A.H. is not a person. It is unflattering nomenclature, by defintion, vulgar.
I simetimes tire of being polite. It's not a natural facet of my character.
Politeness is an acquired discipline.It's an essential of politics . For an argument to be effective it must also be emphatic.
It's difficult to be emphatic while being cloyingly polite.
There's has to be a way to say what you have to say, so the opposition can't lay a finger on you for lack of civility .
The challenge is two-fold. Persuasion and if that fails ,make sure the public understand your side of the argument.
That's what drove the last lot out of their minds.
They thought having a majority block of votes meant absolute power.
Mr. Wilson was quoted ;"She's got to be stopped. She is undermining everything Council is trying to do."
Repeatedly advice was demanded from town solicitor , Shelley Pohjola.
The advice was finally put into writing. "Councillor Buck has every right to say what she has to say.
She goes right to the line but she doesn't cross it."
They found a lawyer at a municipal conference who advized them how to fix that,
Create a new line.
Adopt a Code of Conduct and create a new line. Insert a clause prohibiting comment by a Coucillor after a decision is made.
Adopt a procedure and appoint an Integrity Commissioner to adjudicate complaints. The line up a couple.
Don't give him independent status. Make sure he knows he can be fired if he doesn't make the right decision. Have a second lawyer on retainer to make the sytem foolproof.
All at taxpayers' epense.
The clause was a "deal-breaker" but he signed it anyway and soon had reason to regret.
It was a race to deliver the first decision before being terminated. He won the race and lost the job.
Had to retain legal counsel to protect his own reputation. He wasn't the first and he wasn't the last.
Town reaources flowed unimpeded.
Councillor Abel put forwarded a motion last week that looked like a bit of a witch -hunt. It didn't pass. Who was the intended witch wasn't clear either.
The beat goes on.
Sleeping-dog sleeps still.
For a while yet.
Saturday, 31 May 2014
Fair is Foul...Foul is fair
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "What's Up Doc?":
"I'm not pitting myself against Christopher. I am not discounting his opinion."
Yeah, that's the job of others. *winks*
Posted by Anonymous to Our Town and Its Business at 31 May 2014 13:29
*************
Not in my blog, AH
"I'm not pitting myself against Christopher. I am not discounting his opinion."
Yeah, that's the job of others. *winks*
Posted by Anonymous to Our Town and Its Business at 31 May 2014 13:29
*************
Not in my blog, AH
Who Will Buy ?
Additional documentation was provided to Council on Tuesday by Anna Kroeplin . A letter from the Owner/developer of Wells Street School was included.
It was in response to the motion before Council for a review of the Market Bylaw with reference to election of officers.
Concern is focused on representation.
The developer likes things they way they are. Business interest of the development and Market
are aligned . To that end a Platinum Sponsorship has been paid for three years. There is no mention of how much that's worth.
The owner, speaking for future condo owners, sees the Market as "lifestyle enhancement"
and an "influence to bring more people downtown"
There's more palaver. The gist of it that Anna Kroeplin should continue as Boss of Everybody and elected by Nobody.
Having more people aware of new condos under construction is obviously a sales advantage .
I understand no stalls obscure the "For Sale" sign
Several people accompanied Ms Kroeplin to Tuesday's meeting.
They might have been committee members.
Or Great Uncle George and Great Aunt Annie and second-cousin Norm.
They were not introduced.
The Market's Mission and Vision Statements were offered as evidence :
The first . ..where food, art and community meet.
The Vision is to connect the community with local growers and producers of fresh,healthy food.
In addition ,promote a relationship between the arts and cultural community in our area.
A visit to a Market is a must in any city. Granville Island in Vancouver. Byway Market,Ottawa.
Cleveland ,where fishmongers entertain patrons with a fish-tossing performance.
The entire neighbourhood is alive with sights and smells and throngs of people.
St Laurence Market in Toronto takes a back seat to none . Kitchener,Elmira,Hamilton,St Catherine's.
St Laurence Market in Toronto takes a back seat to none . Kitchener,Elmira,Hamilton,St Catherine's.
all have Markets worth a drive.
Growing a Market is a laudable objective. ... in the right location.
But if it's going to happen, we need a better Bylaw.
If business and service clubs are solicited for funds , accountability is a must.
Public funds and resources invested generate confidence.
The Municipality has an obligation to ensure everything is, as it should be.
Fiefdoms are not in the public interest. Piracy is not confined to the high seas.
No matter how many names with a vested interest, are attached ,
No matter how many names with a vested interest, are attached ,
It's 1.15 P.M. Already thirty-four Aurora Market vendors have packed up and gone home.
Won't be back for seven days.
What's Up Doc?
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The Link is Here":
I tried that, Evelyn, and got extracts from 2 March GC's - this is going to take some time.
Posted by Anonymous to Our Town and Its Business at 31 May 2014 08:22
***************
The information is the change-over is happening over the week-end.
I'm not pitting myself against Christopher. I am not discounting his opinion.
I am saying I am not sufficiently technically literate to formulate an opinion and I'm not in the business of echoing some-one else's.
Staff are working at it over the week-end . So keep trying.
Had I the skill I would fill this space with animation, hopefully amusing.
I copied and pasted an entertaining piece about being old on Friday.
It came up ,complete with colour and pictures on my screen. I didn't know why,
I've tried it before Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't .
This time it did
I was elated. A little piece of me wanted to think I was becoming more proficient.
I received and e-mail saying What's up Doc ? and knew it hadn't worked all the way.
So I return to doing what I do know how..
I tried that, Evelyn, and got extracts from 2 March GC's - this is going to take some time.
Posted by Anonymous to Our Town and Its Business at 31 May 2014 08:22
***************
The information is the change-over is happening over the week-end.
I'm not pitting myself against Christopher. I am not discounting his opinion.
I am saying I am not sufficiently technically literate to formulate an opinion and I'm not in the business of echoing some-one else's.
Staff are working at it over the week-end . So keep trying.
Had I the skill I would fill this space with animation, hopefully amusing.
I copied and pasted an entertaining piece about being old on Friday.
It came up ,complete with colour and pictures on my screen. I didn't know why,
I've tried it before Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't .
This time it did
I was elated. A little piece of me wanted to think I was becoming more proficient.
I received and e-mail saying What's up Doc ? and knew it hadn't worked all the way.
So I return to doing what I do know how..
The Link is Here
Good evening,
Please note that if you had any difficulty accessing the agenda or if you did not receive the email below, the General Committee agenda for Tuesday, June 3, 204 may be found by clicking this link: June 3, 2014 GC Agenda.
******************
I have clicked the link and the agenda for Tuesday is there .
I have not participated in this conversation because I am not competent to judge whether or not what is happening is within the norms.
The above e-mail is the third received on the issue. So staff and the Mayor at the town hall are
doing what needs to be done to keep the lines of communication open/
They are not unaware nor are they unconcerned.
I'm not publishing the most critical comments because I expect in a couple of days wharever is happening or not happening that should be happening will be like a blip on the history of web
communication. But the searing criticism would still be on my blog.
In the meantime I am not criticizing because I am not sufficiently cognizant to do so.
It's great though that so many are so anxious to stay on top of town business .
It sure knocks the heck out of the theory nobody is paying any attention.
All good things come to those who wait
Have a great week-end.
Friday, 30 May 2014
Information I didn't just happen to come by
Notwithstanding previous post. on Tuesday ,Anna Kroeplin provided additional information that might otherwise have been difficult to come by
A letter from the Richmond Hill M.P. provided his name.The Honourable member expressed wonder at the marvels of it all .and exuded praise for Anna Kroeplin , comfort and assurance of support in needed
This year's opening was his first visit.
The Honourable Lois Brown ,our riding M.P. also sent a letter extolling the virtues of Ms Kroeplin and extraordinary benefits of the Market to the community.
The Honourable Member takes a booth at the Aurora Chamber of Commerce Home Show, an entry in the July 1st and Santa Under the Stars Parades. And probably , during Federal elections, a stall at the Famers Market.
The Federal Government is not listed in the Ms Kroeplin' s 5 page presentation as"receiving contributions" from the Aurora Farmers Market sponsorship program.
The item is at the bottom of page 3 of the presentation and part of the public record on the Town's web site.
Fourteen business and organizations are listed as receiving "contributions" from the Farmers Market by being actively promoted through Sponsorships they have provided .
It's convoluted . I've never seen income tabulated that way. And , there are no figures to indicate how much revenue is derived from sponsors. There's nothing to indicate how the funds are used.
But no doubt the sponsors are aware they are classified as recipients and not givers.
Ms Kroeplin notes 500 volunteer hours and each of 13 committee member clocks up 300 hours apiece. As well. two people are employed by the Market.
The committee and staff work on promotions, sponsorships,special events, relocation, governance.
indoor and other events.
34 seasonal vendors set up in the Aurora Farmers Market.
For five months, they vend for five hours on Saturdays or until produce or product is sold out.
The Town is listed as a sponsor receiving contributions from Aurora Farmers Market.
I found that intriguing.
During the last term, a grant of $10,000 was made to the Market from Council's budget.
The Mayor had authority over the fund.
The St Kitts woman was special-events co-ordinator on the Market executive. The family business occupied a stall on the street. The member demanded to be paid for her efforts and quit when the market executive refused,
Sort of similar to the time she volunteered to organize "the best July 1st Parade the town had ever seen"
An event that previously raised several thousand dollars annually to help finance the parade,
suddenly went dry . A budget of $10,000 was provided, St Kitts was paid and provided with an assistant in the last year she was involved with the July 1st Parade.
And feted by the Mayor and Council as the best volunteer ever.
From small acorns, giant oak trees grow. St Kitts Jazz Festival sprang from humble beginnings at the Market .
The Town provided sponsorship without consultation with Council and was not listed as such in the promotion materials.
The Festival was claimed to be most successful by an Association of Festivals of which St Kitts Jazz Festival was a prominent member.
A $75,000 Trillium grant was obtained . But first, on the arguments of Councillor Ballard, the town had to fork out a Platinum sponsorship ( $7.500 )to give the application credibility.
But I digress.
The Farmers Market grant disappeared from Council's budget during this term.
I assumed it had terminated, the Market had become self-sufficient and
no longer required any attention from me.
It appears not to have been so.
I called the finance department early to-day with several questions:
What amount does the Town contribute to the Farmers Market?
How long has it been doing so?
What budget is it paid from?
It is 2p.m. I have not yet received the information.
Ms Kroeplin's additional information provided on Tuesday, now part of the public record, is a treasure trove.
If I stop for lunch , I may have the amount we pay out of taxes to
receive the vast benefits we derive from the Farmers Market through the efforts of Anna Kroeplin.non -vendor Chair of the Market executive.
A letter from the Richmond Hill M.P. provided his name.The Honourable member expressed wonder at the marvels of it all .and exuded praise for Anna Kroeplin , comfort and assurance of support in needed
This year's opening was his first visit.
The Honourable Lois Brown ,our riding M.P. also sent a letter extolling the virtues of Ms Kroeplin and extraordinary benefits of the Market to the community.
The Honourable Member takes a booth at the Aurora Chamber of Commerce Home Show, an entry in the July 1st and Santa Under the Stars Parades. And probably , during Federal elections, a stall at the Famers Market.
The Federal Government is not listed in the Ms Kroeplin' s 5 page presentation as"receiving contributions" from the Aurora Farmers Market sponsorship program.
The item is at the bottom of page 3 of the presentation and part of the public record on the Town's web site.
Fourteen business and organizations are listed as receiving "contributions" from the Farmers Market by being actively promoted through Sponsorships they have provided .
It's convoluted . I've never seen income tabulated that way. And , there are no figures to indicate how much revenue is derived from sponsors. There's nothing to indicate how the funds are used.
But no doubt the sponsors are aware they are classified as recipients and not givers.
Ms Kroeplin notes 500 volunteer hours and each of 13 committee member clocks up 300 hours apiece. As well. two people are employed by the Market.
The committee and staff work on promotions, sponsorships,special events, relocation, governance.
indoor and other events.
34 seasonal vendors set up in the Aurora Farmers Market.
For five months, they vend for five hours on Saturdays or until produce or product is sold out.
The Town is listed as a sponsor receiving contributions from Aurora Farmers Market.
I found that intriguing.
During the last term, a grant of $10,000 was made to the Market from Council's budget.
The Mayor had authority over the fund.
