I have to keep reminding myself, I am only one of nine. My sole responsibility is to express my view clearly in the time available and let it rest.
When the vote is taken, whatever the decision, discussion is over. It's on to the next question and the exercise is repeated. It seems simple. It 's not.
Listening and waiting one's turn to speak provides time to observe how differently information is processed.
At first I was surprised by how words were heard differently. A councillor often claimed someone else's comments as his own.He was sharp, critical and dismissive towards myself but not towards others. Later he was an early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and I wondered if that explained the eccentricity. I was sorry I had judged him..
Other Councillors avoided taking the floor.They took no pleasure in hearing themselves speak..It wasn't they didn't have an opinion they just left it to others. The vote was what counted.
Others stressed about having to speak, didn't hear anybody else. It took all their resources to give an account of themselves.
What went on in a council meeting didn't matter a hill of beans for some. Being a councillor was just about being a councillor.
Some could walk into a council seat just by putting their name on the ballot. Lawyers, high school teachers and other professionals are preferred candidates.
Our culture has a high respect for education, particularly since most have not had the advantage.
There is a reverence which is not entirely deserved. It still surprises me how little.
Theoretically, a Council comes to-gether, having read staff recommendations, presumably
with sufficient comprehension to understand and discern both the logic and the contradictions.
Members raise hands to be recognised by the chair, say their piece, listen to others and eventually the vote is cast and a decision made.
Comments to a blog post , like the Aurora Citizen, provide an excellent example of how people arrive at their own conclusions and discount others.
Guy Poppe is erratic, Sometimes nice, sometimes nasty.
RTB is a frequent contributor. He is sufficiently opinionated to have become frustrated enough to publish his own blog.
I won't be visiting. I already know RTB's prejudice. His views are predictable.
Hugo T Kroon has had a blog. for some time. I've never visited there either.I do not expect to discover anything of interest.
I never miss Chris Watt's posts. Sometimes they are above my head . He is often severe in his criticism. I put that down to the vigour and certainty of youth and an obsession with the power of language. I look forward to his posts.Sometimes he makes me shiver. I am always intrigued. He never fails to entertain.
Saturday, 19 February 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
RtB has a blog?
Post a Comment