garbage collected, the snow ploughed from the roads, water, heat and hydro, parks, a safe environment in which to live and raise their children, and all of this at the lowest possible cost. They simply don't follow the blogs and the newspaper.
How many people turn out for publicized public meetings to provide input into anything? How many people even bother to vote?
There, you have answered my question.
*********************
Whatever the number is, it determines the outcome of the election.
People are reading blogs....watching Council ...talking among themselves
The elephant in the rational you present is failure to understand the significance of leadership .
A failure not entirely the fault of the current Mayor.
I knew it would be an uphill battle .
I hoped to be allowed to help.
I thought it was do-able.
But first the need had to be recognised.
Then there had to be the will.
Then courage.
Finally, respect.
Without these elements, there is no leadership.
Regrets are not useful.
Change had to be.
While things are not best they are better than they were.
I once made a claim in a campaign
As good as the best....better than the rest.
The comment on adequacy of current Councillors ... an obvious response ? ... may we expect to see your name.?.. will you care to disclose it ? on the ballot ?
Members of Council seem to be well intentioned, but naive. Naive when it comes to expect residents to express an opinion about just about anything, including the two multi-million dollar projects presently under consideration, the joint facility and the Heritage Park.
The public is aroused by an issue or a thing that can be identified as a matter of personal interest, often very small in the broad scheme of things.
During this term a few were able to stoke the fires of something that became huge, out of all proportion to the town. One was the Culture Centre agreement, that saw a virtual mob seize and hold the council chamber hostage to an outpouring of vitriol. This was totally unnecessary and a symptom of irrational behaviour. The same end could have been achieved through civilized intercourse, and ultimately could have resulted in a better and more meaningful agreement.
And who can forget the three-time delegation to Council in connection with the camel in the park? This was total lunacy and wasted hours of Council and staff time, with, in the end, no change taking place. A firmer hand at the tiller should have been able to control this better.
More recently the three trees occupied an inordinate amount of Council and staff time over a matter that had originally been handled with dispatch by the Director of Parks and Recreation. Unfortunately the feelings (rights?) of a few neighbours hijacked a simple administrative matter and created an expensive mountain where the smallest of molehills had existed. This should never have been permitted, and in the end the first decision was also the last, the only logical one.
Trees seem to be a sacrosanct subject, as witness the ad nauseam discussion about numbers and size and public and private property, including golf courses. A golf course is designed for whatever degree of difficulty is desired in combination with a pleasing aesthetic. Usually these represent investments of several millions of dollars and the operators of these facilities are aware of the need to care for the grasses and the ponds and the trees. They usually have experts either on staff or in a consulting capacity. For a town council to dictate to the owners of a golf course how many trees may be removed and of what size yearly is really none of the town's business and the inclusion of golf courses in the new tree by-law is simply wrong.
The town is embarking on another ill advised project, a downtown Heritage Park on Yonge Street involving a potential real estate site of some 4.2 acres that contains a National Heritage building, in dubious condition and a couple of other houses, one of which has been boarded up and empty for 20 years. It is suggested that this project could be feasible if at least half the funding ($5-$6 million) could be dug out of the provincial and/or federal government. Considering the state of the finances of these two I doubt they will be sending over a cheque via courier anytime soon. And if Aurora is going to have to finance what could be a $20 million joint facility it may find it difficult to find its half.
The point of all of this is that the populace of Aurora, as is the case pretty well everywhere, is not interested in this sort of stuff. People want their garbage collected, the snow ploughed from the roads, water, heat and hydro, parks, a safe environment in which to live and raise their children, and all of this at the lowest possible cost. They simply don't follow the blogs and the newspaper.
How many people turn out for publicized public meetings to provide input into anything? How many people even bother to vote?
There, you have answered my question.
*********************
Whatever the number is, it determines the outcome of the election.
People are reading blogs....watching Council ...talking among themselves
The elephant in the rational you present is failure to understand the significance of leadership .
A failure not entirely the fault of the current Mayor.
I knew it would be an uphill battle .
I hoped to be allowed to help.
I thought it was do-able.
But first the need had to be recognised.
Then there had to be the will.
Then courage.
Finally, respect.
Without these elements, there is no leadership.
Regrets are not useful.
Change had to be.
While things are not best they are better than they were.
I once made a claim in a campaign
As good as the best....better than the rest.
The comment on adequacy of current Councillors ... an obvious response ? ... may we expect to see your name.?.. will you care to disclose it ? on the ballot ?
Wednesday, 22 January 2014
The Former Hydro Facility is Ours...We Need it
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "A Pox On The Joint Facility":
15:26 shows his or her ignorance of the topic.
The Hydro Building is not being used by the cadets only. The building is the armoury for a Canadian Army Militia Unit. The Queen's York Rangers. When I was in the militia, there were parades 2 nights a week (usually Tuesday and Thursday) and most Saturdays. Some weekends there are full weekend exercises. The cadets would have their parade once a week.
The building is used to store vehicles, weapons, ammunition as well as office space, parade space, etc.
I am not sure about the QYR, but there is probably a number of full CAF staff attached to the unit as well and they use the building space as their workspace.
What difference does it matter how many hours it is in use. It is no longer available.
*****************
How much or how little QYR uses our building is not of much interest to me as an Aurora Councillor.
It's a federal responsibility. I'm content for the feds to take care of their business.
An Aurora Councillor's responsibility is to do the best for Aurora residents.
A space needs study, done after Hydro was sold and Power Stream vacated , recommended the property nut be sold. . It should be kept and used for town use.
The building housed twenty-seven jobs and had an assessed value to produce $69,000 a year.
No decision was made to sell .
Neither was the building declared surplus.
It was occupied by the parks department.
No public statement was made that the building was available for lease.
No opportunity to compete for the advantage.
The town did not sell the building. For a time we used it to good advantage for parks and other purposes.
In the same way Church Street School was slyly diverted from its intended use, the Hydro Building was leased to the Federal government.
QYR had adequate accommodation in the Armories drill shed , It was built and used a hundred years for the purpose.
It's still there.
We own the hydro building.
The Feds are another level of government
There is no moral imperative to honor that lease.
Responsibility for Aurora is ours . The Federal government shares that responsibility
I see no reason why the lease for the Hydro building should not be terminated and the Rangers go home.
An Aurora Councillor who holds otherwise is more concerned about QYR and votes they might lose than they are about votes they won in the last election to represent the town's best interest .
We did not burn the bridge behind us with a property lease .
Possession (ownership) is nine-tenths of the law.
.
15:26 shows his or her ignorance of the topic.
The Hydro Building is not being used by the cadets only. The building is the armoury for a Canadian Army Militia Unit. The Queen's York Rangers. When I was in the militia, there were parades 2 nights a week (usually Tuesday and Thursday) and most Saturdays. Some weekends there are full weekend exercises. The cadets would have their parade once a week.
The building is used to store vehicles, weapons, ammunition as well as office space, parade space, etc.
I am not sure about the QYR, but there is probably a number of full CAF staff attached to the unit as well and they use the building space as their workspace.
What difference does it matter how many hours it is in use. It is no longer available.
*****************
How much or how little QYR uses our building is not of much interest to me as an Aurora Councillor.
It's a federal responsibility. I'm content for the feds to take care of their business.
An Aurora Councillor's responsibility is to do the best for Aurora residents.
A space needs study, done after Hydro was sold and Power Stream vacated , recommended the property nut be sold. . It should be kept and used for town use.
The building housed twenty-seven jobs and had an assessed value to produce $69,000 a year.
No decision was made to sell .
Neither was the building declared surplus.
It was occupied by the parks department.
No public statement was made that the building was available for lease.
No opportunity to compete for the advantage.
The town did not sell the building. For a time we used it to good advantage for parks and other purposes.
In the same way Church Street School was slyly diverted from its intended use, the Hydro Building was leased to the Federal government.
QYR had adequate accommodation in the Armories drill shed , It was built and used a hundred years for the purpose.
It's still there.
We own the hydro building.
The Feds are another level of government
There is no moral imperative to honor that lease.