The St Kitts woman was special-events co-ordinator on the Market executive. The family business occupied a stall on the street. The member demanded to be paid for her efforts and quit when the market executive refused,
Sort of similar to the time she volunteered to organize "the best July 1st Parade the town had ever seen"
An event that previously raised several thousand dollars annually to help finance the parade,
suddenly went dry . A budget of $10,000 was provided, St Kitts was paid and provided with an assistant in the last year she was involved with the July 1st Parade.
And feted by the Mayor and Council as the best volunteer ever.
From small acorns, giant oak trees grow. St Kitts Jazz Festival sprang from humble beginnings at the Market .
The Town provided sponsorship without consultation with Council and was not listed as such in the promotion materials.
The Festival was claimed to be most successful by an Association of Festivals of which St Kitts Jazz Festival was a prominent member.
A $75,000 Trillium grant was obtained . But first, on the arguments of Councillor Ballard, the town had to fork out a Platinum sponsorship ( $7.500 )to give the application credibility.
But I digress.
The Farmers Market grant disappeared from Council's budget during this term.
I assumed it had terminated, the Market had become self-sufficient and
no longer required any attention from me.
It appears not to have been so.
I called the finance department early to-day with several questions:
What amount does the Town contribute to the Farmers Market?
How long has it been doing so?
What budget is it paid from?
It is 2p.m. I have not yet received the information.
Ms Kroeplin's additional information provided on Tuesday, now part of the public record, is a treasure trove.
If I stop for lunch , I may have the amount we pay out of taxes to
receive the vast benefits we derive from the Farmers Market through the efforts of Anna Kroeplin.non -vendor Chair of the Market executive.
Don't Let the Bastards Grind You Down.
A motion requires a seconder to get on the table. A Councillor is not required to second a motion they do not support.
It's a courtesy for a motion to be seconded for discussion. Lack of agreement may even be stated at the time of seconding.
Staff can make recommendations without notice or permission. Delegations may appear on 24 hours notice and speak for 5 minutes to an issue.
A Councillor in Aurora is ham-strung by a Procedure of their own making . If successful in getting an issue on the table for discussion, a Councillor may speak for 2 minutes.
The courtesy was extended on Tuesday. Councillor Abel moved a motion. Councillor Thompson seconded it for discussion but stated he did not support it. He spoke against the motion.
Three members of Council could not participate or influence the vote in any way because of Conflict of Interest. Two did participate before declaring the obvious Conflict.
Councillor Ballard was absent . A bare quorum were left to debate the motion. Two of five voted in favour. The seconder was not one of them.
When no seconder came forward for the simple motion for a review of the Farmers' Market Bylaw, it was clearly an intended snub.
It was particularly egregious since a non-elected person with a vested interest, had already been allowed 5 minutes of Council time to speak against the motion
Dignity and authority of Council has steadily eroded over the past number of years.
During Mayor Jones last term, a loser in previous elections, came to the podium in public forum soon after to upbraid myself . I had been elected with a forty- seven vote advantage. His voice would rise in hysteria as he spoke.
I informed my friend Tim privately after the first occasion not to let him do it again
But he did. I told him again I would take the matter in hand if it happened once more
The third time , The Mayor stopped him. But not before a couple of councillors, Nigel Kean being
one, indicated Mr.Wilson was being denied his rights.
The Mayor and the Mayor alone is responsible for protecting the dignity and authority
of Council. If he/she has no respect, the principle is soon obscured.
Each member is elected separately but once elected , Council is the representative body of the people.
If any member is disrespected, the whole is disrespected.
If the choice of the electorate is disrespected, the community is disrespected.
When a Council disrespects itself the community is betrayed.
This Council has not done that before. I think they planned it this time. I don't think they understood the implications. But there really is no excuse.
They are Canadians. They aspired to elected office. All of their lives they have lived under a democratic system of government.
Council Chambers are designed to de-note the separation between elected and non-elected.
No-one else has the right to speak during a Council meeting, unless invited to do so by the Presiding member .
Members of Parliament are referred to as Honourable. It's not done in deference to the individual . It's not a mutual admiration society.
The Office commands respect as the symbol of the right to govern ourselves.
However fraught with frailty and frustration that might entail, it is the best alternative.It is the one we have chosen.
The best part of my life has been spent defending it.
I am not about to back off now
It's a courtesy for a motion to be seconded for discussion. Lack of agreement may even be stated at the time of seconding.
Staff can make recommendations without notice or permission. Delegations may appear on 24 hours notice and speak for 5 minutes to an issue.
A Councillor in Aurora is ham-strung by a Procedure of their own making . If successful in getting an issue on the table for discussion, a Councillor may speak for 2 minutes.
The courtesy was extended on Tuesday. Councillor Abel moved a motion. Councillor Thompson seconded it for discussion but stated he did not support it. He spoke against the motion.
Three members of Council could not participate or influence the vote in any way because of Conflict of Interest. Two did participate before declaring the obvious Conflict.
Councillor Ballard was absent . A bare quorum were left to debate the motion. Two of five voted in favour. The seconder was not one of them.
When no seconder came forward for the simple motion for a review of the Farmers' Market Bylaw, it was clearly an intended snub.
It was particularly egregious since a non-elected person with a vested interest, had already been allowed 5 minutes of Council time to speak against the motion
Dignity and authority of Council has steadily eroded over the past number of years.
During Mayor Jones last term, a loser in previous elections, came to the podium in public forum soon after to upbraid myself . I had been elected with a forty- seven vote advantage. His voice would rise in hysteria as he spoke.
I informed my friend Tim privately after the first occasion not to let him do it again
But he did. I told him again I would take the matter in hand if it happened once more
The third time , The Mayor stopped him. But not before a couple of councillors, Nigel Kean being
one, indicated Mr.Wilson was being denied his rights.
The Mayor and the Mayor alone is responsible for protecting the dignity and authority
of Council. If he/she has no respect, the principle is soon obscured.
Each member is elected separately but once elected , Council is the representative body of the people.
If any member is disrespected, the whole is disrespected.
If the choice of the electorate is disrespected, the community is disrespected.
When a Council disrespects itself the community is betrayed.
This Council has not done that before. I think they planned it this time. I don't think they understood the implications. But there really is no excuse.
They are Canadians. They aspired to elected office. All of their lives they have lived under a democratic system of government.
Council Chambers are designed to de-note the separation between elected and non-elected.
No-one else has the right to speak during a Council meeting, unless invited to do so by the Presiding member .
Members of Parliament are referred to as Honourable. It's not done in deference to the individual . It's not a mutual admiration society.
The Office commands respect as the symbol of the right to govern ourselves.
However fraught with frailty and frustration that might entail, it is the best alternative.It is the one we have chosen.
The best part of my life has been spent defending it.
I am not about to back off now
Thursday, 29 May 2014
It's Not In My Make-up
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Credit is Due":
13:11
I agree but cannot see how we can help him. Last night it was quite clear that Council, with the one exception, were not going to " micro-manage " the market even if a resident was being bullied. I had been fudging on Cllr Abel but am no longer
Posted by Anonymous to Our Town and Its Business at 28 May 2014 14:
******************
I have no interest in micro-managing the market.
I support the intent of the Farmers Market Bylaw.
Vendors should have representation for communication with the town and they should manage their own affairs.
I presented a motion on Tuesday to direct staff to review the Bylaw to ensure wording was clear as to intent.
Without a seconder the motion was not tabled.
It was a slight to be sure. But it's always a possibility. I don't ask for favours.
A delegate, purporting to represent vendors had five mintes to speak to the issue but a colleague was denied the right.
Any time a right is denied the right is surrendered.
The enemy is within.
If anybody is keeping score ,,,that was a minus zero.
Credit earned for discontinuing the plan for district heritage designation was reduced .
It had nothing to do with the Market Bylaw It was fear of Anna Kroeplin.
A person not a vendor, was a vendor for one season,selling painted plates, sufficiently brazen to take the podium in a Council meeting and lay claim to represent vendors has already spread a circle of intimidation.
On Wednesday morning, an e-mail was copied to all Councillors. Unsigned It came from Park Residents Committee, in support of district designation. It included Anna Kroeplin . It appeared to warn Councillors against failure to act on the "compromise agreement " for protection of the neighborhood against undesirable development,hammered out at the Heritage Advisory Committee.
Councillors Abel and Humfryes are Council's valiant representatives on that illustrious committee.
Sub-committee of the Committee was composed of Park Residents Committee .Anna Kroeplin is one.
I have an anecdote to share:
I have known Lynn Knowles and Mary O'Reilly since I was Mayor in the early seventies.
Mary and Lynn were members of a Sorority that raised $15,000. for development of Black Creek Pioneer Village It's an opportunity to immerse oneself in history if one is so inclined. And it's on our doorstep.
It's a long time since both women established their credentials in heritage preservation in my book.
At General Committee ,when Council made the decision to disontinue designation plans Mary and Lynn were standing at the door of the Council chamber. The proponents were leaving before the decision .
It must be noted throughout repeated appearances before Council , opponents have conducted themselves entirely professionally, always respectful of Council and the proponents.
Never threatening but always firm in their stated determination to oppose the designation to the limit.
every time.
As the proponents were leaving the Chamber , a female member of the group, pushed her face within three inches from Lynn Knowles and spat out "You are a liar"
It wasn't Anna Kroeplin. It was an associate, a member of the committee.
The e-mail Council received indicated 49% of residents had not taken a position on designation.
Some have apparently confiessed to fear. I think that's a distinct possibility.
In this town, much is made of good work by volunteers. Rightly so.
In every community, in every age, people work together to make a better place. It's a given. It's not extraordinary. It makes a community. But Thank you is always in order.
At this time and in this place and for some time there have been those who loudly claim and proclaim volunteer status and use it to cloak selfish interest and club into submission any who might get in the way of their intent.
"All it takes for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing"
Edmund Burke's quote may not be the precise ,but you get my drift.
It is the five year anniversary of my personal battle against harm in our community .
The virus is not yet contained. The major decision is pending.
I am not about to surrender.
13:11
I agree but cannot see how we can help him. Last night it was quite clear that Council, with the one exception, were not going to " micro-manage " the market even if a resident was being bullied. I had been fudging on Cllr Abel but am no longer
Posted by Anonymous to Our Town and Its Business at 28 May 2014 14:
******************
I have no interest in micro-managing the market.
I support the intent of the Farmers Market Bylaw.
Vendors should have representation for communication with the town and they should manage their own affairs.
I presented a motion on Tuesday to direct staff to review the Bylaw to ensure wording was clear as to intent.
Without a seconder the motion was not tabled.
It was a slight to be sure. But it's always a possibility. I don't ask for favours.
A delegate, purporting to represent vendors had five mintes to speak to the issue but a colleague was denied the right.
Any time a right is denied the right is surrendered.
The enemy is within.
If anybody is keeping score ,,,that was a minus zero.
Credit earned for discontinuing the plan for district heritage designation was reduced .
It had nothing to do with the Market Bylaw It was fear of Anna Kroeplin.
A person not a vendor, was a vendor for one season,selling painted plates, sufficiently brazen to take the podium in a Council meeting and lay claim to represent vendors has already spread a circle of intimidation.
On Wednesday morning, an e-mail was copied to all Councillors. Unsigned It came from Park Residents Committee, in support of district designation. It included Anna Kroeplin . It appeared to warn Councillors against failure to act on the "compromise agreement " for protection of the neighborhood against undesirable development,hammered out at the Heritage Advisory Committee.
Councillors Abel and Humfryes are Council's valiant representatives on that illustrious committee.
Sub-committee of the Committee was composed of Park Residents Committee .Anna Kroeplin is one.
I have an anecdote to share:
I have known Lynn Knowles and Mary O'Reilly since I was Mayor in the early seventies.
Mary and Lynn were members of a Sorority that raised $15,000. for development of Black Creek Pioneer Village It's an opportunity to immerse oneself in history if one is so inclined. And it's on our doorstep.
It's a long time since both women established their credentials in heritage preservation in my book.
At General Committee ,when Council made the decision to disontinue designation plans Mary and Lynn were standing at the door of the Council chamber. The proponents were leaving before the decision .
It must be noted throughout repeated appearances before Council , opponents have conducted themselves entirely professionally, always respectful of Council and the proponents.
Never threatening but always firm in their stated determination to oppose the designation to the limit.
every time.
As the proponents were leaving the Chamber , a female member of the group, pushed her face within three inches from Lynn Knowles and spat out "You are a liar"
It wasn't Anna Kroeplin. It was an associate, a member of the committee.
