It's what comes to mind when I contemplate the town hall these days.
Councillors have been provided with    names and  titles of every employee in the administration. It was  intended for  ease of access to  whatever information a Councillor might require to fulfill the role of judicious oversight.
The resource is no longer  available to us.. Staff have apparently  been instructed not to answer queries directly. Inquiries must be referred to department heads. Presumably for the purpose of control.
I had a question to-day.   I sent an e-mail. An hour  passed without response. I do not expect  department heads to be stationed at  computers, awaiting requests for information from  Councillors. It would not be best practice. Yet it 's  the new  protocol in the Mormac regime.
I needed an answer. I called a  secretary's number, then another and another and another and. finally I  spoke with a voice and received the  answer.
A run on copies of reports  to Council is thirty-five .
We have received a report of eighty-four pages.  Printed on both sides it is one hundred and sixty eight pages of print.  Copied thirty-five times adds up to 5,880 pages.. That's a Magnum Opus
Content? A record of  recorded votes during the current  term of office.
A recorded vote allows a councillor's  opposition to a  decision to be a matter of record.  Or conversely, to record names of those in support. It is the means available to a Councillor who wishes their opposition to be on record. That's its purpose.
It is not unusual  for a member of this council , usually the Mayor, to request a recorded  vote when  there is no opposition. It's an exercise in futility.
It's like children playing officialdom and officialdee
.
My critics accuse me of  being disruptive and not being a team player becasue I am frequently opposed to motions presented.  I've never understood why a person should be expected to  surrender the right to think and vote accordingly, by virtue of having been elected to office.From my perspective, it is the point of being elected.
Early in the term, Councillor MacEachern's friend, Walter Mestrinaro was encouraged to return to council time and time again to challenge the competence, authority and integrity of  the CAO,  Chief Building Official and  Town Planning Director. His arguments were  exhausted and  in a final flourish of defiance, after weeks of virtual harassment, Councillor Mac Eachern moved to direct staff to submit a report giving a definition of the word  "storage"
The report  was  prepared by the Chief Building Official. It had  three separate dictionary references to the word.  It was  copied thirty-five times , submitted and received without comment.
Whether or not the vote was recorded  to direct staff to undertake such a purposeless   exercise    I do not recall.  I was most certainly adamantly opposed.
Neither did I support  a current  motion  to compile a report using 5.880 pages of print, showing recorded votes cast during this term, so that someone with a  Warrior pseudonym like Robert the Bruce  can meekly and dutifully echo Team Mormac's  complaints that I am"confrontational", not a "team player" and only need "enough rope to hang" myself.
Anyone undertaking  the tedium of reading the report will  no doubt form an opinion on how well  town resources are being utilised and where the bones are buried.
Erratum: total pages of print in the report  were eighty-four. It was still humongous.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
6 comments:
Perhaps someone will FOI the staff resources that were squandered compiling the opus of votes?
And what would the cost of creating a report giving a definition of the word "storage" be?
Total, including staff time, copies, etc.
How about a FOI request showing where the 35 copies are distributed to. Shouldn't reports to council only require 9?
What a ridiculous waste of time and money. No conclusions can be drawn from the information presented. It is completely out of balance unless you compare the data to the total number of votes taken, and the results of every vote. So what if someone counts the 8-1 votes and states how many there are. It's only a relevent number if you have something to compare it to. Even if you conclude (and you likely can) how often the block votes together, its still not relative unless you have the results of every vote.
Wow. 2940 pages/pieces of paper for this information that will prove nothing but be twisted to suit the Mormac folks. And they advertise themselves as environmentally friendly.
Talk about make work and waste money!
Post a Comment