Responsibility for Aurora is ours . The Federal government shares that responsibility
I see no reason why the lease for the Hydro building should not be terminated and the Rangers go home.
An Aurora Councillor who holds otherwise is more concerned about QYR and votes they might lose than they are about votes they won in the last election to represent the town's best interest .
We did not burn the bridge behind us with a property lease .
Possession (ownership) is nine-tenths of the law.
.
More About The Meeting last night
It was a long meeting laast night and we didn't finish the agenda. There was a presentation on clear bags. Not sure why that was needed but it was on invitation of The Mayor.
Councillor Abel's list of congratulations and events attended in the community was not as long as usual but the Mayor's list was longer than usual
This bit of business was new to me when I came back in 2003. It has nothing to do with
town business.It's at the beginning of the agenda. So there's alwasy time for that ,no matter what else doesn't get attention.
A lovely young woman employed by the Historical Society explained a new outreach program to elementary schools from the Society.
They don't have the collection any more. Hillary House is proposed to be unloaded. The building may not remain upright much longer without substantial funds for foundation restoration
Whatever museum service evolves will be the Town's financial responsibility. The Historical Society appears to be developing a new reason for being . No doubt contemplated with continued financial support from the town.
The outreach program described takes forty minutes to deliver. Teachers are very appreciative.
The program used to be provided by the curator whose job was funded by the town when we had a museum.
The curator also used to provide research for the planning department into old properties.
We have a full-time planner in the planning department doing that now.
That's all about that for now.
Bill Gates is on Charlie Rose on PBS for an hour from 5 to 6 p.m.
Councillor Abel's list of congratulations and events attended in the community was not as long as usual but the Mayor's list was longer than usual
This bit of business was new to me when I came back in 2003. It has nothing to do with
town business.It's at the beginning of the agenda. So there's alwasy time for that ,no matter what else doesn't get attention.
A lovely young woman employed by the Historical Society explained a new outreach program to elementary schools from the Society.
They don't have the collection any more. Hillary House is proposed to be unloaded. The building may not remain upright much longer without substantial funds for foundation restoration
Whatever museum service evolves will be the Town's financial responsibility. The Historical Society appears to be developing a new reason for being . No doubt contemplated with continued financial support from the town.
The outreach program described takes forty minutes to deliver. Teachers are very appreciative.
The program used to be provided by the curator whose job was funded by the town when we had a museum.
The curator also used to provide research for the planning department into old properties.
We have a full-time planner in the planning department doing that now.
That's all about that for now.
Bill Gates is on Charlie Rose on PBS for an hour from 5 to 6 p.m.
A Pox On The Joint Facility
The comment about contracted town services is to the point. We need more observations like that.
The town contracts out out snow plowing , street maintenance , street lighting and sundry other services.
Logic dictates savings from flexibility of manpower and equipment .
Vacations,statutory holidays, sickdays , funerals, time off in lieu ,charity golf tournaments , week-ends, sleep, create significant down-time for space, equipment,light,heat and washroom facilities in town facilities . The more facilities you have multiplies down time.
The same principle applies for ice rinks , baseball diamonds, soccer pitches, tennis courts, schools, parks, and swimming pools, to name but a few.
So the question about needing more facilities and manpower ,while contracting out services is valid.
Contracts should mean reduced requirements for facilities. Manpower contracts mean considerably less overhead and greater control.
It should mean reduced work load due to less building and subdivision development leading to less revenue should be offset by less expenditures.
It doesn't always.
Last year , in the budget approval was given for two contract employees in the works department to become full-time because they weren't getting benefits other employees were and that wasn't fair..
Service contractors are provided free space for vehicles and equipment because well I guess because the space is there.
But if we have surplus space for contractors to use, why are we in such desperate need for new space at a cost of $26 million dollars , built on a shelf , jutting out into a ravine, edging into a flood plain.
We collect heritage architecture salvage. It was stored in the yard of the former hydro facility.
When the parks department was evicted to make room for the federal department of national defense to use for the week-end soldiers, we paid to transport the "salvage " to the works yard.
The new joint facility will accommodate "heritage salvage", otherwise known as construction debris. We don't need it . It's there for anyone who might.
Accommodation cost.... $181,000.
In a heavy snowfall, accumulated snow is removed from downtown streets. A snow "dump " previously identified as a snow melt treatment facility , at a cost close to $900,000 was included in the new facility. It's removal from the $24 million helped to bring the price to $19 million.
Council deferred the project a couple of times but agreed to include it in the new facility
Snow melting equipment would cost a fraction of the cost of removing snow from the core and require only enough space to park it.
Council agreed we should have a green roof on the facility and a platinum standard of construction We should "lead the way." So that's in the cost.
Saints preserve us...even the Conservation Authority couldn't afford that extravagance.
For me to introduce these pesky little details into a discussion about the "desperately needed "
new facility would lead to an accusation of micro-managing ,don't you know. Councillor Abel tossed out the term again last night,
Along with a comment about how easy it is to criticize while we never hear anything positive or constructive while looking sidewise in my direction.
The Taj Mahal of a works building will be debt financed. Money costs money, It's not a factor in the estimate.
Last night, discretion was the better part of wisdom. Council agreed to defer for a month while throwing out the challenge for options.
It's time for observations like the comment received this morning.
It's time for councillors to consider rent from the federal government for the hydro property, cost of maintenance, loss of tax revenue, and measures against the cost of new space for works and parks.
Because you know... if we took back our property from the feds, there would be no need to move from our present location to incur twenty-six million dollar debt for a joint facility for parks and
works.
Parks could move out of their space and works could take it over.
A new building could be constructed at a fraction of the cost.
That's a fact and an option, my friends.
Council has not sought an opportunity to drill down to real cost.
A "workshop" was arranged ,with architect and engineer on hand to help glide over the bumps and Councillor Thompson thoroughly briefed.
The vote to recommend was split , with the Mayor breaking the tie.
On a project of this dimension ,that's political suicide.
There's no passion in the community about a public works and parks facility.
No appeal to social needs of the community to justify the investment
The town contracts out out snow plowing , street maintenance , street lighting and sundry other services.
Logic dictates savings from flexibility of manpower and equipment .
Vacations,statutory holidays, sickdays , funerals, time off in lieu ,charity golf tournaments , week-ends, sleep, create significant down-time for space, equipment,light,heat and washroom facilities in town facilities . The more facilities you have multiplies down time.
The same principle applies for ice rinks , baseball diamonds, soccer pitches, tennis courts, schools, parks, and swimming pools, to name but a few.
So the question about needing more facilities and manpower ,while contracting out services is valid.
Contracts should mean reduced requirements for facilities. Manpower contracts mean considerably less overhead and greater control.
It should mean reduced work load due to less building and subdivision development leading to less revenue should be offset by less expenditures.
It doesn't always.
Last year , in the budget approval was given for two contract employees in the works department to become full-time because they weren't getting benefits other employees were and that wasn't fair..
Service contractors are provided free space for vehicles and equipment because well I guess because the space is there.
But if we have surplus space for contractors to use, why are we in such desperate need for new space at a cost of $26 million dollars , built on a shelf , jutting out into a ravine, edging into a flood plain.
We collect heritage architecture salvage. It was stored in the yard of the former hydro facility.
When the parks department was evicted to make room for the federal department of national defense to use for the week-end soldiers, we paid to transport the "salvage " to the works yard.
The new joint facility will accommodate "heritage salvage", otherwise known as construction debris. We don't need it . It's there for anyone who might.
Accommodation cost.... $181,000.
In a heavy snowfall, accumulated snow is removed from downtown streets. A snow "dump " previously identified as a snow melt treatment facility , at a cost close to $900,000 was included in the new facility. It's removal from the $24 million helped to bring the price to $19 million.
Council deferred the project a couple of times but agreed to include it in the new facility
Snow melting equipment would cost a fraction of the cost of removing snow from the core and require only enough space to park it.
Council agreed we should have a green roof on the facility and a platinum standard of construction We should "lead the way." So that's in the cost.
Saints preserve us...even the Conservation Authority couldn't afford that extravagance.