The e-mail Council received indicated 49% of residents had not taken a position on designation.
Some have apparently confiessed to fear. I think that's a distinct possibility.
In this town, much is made of good work by volunteers. Rightly so.
In every community, in every age, people work together to make a better place. It's a given. It's not extraordinary. It makes a community. But Thank you is always in order.
At this time and in this place and for some time there have been those who loudly claim and proclaim volunteer status and use it to cloak selfish interest and club into submission any who might get in the way of their intent.
"All it takes for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing"
Edmund Burke's quote may not be the precise ,but you get my drift.
It is the five year anniversary of my personal battle against harm in our community .
The virus is not yet contained. The major decision is pending.
I am not about to surrender.
Wednesday, 28 May 2014
A Natural Conclusion
The first item of business after being sworn into office is adoption of a Procedural Bylaw.
Witnin the Bylaw is a requirement to reviewRules of Order within the first six months.
Council did that. A consultant was hired . New Rules were submitted and approved.
Old rules allowed for a Councillor to speak for thirty minutes. No-one ever did.
Older rules permitted a Councillor to speak once during debate. Unless the Councillor had something new to say.
A question could be directed to staff. Presumable to support a point being made in debate.
Under old rules an elected representative had time needed to contribute whatever input he/she had before debate closed and the vote was called.
The rules resembled the Public Planning Meeting .Members of the public are given every opportunity to be heard before the public portion of the meeting is closed and Council debate begins.
It's ironic that a member of the public has unlimited opportunity to express opposition or support to a planning application, but elected representatives,under to-day's rules of order are restricted (two minutes)
Times past, not every member of Council felt compelled to speak on every issue. Nor did they think it worthwhile to repeat an argument already made.
Endless questioning of staff was unheard of. The only staff present was the Clek and Deputy.
A Councillor was expected to be prepared to argue a position . Stand up.speak up and shut up.
Watching nine people carrying out separate fact-finding ,fishing expeditions in the course of the decision-making process does not engender confidence.
Council meetings were not televised in the day.
Last night 's meeting had an interesting turn-up for the book.
I had a motion on the table for a review of the Farmer's Market Bylaw.
Currently Market vendors are required to have representation for purposes of communication with the Town. I believe there's a lack of clarity about what represents representation.
Neither the current chair or vice chair are vendors.
Because of the motion on the agenda, the Chairperson of the Market Executive,was granted delegation status to speak to the issue.
Delegation status provided five minutes to speak.
If the motion did get on the table. an elected representative has two minutes to speak.
The motion did not receive a seconder. Did not get on the table for discussion.
The only input on the issue during a Council meeting came from the non-elected,non-vendor chair of the Market.
In the circumstance,the elected representative was disrespected by elected representatives.
It is my position, when an elected representative is dis- respected, the electorate is dis-respected.
It's a natural conclusion.
Time moves on. Things change. They do not necessarily improve.
Witnin the Bylaw is a requirement to reviewRules of Order within the first six months.
Council did that. A consultant was hired . New Rules were submitted and approved.
Old rules allowed for a Councillor to speak for thirty minutes. No-one ever did.
Older rules permitted a Councillor to speak once during debate. Unless the Councillor had something new to say.
A question could be directed to staff. Presumable to support a point being made in debate.
Under old rules an elected representative had time needed to contribute whatever input he/she had before debate closed and the vote was called.
The rules resembled the Public Planning Meeting .Members of the public are given every opportunity to be heard before the public portion of the meeting is closed and Council debate begins.
It's ironic that a member of the public has unlimited opportunity to express opposition or support to a planning application, but elected representatives,under to-day's rules of order are restricted (two minutes)
Times past, not every member of Council felt compelled to speak on every issue. Nor did they think it worthwhile to repeat an argument already made.
Endless questioning of staff was unheard of. The only staff present was the Clek and Deputy.
A Councillor was expected to be prepared to argue a position . Stand up.speak up and shut up.
Watching nine people carrying out separate fact-finding ,fishing expeditions in the course of the decision-making process does not engender confidence.
Council meetings were not televised in the day.
Last night 's meeting had an interesting turn-up for the book.
I had a motion on the table for a review of the Farmer's Market Bylaw.
Currently Market vendors are required to have representation for purposes of communication with the Town. I believe there's a lack of clarity about what represents representation.
Neither the current chair or vice chair are vendors.
Because of the motion on the agenda, the Chairperson of the Market Executive,was granted delegation status to speak to the issue.
Delegation status provided five minutes to speak.
If the motion did get on the table. an elected representative has two minutes to speak.
The motion did not receive a seconder. Did not get on the table for discussion.
The only input on the issue during a Council meeting came from the non-elected,non-vendor chair of the Market.
In the circumstance,the elected representative was disrespected by elected representatives.
It is my position, when an elected representative is dis- respected, the electorate is dis-respected.
It's a natural conclusion.
Time moves on. Things change. They do not necessarily improve.
Credit is Due
A silver stake was finally driven through the heart of district heritage designation last night.
The decision was finally made at the general committee meeting last Tuesday.
But it's never certain a committee decision will hold at Council.
The Mayor was absent. Even when there he tends to contribute little. Like as not, he will bring something in writing to Council and the previous decision gets changed
On a memorable night ,early in the term, Councillor Abel gave notice of termination to the Culture Board. Ensuing debate was full and complete; nothing left to do but take the vote There was a noticeable pause .....we waited ... Then incredibly, Councillors Humfreys and Thompson , orchestrated a motion that resulted in an entirely different decision.
The ground shifted that moment. I felt it move. Betrayal was thick. A person left the Chamber overwhelmed with nausea. He had worked hard in the previous campaign and attended every council meeting since full of hope and certainty.
Immediately, I moved the solicitor be directed to review the Centre contract. The Mayor did not want that either. "the solicitor has enough work to do" he said. I could have sworn I heard the whisper in his ear from where I was sitting.
The motion passed. The contract was reviewed and improved A full and enlightening report was submitted.
It made little difference. The Mayor and Councillor Abel are on the board and heaping helpings of tax dollars continue to be siphoned from treasury to board coffers filling their hearts with glee.
I might add with full support of Councillor Gallo.
So property-owners from the S.E, quadrant were at Council again last night, hopefully for the final decision. The cut to end all cuts.
It was the fifth time since February. The Consultant had reported to Council earlier, a "significant minority" were opposed to designation in the S.E. quadrant.
It was a contradiction in terms. Being dismissed as a minority spurred the group to greater determination.
The S.E. quadrant is probably home to every professional service in Aurora.
Old homes on Wellington and down through , are owned and occupied by planning consultants, architect design consultants, real estate lawyers, real estate brokers, insurance brokers, chartered accountants, doctors, dentists, butchers,bakers and candlestick makers.
There were experiences to speak of from owners of individually designated homes.
Residents with roots several generations deep had no difficulty comprehending the significance of a restrictive bylaw registered against title of their property.
They wanted no part of that.
Owners researched issues, ignored accusations, refuted claims, produced professional documentation , knocked on doors, explained the process, collected names and delegated to Council. Again and again.
To little avail.
The consultant and some Councillors were certain if only they understood ,they would not be "afraid". Scouts were despatched to the Market to "educate" opponents.
The Market being a hotbed of proponents.
It proved to be ineffective.
Staff - assurances about provincial assurance about problem -free insurance and accounts of
great joy and satisfaction experienced in other designated districts in Ontario had to be reversed.
Four options were presented to Council. The first was to discontinue the study.
The town awarded a contract for $67 thousand and spent $34 thousand.
The study is discontinued.
Another one bites the dust.
Months of frustration and stress for residents, numerous discussions and deferrals by Council and in the end $34 thousand spent with nothing positive accomplished.
Notwithstanding all that , Councillor Thompson on another issue, commented last night.
"Had we done a better job at the beginning, there would have been a different outcome".
I don't know what that is......political hubris...denial of the obvious...inability to comprehend facts...reluctance to acknowledge error ..... or WHAT?
The right decision was made in the end. People who refused to surrender fully appreciate it.
Why not accept the credit?
The decision was finally made at the general committee meeting last Tuesday.
But it's never certain a committee decision will hold at Council.
The Mayor was absent. Even when there he tends to contribute little. Like as not, he will bring something in writing to Council and the previous decision gets changed
On a memorable night ,early in the term, Councillor Abel gave notice of termination to the Culture Board. Ensuing debate was full and complete; nothing left to do but take the vote There was a noticeable pause .....we waited ... Then incredibly, Councillors Humfreys and Thompson , orchestrated a motion that resulted in an entirely different decision.
The ground shifted that moment. I felt it move. Betrayal was thick. A person left the Chamber overwhelmed with nausea. He had worked hard in the previous campaign and attended every council meeting since full of hope and certainty.
Immediately, I moved the solicitor be directed to review the Centre contract. The Mayor did not want that either. "the solicitor has enough work to do" he said. I could have sworn I heard the whisper in his ear from where I was sitting.
The motion passed. The contract was reviewed and improved A full and enlightening report was submitted.
It made little difference. The Mayor and Councillor Abel are on the board and heaping helpings of tax dollars continue to be siphoned from treasury to board coffers filling their hearts with glee.
I might add with full support of Councillor Gallo.
So property-owners from the S.E, quadrant were at Council again last night, hopefully for the final decision. The cut to end all cuts.
It was the fifth time since February. The Consultant had reported to Council earlier, a "significant minority" were opposed to designation in the S.E. quadrant.
It was a contradiction in terms. Being dismissed as a minority spurred the group to greater determination.
The S.E. quadrant is probably home to every professional service in Aurora.
Old homes on Wellington and down through , are owned and occupied by planning consultants, architect design consultants, real estate lawyers, real estate brokers, insurance brokers, chartered accountants, doctors, dentists, butchers,bakers and candlestick makers.
There were experiences to speak of from owners of individually designated homes.
Residents with roots several generations deep had no difficulty comprehending the significance of a restrictive bylaw registered against title of their property.
They wanted no part of that.
Owners researched issues, ignored accusations, refuted claims, produced professional documentation , knocked on doors, explained the process, collected names and delegated to Council. Again and again.
To little avail.
The consultant and some Councillors were certain if only they understood ,they would not be "afraid". Scouts were despatched to the Market to "educate" opponents.
The Market being a hotbed of proponents.
It proved to be ineffective.
Staff - assurances about provincial assurance about problem -free insurance and accounts of
great joy and satisfaction experienced in other designated districts in Ontario had to be reversed.
Four options were presented to Council. The first was to discontinue the study.
The town awarded a contract for $67 thousand and spent $34 thousand.
The study is discontinued.
Another one bites the dust.
Months of frustration and stress for residents, numerous discussions and deferrals by Council and in the end $34 thousand spent with nothing positive accomplished.
Notwithstanding all that , Councillor Thompson on another issue, commented last night.
"Had we done a better job at the beginning, there would have been a different outcome".
I don't know what that is......political hubris...denial of the obvious...inability to comprehend facts...reluctance to acknowledge error ..... or WHAT?
The right decision was made in the end. People who refused to surrender fully appreciate it.
Why not accept the credit?
Tuesday, 27 May 2014
Choices
It is being siggested I have a secret nefarious plot to jump into the Mayoralty race at the last minute
and steal the prize from both our Boy Winders.
There's nothing secretive or nefarious about my intentions.
I think about it all the time. How can I sut by and watch the town slip -slide in the rain.
I know my knowledge and competence far surpasses either of the other two contenders.
I also know that's not taking into consideration everything that needs to be considered.
If I were twenty years younger ,my name would be in like a shot.
I did it in 2006 and decided better of it. The Town needs to present a vibrant,vigorous image of itself.
That's not what the Town got.
Oh my Dear Lord No. Who could have foreseen what the town got?
We had another election and I helped move the change. I don't regert it.
But nothing was said of what was to be realised . We a world apart from where we were but on the whole, not where we should be.
Now we are faced with a questionable choice. Little to choose.
My friends shudder and say....Oh Evelyn, you don't need it.
I know that.
Nobody does
But what about the town's needs?
So now you know.what I wrestle with...... Choices.
It's a Lie ,I tell you...a Brazen Falshood.
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "What's the message?":
"The Hydro building needed for our purpose was transferred to use of the Federal Department of National Defense. As a result, we are now contemplating construction of a $26.9 million works yard and garage complete with an $814.000. treatment facility to remove non-existent salt from snow melting in Spring temperatures."
