"Were you willing to settle ?"
I did settle with Aurora Banner on the morning the trial began. The local press, reported the fact.
Settlement with all the parties could have happened any time at minimal cost and damage after notification of my intent to defend my reputation.
In the seventh year,it still hasn't happened. It takes two to tango.
Results of the last election indicates the damage continues.
The defendants have had no legal costs. Town insurance has paid their freight.
The huge surge in premiums indicates these costs were not contemplated in the original contract.
The question remains; how was the insurance company persuaded to accept liability of almost a million dollars in defense of the action. Who should know better than an insurance company how
costs rise ?
Why are Aurora taxpayers still paying for decisions that had nothing whatsoever to do with the business of the municipality?
By people who were "stripped of their authority " because of their actions .
Yes, the matter could have been settled long since.
They chose not to . After the notice of intent each and every one made a statement in council, Obviously on legal advice , likely paid for by the town.
Again, following the pre-trial conference part of the proceeding, even the courtesy of a response was
denied.
If somebody else is paying the lawyer, dragging litigation out for years until the other party
runs out of resources or in particular circumstance expires whichever comes first.
The more money of someone else's money spent the greater the risk there is in losing.
Do I present as the party whose interest is best served by exercising the alternate ?
runs out of resources or in particular circumstance expires whichever comes first.
The more money of someone else's money spent the greater the risk there is in losing.
Do I present as the party whose interest is best served by exercising the alternate ?