For me to introduce these pesky little details into a discussion about the "desperately needed "
new facility would lead to an accusation of micro-managing ,don't you know. Councillor Abel tossed out the term again last night,
Along with a comment about how easy it is to criticize while we never hear anything positive or constructive while looking sidewise in my direction.
The Taj Mahal of a works building will be debt financed. Money costs money, It's not a factor in the estimate.
Last night, discretion was the better part of wisdom. Council agreed to defer for a month while throwing out the challenge for options.
It's time for observations like the comment received this morning.
It's time for councillors to consider rent from the federal government for the hydro property, cost of maintenance, loss of tax revenue, and measures against the cost of new space for works and parks.
Because you know... if we took back our property from the feds, there would be no need to move from our present location to incur twenty-six million dollar debt for a joint facility for parks and
works.
Parks could move out of their space and works could take it over.
A new building could be constructed at a fraction of the cost.
That's a fact and an option, my friends.
Council has not sought an opportunity to drill down to real cost.
A "workshop" was arranged ,with architect and engineer on hand to help glide over the bumps and Councillor Thompson thoroughly briefed.
The vote to recommend was split , with the Mayor breaking the tie.
On a project of this dimension ,that's political suicide.
There's no passion in the community about a public works and parks facility.
No appeal to social needs of the community to justify the investment
MORNING SMILE OF RE-ASSURANCE
FOR OURS IS THE KINGDOM ,THE POWER AND THE GLORY
AND VERILY WE SAY UNTO YOU
WE WILL GIVE YOU AN EXCEPTIONAL QUALITY OF LIFE SUCH AS YOU NEVER DREAMED OF
IF WE HAVE TO BANKRUPT YOU IN THE PROCESS
BECAUSE WE SAID SO IN THE STRATEGIC PLAN
DON"T-CHA KNOW
CHA-CHA-CHA
To be continued:
AND VERILY WE SAY UNTO YOU
WE WILL GIVE YOU AN EXCEPTIONAL QUALITY OF LIFE SUCH AS YOU NEVER DREAMED OF
IF WE HAVE TO BANKRUPT YOU IN THE PROCESS
BECAUSE WE SAID SO IN THE STRATEGIC PLAN
DON"T-CHA KNOW
CHA-CHA-CHA
To be continued:
Monday, 20 January 2014
The Labourer is worthy of hers hire
I took poetic license with the the multiplying factor in the last post. It should have been six to eight times ....not eight to ten.
A candidate once made council pay a campaign issue. He said they shouldn't get any.
He didn't get elected.
He didn't get elected.
A couple of immediate and predictable responses received....one calling me a hypocrite ....the other that I'm ready to fight against every expense except Councillor salaries.
There hasn't been a fight and there isn't one now.
These days, there's very little that can't be talked about
Why can't we talk about what a Councillor should be paid without getting twisted out of shape?
Who should talk about it if not someone who's had the experience?
Who should talk about it if not someone who's had the experience?
Why should a committee of residents , needing support from staff be superior.
Council still has to make the decision.
Council still has to make the decision.
Why do we go through the ridiculous rig-a-ma-role of make the decision before an election so that we can pretend to be deciding for somebody else.
What's that about?
What's that about?
A candidate once made council pay a campaign issue. He said they shouldn't get any.
People scoffed.
He didn't get elected.
In another election, a candidates said he was running for the money .
He didn't get elected.
When I brought up the issue last week the Mayor said he agreed.
He discussed it with someone who had done a study, which concluded since the job was part-time , a similar position should be selected and if the salary was $100,000. a Councillor should receive half of that.
He discussed it with someone who had done a study, which concluded since the job was part-time , a similar position should be selected and if the salary was $100,000. a Councillor should receive half of that.
The Mayor said he would support that "for the next council"
Yeah right...I thought... you didn't suggest the Mayor's increase should be deferred to the next term.
Someone said Markham Ward Councillors are paid $65,000.
I noted Markham Councillors also receive funds to rent an office and two Councillors share an administrative assistant. Calls are taken and problems attended on behalf of the Councillor.
I noted Markham Councillors also receive funds to rent an office and two Councillors share an administrative assistant. Calls are taken and problems attended on behalf of the Councillor.
An Aurora Councillor's salary is around $25,000. A flat mileage payment brings it to $27,000.
No office, no administrative assistant ,no benefits , no life insurance or severance on retirement or defeat.
No office, no administrative assistant ,no benefits , no life insurance or severance on retirement or defeat.
What is the job about ?
Meetings you know about.... like in a fish bowl. Some function better in that venue than others.
Members serve on advisory committees and attend more meetings.
Responding to calls from constituents and following up with whatever assistance is required.
Attendance at community events. People like to see an interest from Council.
I respond to e-mails, phone calls and write a blog post every day...sometimes more than one.
Criticism goes with the job. A necessary occupational hazard. Nobody enjoys it. Neither are they compelled to be in office.
Despite a variety of opinion about how this or that Councillor performs, it must be said,
Aurora Councillors. the only ones I know, are a conscientious group.
They attend meetings....come prepared....read the reports .. and participate.
They do what they committed to do , were elected to do ...they should be paid accordingly.
Meetings you know about.... like in a fish bowl. Some function better in that venue than others.
Members serve on advisory committees and attend more meetings.
Responding to calls from constituents and following up with whatever assistance is required.
Attendance at community events. People like to see an interest from Council.
I respond to e-mails, phone calls and write a blog post every day...sometimes more than one.
Criticism goes with the job. A necessary occupational hazard. Nobody enjoys it. Neither are they compelled to be in office.
Despite a variety of opinion about how this or that Councillor performs, it must be said,
Aurora Councillors. the only ones I know, are a conscientious group.
They attend meetings....come prepared....read the reports .. and participate.
They do what they committed to do , were elected to do ...they should be paid accordingly.
What's Wrong With this Picture
Budget again ....9 a.m. Monday.
i will rise at 6.30 a.m.
Shower,dress, make-up ,breakfast, clear snow off the car
If it was easy I would still be in full time employmrnt.
I' m not being paid for it either.
I wont lie. As the day wears on , resentment will grow.
This second full day budget session is not for the convenience of "part-time" Councillors.
Staff will be handily accommodated.
The budget will be completed and time cleared for mid-winter break .
I raised the issue of Councillor salaries at the last budget meeting. Created a slight stir but
that's all.
Councillor remuneration has kept pace with outside workers union rates .....not management level.
It's been that way for ten years.
Except for the position of Mator.
An ad hoc committee recommended $9.thousand dollar increase for th at office and full employee benefits....health..dental...life insurance, long-term disability...etcetera..etcetera
Councillors can have benefits as well as long as they pay for them.
No recognition for increased responsibility or time demands .
Minimum wage ....nada benefits....accountable for a budget pf $75 million and authority
over staff earning eight to ten times as much.
Sunday, 19 January 2014
The Mayor's Comment
The quote attributed to the Mayor was not made during last week's committee meeting.
The insane hokum scheme to remove three Yonge Street frontage properties from assessment rolls
was not discussed.
The Report was received for information; to return mid-February for deliberation.
It may or may not be the decision at Tuesday's council.
I detect a level of ,shall I say, dismay, among Councillors .....confusion about when the considerable work the report represents was authorized.
I chaired the meeting. My job was to move the agenda forward smoothly, ensuring each members had opportunity to state position on matters before them.
It means I don't participate in the debate. I do not stir things up from the chair.
When the Strategic Plan was updated and enfolded into the Official Plan and adopted by Council, the CAO expressed gratification that Council had placed such confidence in staff.
I did not vote to adopt the update . We already had a plan. All it needed was a review and determination if it still fit. . If not make the necessary adjustments to bring it up to date.
$80,000. for a consultant study was an unneccessary extravagance in my view.
Not having voted to approve and cringing at the juvenile and excessive language and unreal objectives of the new edition, I emained consistent.
I was concerned by the CAO 's understanding the green light to bring the airy-fairy crazy stuff
to fruition had been given by adoption of the plan.
I cautioned Council on what I perceived to be mis-perception on both sides.