Again this old nugget! The building was declared surplus - if we needed it no one spoke up. You can blame the "former" all you want, but at the time the former had 3 "currents" on council as well
Posted by Anonymous to Our Town and Its Business at 27 May 2014 08:14
**********************
Among many advantages of social media is never having to say you are sorry for reminding people of what was done,
The list grows as the term extends and people do appreciate reminders.
This poster keeps insisting the building was declared surplus and no-one spoke up. .
That's a downright lie.
(frog is croaking in my garden. Never heard one like that before. Maybe a different species)
The building was never declared surplus. We had to do that when a property is being sold.
And we did have people making inquiries about when it might be sold.
I don't know why a politician would imagine they could get away with telling a lie like that .
A declaration of surplus is just that. Coucil has to approve it. The notice has to be posted in the media.
One of the mysteries about the former Mayor was how she was able to entice people to say things she wanted to be said, without saying them herself and taking responsibility/
There's speculation in Town that after enticing J.Gallo into the mayoralty, she plans to jump in at the last minute and steal it out from under.
Yes I know it's ridiculous. But old Hollywood movies were full of such plots with dire results.Joan Crawford "Mommie Dearest,"comes to mind
That such plotting would be feverishly explored in back rooms is alas not ridiculous.
Perspective of reality has never been sharp .Positively dim,in fact. Totally obscure in the short run,
intermediate and long run as well.
To be totally frank. ... comprehension has never risen above zilch , zero, nada nil nothing and E minus .
But it's the followers who are truly mystifying in their loyal adherence.
Like the one above.... the battery,.... ever-ready to lie to obscure the obvious/
"The Hydro building needed for our purpose was transferred to use of the Federal Department of National Defense. As a result, we are now contemplating construction of a $26.9 million works yard and garage complete with an $814.000. treatment facility to remove non-existent salt from snow melting in Spring temperatures."
Again this old nugget! The building was declared surplus - if we needed it no one spoke up. You can blame the "former" all you want, but at the time the former had 3 "currents" on council as well
Posted by Anonymous to Our Town and Its Business at 27 May 2014 08:14
**********************
Among many advantages of social media is never having to say you are sorry for reminding people of what was done,
The list grows as the term extends and people do appreciate reminders.
This poster keeps insisting the building was declared surplus and no-one spoke up. .
That's a downright lie.
(frog is croaking in my garden. Never heard one like that before. Maybe a different species)
The building was never declared surplus. We had to do that when a property is being sold.
And we did have people making inquiries about when it might be sold.
I don't know why a politician would imagine they could get away with telling a lie like that .
A declaration of surplus is just that. Coucil has to approve it. The notice has to be posted in the media.
One of the mysteries about the former Mayor was how she was able to entice people to say things she wanted to be said, without saying them herself and taking responsibility/
There's speculation in Town that after enticing J.Gallo into the mayoralty, she plans to jump in at the last minute and steal it out from under.
Yes I know it's ridiculous. But old Hollywood movies were full of such plots with dire results.Joan Crawford "Mommie Dearest,"comes to mind
That such plotting would be feverishly explored in back rooms is alas not ridiculous.
Perspective of reality has never been sharp .Positively dim,in fact. Totally obscure in the short run,
intermediate and long run as well.
To be totally frank. ... comprehension has never risen above zilch , zero, nada nil nothing and E minus .
But it's the followers who are truly mystifying in their loyal adherence.
Like the one above.... the battery,.... ever-ready to lie to obscure the obvious/
More Questions Than Answers
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "I LOVE YOU DAD":
19:51
I am not an expert at all. I am asking what the current process is and the cost... vs. what Ms Buck is suggesting.
If her plan saves money then I ould agree with it. If the current process is cheaper, then I say we stick with it. It really is a black and white argument
Posted by Anonymous to Our Town and Its Business at 27 May 2014 08:25
******************
It's not my job to present alternates to staff recommendations .
My function is to read, understand and agree with the recommendation before I vote to approve.
Council makes the decision .
Council is elected to act in the taxpayers' interest.
Council is accountable. Not staff.
We have been asked to increase the budget for salt and sand. It was a severe winter. Supplies were
used up.
Shortage resulted.
Prices went up.
Nothing complicated about that.
In the course of discussion, I recalled the practice of collecting sand and stock-piling for re-use .
I asked if we still did that. Sand by the way is not an expensive commodity.
The Director answered no, the sand is contaminated.
That brought me up sharp. Wait a minte...sand is permeable.. washes clean... how clean does it need to be to be mixed with and re-used on roads.
Further explanation.... street sweeping is contracted, the contractor takes the sand.
Next question .... If it's contaminated, how does he dispose of it?
All the time , I'm conscious of the restrictions on time a Councillor is allowed to speak.
How daft is that?
Also the Mayor is bored,likely finds the discussion tedious and any moment will call a phoney-baloney point of order. The Chair may uphold or dismiss it. Either way, no-one else will indicate any interest and the moment will pass.
Answers generally lead to more questions. We bought a new street -sweeper fairlt recently/ It's an
expensive machine. How often is it used?
Street sweeping started this year before the snow and ice was gone. How much sand did the sweepers collect?
What does the contract cost. ? A comment to the blog, indicates we pay to have sand removed.
Is the contractor allowed to keep his equipment and supplies in the town yard.?
Are we paying for a yard big enough to accommodate contractors' equipment and supplies?
Why shouldn't they pay for theri opwn yard? Does it save us money for them to use our space?
Or does it save the contractor on overheads? Do we benefit/?
Do we not have room to stock-pile used sand because of accommodating contractors equipment and supplies.
Just exactly how much are we saving by contracting out public works responsibilities?
Do they get to use our mechanics and parts department?
No I don't think that's a silly question.
If we are so cosy with contractors as to provide them a home why not all the comforts of home?
So, you see. Doubting Thomas , I can't give you the answeres you want. Bbecause I can't get the answers I want.
I can't because I'm the only one who wants them.
Staff don't need to pay attention to the lone councillor who thinks like a freak.
19:51
I am not an expert at all. I am asking what the current process is and the cost... vs. what Ms Buck is suggesting.
If her plan saves money then I ould agree with it. If the current process is cheaper, then I say we stick with it. It really is a black and white argument
Posted by Anonymous to Our Town and Its Business at 27 May 2014 08:25
******************
It's not my job to present alternates to staff recommendations .
My function is to read, understand and agree with the recommendation before I vote to approve.
Council makes the decision .
Council is elected to act in the taxpayers' interest.
Council is accountable. Not staff.
We have been asked to increase the budget for salt and sand. It was a severe winter. Supplies were
used up.
Shortage resulted.
Prices went up.
Nothing complicated about that.
In the course of discussion, I recalled the practice of collecting sand and stock-piling for re-use .
I asked if we still did that. Sand by the way is not an expensive commodity.
The Director answered no, the sand is contaminated.
That brought me up sharp. Wait a minte...sand is permeable.. washes clean... how clean does it need to be to be mixed with and re-used on roads.
Further explanation.... street sweeping is contracted, the contractor takes the sand.
Next question .... If it's contaminated, how does he dispose of it?
All the time , I'm conscious of the restrictions on time a Councillor is allowed to speak.
How daft is that?
Also the Mayor is bored,likely finds the discussion tedious and any moment will call a phoney-baloney point of order. The Chair may uphold or dismiss it. Either way, no-one else will indicate any interest and the moment will pass.
Answers generally lead to more questions. We bought a new street -sweeper fairlt recently/ It's an
expensive machine. How often is it used?
Street sweeping started this year before the snow and ice was gone. How much sand did the sweepers collect?
What does the contract cost. ? A comment to the blog, indicates we pay to have sand removed.
Is the contractor allowed to keep his equipment and supplies in the town yard.?
Are we paying for a yard big enough to accommodate contractors' equipment and supplies?
Why shouldn't they pay for theri opwn yard? Does it save us money for them to use our space?
Or does it save the contractor on overheads? Do we benefit/?
Do we not have room to stock-pile used sand because of accommodating contractors equipment and supplies.
Just exactly how much are we saving by contracting out public works responsibilities?
Do they get to use our mechanics and parts department?
No I don't think that's a silly question.
If we are so cosy with contractors as to provide them a home why not all the comforts of home?
So, you see. Doubting Thomas , I can't give you the answeres you want. Bbecause I can't get the answers I want.
I can't because I'm the only one who wants them.
Staff don't need to pay attention to the lone councillor who thinks like a freak.
Monday, 26 May 2014
What triggers a memory
The ducks are back.
My clothes pins were left out all winter'; on the deck under the maple. The bucket lid was closed. But snow and dirt got in anyway. I've been using the pins on top.
This morning I brought the bucket in after I hung out the wash. Cleaning was overdue and the pins given a bit of a wipe as well.
The pins are bamboo. Really cheap. As I washed and dried with a dish cloth saved because it was sound if a bit discolored, I noticed things. Most of the bamboo pins are in good shape. Not too much rust on the springs. Only half a dozen plastic pins have survived and they have a lot of rust.
Replacing all of them would have cost little. Hardly worth the time it took to washand dry. But I can't bring myself to get rid of things that are still useable.
Maybe it's not so much that I think like a freak but I am a product of my environment.
But planned obsolescence has been part of my environment longer.
So maybe I do think like a freak.
As I wiped I thought of clothes pegs of the past. Gypsy women clad in shawls peddled them from wicker baskets carried resting on a hip encircled by an arm . Basket also probably woven by themselves. Pins were whittled with a knife from willow I think. . You might still find one here and there with a face painted on the knob and body dressed like a doll.
They were big pins. Laundry was heavier in those days. No man-made fibres.
There were no washing machines. no dryers. No electricity in the beginning.
Poor women did washing for better-off women. A boy might trundle it to and from in a battered old pram with wobbly wheels or a mother carried it, borne down by the weight of it.
Likely not much more than pennies changed hands. Storefront laundries were common.
People did what they had to do to survive.
You wouldn't believe the things we saved. Bits of string. Paper bags folded and re-used. More than once.
Games had little but imagination and organization. As many as fifteen or twenty kids got to-gether for a game.
On the ground playing bools,plunking them of first finger with the thumb. Conkers ,dried chestnuts , on a string. They were boys games. I never understood that.
Hide and Go Seek. ....Leave A' ....... A circle drawn with chalk was the den.A kid from the opposing team, running through the den with a cry meant everybody who had been captured could run free.
Choosing sides or who would be IT. One potato.two potato,three potato,four. Five potato,six potato,seven potato more. You're out.
Strange how often it was the youngest or slowest kid who was TT.
The games were all hard. We were breathless most of the time. Speed or skill were factors. Reputations were built and lost in the games we played.
We went home tired. Little inclined to anything but sleep. Just as well because there wasn't room for much else.
If the weather was bad we sat around the small coal range and listened to ghost stories .sang songs or played guessing games like My Grannie had a sweetie shop and in it she sold.,,,,
initials would be given and the sweetie had to be guessed for someone else to have a turn.
My clothes pins were left out all winter'; on the deck under the maple. The bucket lid was closed. But snow and dirt got in anyway. I've been using the pins on top.
This morning I brought the bucket in after I hung out the wash. Cleaning was overdue and the pins given a bit of a wipe as well.
The pins are bamboo. Really cheap. As I washed and dried with a dish cloth saved because it was sound if a bit discolored, I noticed things. Most of the bamboo pins are in good shape. Not too much rust on the springs. Only half a dozen plastic pins have survived and they have a lot of rust.
Replacing all of them would have cost little. Hardly worth the time it took to washand dry. But I can't bring myself to get rid of things that are still useable.
Maybe it's not so much that I think like a freak but I am a product of my environment.
But planned obsolescence has been part of my environment longer.
So maybe I do think like a freak.
As I wiped I thought of clothes pegs of the past. Gypsy women clad in shawls peddled them from wicker baskets carried resting on a hip encircled by an arm . Basket also probably woven by themselves. Pins were whittled with a knife from willow I think. . You might still find one here and there with a face painted on the knob and body dressed like a doll.
They were big pins. Laundry was heavier in those days. No man-made fibres.
There were no washing machines. no dryers. No electricity in the beginning.
Poor women did washing for better-off women. A boy might trundle it to and from in a battered old pram with wobbly wheels or a mother carried it, borne down by the weight of it.
Likely not much more than pennies changed hands. Storefront laundries were common.
People did what they had to do to survive.
You wouldn't believe the things we saved. Bits of string. Paper bags folded and re-used. More than once.
Games had little but imagination and organization. As many as fifteen or twenty kids got to-gether for a game.
