"Cowardice asks the question...is it safe? Expediency asks the question...is it politic? Vanity asks the question...is it popular? But conscience asks the question...is it right? And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but one must take it because it is right." ~Dr. Martin Luther King

Thursday 8 April 2010

The Code of Conduct

Second paragraph states the purpose as follows:

* the decision making process of the Town Council is transparent,accessible and equitable

* decisions are made through appropriate channels of government structure.

There are thirteen principles in the Code:

The fourth refers to relations with staff.

Members of Council shall acknowledge and respect the fact that staff work for the Town as a corporate body and are responsible for making recommendations that reflect their professional expertise and corporate objectives, without undue influence from any individual member.

In addition, Members shall acknowledge and respect the fact that staff carry out directions of Council as a whole and administer the policies of the town. A member of Council shall refrain from using their position to improperly influence members of staff in their duties and functions or to gain advantage for themselves or others.

Members of Council shall refrain from publicly criticizing individual members of staff in a way that casts aspersions on their professional competence and credibility.

I did not support the Code of Conduct. It keeps being repeated that all Members of Council are bound by it nevertheless.

Some say , if a person does not favour a law against dirty deeds , it's because the person favours dirty deeds.

I would say, if a law against dirty deeds is not likely to be observed, it should not be passed. Laws not respected bring all law into disrepute

Ah yes, you ,might answer, but we have an Integrity Commissioner and penalties.

Ah yes, that's true. But let us look a little closer.

We received notice recently that Neighbourhood Network had an exciting project in hand.

Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority were providing thousands of trees. Neighbourhood Network had organised students in Aurora and Newmarket to plant the trees in parks.

The students can obtain credit for community service.

The urban forest can be amplified

Young people can do something worthwhile for the community and have the satisfaction of seeing it grow.

Town parks could have shady places. The environment can be improved It's what's meant by Green.

A win win for everybody.

But wait a minute: first negative reaction was an e-mail circulated by Councillor MacEachern.

It's too bad, the event is planned for the Mayor's Anti-Litter Day.

Well, I thought. Why is that? It would just be an especially cheerful and busy day.

It would certainly complement the anti-litter day.

Since then however, the word is out. It will not be happening in Aurora. Girl Guides who wanted to participate in planting trees in town parks have been told they have to apply to Council.

Direction to that effect was not given by Council.

It came from the Mayor, a member of Council as referred in the Code of Conduct. Where it says no member of Council shall give direction or attempt to influence staff.

So, the Code is not observed.

The Code is breached.

The Code with potential for penalties .

Of course, to accomplish that, a complaint must be filed.

It's a new privilege accorded to us by the Mormac regime.

5 comments:

Something Fishy in Aurora said...

“Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority were providing thousands of trees. Neighbourhood Network had organised students in Aurora and Newmarket to plant the trees in parks.”

Let us take a closer look at this. Thousands of trees provided for planting that the town does not pay for. Free labour from the students to plant these trees. How much money could the town have saved if they accepted this offer.

Not to mention all of the positives for the environment that have been lost. Maybe if they were giving out free clothes lines?

Too bad there is a personal edge to this story. Will Neighbourhood Network ever be able to get anything done in this town under the current regime?

Anonymous said...

Ok,I have had enough of this garbage.

It was said by a member of council that the reason there is not a partnership with Neighbourhood Network is because

"The Mayor hates Tim Jones"

Two witnesses present.

That is why it has been sent back to staff twice I believe.

Hate cannot provide leadership in any community.

Anonymous said...

Exactly TWO HUNDRED days left.

That's all.

200

Goodbye Mayor Morris.

Anonymous said...

Why don't we see any of this in the Banner?
Maybe Ron will pick up on this in the Auroran.

Resdient at Large said...

And what about Councillor Evil who badmouthed staff (most of whom have now been fired, retired or walked out)CONSTANTLY ON TV FOR THE WHOLE TOWN TO WITNESS. Where is the complaint about her with video evidence to support it? I think it is time for a little written communication with Mr. Tsubouchi and test his mettle and integrity. We will then find out if he is selective about the complaints he investigates.