I was advised of the need to move forward and get with the program.
Ding Dong Ding Dong
Council continued down the road divesting themselves of authority all the way ....surrendering the town's future to others.
Spending authority for the CAO was increased from $50, thousand to $100, thousand.
$200.thousand had been recommended.
The CAO had now received authority and resources to bring objectives of the Strategic Plan to reality .
No need to slow things down with reference to Council for approvals.
Lickety split ...that's the ticket.
Heritage Theme park, Fab Lab, Post Secondary Institution(University) , Cultural Tsunami, Town Hall Renovation , Joint Works and Parks facility are all objectives intended to provide an exceptional quality of life for all .
All straight from the pages of the lofty and superior plan .
The report tabled on Tuesday was written by the Special Project Planner signed by the CAO. and had a consultant study attached.
The Exalted Executive Leadership Team apparently had no role to play.
The Mayor has apparently swallowed holus bolus,hook,line and sinker , the plan of assembly of millions of dollars worth of real estate To find out later how it might be developed into a mini northern Disneyland in the glow of the Aura of Aurora.
All ya gotta do is throw money at stuff and something is bound to happen is a philosophy not heard
often in political circles.
It might be reasonable to assume the remark was made to The Banner
This may be an epiphany for Council.
One can only hope.
To be sure, it's late in the day.
But not too late.
There's still time to redeem commitment.
The insane hokum scheme to remove three Yonge Street frontage properties from assessment rolls
was not discussed.
The Report was received for information; to return mid-February for deliberation.
It may or may not be the decision at Tuesday's council.
I detect a level of ,shall I say, dismay, among Councillors .....confusion about when the considerable work the report represents was authorized.
I chaired the meeting. My job was to move the agenda forward smoothly, ensuring each members had opportunity to state position on matters before them.
It means I don't participate in the debate. I do not stir things up from the chair.
When the Strategic Plan was updated and enfolded into the Official Plan and adopted by Council, the CAO expressed gratification that Council had placed such confidence in staff.
I did not vote to adopt the update . We already had a plan. All it needed was a review and determination if it still fit. . If not make the necessary adjustments to bring it up to date.
$80,000. for a consultant study was an unneccessary extravagance in my view.
Not having voted to approve and cringing at the juvenile and excessive language and unreal objectives of the new edition, I emained consistent.
I was concerned by the CAO 's understanding the green light to bring the airy-fairy crazy stuff
to fruition had been given by adoption of the plan.
I cautioned Council on what I perceived to be mis-perception on both sides.
I was advised of the need to move forward and get with the program.
Ding Dong Ding Dong
Council continued down the road divesting themselves of authority all the way ....surrendering the town's future to others.
Spending authority for the CAO was increased from $50, thousand to $100, thousand.
$200.thousand had been recommended.
The CAO had now received authority and resources to bring objectives of the Strategic Plan to reality .
No need to slow things down with reference to Council for approvals.
Lickety split ...that's the ticket.
Heritage Theme park, Fab Lab, Post Secondary Institution(University) , Cultural Tsunami, Town Hall Renovation , Joint Works and Parks facility are all objectives intended to provide an exceptional quality of life for all .
All straight from the pages of the lofty and superior plan .
The report tabled on Tuesday was written by the Special Project Planner signed by the CAO. and had a consultant study attached.
The Exalted Executive Leadership Team apparently had no role to play.
The Mayor has apparently swallowed holus bolus,hook,line and sinker , the plan of assembly of millions of dollars worth of real estate To find out later how it might be developed into a mini northern Disneyland in the glow of the Aura of Aurora.
All ya gotta do is throw money at stuff and something is bound to happen is a philosophy not heard
often in political circles.
It might be reasonable to assume the remark was made to The Banner
This may be an epiphany for Council.
One can only hope.
To be sure, it's late in the day.
But not too late.
There's still time to redeem commitment.
Saturday, 18 January 2014
Certainly you have a right.
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Will The Information be Forthcoming?????":
Evelyn
Communications enters every facet to town business. It is becoming obvious that the current state of affairs is not cutting it. But, are you going to get into hot water because the complaints are landing on your Blog? I know we aren't allowed to criticize staff, but is a department fair game ?
**********
Communications is a town service. You do have a right to declare satisfaction/ dis-satisfaction with a town service. Any time you don't think you are getting value for your tax dollar you have a right to say so.
Mr. Simanovskis , Director of Infrastructure and Environmental Services, formerly known as Public Works, has a question at the bottom of his e-mail communication asking people to let him know how "we are doing".
Obviously the town needs feedback.
I'm not sure this blog is the best place to accomplish that.
The comments are anonymous and nobody is compelled to read it.
An email to the Mayor and Councillors, noting it is intended as confidential , would be far more effective.
And it is private. An e-mail solely to the Mayor or a Councillor is even more private.
Councillors also need to know what you are thinking about things.If they don't hear, they assume everything is fine.
Communications has four and a half people in the department.The person at the top came from the Region "on loan" and eventually became manager.
I believe there's a request for an additional staff person in the budget.
I am not well-informed about web sites and such. I don't have to be . I am in the ring.
I depend on what taxpayers have to say to know how well received the service is.
That's the test.
Comments indicate users are under- impressed.
Streaming of committee meetings is a problem. Last week it didn't happen.Don't know why.
Blog comments assure people they are not alone.
Unfortunately since they're anonymous, it might only be one person...who would know for sure.?
An e-mail to the Mayor and or a Councillor is the most effective communication
Then I know I'm not the only one getting it.
Prior to 2009 Communications were under the jurisdiction of the Director of Corporate and Legislative Services. In the first re-organization in the last term, recommended of course by a consultant, responsibility was transferred to the CAO"s department.
An e-mail to the CAO expressing dis-satisfaction with the service would not be remiss. But it would not be as private as an e-mail to your Mayor or Councillor.
If you are really upset you can let one and all know about it.
Just don't be abusive, It's a real turn off. Not likely to be producive.
Evelyn
Communications enters every facet to town business. It is becoming obvious that the current state of affairs is not cutting it. But, are you going to get into hot water because the complaints are landing on your Blog? I know we aren't allowed to criticize staff, but is a department fair game ?
**********
Communications is a town service. You do have a right to declare satisfaction/ dis-satisfaction with a town service. Any time you don't think you are getting value for your tax dollar you have a right to say so.
Mr. Simanovskis , Director of Infrastructure and Environmental Services, formerly known as Public Works, has a question at the bottom of his e-mail communication asking people to let him know how "we are doing".
Obviously the town needs feedback.
I'm not sure this blog is the best place to accomplish that.
The comments are anonymous and nobody is compelled to read it.
An email to the Mayor and Councillors, noting it is intended as confidential , would be far more effective.
And it is private. An e-mail solely to the Mayor or a Councillor is even more private.
Councillors also need to know what you are thinking about things.If they don't hear, they assume everything is fine.
Communications has four and a half people in the department.The person at the top came from the Region "on loan" and eventually became manager.
I believe there's a request for an additional staff person in the budget.
I am not well-informed about web sites and such. I don't have to be . I am in the ring.
I depend on what taxpayers have to say to know how well received the service is.
That's the test.
Comments indicate users are under- impressed.
Streaming of committee meetings is a problem. Last week it didn't happen.Don't know why.
Blog comments assure people they are not alone.
Unfortunately since they're anonymous, it might only be one person...who would know for sure.?
An e-mail to the Mayor and or a Councillor is the most effective communication
Then I know I'm not the only one getting it.
Prior to 2009 Communications were under the jurisdiction of the Director of Corporate and Legislative Services. In the first re-organization in the last term, recommended of course by a consultant, responsibility was transferred to the CAO"s department.
An e-mail to the CAO expressing dis-satisfaction with the service would not be remiss. But it would not be as private as an e-mail to your Mayor or Councillor.
If you are really upset you can let one and all know about it.
Just don't be abusive, It's a real turn off. Not likely to be producive.
Will The Information be Forthcoming?????
