Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "A Melange":
Councillor Buck, do you really think you should have published 11:11's comment? With our recent town history of defamation and libel actions, those unfair comments strike me as potentially injurious to Mr Thompson.
Please take better care.
***************
The comments are not helpful to either Councillor or the Mayor. I appreciate your concern for the Councillor's well being.
If there is a common denominator in politics, it is that criticism is an occupational hazard.
You should have been there on Tuesday to hear Susan Walmer accost residents and promise "two more years" and we'll be back.
In the recent defamation suit undertaken against three people in Aurora for publishing critical comments about a politician, the final determination was clear:
Citizens are entitled to criticize their government. There can be no law to restrict that freedom.
This is Canada, people.
If we stand for nothing else, we have a Charter of Freedoms.
Not everyone in the world has that. Civilizations older than our own
don't have it.
We have it and Sae the Lord be thankit.
I think it might have been the Scottish genetic half of the late Pierre Elliott Trudeau that drove him to complete his second objective before he left politics forever.
Prior to Mormac, I never knew a politician who would think of publicly complaining about political criticism.
Since the internet, people never before in a position to exercise the right without being fearful of losing a job, or a client or
of a child paying the price in the classroom or the school yard, can now say what they think, anonymously, without risk. Never, in the history of democracy, have people been as free as they are now to participate freely in political debate.
Obviously tt would be better if they could affix their names without fear of any consequences. But we are not their yet.
Some argue there should be consequences. Along with freedom goes responsibility.
I would argue fear is what has kept democracy from coming alive.
I voted for Michael Thompson. I advised people to vote for the Councillor. As late as Tuesday's meeting I commended my colleagues for thoughtful logical dignified argument in support of the Abel/Pirri resolution in the face of virulent and unbridled opposition.
The crowd had had their say. The town's business was set aside to allow them to repeat falsehoods and deliberate misrepresentation of the facts over and over.
Councillors took their various positions in defence of the town's interest and fulfilled their obligations with calm dignity.
The debate ended. It was time to call the vote.
The Mayor waited. Sure enough out of the blue came a pretext of an amendment , that altered the purpose of the motion and neutered its objective.
The move was seconded by Councillor Thompson, accepted by the presiding member and put to a vote.
Had they asked my advice would have been. You can't play games like that with public trust. Try it and you lose far more than you gain.
Putting a lid on criticism will not put out the fire.
The public watched it happen.
The rules are harsh.There are no second chances.
I never promised you a rose garden?
Friday, 2 March 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
I wrote the comment about being disappointed in Councillor Thompson. I voted for him, for most of the new lot, and have enjoyed watching them learn and grow. There was no malice in the post, just sadness that a fairly simple matter had caused such discord and unease. I believe Aurora capitulated to an uninformed mob because angry groups are very intimidating, that common sense was over-come. We are no closer to an agreement with the ACC than before the raucous meeting. Nothing gained, a great deal lost.
Weird for any individual to be so ignorant as to wave the word' defamation ' over a Blog and expect fear to ensue. It's like a lot of common words in Aurora that cause a visceral reaction unconnected with the original meaning. Words like ' democracy ', ' civility ', 'transparency ', ' dialogue '. Not too many people find the word ' clothes-line ' to be funny, but in Aurora it is and ' chicane ' usually gets a reaction. Wonder how that all happened in just a few short years? So lose all legal threats - they just won't fly.
5:18 PM
May I please add ' Code of Conduct ' and ' Good Governance ' and ' Integrity ' ?
Love this: ' no comment' ,' not for Profit', ' fundraiser ' and ' town's initiative'. If we are allowed sentences, " There is no need for affordable housing in Aurora" and " What date is that we have Memorial Day? "
Just read a Blog for UK girls playing tennis. Only 2 posters arguing about their daughters. Pages of it. You, E, are never boring. Odd none of the other councillors have attempted this. I exclude Ballard who apparently uses his dog to provide fill.
"His actions argue that he must have been ... deliberately doing something that injured Aurora."
5:18, I'm not a lawyer, but the above statement appears to exceed mere criticism and reads as a serious accusation of malfeasance.
Yes, Councillor Buck is upset, but publishing that comment was reckless and potentially damaging to a person's reputation.
Post a Comment