On the ground playing bools,plunking them of first finger with the thumb. Conkers ,dried chestnuts , on a string. They were boys games. I never understood that.
Hide and Go Seek. ....Leave A' ....... A circle drawn with chalk was the den.A kid from the opposing team, running through the den with a cry meant everybody who had been captured could run free.
Choosing sides or who would be IT. One potato.two potato,three potato,four. Five potato,six potato,seven potato more. You're out.
Strange how often it was the youngest or slowest kid who was TT.
The games were all hard. We were breathless most of the time. Speed or skill were factors. Reputations were built and lost in the games we played.
We went home tired. Little inclined to anything but sleep. Just as well because there wasn't room for much else.
If the weather was bad we sat around the small coal range and listened to ghost stories .sang songs or played guessing games like My Grannie had a sweetie shop and in it she sold.,,,,
initials would be given and the sweetie had to be guessed for someone else to have a turn.
What's the message?
"Like a red rag to a bull"
It's a familiar saying. It means an incitement to rage.
If it has been discounted asa myth, I haven't heard it.
Not being terribly familiar ,I would still not risk entering a field with a bull wearing a red jacket.
That was the sense I took of the criticism of The Honorable Kathleen Wynn's campaign advert.
I don't think criticism of a campaign ad is disrespectful.
I haven't seen that one but there are certainly plenty of them. Without attention to content, they are attractive. But they are political campaign ads.
All feature the Premier.
Maybe if the message was more profound than locations schools,universities,hospitals,factories.train platforms,and now apparently on the family farm the Premier's wardrobe not draw any attention.
I just realized ......it's all about entitlements in the Wonderful World of Wynn.
Ads do not show the Premier in hard hat and construction boots at the chained and rusty gate of the
abandoned construction sites of gas-fired Hydro generation plants in Sousa and McCallion
land. Nor does she appear in those locations offering apologies with the appalling monuments to entitlement; $1.2 billion worth. as a back-drop.
We have an oddly similar circumstance right here in River City.
The Hydro building needed for our purpose was transferred to use of the Federal Department of National Defense. As a result, we are now contemplating construction of a $26.9 million works yard and garage complete with an $814.000. treatment facility to remove non-existent salt from snow melting in Spring temperatures.
Maybe during this campaign ,we will see Aurora/Newmarket Liberal candidate in a brand new dress uniform of the Queen's York Rangers accepting honors from the Regiment for favors received.
More entitlement so willingly provided.
It's a familiar saying. It means an incitement to rage.
If it has been discounted asa myth, I haven't heard it.
Not being terribly familiar ,I would still not risk entering a field with a bull wearing a red jacket.
That was the sense I took of the criticism of The Honorable Kathleen Wynn's campaign advert.
I don't think criticism of a campaign ad is disrespectful.
I haven't seen that one but there are certainly plenty of them. Without attention to content, they are attractive. But they are political campaign ads.
All feature the Premier.
Maybe if the message was more profound than locations schools,universities,hospitals,factories.train platforms,and now apparently on the family farm the Premier's wardrobe not draw any attention.
I just realized ......it's all about entitlements in the Wonderful World of Wynn.
Ads do not show the Premier in hard hat and construction boots at the chained and rusty gate of the
abandoned construction sites of gas-fired Hydro generation plants in Sousa and McCallion
land. Nor does she appear in those locations offering apologies with the appalling monuments to entitlement; $1.2 billion worth. as a back-drop.
We have an oddly similar circumstance right here in River City.
The Hydro building needed for our purpose was transferred to use of the Federal Department of National Defense. As a result, we are now contemplating construction of a $26.9 million works yard and garage complete with an $814.000. treatment facility to remove non-existent salt from snow melting in Spring temperatures.
Maybe during this campaign ,we will see Aurora/Newmarket Liberal candidate in a brand new dress uniform of the Queen's York Rangers accepting honors from the Regiment for favors received.
More entitlement so willingly provided.
Sunday, 25 May 2014
Busybodies
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Memory Lane. Thanks im Tim the Enchanter":
In the "good old days" referred to everything seemed simpler, and easier to repair.
Possibly life was more enjoyable then without the rush-rush of today and the intrusion of the world into our homes and into our lives.
I suppose it's a matter of perspective.
Posted by Anonymous to Our Town and Its Business at 25 May 2014 12:00
**********************
No it's not ....life never has been simple or easy to enjoy.
People had the same responsibilities, the same joys,the same sorrows.
Before phones and family cars, they walked to bring news . We walked to the post office to pick up mail. We stood in line everywhere and discussed current affairs.
There were no malls , shopping centres, donut shops or bank machines.No online banking or bill-paying.
Taxes were paid over the counter and Dorothy Wardle and Colleen Gowan brought people up to date on town business.
Water rates sent out with the hydro bill were paid at the office.
Polio left survivors crippled. Cancer was a death sentence. Childhood Diseases long forgotten were rampant .Epidemics carried off dozens.
Life was precious, grief just as devastating.
Tuberculosis was a scourge
A war that carried off hundreds of thousands of lives settled nothing thanks to the incompetence of those in charge. It started again and hundreds of thousands more men were led to slaughter.
Stupidity was obscured by jingoism and grief assuaged with medals,statues.monuments and endless
jargon about the glory of death and dismemberment.
Damage to survivors and their families was smothered into silence. To speak of the horror became a betrayal of those who did not return.
We send young people today to the bleakest places in the world, minds full of the same jargon.
It didn't work then and it's not working now. Some come back in caskets. Others terribly scarred by their experience. It's not new.
What's new is, the reality and futility of war can no longer be hushed up or glorified.We are not a country at war. Why are young Canadians being killed in God forsaken places and paying such a heavy price?
The perspective of war must change.
This post has not gone in the direction intended.
As well as citing cronyism and entitlements as twin problems for government of the day. the Economist editors listed government involvement inareas that are none of their business.
This week we have a Culture Master Plan on the agenda. Council directed it be prepared.
The usual guff. Meagre participation measured against meagre participation, deemed to be
satisfactory. But not.
We' compare it to other municipalities and feel good about ourselves.
We will refer to the Strategic Plan which promises an "exceptional quality of life".is sub-sumed in the Official Plan , requires an army of managers to implement and swallows up wheel-barrow loads of cash from our pockets.
Of the nine representatives sitting at the table to consider the plan. only one opposed the Culture Master Plan.. Only one is likely to think like a freak
The rest will raise their eyes and follow the magician's instruction to a T.
In the "good old days" referred to everything seemed simpler, and easier to repair.
Possibly life was more enjoyable then without the rush-rush of today and the intrusion of the world into our homes and into our lives.
I suppose it's a matter of perspective.
Posted by Anonymous to Our Town and Its Business at 25 May 2014 12:00
**********************
No it's not ....life never has been simple or easy to enjoy.
People had the same responsibilities, the same joys,the same sorrows.
Before phones and family cars, they walked to bring news . We walked to the post office to pick up mail. We stood in line everywhere and discussed current affairs.
There were no malls , shopping centres, donut shops or bank machines.No online banking or bill-paying.
Taxes were paid over the counter and Dorothy Wardle and Colleen Gowan brought people up to date on town business.
Water rates sent out with the hydro bill were paid at the office.
Polio left survivors crippled. Cancer was a death sentence. Childhood Diseases long forgotten were rampant .Epidemics carried off dozens.
Life was precious, grief just as devastating.
Tuberculosis was a scourge
A war that carried off hundreds of thousands of lives settled nothing thanks to the incompetence of those in charge. It started again and hundreds of thousands more men were led to slaughter.
Stupidity was obscured by jingoism and grief assuaged with medals,statues.monuments and endless
jargon about the glory of death and dismemberment.
Damage to survivors and their families was smothered into silence. To speak of the horror became a betrayal of those who did not return.
We send young people today to the bleakest places in the world, minds full of the same jargon.
It didn't work then and it's not working now. Some come back in caskets. Others terribly scarred by their experience. It's not new.
What's new is, the reality and futility of war can no longer be hushed up or glorified.We are not a country at war. Why are young Canadians being killed in God forsaken places and paying such a heavy price?
The perspective of war must change.
This post has not gone in the direction intended.
As well as citing cronyism and entitlements as twin problems for government of the day. the Economist editors listed government involvement inareas that are none of their business.
This week we have a Culture Master Plan on the agenda. Council directed it be prepared.
The usual guff. Meagre participation measured against meagre participation, deemed to be
satisfactory. But not.
We' compare it to other municipalities and feel good about ourselves.
We will refer to the Strategic Plan which promises an "exceptional quality of life".is sub-sumed in the Official Plan , requires an army of managers to implement and swallows up wheel-barrow loads of cash from our pockets.
Of the nine representatives sitting at the table to consider the plan. only one opposed the Culture Master Plan.. Only one is likely to think like a freak
The rest will raise their eyes and follow the magician's instruction to a T.
More Clarity about Clear Bags
Tim the Enchanter has left a new comment on your post "Clear bags versus opaque...how obscure is the plan...":
A portion From the Ajax News May 8/2014
Ajax will be using the new incinerator as well so their council is doing the Clear Bag Boogie too.
The "reasoning" is the same used in Aurora - burning batteries and other recyclables will cause air quality issues.
However.
"Mirka Januszkiewicz, Durham Region’s director of waste management services, says a “comprehensive” staff report on the issue is coming to regional council. She also noted that clear bags are not a magical solution to preventing hazardous items from reaching the incinerator -- or for increasing Durham’s waste-diversion rate. She says “education is the best safeguard” and that even in a clear garbage bag, a waste disposal driver will not be able to distinguish a battery, for example."
Exactly.
How hard is it to hide a few household batteries?
And why weren't those batteries disposed of correctly?
Because we all know how to do that - right?
I'm not sure who's been mixing up this "clear bags will save the environment" Kool-Aid but councils near and far have been drinking it.
Of course there are the privacy issues but there seems to be a workaround there.
So you stop buying green bags and buy clear bags.
What's the big deal?
Nothing.
Much.
Other than I don't appreciate the fact that my own town council has apparently given up on recycling education and decided that good old-fashioned public shaming is just the ticket, as if picking up our garbage was a favour and not actually financed by the piles of cash that we leave on the Town Hall doorstep every year.
And I'm a tad miffed, though not the least bit surprised that they've found a handy consultant, who for only $45000 will inform us all of the subtle, yet distinct difference between green (bad) and clear(good) bags.
That's almost a year's worth of Hillary House financing isn't it?
Publish
Dele
Posted by Tim the Enchanter to Our Town and Its Business at 24 May 2014 19:56
A portion From the Ajax News May 8/2014
Ajax will be using the new incinerator as well so their council is doing the Clear Bag Boogie too.
The "reasoning" is the same used in Aurora - burning batteries and other recyclables will cause air quality issues.
However.
"Mirka Januszkiewicz, Durham Region’s director of waste management services, says a “comprehensive” staff report on the issue is coming to regional council. She also noted that clear bags are not a magical solution to preventing hazardous items from reaching the incinerator -- or for increasing Durham’s waste-diversion rate. She says “education is the best safeguard” and that even in a clear garbage bag, a waste disposal driver will not be able to distinguish a battery, for example."
Exactly.
How hard is it to hide a few household batteries?
And why weren't those batteries disposed of correctly?
Because we all know how to do that - right?
I'm not sure who's been mixing up this "clear bags will save the environment" Kool-Aid but councils near and far have been drinking it.
Of course there are the privacy issues but there seems to be a workaround there.
So you stop buying green bags and buy clear bags.
What's the big deal?
Nothing.
Much.
Other than I don't appreciate the fact that my own town council has apparently given up on recycling education and decided that good old-fashioned public shaming is just the ticket, as if picking up our garbage was a favour and not actually financed by the piles of cash that we leave on the Town Hall doorstep every year.
And I'm a tad miffed, though not the least bit surprised that they've found a handy consultant, who for only $45000 will inform us all of the subtle, yet distinct difference between green (bad) and clear(good) bags.
That's almost a year's worth of Hillary House financing isn't it?
Publish
Dele
Posted by Tim the Enchanter to Our Town and Its Business at 24 May 2014 19:56
Memory Lane. Thanks to Tim the Enchanter
Tim the Enchanter has left a new comment on your post "Clear bags versus opaque...how obscure is the plan...":
This week at Council
1. Received an estimate from the Godson construction company of approximately $1,500 for paving, grading and curbing a strip of payment on the grade at Centre and Yonge Sts. 163' x 28' and left the matter to be included in the town inspection by council on Saturday.