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Not Here..Not Now...Not Bloody Likely":
"A tourist attration (sic) intended to put Aurora on the map as Heritage Capital of Ontario ,if not Canada, if not the world if not the Universe."
Nobody likes a smartass.
**************
The above is only partly true.
***************
Drafts od two Notices of Motion:
Moved by Councillor Buck Seconded by------------------
Whereas Council has eliminated a Director position in the interest of economy.
And whereas, economy is achieved by greater efficiency and reduction in expenditure.
And whereas although title of Director is removed, responsibilities remain and no public report hto establish efficiencies and saving is available
And whereas ,the former Director was due to retire within twelve months and a severance
package is normal to avoid a complaint of unfair dismissal
Now therefore be it hereby resolved:
The Executive Leadership Team be directed to report specific efficiencies and savings anticipated by the elimination of the Director's position, requiring a severance package (payout with no return) within twelve months of the director's retirement.
**********************
Draft of second Notice of Motion
Moved by Councillor Buck Seconded by --------------
Whereas 2014 is municipal election year , registration for candidates are already open and planning for the election underway.
Whereas the Town Clerk is Elections Officer and heretofore Director of Corporate and Legislative Services .
Whereas the position of Director of Corporate and Legislative Sercies has been eliminated for the purpose of eonomy and a severance package granted.
Whereas the next nine months are required to plan and manage the town's election.
Now therefore be it hereby resolved ;
The Executive Leadership Team be directed to publicly report how resources to plan and organize
the municipal election will be available at the same time economy is achieved with the elimination of the position of the Director with the relevant skills necessary.
***********************
Neither of the resolutions will reach the table for debate and decision without a seconder.
I have sought to be informed of the basis of Council's decision without success.
My intent is to be publicly informed of the whys and wherefores of a decision to eliminate a Director's position.
Despite the services of a Communications Division, I am not aware relevant information has been provided.
Certainly nothing to indicate efficiency and or economy can be anticipated all things considered.
"A tourist attration (sic) intended to put Aurora on the map as Heritage Capital of Ontario ,if not Canada, if not the world if not the Universe."
Nobody likes a smartass.
**************
The above is only partly true.
***************
Drafts od two Notices of Motion:
Moved by Councillor Buck Seconded by------------------
Whereas Council has eliminated a Director position in the interest of economy.
And whereas, economy is achieved by greater efficiency and reduction in expenditure.
And whereas although title of Director is removed, responsibilities remain and no public report hto establish efficiencies and saving is available
And whereas ,the former Director was due to retire within twelve months and a severance
package is normal to avoid a complaint of unfair dismissal
Now therefore be it hereby resolved:
The Executive Leadership Team be directed to report specific efficiencies and savings anticipated by the elimination of the Director's position, requiring a severance package (payout with no return) within twelve months of the director's retirement.
**********************
Draft of second Notice of Motion
Moved by Councillor Buck Seconded by --------------
Whereas 2014 is municipal election year , registration for candidates are already open and planning for the election underway.
Whereas the Town Clerk is Elections Officer and heretofore Director of Corporate and Legislative Services .
Whereas the position of Director of Corporate and Legislative Sercies has been eliminated for the purpose of eonomy and a severance package granted.
Whereas the next nine months are required to plan and manage the town's election.
Now therefore be it hereby resolved ;
The Executive Leadership Team be directed to publicly report how resources to plan and organize
the municipal election will be available at the same time economy is achieved with the elimination of the position of the Director with the relevant skills necessary.
***********************
Neither of the resolutions will reach the table for debate and decision without a seconder.
I have sought to be informed of the basis of Council's decision without success.
My intent is to be publicly informed of the whys and wherefores of a decision to eliminate a Director's position.
Despite the services of a Communications Division, I am not aware relevant information has been provided.
Certainly nothing to indicate efficiency and or economy can be anticipated all things considered.
Friday, 17 January 2014
Not Here..Not Now...Not Bloody Likely
Christopher Watts posted the website here for the Staff Report presented to Council on Tuesday to be received as information. It recommends something called a Heritage Park on Yonge Street frontage. A tourist attration intended to put Aurora on the map as Heritage Capital of Ontario ,if not Canada, if not the world if not the Universe.
Maybe Richard Branson can be persuaded to make it a destination for an international balloon trip.
That's all you get.
This blog will not be used to promote the scheme.
The idea is an embarrassment.
Publicly suggested price of $1,3 million dollars for the Horton House that calls for the owner to continue to live in the house, paying rent, to provide protection for the property until a plan is complete is utterly bereft of any kind of sense.
Not a scintilla....soupcon...hint...or trace.
Nothing ....Nil ....Nada....Zilch...Zero
Get outta here.
Maybe Richard Branson can be persuaded to make it a destination for an international balloon trip.
That's all you get.
This blog will not be used to promote the scheme.
The idea is an embarrassment.
Publicly suggested price of $1,3 million dollars for the Horton House that calls for the owner to continue to live in the house, paying rent, to provide protection for the property until a plan is complete is utterly bereft of any kind of sense.
Not a scintilla....soupcon...hint...or trace.
Nothing ....Nil ....Nada....Zilch...Zero
Get outta here.
Memory...Peculiar to the owner thereoff
Recently I was told I have a phenomenal memory. It's been said before. I think it must be true.
The thing is, mine is the only memory I know. I've never thought it was different.
It explains why I might have had unreal expectations over the years. Particularly with my late husband. If he didn't remember things the way I did I thought he was deliberately trying to annoy me.
It must have made me difficult to live with.
This is not a lament or a confession.
A good memory is an asset, no doubt about that. It's not perfect re-call.
I think maybe the greatest advantage is being able to connect the dots and string happenings together ending with a picture spanning a long period.
Kind of like a gigantic mentally completed jigsaw puzzle.
The challenge in politics lies in getting other people to see what's in my head.They don't have to.
***********8
Council has been receiving a steady stream of e-mails from neighbors of Wethersfield Court over the last three days,
A bus parked in a driveway is bigger than zoning permits.
Neighbors complained.
Owner applied for a variance to the Committee of Adjustment.
Variance denied..
OMB appeal triggered.
Neighbors feel the town should support their position at the OMB and have bus removed forthwith.
I've been responding with reasons why I can't support that.
The CofA and OMB have been in place since Zoning.
Takes decisions out of the political.
I think that's a good thing.
**********************
Over the week-end I will re-tell the story again about the Petlovany property complete with sequel, before Council tackles the decision about building a Joint Use facility in a ravine nearby
The thing is, mine is the only memory I know. I've never thought it was different.
It explains why I might have had unreal expectations over the years. Particularly with my late husband. If he didn't remember things the way I did I thought he was deliberately trying to annoy me.
It must have made me difficult to live with.
This is not a lament or a confession.
A good memory is an asset, no doubt about that. It's not perfect re-call.
I think maybe the greatest advantage is being able to connect the dots and string happenings together ending with a picture spanning a long period.
Kind of like a gigantic mentally completed jigsaw puzzle.
The challenge in politics lies in getting other people to see what's in my head.They don't have to.
***********8
Council has been receiving a steady stream of e-mails from neighbors of Wethersfield Court over the last three days,
A bus parked in a driveway is bigger than zoning permits.
Neighbors complained.
Owner applied for a variance to the Committee of Adjustment.
Variance denied..
OMB appeal triggered.
Neighbors feel the town should support their position at the OMB and have bus removed forthwith.
I've been responding with reasons why I can't support that.
The CofA and OMB have been in place since Zoning.
Takes decisions out of the political.
I think that's a good thing.
**********************
Over the week-end I will re-tell the story again about the Petlovany property complete with sequel, before Council tackles the decision about building a Joint Use facility in a ravine nearby
Thursday, 16 January 2014
That's an excuse not an argument
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Last Call Gentlemen Please":
I really wish I thought you were right, Evelyn. But I can't agree. There may be opportunities there but it is awfully late for reversals.
**********
It's the beauty of the democratic process. We have a right to disagree.
If we are making a decision on behalf of the community, we have na obligation to provide
an argument to support it.
Being too late to reverse a decision not yet made is not a valid argument.
It is not an argument at all.
