Stephanie took my mail box out of outlook express and replaced it with something better. I am in her hands. She knows more about computers than me.
I know more about me. I like familiar things . But I also do not wish to admit to a grand-daughter I can't do what she can do. I am doing it. It just takes a bit of getting used to.
This morning I published a comment that was intended just for me. It can be deleted but I have to get the post done first. If I don't write it while it's in my head, it has to be re-generated. Double the work.
.
I don't usually post comments critical of staff. There is one this morning suggesting staff are responsible for decisions. I published it because it's the theme of this post
Staff do not decide. They recommend.
During Tuesday's discussion on the award of a consultant contract for design of a sidewalk, the statement was made, too much work in the job for staff and they do not have the time. Underground utilities are situated under sidewalks. A lot of research is needed to determine locations
Underground utilities are in the boulevard. It makes them easier to access. Each property is serviced with sewer and water lines. They cross under the sidewalk. They are sufficiently deep, not to interfere with placement of the sidewalk.
Construction contractors are responsible for determining location of utilities. They are the ones doing the digging.
To get back to responsibility for decision making: Staff provide best professional advice.
Council makes decisions. Staff are accountable to council. Council is accountable to the electorate.
It is not in the least odd I have a different perspective from other members of council
I make no apology. With forty-four years of experience twenty-five of it hands on. it would indeed be odd if I shared the same perspective.
Decision-making is collective. Listening is a political imperative.
But that's not as simple as it sounds.
New councillors should seek understanding about how the municipality functions
from staff.
Mayor Dawe takes every opportunity to express profound appreciation for the help and support he has received from the administration.
It is staff's job to provide information.
Difficulty arises with inexperience. When is it information? When does it cross the line and become heavy-handed influence.
Inexperience in the Mayor's chair is a definite disadvantage . The role spelled out in the Municipal Act is to provide leadership and guidance. Humans have a natural tendency to look for and follow leadership.
In the last term we had a despot.Changes were made to suit the intent. This term the stage is set but without malignant intent.
The Mayor clearly finds it to his liking.
Then there's ego. No shortage of that among politicians.
Council's function is the force that keeps public spending in check.
If counter-pressure is not exerted.....Oh My God...millions of dollars have been flushed and continuing to be flushed from the town treasury.
I have told much ...but not everything.
Aurora's town hall has become a mini-region . Identification with taxpayers is seriously lacking.
Time and resources are devoted more to style than substance.
I don't know if all councillors read my blog. Or if they do, do they also read the comments.
My dialogue with readers keeps me focused. The logic is not obscure. Conclusions are concurred..
Snarky sarcasm still emanates from the usual suspects. Less of late. They seldom challenge solid reasoning.
Council's decision to spend $94,000 for a consultant to design sidewalks is inexcusable extravagance.
It builds not a foot of sidewalk
Other departments construct such projects without benefit of consultants..
A consultant has none of the skills experienced staff have at their fingertips.
Information used by consultants, they have to get from staff
Thursday, 8 December 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I'm not sure if the Money Pit on Oak Island in the Maritimes has been declared a tourist attraction.
Perhaps we should consider listing Aurora Town Hall
as our version to earn a bit of revenue. But do we know
anyone good at saving money ? Seem to be plenty of the other type around. It could not just be another
not=for-profit venture. We need to make some money.
This is making me more and more bewildered. If
Aurora can handle the sidewalks itself, we are we not just getting on with the job ? Wouldn't that save money
that could be used for the Youth Centre or the new
park everyone seemed so keen on creating ?
Have you ever considered your knowledge and experience to be a disadvantage because quite clearly you are seriously challenged to get your fellow members on side, Last term there was no hope at all with all the personal attacks, animosity and jealousy that your knowledge garnered, This term the air around your circles is smelling of sweet congeniality and willingness to do what’s right for the tax payers yet still you are faced with resistance to cut the fat, the frills, the 0 value added initiatives and get back to basic government over a mere 50 + thousand minions
Let's cut to the chase and ignore hurt feelings. If
you have an investment advisor who keeps telling you
to put YOUR money into questionable projects, you
stop taking his advice and look around for someone
who has more business reliability.
If you and Stephanie were to change shoes for an hour or so, whose feet would hurt most?
Post a Comment