2. Named Saturday, May 25 as inspection day of the town by council members.
3. Received a letter from the C.N.R. industrial commission regarding water facilities in town for an industry and asked for further information.
4. Appointed finance and property committee to deal with the offer of A.A. Cook for the purchase of the match factory property.
5. Conferred with Mr. Bazley of Dehydrating Processes Ltd. regarding the quit claim deed to be received by the town and received assurance of co-operation.
6. Heard report of Dr. C.J. Devins on the health of the assistant town clerk, M.L. Andrews, and on a unanimous vote of council granted Mr. Andrews a two or three months' leave of absence, the first month on full pay and the succeeding time on half pay.
7. Heard Dr. C.J. Devins present the recommendations and suggestions of the safety week committee.
8. Heard Robert Smith, town employee, request increased wages and placed him on full-time at $18 per week for four months ending Sept. 30. His services to be hired from then on at 35 cents per hour as at present.
9. Heard Dr. C.J. Devans suggest a clean-up campaign to keep the streets and boulevards cleaner and urge the use of street receptacles for waste.
10. Approved purchase by fire committee of 2,000 ft of copper wire and materials at a cost of $64.70 for use in installing bells in the homes of brigade members and of replacing worn-out lines in alarm system
11. Heard David Judd and his brother Donald Judd complain of the visciousness of a certain collie dog and discussed at length the dog problem and the question of a municipal pound.
12. Approved use of Constables Dunham and Goulding at a central crossing for public school children at Yonge and Church Sts. daily.
13. Passed recommendations of relief committee whereby inspection and supervision of relief gardens will be made and a certain quota of production attained before any relief will be granted next winter.
14. Learned the provincial government will contribute $87.50 to the town for the expenditures on relief gardens.
15. Referred offer of Professor Henri Lasere of the use of 25 acres on his property (the Collins farm) for use or relief gardens to the relief committee.
16. Approved purchase of transformers by the electric light committee from Maloney Electric, all prices submitted being the same.
17. Approved purchase of a new Union Jack for the town hall at a cost of $12.
Oh - did I mention it was this week in May 1940?
The Mayor was JM Walton and council meetings were on Mondays.
"Of Mice and Men" was playing at the Royal Theatre.
The British Expeditionary Force was trapped at Dunkirk waiting for evacuation.
In the first baseball game of season in the Aurora town league Collis Leather defeated Fleury Bissell 7-4.
(incidentally, Fleury-Bissell had confirmed in April that they were moving to Elora ON)
Regarding items 13,14 & 15.
Aurora council made it a rule that in order to qualify for winter relief one had to cultivate a garden and grow two bags of potatoes per person and two bushels of turnips, carrots etc.
The town was allotting land to applicants, inspecting the gardens and providing storage if needed.
Just thought we might enjoy an interesting little respite from some of the current political heat.
Posted by Tim the Enchanter to Our Town and Its Business at 24 May 2014 22:31
This week at Council
1. Received an estimate from the Godson construction company of approximately $1,500 for paving, grading and curbing a strip of payment on the grade at Centre and Yonge Sts. 163' x 28' and left the matter to be included in the town inspection by council on Saturday.
2. Named Saturday, May 25 as inspection day of the town by council members.
3. Received a letter from the C.N.R. industrial commission regarding water facilities in town for an industry and asked for further information.
4. Appointed finance and property committee to deal with the offer of A.A. Cook for the purchase of the match factory property.
5. Conferred with Mr. Bazley of Dehydrating Processes Ltd. regarding the quit claim deed to be received by the town and received assurance of co-operation.
6. Heard report of Dr. C.J. Devins on the health of the assistant town clerk, M.L. Andrews, and on a unanimous vote of council granted Mr. Andrews a two or three months' leave of absence, the first month on full pay and the succeeding time on half pay.
7. Heard Dr. C.J. Devins present the recommendations and suggestions of the safety week committee.
8. Heard Robert Smith, town employee, request increased wages and placed him on full-time at $18 per week for four months ending Sept. 30. His services to be hired from then on at 35 cents per hour as at present.
9. Heard Dr. C.J. Devans suggest a clean-up campaign to keep the streets and boulevards cleaner and urge the use of street receptacles for waste.
10. Approved purchase by fire committee of 2,000 ft of copper wire and materials at a cost of $64.70 for use in installing bells in the homes of brigade members and of replacing worn-out lines in alarm system
11. Heard David Judd and his brother Donald Judd complain of the visciousness of a certain collie dog and discussed at length the dog problem and the question of a municipal pound.
12. Approved use of Constables Dunham and Goulding at a central crossing for public school children at Yonge and Church Sts. daily.
13. Passed recommendations of relief committee whereby inspection and supervision of relief gardens will be made and a certain quota of production attained before any relief will be granted next winter.
14. Learned the provincial government will contribute $87.50 to the town for the expenditures on relief gardens.
15. Referred offer of Professor Henri Lasere of the use of 25 acres on his property (the Collins farm) for use or relief gardens to the relief committee.
16. Approved purchase of transformers by the electric light committee from Maloney Electric, all prices submitted being the same.
17. Approved purchase of a new Union Jack for the town hall at a cost of $12.
Oh - did I mention it was this week in May 1940?
The Mayor was JM Walton and council meetings were on Mondays.
"Of Mice and Men" was playing at the Royal Theatre.
The British Expeditionary Force was trapped at Dunkirk waiting for evacuation.
In the first baseball game of season in the Aurora town league Collis Leather defeated Fleury Bissell 7-4.
(incidentally, Fleury-Bissell had confirmed in April that they were moving to Elora ON)
Regarding items 13,14 & 15.
Aurora council made it a rule that in order to qualify for winter relief one had to cultivate a garden and grow two bags of potatoes per person and two bushels of turnips, carrots etc.
The town was allotting land to applicants, inspecting the gardens and providing storage if needed.
Just thought we might enjoy an interesting little respite from some of the current political heat.
Posted by Tim the Enchanter to Our Town and Its Business at 24 May 2014 22:31
Saturday, 24 May 2014
Clear bags versus opaque...how obscure is the plan. What else don't we know?
A garbage incinerator is being jointly built by Durham and York Region. Garbage will no longer be trucked across the border to another country for disposal because we are so pernickety we can't stand
the idea of disposing it in our neighbourhood.
The last person who dared to identify a suitable site sufficiently distant from all human habitation was Bob Rae when he was Ontario's Premier and we all know what happened to him.And if you don't.I don't
I don't know why you don't because we keep being reminded by other parties what an awful period that was.
He suggested public servants in all sectors take days off without pay so that nobody would have to be laid off.
Oh My Lord , the Public Service Unions under Sid Ryan, new friend of the Liberals, can still be heard over the years in their screams of outrage.
Bob Rae gave up on the NDP after that. But he never lived it down. There was a perfect example of a Leader who tried to deal with entitlement and paid the penalty.
Anyway, back to clear bags and the incinerator.
When the incinerator is operating, garbage content becomes critical.
The problem is about batteries and such getting into the incinerator and causing toxic emissions into the atmosphere.
The problem with clear plastic bags is public acceptance .
People don't like their garbage to be exposed. garbage men might have similar reluctance.
So...small opaque bags inside the clear bags, can be used for that stuff.
At first , I thought the plan was fine. Then a consultant was brought in .I didn't know we had hired a consultant.
He talked about enforcement. I asked "How is that proposed" He said "Bylaw officers would issue tickets."
I almost fell back in my chair. Somehow I couldn't picture that.
Now the suggestion is a bag containing something it shouldn't would get a sticker and be left behind.
Well no. That's not much better.
Markham's experience has been positive. Rates of separation have improved tremendously.
Initial reaction in Aurora is negative. So....The first hurdle is overcoming the first hurdle.
We need a few answers. Getting permission to build an incinerator is not a simple process.
Was the risk of toxic emissions. a known factor and a qualified risk. If not why is it offered as an
argument for clear bags?
Other countries use incinerators. Do they use clear plastic bags ? Or what?
What else do we need to know we haven't been told until now?
We certainly don't want toxic emissions from a garbage incinerator.
If clear bags versus opaque bags are the solution ,I don't think that should be a hard sell.
I think we need to do a better job of informing than we ever have before. Including this time.
the idea of disposing it in our neighbourhood.
The last person who dared to identify a suitable site sufficiently distant from all human habitation was Bob Rae when he was Ontario's Premier and we all know what happened to him.And if you don't.I don't
I don't know why you don't because we keep being reminded by other parties what an awful period that was.
He suggested public servants in all sectors take days off without pay so that nobody would have to be laid off.
Oh My Lord , the Public Service Unions under Sid Ryan, new friend of the Liberals, can still be heard over the years in their screams of outrage.
Bob Rae gave up on the NDP after that. But he never lived it down. There was a perfect example of a Leader who tried to deal with entitlement and paid the penalty.
Anyway, back to clear bags and the incinerator.
When the incinerator is operating, garbage content becomes critical.
The problem is about batteries and such getting into the incinerator and causing toxic emissions into the atmosphere.
The problem with clear plastic bags is public acceptance .
People don't like their garbage to be exposed. garbage men might have similar reluctance.
So...small opaque bags inside the clear bags, can be used for that stuff.
At first , I thought the plan was fine. Then a consultant was brought in .I didn't know we had hired a consultant.
He talked about enforcement. I asked "How is that proposed" He said "Bylaw officers would issue tickets."
I almost fell back in my chair. Somehow I couldn't picture that.
Now the suggestion is a bag containing something it shouldn't would get a sticker and be left behind.
Well no. That's not much better.
Markham's experience has been positive. Rates of separation have improved tremendously.
Initial reaction in Aurora is negative. So....The first hurdle is overcoming the first hurdle.
We need a few answers. Getting permission to build an incinerator is not a simple process.
Was the risk of toxic emissions. a known factor and a qualified risk. If not why is it offered as an
argument for clear bags?
Other countries use incinerators. Do they use clear plastic bags ? Or what?
What else do we need to know we haven't been told until now?
We certainly don't want toxic emissions from a garbage incinerator.
If clear bags versus opaque bags are the solution ,I don't think that should be a hard sell.
I think we need to do a better job of informing than we ever have before. Including this time.
Contractors do well out of it
My street has a strip of asphalt down the middle. Grit,gravel and dust form the shoulders of the road.
It's referred to as "soft". Drainage is by ditch and culvert.
It's been like that more than fifty years. Getting close to heritage status. Stable neighbourhood.
Street vistas unlikely to change. Tree groupings established. A former Mayor has always lived in a house on the street. House owned and occupied all those years by the same family.
We don't have sidewalks so we don't get sidewalk plowing in winter. Why would we?
But we do have the privilege of paying for sidewalk plowing elsewhere.
We do get street -sweepng though. It's not clear why. The sand has washed off the street onto the soft shoulder and on into the drainage ditch long before the street-sweeper arrives.
What the machine does, is send up choking clouds of dust to come back down and settle on grass and gardens just beginning to green up nicely.
Windows,window sills and shutters do not benefit.
Contractors probably appreciate the business though.
It's referred to as "soft". Drainage is by ditch and culvert.
It's been like that more than fifty years. Getting close to heritage status. Stable neighbourhood.
Street vistas unlikely to change. Tree groupings established. A former Mayor has always lived in a house on the street. House owned and occupied all those years by the same family.
We don't have sidewalks so we don't get sidewalk plowing in winter. Why would we?
But we do have the privilege of paying for sidewalk plowing elsewhere.
We do get street -sweepng though. It's not clear why. The sand has washed off the street onto the soft shoulder and on into the drainage ditch long before the street-sweeper arrives.
What the machine does, is send up choking clouds of dust to come back down and settle on grass and gardens just beginning to green up nicely.
Windows,window sills and shutters do not benefit.
Contractors probably appreciate the business though.
Think Like A Freak...It's a good thing
Charlie Rose is on from 5-6 on weeknights.All of his guests are interesting but some more than others
depending on one's interest.
Last Tuesday was very satisfying. A full half hour of discussion for each book; The Fourth Revolution and Think LIke A Freak.
My mind was still engaged when I sat down at the Council table
Cronyism and entitlement. Think like a freak. How totally relevant to the times we live in.
There really is nothing new under the sun.
On the agenda ,a budget increase was recommended for sand and salt. Sand is considerably cheaper than salt. The winter was severe. Stocks were used up Prices rise when demand increases.
I asked a question about re-using sand. as was the practice back in the day.