It's a lame exc
Council can not be more confident that the current estimate of $19 million dollars is any more firm than the original of $14.5 million or the immediately previous of $24 million.
A hospital in Niagara Region has this week been approved by the Province at a cost of $26 million .
Think about that.
The current works and parks sites are still in public ownership.
The bylaw required by provincial legislation, to declare the property surplus has not been passed.
There's more to be said . And I will say it. But right now, I need to have breakfast.
I really wish I thought you were right, Evelyn. But I can't agree. There may be opportunities there but it is awfully late for reversals.
**********
It's the beauty of the democratic process. We have a right to disagree.
If we are making a decision on behalf of the community, we have na obligation to provide
an argument to support it.
Being too late to reverse a decision not yet made is not a valid argument.
It is not an argument at all.
It's a lame exc
Council can not be more confident that the current estimate of $19 million dollars is any more firm than the original of $14.5 million or the immediately previous of $24 million.
A hospital in Niagara Region has this week been approved by the Province at a cost of $26 million .
Think about that.
The current works and parks sites are still in public ownership.
The bylaw required by provincial legislation, to declare the property surplus has not been passed.
There's more to be said . And I will say it. But right now, I need to have breakfast.
Last Call Gentlemen Please
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Out of
Confusion.....Clarity ????":
I read with interest in the Auroran about how badly Aurora needed to do the
Heritage purchase & all the reasons that the opportunity should not be
missed. The proponent was not one of the property owners. It was our own
head of staff. Can't recall ever voting for the man who I don't think even
lives in Aurora. I, on the other hand, am very familiar with the properties
in question, one of which has been rejected by the market for about 2
decades.
**********************
I do not know that the above statement is true.
I do know Mr Albino appeared as leading proponent with a real estate operator hard on his heels.
The Historical Society was used in the process.
The Mayor lent his Office in support.
The Report to Council on Tueday is signed by the CAO.
Written by a Special Project Planner subject to direction of the CAO.
A consultant study has been produced .Funding for same is in question.
I am not persuade to merit in the report .
Real estate speculation is not the role of a Municipality .
Taxation on people's homes and business cannot be considered a source of risk capital.
When Council approved an updated Strategic, the decision did not .could not authorise staff to implement in a myriad direction to make the vision
To take that meaning is to demonstrate failure to understand the basic principles of elective authority.
Strategic Plan visions are excessive and language unbelievably juvenile.
I cringe at reference to the goal of " an exceptional quality of life for all"
The right of people to choose decision-makers is inviolate.
I believe intent of members is to be the best they can be.
The mandate ends in nine months.
Time yet to demonstrate growth in competence and confidence.
Immediately pending decisions provide opportunity.
First being the go-ahead for a Joint facility for Works and Parks to be constructed on a shelf built out on the side of a ravine requiring massive retaining walls at a cost of millions to make a poorly chosen site suitable for the purpose .
The roject is as sound and stable as the site is not.
A review and termination of a lease to the federal government of a town-owned site and building would negate the need for $ millions of excessive spending.
Little current use of the facility by the tenant is observed
There's more . .. much more
The budget process provides . Opportunities abound.
It's alast chance.
Confusion.....Clarity ????":
I read with interest in the Auroran about how badly Aurora needed to do the
Heritage purchase & all the reasons that the opportunity should not be
missed. The proponent was not one of the property owners. It was our own
head of staff. Can't recall ever voting for the man who I don't think even
lives in Aurora. I, on the other hand, am very familiar with the properties
in question, one of which has been rejected by the market for about 2
decades.
**********************
I do not know that the above statement is true.
I do know Mr Albino appeared as leading proponent with a real estate operator hard on his heels.
The Historical Society was used in the process.
The Mayor lent his Office in support.
The Report to Council on Tueday is signed by the CAO.
Written by a Special Project Planner subject to direction of the CAO.
A consultant study has been produced .Funding for same is in question.
I am not persuade to merit in the report .
Real estate speculation is not the role of a Municipality .
Taxation on people's homes and business cannot be considered a source of risk capital.
When Council approved an updated Strategic, the decision did not .could not authorise staff to implement in a myriad direction to make the vision
To take that meaning is to demonstrate failure to understand the basic principles of elective authority.
Strategic Plan visions are excessive and language unbelievably juvenile.
I cringe at reference to the goal of " an exceptional quality of life for all"
The right of people to choose decision-makers is inviolate.
I believe intent of members is to be the best they can be.
The mandate ends in nine months.
Time yet to demonstrate growth in competence and confidence.
Immediately pending decisions provide opportunity.
First being the go-ahead for a Joint facility for Works and Parks to be constructed on a shelf built out on the side of a ravine requiring massive retaining walls at a cost of millions to make a poorly chosen site suitable for the purpose .
The roject is as sound and stable as the site is not.
A review and termination of a lease to the federal government of a town-owned site and building would negate the need for $ millions of excessive spending.
Little current use of the facility by the tenant is observed
There's more . .. much more
The budget process provides . Opportunities abound.
It's alast chance.
Wednesday, 15 January 2014
Out of Confusion.....Clarity ????
I chaired the general committee meeting last night.
A couple of contradictions were corrected.
The agenda of the in-camera meeting prior to the Committee meeting listing acquisition of Yonge Street property, was not the same acquisition of property listed in the agenda of the in-camera meeting held after the general committee meeting.
In fact, the first acquisition was not even Yonge Street properties. Apparently I missed a second brown envelope containing the agenda of the Special Council meeting held to authorize the first in-camera meeting to happen.
And apparently the meeting was not held to authorize acquisition of properties that are not really on Yonge Street.
What we did was authorize staff to keep tabs on something cooking between the Province and the post-secondary academic community.
That's all I can tell you about that .
The 107 page report , on the cockamamie heritage theme park , aka by me as a real estate scam ,that was first item of the agenda of the general committee meeting .was received for information, to be dealt with at a general committee meeting a month from now.
Dismay was noted by some Councillors about how authority was conveyed for this work to be done
and the report presented.
No doubt all well be revealed.
But the word is, Council is not on the edge of parting with massive chunks out of the Hydro Asset Reserve Fund to convey to a couple of property-owners for creation of a Heritage theme park.
The report should be at the Library for anyone who wants to read it.
It's called the Hillary-McIntyre Park Cost Benefit Study ..Report CAO 14-001
A couple of contradictions were corrected.
The agenda of the in-camera meeting prior to the Committee meeting listing acquisition of Yonge Street property, was not the same acquisition of property listed in the agenda of the in-camera meeting held after the general committee meeting.
In fact, the first acquisition was not even Yonge Street properties. Apparently I missed a second brown envelope containing the agenda of the Special Council meeting held to authorize the first in-camera meeting to happen.
And apparently the meeting was not held to authorize acquisition of properties that are not really on Yonge Street.
What we did was authorize staff to keep tabs on something cooking between the Province and the post-secondary academic community.
That's all I can tell you about that .
The 107 page report , on the cockamamie heritage theme park , aka by me as a real estate scam ,that was first item of the agenda of the general committee meeting .was received for information, to be dealt with at a general committee meeting a month from now.
Dismay was noted by some Councillors about how authority was conveyed for this work to be done
and the report presented.
No doubt all well be revealed.
But the word is, Council is not on the edge of parting with massive chunks out of the Hydro Asset Reserve Fund to convey to a couple of property-owners for creation of a Heritage theme park.
The report should be at the Library for anyone who wants to read it.
It's called the Hillary-McIntyre Park Cost Benefit Study ..Report CAO 14-001
The one that got away
Stirring the porridge , a picture flashed through my mind of a summer afternoon at the Sandbanks.
We were making our way to the beach ,adults in front,small ones following. We stopped at a T-intersection and I looked back to check the entourage.
Four little cousins strolled quietly, hand in hand gazing here and there and upwards. The ten and seven year old sisters on either side,four year old twins in the middle.
We were at the bottom of an incline. No-one else around. It was quiet and peaceful.
The trees towered above ....brambles and wild flowers clustered at the edge. Four-legged,furry creatures also silently shared the space close to the ground
The small figures were diminished further by the breadth and height of their surroundings.
