Yesterday I met a young woman in Costco who grew up in Aurora and is now raising her family in East Gwillimbury. I was in the line-up at the cash register. She spoke to my daughter Heather and. asked her to tell me how much she enjoyed watching Aurora Council on T.V.
"You make good points" she said.
It was nice. Every politician needs re-assurance we still speak for the people who elected us and even some who don't live within our borders.
To be sure ,my family keeps me grounded and the circle here, small as it is, keeps us in touch. You, know what I'm thinking and I hear back.
I also receive comments from those who do not appreciate frankness but. take advantage of the opportunity I provide to let me know.
Here's a thing. .. just off the press .....An e-mail from the Mayor's administrative assistant and two more from the Mayor with the same message
An invitation for a photo opportunity has been extended from Mr. Simanovskis, Director of Infrastructure and EnvironmentL Services and CAO Neil Garbe ...
Wait a minute.....I have to go back and see how it's worded,
It is for a photo on the empty site of the future Joint Operations Centre with the Contractor, the Architects The Director , the CAO and whoever else wants to attend.
That is verry verry interesting.
An invitation from staff to celebrate a decision made by a bare majority of Council to spend $27 million of your money on a garage and works yard.
An invitation from staff to Council.
Yesterday a question was posed here about staff being accountable to Council.
I hadn't gotten around to answering it.
Maybe this juxtaposition does it for me.
In a matter of days, registrations will close and all will be candidates on An equal footing.
At least two candidates are vying for the Mayor's office.
One supported the project. One didn't
Now staff arrange a celebrity photo for themselves,the Contractor and the Architects and invite others to attend. Maybe they will have bagpipes and dance a jig for the audience.
Is that political? Or not? If not what is the purpose?
What other reason can there possibly be for a photograph of an empty site and the main beneficiaries?
I've been in photos of a sod-turning. But this isn't that.
This is a photo of Director, Chief Administrative Officer,Contractor and Architects .
And whoever else may chance accep the invitation.
THE STAFF INVITATION.
The Mayor, wearing the Chain of Office will stand to one side as a guest of the Principals in the grand scheme of things .
As a coincidence , at this time in 2010 , the town was informed of a lease signed with
the Department of National Defense for Queen's York Rangers to take over the hydro building.
The parks department had previously been evicted despite a consultant study of space needs indicating theMunicipality needed the building and the site.
The Chief Administrator was commended on that occasion also for successful negotiation of the lease.
That decision triggered the need for the new site for the works department.
In the election that followed ,weeks later, the incumbent Mayor and others were defeated.
After the defeat an amendment was made to the lease with the Mayor's signature but without Council approval.
Now here we are four years later almost on the anniversary of that previous decision
Friday, 15 August 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
I can understand a sod-turning, a celebration when a project has been completed or a shop opened. Even a blessing from a person of royalty for a local park plaque given in another town. But a gathering on the site pre-shovel sounds a bit over the top,
"Yesterday a question was posed here about staff being accountable to Council.
I hadn't gotten around to answering it."
You didn't print it and you really haven't answered it either, juxtaposition or not.
This is a serious question with serious implications. Who exactly is running the good ship Lollipop and spending our money?
It's just another photo-op. Both candidates for mayor will be using the media to keep themselves in front of the electorate. Those running for council, too, especially the new ones without entanglements that get them invites to the events of the top tier.
15:19
I am not sure if it helps but senior staff can ok anything up to $50,000 without bringing it to council.
I " think "- might be wrong there.
I have the minutes. There is no mention of Cllr Humfryes or why she was absent. If there was a family problem, I fully understand. But it would be nice if there was a comment early in the meeting to explain the situation. Just a suggestion.
From what I understand…and I could be wrong. The CAO is the overall dept head. He is responsible for all admin staff in the Town. Council has “technically” no say in getting rid of or hiring anyone within the Town. It’s the Mayor and I believe council who has say with the position of the CAO.
23:12
You might be right. I do not believe that this Council was involved with the recent replacement of the clerk. In the last term there was definitely Council direction to staffing.
I don't always agree with you but shouldn't Council be on equal footing with staff at the very least, why isn't the mayor inviting everyone isn't he the head of the town, so to speak
Post a Comment