"Cowardice asks the question...is it safe? Expediency asks the question...is it politic? Vanity asks the question...is it popular? But conscience asks the question...is it right? And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but one must take it because it is right." ~Dr. Martin Luther King

Thursday 12 August 2010

Still Nattering

It's still going on. The dispute about how the Aurora Cenotaph is identified .

I didn't even mention the "vision" the Promenade Study has for the Cenotaph.

We know it as a Sacred Monument, an Alter of Sacrifice, a Garden of Remembrance with a tree growing for every life lost. I believe there are seventy-five.There are no accompanying concrete plinths on the ground bearing brass nameplates to interfere with seven man lawnmowers.

Under the Promenade Study it will be a passive park where occasionally "events" will be held.

The "vision" has it encircled by buildings and roads.

Currently the rear of the Edwards Plaza is on one side and MacDonald's on the other.

If opportunity ever presented in a redevelopment proposal, a different layout for those two sites should be required.

If I was there when it happened, I regret the oversight. MacDonald's landscaping should abut the Cenotaph not the street. Configuration of Edwards Plaza should also be changed.

The property behind the Cenotaph has a swathe of green.It needs to stay. .

Considering the parks we have, why do we need to contemplate using the Aurora Cenotaph for "events".

Why did the Promenade Steering Committee led by Mayor Morris, feel compelled to include the Cenotaph in their study of the downtown core ?

Was the Promenade Study for the sake of it? To create an illusion of action?

Decisions needed now, didn't happen .... instead, future changes are proposed for things perfect they way they are.

In the last term, staff were replacing the fence around the Cenotaph. They discovered a gate to Edwards Plaza had been installed by a vet who was using the Cenotaph property as a run for his patients. They needed to "go" on grass.

He was told the gate would not be replaced. He appealed to Council.. Some Councillors were so inclined .

Councillor Morris said she and Councillor Gaertner, cleaning up litter on Clean-Up Saturday , found far more disgusting stuff at the back of the Cenotaph.

Councillor Vrancic told us he regularly walked his dog all the way from Kennedy Street to the Cenotaph.

I thought, it's amazing how different we all are. When I put my name forward to serve as a Councillor, in my wildest dreams, I never visualised doing anything so disgusting or silly.

There are a whole bunch of things I won't to do to win a vote. I'm not shy about it.

I demanded the town consult with the Aurora Legion to determine their position on allowing a vet to use the Cenotaph for a dog run.

The vet did not get a gate back into the Cenotaph fence.

Subsequently I received a call from someone who had lived in town for twenty-seven years. She didn't know if I was called alderman or what. She was sure the vet was conscientious. She didn't see dogs any different to squirrels or birds defecating in the Cenotaph property. The whole thing was totally ridiculous.

I listened until she finished. I learned she was twenty-seven years old and a high school teacher. She was speaking from the teachers lunch room. She had an audience.

When I started to respond, she said it was clear she had just wasted her lunch hour. Someone in the background signified agreement.

There was no further exchange.

My God, I thought, they are teachers.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Who originally owned the land that was donated to become the
'Cenotaph".

Resident at Large said...

I think the whole concept is sacreligious. Why do we have to try and get our hands on evry square inch and "develop or redevelop" it? Do we live in a society now that has lost its ability to honour and respect and show gratitude to those who fought and died that we might live in the freedom and comfort that we now enjoy? Memories are short; those who lived it and remember are few.
God forbid that the only way to rekindle respect is to experience another war that would threaten our freedom and values - values that existed when World Was 1 & 2 were fought.
Is it surprising that this nonsense is being considered when one councillor didn't even know when Remembrance Day was last year? That's how important it was to her!
Leave the Cenotaph alone - its name and its purpose. Let the committee or consultants or whoever they are go and rub their greasy little hands together over some other plot.

Jacqueline Stuart said...

The monument was officially the Aurora War Memorial and has been cared for for much of its life by the Aurora War Memorial Association, which included representatives from King and Whitchurch. The Association purchased four acres of land from Walter Wood (the site is now six acres, I believe, but I do not have the land records to hand). As Mrs. Buck noted, the Association was wound up. Its records are in the collection of the Aurora Historical Society.

Jacqueline Stuart said...

Oops! Forgot to say that "cenotaph" is a perfectly good term for a memorial for persons buried elsewhere. It is is just not the official name for Aurora's monument.

Something Fishy in Aurora said...

Busy couple of days for the Mayor...she officially entered the mayoral race yesterday…

Anonymous said...

Ahhh..so she has declared. That explains all the "chatter" at Thursday meeting. Let the posturing begin.