In bathing suits and flip-flops ,they were part of the nature surrounding them.
I didn't have a camera. I never have a camera.
It will always be the picture, that can never be re-captured ,that I really minded not taking.
We were making our way to the beach ,adults in front,small ones following. We stopped at a T-intersection and I looked back to check the entourage.
Four little cousins strolled quietly, hand in hand gazing here and there and upwards. The ten and seven year old sisters on either side,four year old twins in the middle.
We were at the bottom of an incline. No-one else around. It was quiet and peaceful.
The trees towered above ....brambles and wild flowers clustered at the edge. Four-legged,furry creatures also silently shared the space close to the ground
The small figures were diminished further by the breadth and height of their surroundings.
In bathing suits and flip-flops ,they were part of the nature surrounding them.
I didn't have a camera. I never have a camera.
It will always be the picture, that can never be re-captured ,that I really minded not taking.
Tuesday, 14 January 2014
Smoke and Mirrors and Barbecue Sauce
Years ago, when Sterling Drug was located in Aurora, there was a union strike that went on for some time.
The town was less than ten thousand. Most of the employees were Aurora residents.
The Aurora Banner sought anddained an interview with a management spokesperson.
I remember a quote from the story , only one, but it stands out stark and clear in my memory.
The VIP told the newspaper; "We could teach monkeys to do what they do"
I thought; " whatever you have learned mister, you have acquired no judgement whatsoever.
Comments on remuneration yesterday were interesting.
I think judgement is an essential quality of management. It's what we pay for. If it's not there, we are not getting value .
A comment suggests to determine he going rate for the job is how to decide on appropriate remuneration is to
It's the constant measurement used.
On Saturday's budget discussion it was noted the IT department had asked for a trainer position. The request was denied. Suggestion made t seek to share a trainer with the Town of Newmarket.
At an OMA conference a couple of years ago,I attended a workshop on the Work Asset
Management System aka WAMS.
Municipalities in Ontario are having considerable difficulty implementing the system.
In November 2011, Aurora bought a WAMS software program at a cost of $440,000. The IT department were neither consulted nor informed.
The next audit produced a management letter indicating problems in the treasury department linked to a lack of training and direction for hands on staff.
Since the system was purchased additional bits and pieces have been purchased. Council really doesn't know the final tally.
The budget advises of the merits of hand-held devices . Another likely future purchase.
As near as I can determine, field employees are having to come in earlier to input into the computer the daily record of tasks accomplished .
It's what the Work Asset Management System is about.
Hardly surprising many municipalities are having difficulty with the concept.They can't all afford to spend money on a consultant to recommend the purchase of a $440,000 soft-ware program and wait two years for it to be "up and running"
Ontario has 440 municipalities. Not all GTA. Not all collecting billions in extortion money from builders of homes and spending willy-nilly on luxuries and toys and airy-fairy entrepreneur schemes never dreamed of when it was clear and transparent who was footing the bill.
And poor judgement in decision-making was equally conspicuous .
Aurora shares fire protection services with the Town of Newmarket. Our water system is connected.
The transit system is Regional.
The Northern Six municipalities contract garbage collection and insurance coverage.
Now it's suggested an IT trainer might be shared with the Town of Newmarket.
Consultants are retained to tell us what to do next and eliminate a position to save money. Which was promptly done without time to turn around.
So who is accountable?
Did the devil make us do it?
We shift department responsibilities in consultant-led re-organisation and when it doesn't work, we shift them again.
We take out membership in a Canadian Institute of Excellence then we apply for a Bronze Certificate to cover ourselves in glory and tell the nation know how great we art.
In the meantime good employees are thrown away like they were so much flotsam.
I hear at the present time ,Management Team meetings are attended by a conciliator to help the team get along.
The town was less than ten thousand. Most of the employees were Aurora residents.
The Aurora Banner sought anddained an interview with a management spokesperson.
I remember a quote from the story , only one, but it stands out stark and clear in my memory.
The VIP told the newspaper; "We could teach monkeys to do what they do"
I thought; " whatever you have learned mister, you have acquired no judgement whatsoever.
Comments on remuneration yesterday were interesting.
I think judgement is an essential quality of management. It's what we pay for. If it's not there, we are not getting value .
A comment suggests to determine he going rate for the job is how to decide on appropriate remuneration is to
It's the constant measurement used.
On Saturday's budget discussion it was noted the IT department had asked for a trainer position. The request was denied. Suggestion made t seek to share a trainer with the Town of Newmarket.
At an OMA conference a couple of years ago,I attended a workshop on the Work Asset
Management System aka WAMS.
Municipalities in Ontario are having considerable difficulty implementing the system.
In November 2011, Aurora bought a WAMS software program at a cost of $440,000. The IT department were neither consulted nor informed.
The next audit produced a management letter indicating problems in the treasury department linked to a lack of training and direction for hands on staff.
Since the system was purchased additional bits and pieces have been purchased. Council really doesn't know the final tally.
The budget advises of the merits of hand-held devices . Another likely future purchase.
As near as I can determine, field employees are having to come in earlier to input into the computer the daily record of tasks accomplished .
It's what the Work Asset Management System is about.
Hardly surprising many municipalities are having difficulty with the concept.They can't all afford to spend money on a consultant to recommend the purchase of a $440,000 soft-ware program and wait two years for it to be "up and running"
Ontario has 440 municipalities. Not all GTA. Not all collecting billions in extortion money from builders of homes and spending willy-nilly on luxuries and toys and airy-fairy entrepreneur schemes never dreamed of when it was clear and transparent who was footing the bill.
And poor judgement in decision-making was equally conspicuous .
Aurora shares fire protection services with the Town of Newmarket. Our water system is connected.
The transit system is Regional.
The Northern Six municipalities contract garbage collection and insurance coverage.
Now it's suggested an IT trainer might be shared with the Town of Newmarket.
Consultants are retained to tell us what to do next and eliminate a position to save money. Which was promptly done without time to turn around.
So who is accountable?
Did the devil make us do it?
We shift department responsibilities in consultant-led re-organisation and when it doesn't work, we shift them again.
We take out membership in a Canadian Institute of Excellence then we apply for a Bronze Certificate to cover ourselves in glory and tell the nation know how great we art.
In the meantime good employees are thrown away like they were so much flotsam.
I hear at the present time ,Management Team meetings are attended by a conciliator to help the team get along.
A Low Point
It's 4.23a.m.
I am not sleeping.
I've been carrying a great weight inside of me since Saturday morning.
It's always worse in the night.
I have nowhere to go with it. I need to share.
A comment notes I weave a marvelous web. I suppose, if a story is told , as it happens, it could be perceived as a web woven strand by strand until it's complete.
On Saturday morning ,before the budget meeting started, I learned I had been powerless to prevent two decisions which by my standards were merciless and unjust.
An employee of twenty-six years service was displaced by a decision to eliminate her position . I sought an explanation and was informed that would be micro-managing.
On Saturday, I learned of a second position eliminated. Council made the decision this time. The employee was informed a week before Christmas.
The tasks remain. Cost still needs to be borne.
It's hard to reconcile the decisions with an argument for economic efficiency. There is none.
Even harder to justify the devastation to a loyal and conscientious employee.
The cold, grey heartlessness that countered my concern ... the lack of empathy around me ...was certainly an assault on my consciousness.
Experts have determined all decisions are based on 80% emotion and 20% logic.
What emotion was involved in the two decisions?
It certainly wasn't compassion
Or even simple humanity.
How were eight people , Mayor and seven Councillors influenced by a single emotion?
I had no stomach to join the group on Saturday for budget discussion.
I did anyway.
I did so again last night.
I will again to-night.
In a $75 million dollar budget I argued against membership in an Institute for Excellence ...competing to be one of a hundred best employers in Canada.
And against an $8,000 grant to the Chamber of Commerce for Business Achievement Awards;
framed paper certificates presented to businesses lucky enough to survive, presented at a gala dinner which may or may not be held within the municipality.