Sand collected from the pavement after winter use is contaminated. So it can't be used again for road maintenance. The answer was unacceptable. But if no-one else picks up on the question, I am left to spin my wheels.
The Mayor from his lofty perch will call a point of order and ask "What is the relevance?"
A point of order requires a statement , not a question, and a ruling by the chair.
I will react to the combination of the Mayor's thin-lipped,pointy-nosed superiority and ham-fisted mis-statement of the rule. At that point. I am much more likely to break every rule in the book. The discussion will go off the rails. Maygem will ensue.
The town will continue to pay a contractor to sweep the streets, colect the sand and truck it off elsewhere. We will probably continue to provide space in the town's yard for the contractor to park his equipment at no cost to himself. While we contemplate with equanimity a figure of $26,9 million
for a garage and yard.
Later in the meeting, the clear plastic bag program was recommended deferred. We spent 40 minutes discussing before approving deferral.
In the course of discussion,Councillor Thompson revealed ,he and the Mayor had made an expedition to Markham where the program is in place, to discover how it is operating.
Councillor Abel indicated he had gone too.
I wondered ...did they ride around on the garbage truck?
Maybe hanging on at the back?
Were they examining contents of the bags perhaps ?
Then I thought...wait a minute...why is it always these three?
The Mayor and Thompson are monitoring financing of the Joint Facility project.
The Mayor and Abel are Council's representation on the secretive Vulture Centre Board.
What else are they up to , the rest of us don't know about?
They certyainly lined up the votes to approve spending $29.6 million on the joint facility?
We should re-think that name,I think.
Sounds a lot like cronyism to me. But then....I think .... I must be thinking like a freak....because I seem to be the only one.
depending on one's interest.
Last Tuesday was very satisfying. A full half hour of discussion for each book; The Fourth Revolution and Think LIke A Freak.
My mind was still engaged when I sat down at the Council table
Cronyism and entitlement. Think like a freak. How totally relevant to the times we live in.
There really is nothing new under the sun.
On the agenda ,a budget increase was recommended for sand and salt. Sand is considerably cheaper than salt. The winter was severe. Stocks were used up Prices rise when demand increases.
I asked a question about re-using sand. as was the practice back in the day.
Sand collected from the pavement after winter use is contaminated. So it can't be used again for road maintenance. The answer was unacceptable. But if no-one else picks up on the question, I am left to spin my wheels.
The Mayor from his lofty perch will call a point of order and ask "What is the relevance?"
A point of order requires a statement , not a question, and a ruling by the chair.
I will react to the combination of the Mayor's thin-lipped,pointy-nosed superiority and ham-fisted mis-statement of the rule. At that point. I am much more likely to break every rule in the book. The discussion will go off the rails. Maygem will ensue.
The town will continue to pay a contractor to sweep the streets, colect the sand and truck it off elsewhere. We will probably continue to provide space in the town's yard for the contractor to park his equipment at no cost to himself. While we contemplate with equanimity a figure of $26,9 million
for a garage and yard.
Later in the meeting, the clear plastic bag program was recommended deferred. We spent 40 minutes discussing before approving deferral.
In the course of discussion,Councillor Thompson revealed ,he and the Mayor had made an expedition to Markham where the program is in place, to discover how it is operating.
Councillor Abel indicated he had gone too.
I wondered ...did they ride around on the garbage truck?
Maybe hanging on at the back?
Were they examining contents of the bags perhaps ?
Then I thought...wait a minute...why is it always these three?
The Mayor and Thompson are monitoring financing of the Joint Facility project.
The Mayor and Abel are Council's representation on the secretive Vulture Centre Board.
What else are they up to , the rest of us don't know about?
They certyainly lined up the votes to approve spending $29.6 million on the joint facility?
We should re-think that name,I think.
Sounds a lot like cronyism to me. But then....I think .... I must be thinking like a freak....because I seem to be the only one.
Friday, 23 May 2014
Cronyism and Entitlements
has left a new comment on your post "Us and Them":
Even if the entitlement trend continues, the flow of money from governments
cannot. We just have a particularly virulent strain of it due to
Posted by Anonymous to Our Town and Its Business at 23 May 2014 15:04
****************************
This comment brings a particular issue to mind.
A land parcel in Mavrinac was relinquished by the Separate school board.
The town has no purpose for the land. The neighbourhood is fully serviced with parks according to approved standards.
Councillor Gallo hand-delivered aletter advising neighbours the land should be a park
He reserved the Council chamber and residents were invited to rally in support.
It had been done before.
Hydro One planned to distribute increased supply in the Hydro corridor.
The alarm was sounded. A ferocious campaign ensued starting with the Council Chamber being reserved to rally the forces.
Aurora joined the Town of Markham and a $100,000 was used to oppose the proposal.
The Ontario Power Authority, a second government agency was eventually created a committee was formed to develop an alternative to Hydro One's plans. They met over a period of months.
Natural gas fired generation plants were the agreed alternative.
An election was held. A promise was made by the challenger to bury existing hydro wires.
A partial slate was elected. The Mayor's office changed hands.
Councillor Gallo was a first-time candidate in the election. The votes that changed the Mayoralty came from his neighbourhood.
He was appointed to fill the vacancy when Councillor Marsh resigned
A site was chosen by the Ontario Power Authority and a natural gas fired generation plant designed and presented to Council for approval.
No doubt land had been acquired and contracts signed.
It was opposed by Aurora.
Had to be built in the neighbouring Municipality of King
The promise to bury hydro wires was never raised again by the promised ones or those who made the promise.
The story continued to and the Mayoralty changed again. A further chapter is on hand and once again the Mayor's office is subject to challenge,
A successful strategy has been re-played.
Willing residents responded to Councillor Gallo's enticement.
Councillors nimbly leaped into the wagon.
The Town is in the process of litigation to compel the property-owner to sell land to the municipality for a fraction of its value.
The litigation could extend over years... with everybody on side ,it may not be an issue in the election.
All that's at stake ?...public resources....tax dollars.
Peanuts in the grand scheme of things.
Even if the entitlement trend continues, the flow of money from governments
cannot. We just have a particularly virulent strain of it due to
Posted by Anonymous to Our Town and Its Business at 23 May 2014 15:04
****************************
This comment brings a particular issue to mind.
A land parcel in Mavrinac was relinquished by the Separate school board.
The town has no purpose for the land. The neighbourhood is fully serviced with parks according to approved standards.
Councillor Gallo hand-delivered aletter advising neighbours the land should be a park
He reserved the Council chamber and residents were invited to rally in support.
It had been done before.
Hydro One planned to distribute increased supply in the Hydro corridor.
The alarm was sounded. A ferocious campaign ensued starting with the Council Chamber being reserved to rally the forces.
Aurora joined the Town of Markham and a $100,000 was used to oppose the proposal.
The Ontario Power Authority, a second government agency was eventually created a committee was formed to develop an alternative to Hydro One's plans. They met over a period of months.
Natural gas fired generation plants were the agreed alternative.
An election was held. A promise was made by the challenger to bury existing hydro wires.
A partial slate was elected. The Mayor's office changed hands.
Councillor Gallo was a first-time candidate in the election. The votes that changed the Mayoralty came from his neighbourhood.
He was appointed to fill the vacancy when Councillor Marsh resigned
A site was chosen by the Ontario Power Authority and a natural gas fired generation plant designed and presented to Council for approval.
No doubt land had been acquired and contracts signed.
It was opposed by Aurora.
Had to be built in the neighbouring Municipality of King
The promise to bury hydro wires was never raised again by the promised ones or those who made the promise.
The story continued to and the Mayoralty changed again. A further chapter is on hand and once again the Mayor's office is subject to challenge,
A successful strategy has been re-played.
Willing residents responded to Councillor Gallo's enticement.
Councillors nimbly leaped into the wagon.
The Town is in the process of litigation to compel the property-owner to sell land to the municipality for a fraction of its value.
The litigation could extend over years... with everybody on side ,it may not be an issue in the election.
All that's at stake ?...public resources....tax dollars.
Peanuts in the grand scheme of things.
Us and Them
When I responded to Mr. Newman's letter to The Auroran ,I had only read the headline. I didn't read the letter. The headline set me off.
Yes Yes,,,I admit to human failings. What do you want from me? .Sackcloth and ashes?It's not going to happen.
Since the thread continued, I thought I ought to check back to the beginning.
Mr.Newman's letter prompted my memory. It sent me back to twin letters in The Auroran a few years ago. One from Mr.McIntyre another from an apparent friend. I can't remember what it was about. But the most likely issue was The Petch House.
The friend commented I had outlived my usefulness and should step aside.
Just like Mr.Newman did. Now that I think of it, it may even be one and the same.
Being scolded for being disrespectful by a person being disrespectful is an interesting contradiction.
I have been elected a number of times in free and clear elections.
I do hold the office of Councillor.
I have held the office of Reeve and County Councillor as well as Mayor and Regional Councillor and sundry others.
It appears my manners were acceptable to a sufficient number of Aurorans ,over several generations, to generate sufficient support at the polls where it counts.
I have held the office of Reeve and County Councillor as well as Mayor and Regional Councillor and sundry others.
It appears my manners were acceptable to a sufficient number of Aurorans ,over several generations, to generate sufficient support at the polls where it counts.
I am in the happy circumstance of being myself, being in politics and never having to say I'm sorry
because I always did my best.
I thought about it as I listened to the twin editors of The Economist talking about their book The Fourth Revolution on Charlie Rose on Tuesday before I went to the Council meeting. They identified cronyism and entitlements as the main problems for governments
Charlie asked who is the world's best leader." Angela Merkel" they said. But even she is caught in the common dilemma. She knows the problem. Knows how to fix it. But if she does she can't get elected.
Well,I thought,there she is the most powerful woman in the world,carrying the heaviest burden she can't do what needs to be done because getting elected is the most important thing in her life . I understand that. I am not unsympathetic.
Well,I thought,there she is the most powerful woman in the world,carrying the heaviest burden she can't do what needs to be done because getting elected is the most important thing in her life . I understand that. I am not unsympathetic.
In my very much less exalted position , I think I am fortunate. I enjoy politics. But most important to me is ,when people vote for me,they know exactly what to expect.
I will be true.
I will be true.
I have banked my life and everything else on the principle ...honesty matters ....to me ...to my parents and grandparents before me and to people like me.
And there are more of us than there are of them.
Thursday, 22 May 2014
I LOVE YOU DAD
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "To Lighten the Moment":
I was scouting for Father's Day cards this morning. What a bunch of drivel ! When I finally found a few possibilities, I realized that so many of the time-honoured words have lost their meaning. We have become a place of platitudes and political correctness lacking in humour and empathy.
Posted by Anonymous to Our Town and Its Business at 22 May 2014 10:29
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yes, Indeed we have, It's why you are looking for a fancy card to tell Dad how much you love him.
He already knows that. He's known you all your life. You don't need to hand your Father a card
to tell him you love him. Just give him a hug , hold him close for more than a minute.
The card thing is about separating you from your resources. Doesn't have a damn thing to do with loving your Dad.
We had a report on Tuesday recommending a big increase in the sand and salt budget because of the severe winter we had All our stock pile was used up.
I asked the Director if we still collected sand and re-used it ,
"No." he said. "It's contaminated and the street sweeper contractor takes it away and disposes of it."
"How does he do that if it's contaminated" I asked. "And sand is permeable. Doesn't it clean itself in the rain?"
I gave up on the argument at that point. If nobody else picks up on it, it means nobody is interested and nothing will come of it.
But think about it. Sandy beaches are our favorite recreation places. We can lie on it comfortably.
We can make a pillow of it. Be buried in it for our children's amusement.
We dig in it. Make castles in the sand. Put moats around them. Let the baby crawl on the sand.
When they are really young we let them put it in their mouths to discover it's not candy.
It's out there in the rain. They tell us pollutants in the atmosphere come down in the rain. But the
rain washes through sand and cleans it.
Why discard it instead of re-using it on roads for next winter's maintenance.
We have $814,000 in the Joint Facility budget for snow storage. Why collect snow to store and not sand ?
We could buy a snow melter for half the money budgeted to store snow.
Streets would be clear in half the time
We would stop trundling trucks full of snow to an almost $million storage facility,
We would save on gas and manpower and stop polluting the atmosphere.
But Oh Dear me! No
There is no imperative to save...only to spend.
A consultant would have to do a study. It would take six months, There would have to be surveys and interviews and a mile long report written at a cost of $150. a word.
