I don't often have to think about my health. All things considered, it's good. I was busy at the week-end, going through the budget with a fine-tooth comb and responding to comments. I was looking forward to Councillors have an opportunity to impact the budget with their own ideas.
My task was not complete by the time I went to the town hall last night.I left the meeting at nine-thirty p.m. I felt my head bowed low with a sense of complete futility and exhaustion.
Even Mormac did not have that effect on my spirits.
I cited a few items culled from the budget. Not the complete list. Some were discussed. The first item was not mine. .
South Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority made a request . in October for work on the East Holland river. IN Aurora it's identified as Tannery Creek..The memo received last night indicated, if we contribute $20,000, it would be "leveraged" to a $100,000 of service. I asked how that would be accomplished. The Treasurer was unable to supply details.
Councillor Ballard was in support. He said: we should give them the money. "we use the river We dump waste into it"
For more than thirty years neither Aurora or Newmarket has discharged clean and clear effluent into the carrying stream that leads to the East Holland River.
Mayor Dawe supported Councillor Ballard. Said he didn't think that wasCouncillor Ballard's reference. .
The Mayor thought he meant the garbage we dump into the river.
At that point, the sinking feeling overcame me.
When I left, the recommendation for three contract positions to be converted to permanent status at a cost of $77,300 was up for discussion.
The Chief Administrative Officer indicated extra cost was due in part to the employees becoming union members.
Flexibility in Recreation and parks programs is created by use of seasonal contract positions.Programs may differ from year to year. Manpower needs may be less or more
Reserves were the next item.We have $69 million . This year we will add , $1,240 million from 2011 budget surplus.Share of the gas tax share from the Federal government adds an additional $1,419.million.
Councillor Thompson thought the tax could be reduced by $125,thousand .I thought the whole thing could be eliminated.
The Treasurer said:
"CURRENT TAXPAYERS ARE NOT PAYING THEIR SHARE FOR REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT WHICH ARE GOING TO BE NEEDED AS FACILITIES AGE"
The Mayor supported the cut of $125,thousand because a Finance Committee is proposed by Councillor Thompson. His stated preference is" to have something put by for a rainy day"
When I left, the recommendation for three contract positions to be converted to permanent status at a cost of $77,300 was up for discussion.
The Chief Administrative Officer indicated extra cost was due in part to the employees becoming union members.
Flexibility in Recreation and parks programs is created by use of seasonal contract positions.Programs may differ from year to year. Manpower needs may be less or more
Facility user fees are impacted by the cost of operation .Five other contract positions alternate between parks and works. If all seven contract employees received the same consideration, and why not, the costwould be an extra $203,900 on the backs of taxpayers. And that would only be the start.
I listened to the argument about why council is compelled to honour an agreement that hands over a building , rent-ree that cost $3million to renovate, $150.thousand to maintain. plus a generous $353.thousand bundle of cash to a self-appointed board of management, accountable to no-one
The Mayor pomdered aloud, "What would people say about a municipality that doesn't honour legal agreements?
The expenditure represents close to 2 percentage points in the tax rate.
I left before the decision to make three out of five contract employees full time and add them to the union.
I need to husband my resources. The final budget, pretty much the same as the draft document, received approval in committee. It will be presented to council for approval.
1 comment:
"For more than thirty years neither Aurora or Newmarket has discharged clean and clear effluent into the carrying stream that leads to the East Holland River."
So it is okay to continue this practice? I don't think so. Just because we have done something for 30 years doesn't make it right!
Post a Comment