And against $8,500 to advertise in a commercial sports magazine ,
Trivial amounts to be sure.
Symbols nonetheless , of a perception that's not really true.
We are a small town ....eighty-five thousand souls.
We elect a Council of nine to serve the community's interest.
At the very least we should expect no harm to come of it.
I am not sleeping.
I've been carrying a great weight inside of me since Saturday morning.
It's always worse in the night.
I have nowhere to go with it. I need to share.
A comment notes I weave a marvelous web. I suppose, if a story is told , as it happens, it could be perceived as a web woven strand by strand until it's complete.
On Saturday morning ,before the budget meeting started, I learned I had been powerless to prevent two decisions which by my standards were merciless and unjust.
An employee of twenty-six years service was displaced by a decision to eliminate her position . I sought an explanation and was informed that would be micro-managing.
On Saturday, I learned of a second position eliminated. Council made the decision this time. The employee was informed a week before Christmas.
The tasks remain. Cost still needs to be borne.
It's hard to reconcile the decisions with an argument for economic efficiency. There is none.
Even harder to justify the devastation to a loyal and conscientious employee.
The cold, grey heartlessness that countered my concern ... the lack of empathy around me ...was certainly an assault on my consciousness.
Experts have determined all decisions are based on 80% emotion and 20% logic.
What emotion was involved in the two decisions?
It certainly wasn't compassion
Or even simple humanity.
How were eight people , Mayor and seven Councillors influenced by a single emotion?
I had no stomach to join the group on Saturday for budget discussion.
I did anyway.
I did so again last night.
I will again to-night.
In a $75 million dollar budget I argued against membership in an Institute for Excellence ...competing to be one of a hundred best employers in Canada.
And against an $8,000 grant to the Chamber of Commerce for Business Achievement Awards;
framed paper certificates presented to businesses lucky enough to survive, presented at a gala dinner which may or may not be held within the municipality.
And against $8,500 to advertise in a commercial sports magazine ,
Trivial amounts to be sure.
Symbols nonetheless , of a perception that's not really true.
We are a small town ....eighty-five thousand souls.
We elect a Council of nine to serve the community's interest.
At the very least we should expect no harm to come of it.
Monday, 13 January 2014
Only One Thing Is Known
The position of Director of Corporate and Legislative Services has been eliminated by Council.
The Municipal clerk who holds the position is still working . He was at the Budget meeting on Saturday and will be there again to-night.
He presented the department's 2014 budget and everyone at the table knew what they had done.
The responsibilities of the position are still there.
It's not clear how they will be carried out without the Director in place.
I have yet to discover that.
A conundrum.
I can't publish comments that reflect negatively on staff.
I don't want to edit comments.
Comments that add to reader understanding of municipal business are particularly welcome.
I have a problem when I receive an informative comment that reflects negatively on staff.
Would you please send the 2012 list of salaries over $100.000. again without editorial comment
It would really be appreciated
Thank you ,whoever you are.
I don't want to edit comments.
Comments that add to reader understanding of municipal business are particularly welcome.
I have a problem when I receive an informative comment that reflects negatively on staff.
Would you please send the 2012 list of salaries over $100.000. again without editorial comment
It would really be appreciated
Thank you ,whoever you are.
Airy Fairy ,,,Peter Pan ....Tinker Bell....Lost Boys
The idea for the theme park appeared to have originated with the Historical Society.
In these modern Aurora times , one learns not to depend on appearances. Scratching the surface, frequently reveals a plan within a plan ....a strategy leading to a strategy.
Aurora Historical Society recently celebrated its fifty year anniversary.I have been around and been a supporter from the beginning .
Half a century is a period in history.
I returned to Council in 2003. The Society had been raising funds. The old school had been gutted with hundreds of volunteer hours....collection in storage... curator in Hillary House.
A retired School Board Director was retained adviser for school renovations.
Sharon Nisbett was a feisty and determined President.
$750,000, had been raised ... future of the museum was firm.
The building was always to accommodate museum and cultural events.
Legal Counsel was retained and an agreement struck with the town to protect the Society's investment in a building they did not own.
After three years, the building, with millions already invested in structural restoration,stood idle, empty and costing.
Hydro was sold and realized a substantial asset. That decision was compelled by the Province.
I moved, Ron Wallace seconded and Council approved ,funding to complete a state of the art museum Eventually it cost $2.3 million and was completed during the next term of office.
The Society had commissioned and paid for the design.
Society president changed ,The group withdrew commitment to operate the museum.They were too few . They had fifty-nine members. The agreement was set aside. The museum never came to be...until now.
A horrendously expensive agreement to purchase culture took its place.
Fast forward...another new president. Organization numbers slightly over a hundred. Structure of executive slightly fuzzy.
Volunteers for fund-raising events are frequently sparse. Failure to muster half the membership at the last annual meeting meant a plan to change the name was abandoned.
A new member , William Albino, joined. An executive within the executive ,including Society President, was suddenly functional. From there, like computer generated artifice, the idea of a heritage theme park was preseted to the board and then introduced to the community as the idea of the Historical Society.
A list of prominent activists were solicited to lend their names, Mayor Dawe among them to lend their support.
Persistent manipulation and calculation has proceeded since and up to the current position of recommended the land be assembled.
From where I sit , there is no substance to the scheme.
$25,000 of taxpayers money has been spent on a consultant, despite te initial decision of Council was for proponents to make that investment .
Proponents include two property owners , one a real estate operator one a member of the Historical Society, who stand to make in excess of a million dollars apiece if the town agrees to purchase the properties
There's a pattern here.
I think we have a number of would-be Warren Buffet's squashed together in a tight closet in Hillary House yearning to make the Swan's leap in the ballet of that name, into centre stage of the election.
Oh My Goodness.
.
In these modern Aurora times , one learns not to depend on appearances. Scratching the surface, frequently reveals a plan within a plan ....a strategy leading to a strategy.
Aurora Historical Society recently celebrated its fifty year anniversary.I have been around and been a supporter from the beginning .
Half a century is a period in history.
I returned to Council in 2003. The Society had been raising funds. The old school had been gutted with hundreds of volunteer hours....collection in storage... curator in Hillary House.
A retired School Board Director was retained adviser for school renovations.
Sharon Nisbett was a feisty and determined President.
$750,000, had been raised ... future of the museum was firm.
The building was always to accommodate museum and cultural events.
Legal Counsel was retained and an agreement struck with the town to protect the Society's investment in a building they did not own.
After three years, the building, with millions already invested in structural restoration,stood idle, empty and costing.
Hydro was sold and realized a substantial asset. That decision was compelled by the Province.
I moved, Ron Wallace seconded and Council approved ,funding to complete a state of the art museum Eventually it cost $2.3 million and was completed during the next term of office.
The Society had commissioned and paid for the design.
Society president changed ,The group withdrew commitment to operate the museum.They were too few . They had fifty-nine members. The agreement was set aside. The museum never came to be...until now.
A horrendously expensive agreement to purchase culture took its place.
Fast forward...another new president. Organization numbers slightly over a hundred. Structure of executive slightly fuzzy.
Volunteers for fund-raising events are frequently sparse. Failure to muster half the membership at the last annual meeting meant a plan to change the name was abandoned.
A new member , William Albino, joined. An executive within the executive ,including Society President, was suddenly functional. From there, like computer generated artifice, the idea of a heritage theme park was preseted to the board and then introduced to the community as the idea of the Historical Society.
A list of prominent activists were solicited to lend their names, Mayor Dawe among them to lend their support.
Persistent manipulation and calculation has proceeded since and up to the current position of recommended the land be assembled.
From where I sit , there is no substance to the scheme.
$25,000 of taxpayers money has been spent on a consultant, despite te initial decision of Council was for proponents to make that investment .
Proponents include two property owners , one a real estate operator one a member of the Historical Society, who stand to make in excess of a million dollars apiece if the town agrees to purchase the properties
There's a pattern here.
I think we have a number of would-be Warren Buffet's squashed together in a tight closet in Hillary House yearning to make the Swan's leap in the ballet of that name, into centre stage of the election.
Oh My Goodness.
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
