"Cowardice asks the question...is it safe? Expediency asks the question...is it politic? Vanity asks the question...is it popular? But conscience asks the question...is it right? And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but one must take it because it is right." ~Dr. Martin Luther King

Monday, 12 April 2010

What Is The Real Deal.

The location of a gas fired peaker plant in the Holland Marsh area is being challenged by King in an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing.

The main argument appears to be damage to growing fields. I keep waiting for the evidence. The argument doesn't make sense.

In the first place, marsh muck contains no natural nutrients. Chemical fertilizers must be added.

Much of it washes off in rain and massive sprinklers used by farmers, into the canal.But maybe the water in the sprinklers comes from the chemical drenched canal. The most difficult problem restoring health to Lake Simcoe comes from the fertilizers required to be added by marsh farmers.

Phosphates from detergent were also a major problem but less so since sewage from urban municipalities,Aurora and Newmarket are carried away by the regional trunk sewer.

When I was travelling, I noticed vibrant colours in the gardens of the City of Hamilton. Rambling roses grew with the profusion of dandelions. I commented one Monday morning when the board gathered that I thought pollution must be good for gardens. In Hamilton,you can taste and feel grit in your teeth.Windsor across the river from the foundries of Detroit was the same. But both cities had spectacular gardens and both had famous public botanical gardens.

Then there's Aylmer and vegetable farms all around. Farmers dump truck loads of broccoli,snow white cauliflowers and gigantic cabbages at the side of the road for sale,in an area, also in the fall-out from the foundries of Detroit and Windsor.

A board member who lived all his life, near Exhibition Place, in a narrow little street with tiny little garden, which he was especially proud of at this time of the year, commented on a Harrowsmith magazine feature.

Since the government banned soft coal burning in the U.K., after thousands of people choked to death in a 1956 London pea soup fog, English gardens were no longer legendary.

I was there then. I remembered; soot from chimneys was added to garden soil. Ashes from the fire as well.

Eight hours exposed to sun in London, wouldn't bring as much as a tinge of pink to the skin, let alone a tan.

The layer of pollution between the sun and the earth was so dense, no ultra violet rays penetrated. The only thing missing in summer was the fog

A bit of a wind over the Holland Marsh, lifts the soil and swirls it away in a black cloud and that becomes a problem of loss for the farmers.

Marsh muck is only a good growing medium because it allows roots to grow in perfect
shape. Nutrition must be added for the vegetables to be nutritional.

Even if there were chemicals falling from the peaker plant's especially tall chimney designed to carry the smoke away, would they not be the same chemicals that fell from chimneys that burned coal that made English gardens legendary.And the foundries of Detroit and Winndsor and Hamilton.

In Scotland, gas was produced from coal. The process left massive clumps of cinders as a by-product. I think they were crushed and used for certain road surfaces.

In Canada, natural gas comes from the ground. The same place as oil, The same place as coal. All are fossil fuels in different stages of decay.

Well now, I am not trying to be an expert. I do not argue for a peaker plant in an agricultural versus an industrial area.

If I were a resident of King, I would certainly enjoin the battle.

It sure looks to me as if the location was chosen because it was a line of least resistance.

But I would like to hear the counter argument that fall-out from a peaker plant will destroy marsh soil as a growing medium.

I also like to note how apparently inexpert, experts can be.

1 comment:

Matt said...

Your arguments make no sense.

"In the first place, marsh muck contains no natural nutrients. Chemical fertilizers must be added."

I'm afraid you're misinformed. The soil in the Holland Marsh is some of the most fertile in the province. That's why farming there took off LONG before our modern chemical farming processes (which include chemicals) were invented.

"In Hamilton,you can taste and feel grit in your teeth.Windsor across the river from the foundries of Detroit was the same. But both cities had spectacular gardens and both had famous public botanical gardens."

The botanical gardens are tightly managed by a large staff. Farms are not.

"Soot from chimneys was added to garden soil. Ashes from the fire as well."

Wood ash has been used as a soil amendment for ages, though I must wonder what sort of chemicals ended up leeching in to people's vegetables when chimney soot was used.

"In Canada, natural gas comes from the ground. The same place as oil, The same place as coal. All are fossil fuels in different stages of decay."

You are correct that they come from the ground, but they come from very different original sources. Furthermore, you are talking about the originating product, not the waste left from burning each of these fuels. Oil, natural gas, and coal all produce VERY different waste products. Furthermore, the ash from coal versus the ash from wood-burning stoves is different yet again. Thus, the comparison doesn't make sense.

"Well now, I am not trying to be an expert. I do not argue for a peaker plant in an agricultural versus an industrial area."

The tone of your post suggests otherwise.

"But I would like to hear the counter argument that fall-out from a peaker plant will destroy marsh soil as a growing medium."

Whether or not this plant will damage the soil, the fact is that it will cover up prime farmland (which is already at a premium in Ontario) with an industrial plant. Furthermore, this land is supposed to be protected by the Greenbelt legislation, though it turns out that the legislation is so vauge and full of loopholes that the government can safely ignore it.