Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Climate Change in Aurora":
Is the CAO running the town or is Council?
This is a very serious question that must be addressed immediately.
I don't recall voting for Mr. .....
******************
The answer is the CAO is top man within the administration.
It is a position of authority and responsibility.
The town is managed by an Executive Leadership Team.
It used to be known as Management Team. I think the title and function were more apt..
The Mayor is Head of Council. The two positions are not the same. Each councillor has authority and separate accountability.The Mayor's role is leadership. Not the same thing as being the boss.
I have previously referred to the disadvantage of being Head of Council without political experience. A big drawback is not knowing ,what you don't know and learning it by doing it in a fish bowl.
Something happened on Tuesday which indirectly illustrates the point.
A delegation presented for the Farmers' Market. Councillor Humphreys had been named contact person between Council and the Market. I'm not sure what it meant but everyone seems pleased about it. . So that's O.K.
Councillor Humphreys engaged the delegate in a lengthy conversation. Which the rules do not permit. No point of order was called. Sandra is well regarded.
Had Councillor Gaertner done the same thing, someone would assuredly have called a point of order. Wendy has rubbed more than a few people the wrong way.
But that's not right. Called from the chair or the floor, the rules must apply without bias.
If not, more problems than solutions are created in a heavily competitive political environment..
Resentment poisons the atmosphere. You have to be on the receiving end of bias, to appreciate the
counter-reaction. It may not be pretty.
A presiding member who does not understand the imperative of impartiality,. does not have an opportunity for leadership. It is not subject to command.
Dynamics of a council are fluid. Currents run beneath the surface. They twist and turn and sometimes. instantaneously, gather force and suck everything down into a vortex.
The Mayor operated a successful business. Decisions were his alone to make.
Working with eight other people to achieve a majority decision, with everything happening as it should and each Councillor bringing a perspective to the table to be heard before a vote is cast , calls for something more an orchestration.
Any hint of group conferencing prior to debate is not conducive to harmony. It bespeaks a lack of confidence, courage and a tendency to dependency.
Councillors are wise to seek knowledge from staff . But it's only part of the responsibility.
Personal judgement is the other part. Each Councillor is accountable for the vote he casts.
If the electorate considers facts presented and withheld and arrives at a different judgment,it does not profit a councillor to explain "I did my homework and thought it was right"
People will make up their minds if they have all the facts. They will make up their minds if they don't.
It's best if they have all the facts.
If I don't believe a particular expenditure is in the best interest of the community I serve it's my job to say so and articulate the reason why.
Thursday, 17 November 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Rules of order I feel are guidelines rather than hard and fast rules when it come to local government.
Was thereany harm caused by Sandra's actions?
Post a Comment