I have removed a letter I had cut and copied from a link provided. A friend is convinced I could be sued and the prospect is causing him considerable disquiet.
Mr.Maclean's letter is but one of a deluge published in the local press.
Councillor Danny Wheeler signed the Bylaw as Acting Mayor.
Still no evidence the Mayor declared a pecuniary interest or absented himself from the meeting when the question was debated and the vote taken.Legality of the meeting itself is not established.
Righteous rage over criticism is a peculiarity of the modern- day breed of politician After battling their way into the boiling roiling pot of politics, some of the little darlings, huff and puff in the heat and in a new tactic,beat constituents about the head and shoulders with public resources for daring to exhibit any signs of opposition..
I think it's the fault of the baby-boomer generation .They spoiled their kids rotten ,created unreal expectations and fostered grandiose delusions.
That said, there is nothing extraordinary about staff being directed by Council. Council is the authority.
The Mayor is not unless delegated by Council. Even then, staff ignore a Mayor at their peril unless he is a de-clawed pussy cat.
If no record exists of direction from Council, staff are left with posteriors uncovered and exposed to the elements which are the vagaries of politics. Teflon hides are de rigeur.
The current over-run of the project is $1.6million. Add various potential costs of litigation and it's big money.
Residents have a right to be infuriated and concerned about source of payment for over-run and litigation.
Development charges and grants, would cover expected costs.
Contingency allowed for change orders,will not likely stretch to cover the overage.
That the municipality may sue the project consultant for a mistake in measurement as reported, is extraordinary.
Normal advice issued to all and sundry, in the matter of litigation is as follows;
Button up....Zip your lip....Hush yo mouth,baby...Let the lawyer do his job.
Letters to the editor can be ignored. Litigation can be an excuse not to talk.
But Grossi's Mountain cannot be obscured.
Save maybe in a white out of man made precipitation.
Tuesday, 31 January 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Keep in mind that I think it was reported that the cost of this toboggan run was $16 million, which must come close to what some councils give their food banks, but then again I could be wrong.
Wow!
Great letter from Mclean ! Not going to be a roll-over.
Did Grossi ever pick the wrong target!
I wonder if they can fit a museum in it?
ZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
This just in.... Municipal governments are corrupt! Film at 11.
To anon 12:45PM
Oh ya they are.
This is why they are afraid of ghosts.
Aurora has lots of municipal skeletons.
That Heard fellow should drag people through the town and tell
tales about how politicians give
us the creeps.
Imagine being sued for $125,000 for writing a letter like John McLean's... wow ! It’s hard to imagine what anyone was thinking when they supported the use of what could be hundreds of thousands of tax dollars for that purpose ! Too bad that G's council has been muzzled by their tax funded lawyers. I'd love to hear the logic that tries to explain this mess away.
Post a Comment