If Councillors didn't agree we could get external legal advice to tell us what decision we are allowed to make under the circumstance. We have legal services on staff but if we don't like advice given
we can retain another lawyer.
Judgement doesn't come into it. That's not why we were elected.
A learned Judge told me once .... "the law is not what people think it is...and it's not what it should be," By Jove, he was right.
So, if we can't depend on the law to be what we think it ought to be, why should we expect politics to be any better.
Well because we do....that's why.
Because we are eternal optimists,
We have Blog and every four years ,we have a vote.
The only other thing we need are honest, sensible men and women....good and true...to offer themselves as candidates.
You don't need a fancy card with words written by someone else to tell your Dad you love him.
Just hold him tight in your arms and say "I love you Dad. "
Be glad you have a Dad.
Don't wait for Father's Day. Tell him every time you talk to him or see him.
I was scouting for Father's Day cards this morning. What a bunch of drivel ! When I finally found a few possibilities, I realized that so many of the time-honoured words have lost their meaning. We have become a place of platitudes and political correctness lacking in humour and empathy.
Posted by Anonymous to Our Town and Its Business at 22 May 2014 10:29
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yes, Indeed we have, It's why you are looking for a fancy card to tell Dad how much you love him.
He already knows that. He's known you all your life. You don't need to hand your Father a card
to tell him you love him. Just give him a hug , hold him close for more than a minute.
The card thing is about separating you from your resources. Doesn't have a damn thing to do with loving your Dad.
We had a report on Tuesday recommending a big increase in the sand and salt budget because of the severe winter we had All our stock pile was used up.
I asked the Director if we still collected sand and re-used it ,
"No." he said. "It's contaminated and the street sweeper contractor takes it away and disposes of it."
"How does he do that if it's contaminated" I asked. "And sand is permeable. Doesn't it clean itself in the rain?"
I gave up on the argument at that point. If nobody else picks up on it, it means nobody is interested and nothing will come of it.
But think about it. Sandy beaches are our favorite recreation places. We can lie on it comfortably.
We can make a pillow of it. Be buried in it for our children's amusement.
We dig in it. Make castles in the sand. Put moats around them. Let the baby crawl on the sand.
When they are really young we let them put it in their mouths to discover it's not candy.
It's out there in the rain. They tell us pollutants in the atmosphere come down in the rain. But the
rain washes through sand and cleans it.
Why discard it instead of re-using it on roads for next winter's maintenance.
We have $814,000 in the Joint Facility budget for snow storage. Why collect snow to store and not sand ?
We could buy a snow melter for half the money budgeted to store snow.
Streets would be clear in half the time
We would stop trundling trucks full of snow to an almost $million storage facility,
We would save on gas and manpower and stop polluting the atmosphere.
But Oh Dear me! No
There is no imperative to save...only to spend.
A consultant would have to do a study. It would take six months, There would have to be surveys and interviews and a mile long report written at a cost of $150. a word.
If Councillors didn't agree we could get external legal advice to tell us what decision we are allowed to make under the circumstance. We have legal services on staff but if we don't like advice given
we can retain another lawyer.
Judgement doesn't come into it. That's not why we were elected.
A learned Judge told me once .... "the law is not what people think it is...and it's not what it should be," By Jove, he was right.
So, if we can't depend on the law to be what we think it ought to be, why should we expect politics to be any better.
Well because we do....that's why.
Because we are eternal optimists,
We have Blog and every four years ,we have a vote.
The only other thing we need are honest, sensible men and women....good and true...to offer themselves as candidates.
You don't need a fancy card with words written by someone else to tell your Dad you love him.
Just hold him tight in your arms and say "I love you Dad. "
Be glad you have a Dad.
Don't wait for Father's Day. Tell him every time you talk to him or see him.
Charlie Rose Has It All
Charlie Rose' program on Tuesday was particularly interesting ...and satisfying.
Two books were on the table, each with collaboration of two authors.
First was The Fourth Revolution and second... Think Like A Freak.
Half the program was allocated to each. Authors of the first ,were Editor-in-Chief of the Economist, a British journal and its Managing editor.
The second was a journalist of high repute and an eminent professor.
I don't remember names but they could be googled
The first examined organized government from the beginning of civilization. China having the first civil service.
There have been three revolutions already . We are in the midst of a fourth.
Governments world over have ground to a halt in chaos .
We know about that don't we in Aurora. We could have written the book . the perfect microcosm.
In my mind the difference is .......at our level of government, a candidate ,who commits to seizing cronyism and entitlement by the throat and giving the pair a bone -rattling shake ...can get elected.
I've been doing it for years. Hoping it would catch on. Maybe now's the time.
The second book was a serious look at our conditioning.
Analogy of an art was used.
A magician , holding a kerchief, stretches his arm up and instructs his audience to pay close attention. Adults do.
A child, on the other hand, looks where he wants to and spots the magician's sleight of hand .
The Professor offered another analogy, closer to home. A person ,very much his junior ,could offer an idea to a group and get zero reaction. Ten minutes later, the professor offers precisely the same idea and genius is instantly proclaimed.
As a person without credentials, what I offer is simple and common sense. But the table perceives it to be too simple and too common. It can't be worth much .
It's my experience... as one without status... and outside cronyism , whose ideas must be squashed .... whose rights must be trampled with lawyers and such....
if that's what it takes. .. and that's what it took .
But the jury's still out.... thrown out in fact
Two books were on the table, each with collaboration of two authors.
First was The Fourth Revolution and second... Think Like A Freak.
Half the program was allocated to each. Authors of the first ,were Editor-in-Chief of the Economist, a British journal and its Managing editor.
The second was a journalist of high repute and an eminent professor.
I don't remember names but they could be googled
The first examined organized government from the beginning of civilization. China having the first civil service.
There have been three revolutions already . We are in the midst of a fourth.
Governments world over have ground to a halt in chaos .
We know about that don't we in Aurora. We could have written the book . the perfect microcosm.
In my mind the difference is .......at our level of government, a candidate ,who commits to seizing cronyism and entitlement by the throat and giving the pair a bone -rattling shake ...can get elected.
I've been doing it for years. Hoping it would catch on. Maybe now's the time.
The second book was a serious look at our conditioning.
Analogy of an art was used.
A magician , holding a kerchief, stretches his arm up and instructs his audience to pay close attention. Adults do.
A child, on the other hand, looks where he wants to and spots the magician's sleight of hand .
The Professor offered another analogy, closer to home. A person ,very much his junior ,could offer an idea to a group and get zero reaction. Ten minutes later, the professor offers precisely the same idea and genius is instantly proclaimed.
As a person without credentials, what I offer is simple and common sense. But the table perceives it to be too simple and too common. It can't be worth much .
It's my experience... as one without status... and outside cronyism , whose ideas must be squashed .... whose rights must be trampled with lawyers and such....
if that's what it takes. .. and that's what it took .
But the jury's still out.... thrown out in fact
Wednesday, 21 May 2014
An Item Of Correspondence.
The following is an e-mail forwarded to the Chairman of the executive committee of theFarmers Market, in response to an e-mail received
A 3 page PDF was attached .I cannot copy it for your information. If anyone can tell me how,I will be forever indebted .
Perhaps the writer could oblige. The missive was copied to all members of council, the CAO ,the Clerk of the Municipality and the two council representatives to the Market.
I've opted to process a resolution to Council for the issue to be discussed.
It's a relatively long and lugubrious process.
But the Mayor does not encourage informal discussion of such issues. He believes it to be micro-managing.
So other than ignoring the problem and hoping it will go away, there is no other option.
Even this may not be available. If the motion is not seconded, it will not reach the table for discussion.
********************
Good Morning,
Thank you for the communication received this morning.
The private nature of your organization is referenced multiple times. I assure you my interest is not invasive.
I have been a member of Council since the market's inception.
It was a simple project and small. It would never have amounted to anything, had it not been for the efforts of a single Councillor with support from town staff and the rest of Council.
It was well-received by the community and for that reason,I wished it well.
The original market concept appears to have evolved into something more than asimple gathering on a Saturday morning, and an offering wares and produce, breakfast and lunch.
I am aware of criteria required to be classified as a "Farmer's Market" in Ontario and appear on a distributed list. I'm not persuaded being listed makes a difference to Saturday morning Market activity.
My interest in the Market extends only insofar as vendors are successful and return to do business with the town and residents enjoy the Market experience.
I believe I might share that in common with vendors and patrons.
I am aware activities at the market may have little to do with Farmers.
Ticket-selling and other promotional events ,have used the gathering place to promote special projects. The town uses the market to provide and collect information for various studies underway.
Katherine Belrose used it for fund-raising to save the Petch House. Apparently unsuccessfully for I am not aware of funds contributed for the purpose.
The Market was used regularly to promote St.Kitts entertainment business. Ms St Kitts became event organiser on the executive and only surrendered that responsibility when the executive made the decision it would not be a paid position.
At one time a grant was provided by the town to fund special events.
I believe the facility should be accessible, as it has since the beginning, to any Aurora enterprise that buys a permit .
The Market is a public venue Permits are issued by the Town. It should be inclusive.
Insofar as the Town's Bylaw is concerned, for practical purposes,market representation. is required. The model most familiar is achieved by an election process.
Activities undertaken by the executive outside and beyond town authority, as you have noted is not within the purview of Council. I have no interest in that aspect of the Market operation.
I trust you now have a better sense that my request for a review of the Famers' Market Bylaw seeks only to ensure the original concept is upheld.
Evelyn Buck
****************
A 3 page PDF was attached .I cannot copy it for your information. If anyone can tell me how,I will be forever indebted .
Perhaps the writer could oblige. The missive was copied to all members of council, the CAO ,the Clerk of the Municipality and the two council representatives to the Market.
I've opted to process a resolution to Council for the issue to be discussed.
It's a relatively long and lugubrious process.
But the Mayor does not encourage informal discussion of such issues. He believes it to be micro-managing.
So other than ignoring the problem and hoping it will go away, there is no other option.
Even this may not be available. If the motion is not seconded, it will not reach the table for discussion.
********************
Good Morning,
Thank you for the communication received this morning.
The private nature of your organization is referenced multiple times. I assure you my interest is not invasive.
I have been a member of Council since the market's inception.
It was a simple project and small. It would never have amounted to anything, had it not been for the efforts of a single Councillor with support from town staff and the rest of Council.
It was well-received by the community and for that reason,I wished it well.
The original market concept appears to have evolved into something more than asimple gathering on a Saturday morning, and an offering wares and produce, breakfast and lunch.
I am aware of criteria required to be classified as a "Farmer's Market" in Ontario and appear on a distributed list. I'm not persuaded being listed makes a difference to Saturday morning Market activity.
My interest in the Market extends only insofar as vendors are successful and return to do business with the town and residents enjoy the Market experience.
I believe I might share that in common with vendors and patrons.
I am aware activities at the market may have little to do with Farmers.
Ticket-selling and other promotional events ,have used the gathering place to promote special projects. The town uses the market to provide and collect information for various studies underway.
Katherine Belrose used it for fund-raising to save the Petch House. Apparently unsuccessfully for I am not aware of funds contributed for the purpose.
The Market was used regularly to promote St.Kitts entertainment business. Ms St Kitts became event organiser on the executive and only surrendered that responsibility when the executive made the decision it would not be a paid position.
At one time a grant was provided by the town to fund special events.
I believe the facility should be accessible, as it has since the beginning, to any Aurora enterprise that buys a permit .
The Market is a public venue Permits are issued by the Town. It should be inclusive.
Insofar as the Town's Bylaw is concerned, for practical purposes,market representation. is required. The model most familiar is achieved by an election process.
Activities undertaken by the executive outside and beyond town authority, as you have noted is not within the purview of Council. I have no interest in that aspect of the Market operation.
I trust you now have a better sense that my request for a review of the Famers' Market Bylaw seeks only to ensure the original concept is upheld.
Evelyn Buck
****************
On May 21, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Anna Kroeplin <annasmosaics@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Councillor Buck.
At our AFM Committee meeting last night, I was directed by the AFM Committee to prepare and send you the attached information to help in your search for answers.
Please note that I have copied all of Council, the CAO, the Town Clerk, plus the two Town Directors who are involved with the workings of our successful event. I've also copied our active AFM Committee Members to assure them that this has been sent.
Yours in trust,Anna Kroeplin
Chair, Aurora Farmers' Market & Artisan Fair
<Councillor Buck -Letter-AFM.pdf>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
