"Cowardice asks the question...is it safe? Expediency asks the question...is it politic? Vanity asks the question...is it popular? But conscience asks the question...is it right? And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but one must take it because it is right." ~Dr. Martin Luther King

Tuesday 13 May 2014

Pun-a-magic .Is 2 cents real currency any more.

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Guest Post ....From the mouths of babes":

The Guest Post here fails to show that the blog page also has a copy of the motion to suspend pay. The motion was brought forward by....

Councillor Ballard.

So, at least he had the balls to start the process.


**********************

The motion read like a proclamation of  candidacy with  the name mentioned in every whereas.

The record might show I moved the motion.

When I thought of it later, I realized it  wasn't particularly sensible.  That happens in the heat of the moment.

Changing the  computer program to accommodate  the motion is probably  more trouble than merit.

The Councillor  could simply refund remuneration for the month.... quietly without drawing attention to his noble deed.

Silly me.  Then  the object of the exercise would not be accomplished.

We do all know who is managing his  campaign and directing his strategy don't we?

That should help him a lot.

I think most of Council are Liberals.  A dilemma presents.

The Minister of Health  visited  last week  claiming the Riding as  traditional Liberal.

It's not at all.

Conservative Major Lex Mackenzie of Woodbridge  was the MLA  forever. Former King Township Reeve and County Warden Bill Hodgson followed  as Conservative MLA for several terms after  the Major.

Liberal Charles Beer of Newmarket held it for a couple of terms . But  that was because he was  personally very  well regarded.

Conservative Frank Klees  has held it  four terms.

The Minister of Health was  mis-informed

It's a compact Riding.

Newmarket  historically inclines Liberal  but Aurora leans  Conservative.It's the Irish Catholic and Scottish Presbyterian influence.

Jane Twinney carries a Liberal name but the Conservative  Banner. As a Newmarket Councillor, she has earned a solid reputation in her own right. It will be needed because the Honorable Tim Hudak will be no help. 

Anyone who thinks Candidate Ballard "has it made in the shade" is  obviously blinded by the hot air and glare of intense sunlight. 

It's a wonder he's not recommending the former Mayor as alternate in his absence from Council ; such is his adulation. 

It's my impression voters  are champing at the bit to throw the bastards out. 

Voters generally don't take kindly to being taken for fools. 

They take revenge. 

The Honorable Kathleen Wynn may understand that very well but there's not a lot she can do 
at this stage of the game . The phoney-baloney budget rubbed salt in the wounds. 

The NDP  will likely find someone to carry their banner.  There's always a brave soul willing. Unfortunately, it will be an enormously strenuous wasted effort in this riding. 

It's going to be a short ride, Not the least  bit bumpy

18 comments:

Anonymous said...

"We do all know who is managing his campaign and directing his strategy don't we?"

Hmmm, and how did her last election campaign work out?

Anonymous said...


It's interesting that Clr. Ballard recommends the two fellow councillors that in the previous term were the weakest and least
vicious of the Gang of Six.

The four worst ones got turfed by an astute voting public.

I hope that with this coming election the voting public will be equally focused and will clean house once and for all. Gallo will be gone as a result of his futile attempt at self-aggrandizement.

Anonymous said...

You wrote: "We do all know who is managing his campaign and directing his strategy don't we?"
Yes, and that's what scares me away from the local Liberals, although I have generally voted Liberal in the past.

This election also needs to clean house and get Wynne & her cohorts out. Problem is there doesn't seem to be any strong leadership from any side you look.

I can't believe Wynne's latest comment that she admits that the McGinty government made mistakes but she is the best leader to correct them. This is like trying to decide on who to vote for of the best of the worst.

Regardless it's time to give another party the chance to screw up & make mistakes, how much worse can it get. They'll mess it up and we'll have another election, and so on and so on. Perhaps that's why there is so much apathy from the general population. We must all forge ahead and make the best of our lives in spite of what the government does or does not do.

Anonymous said...

13:05
There is an individual in town who has managed 3 losing campaigns that I can recall, maybe even more. I expect he will also be involved. As his neighbours we are delighted as he just hangs around his property glaring at us as if we were intruders on our own street.

Anonymous said...

Cllr Ballard made a big deal out of that motion. Trouble is Jane Twinney did the same. Probably without all the fanfare. Nothing gained.

Anonymous said...

"The NDP will likely find someone to carry their banner. There's always a brave soul willing. Unfortunately, it will be an enormously strenuous wasted effort in this riding. "

You know that for a fact !!

Anonymous said...


According to the Election Almanac - just discovered it and it shows all provincial ridings with all candidates from all parties. Lots of "all."

As of a few minutes ago there are three candidates running in Newmarket-Aurora:

Liberal Chris Ballard

PC Jane Twinney

Libertarian Jason Jenkins

Because of the absolutely disgusting leadership of the first two parties Jenkins is going to get an "X" beside his name.

For me this is a similarly disgusting copout on my part. But at least I will be able to tell myself that I did not contribute to an ongoing ignorant stupidity in a provincial government, the likes of which I do not recall encountering, possibly ever.


Anonymous said...

14:54 you forgot Dorian Baxter who will get more votes than the Libertarian.

Anonymous said...


15:18

According to Election Almanac he does not show up us a candidate.

This is strange as I have seen Baxter signs, but no sign of him.

Anonymous said...

14:54 - Speaking of stupidity you don't have to go all the way to Queens Park. I understand our town is in for $45,000 on the issue of green or clear garbage bags. Money paid to consultants when we have the payroll we do over at town hall.

Having said that, I have to agree with your logic on casting your ballot.

Anonymous said...

How could the Minister of Health be mis-informed ? Oh, right, she's running for election for the Liberal party. It seems to be congenital.

Anonymous said...

I find it amusing & a wee bit sick that 2 of the last 4 to be elected to Council for the first time [ No, Gallo was not elected in the last term ] have decided that they wish a higher position & pay rate.

Anonymous said...

Thank you for the over-view, Evelyn. I had never even considered the provincial affiliation of council members. Didn't have a clue about the mayors until they were out of office. It was a speed-bump to discover the former on the Newmarket/Aurora Liberal board with Cllr Ballard right at the top. It is not going to take a lot of thought to decide a course.

Anonymous said...



19:29

My mind seems to have conked out.

Who is the second?

Anonymous said...



"God Help Aurora" indeed, Christopher.

Will no one rid me of this ignoramus?

Only 157 days to go. Can I make it?

Sure hope so. Want to see the losers list.

Anonymous said...

20:00

I think 19:29 is referring to Gallo and Ballard.

The comment about Gallo not be elected the first term is semantics. Gallo's first election bid was 9th place (or the "first loser"). However, when one of the top 8 dropped out, his votes made him the next in line.

Anonymous said...


07.58

Gallo was personally selected by the then mayor.

Over 90% of Aurorans were in favour of an election to fill the seat vacated by Grace Marsh.

I do NOT consider Gallo to have been elected in 2006.

This is not a case of semantics. It's a case of the buddy system. And another clone was added to the mayor's gang, one who was incapable of thinking and expressing a clear thought. One who publicly stated that he did not fully understand the circumstances that led to a closed session vote to retain outside counsel and thereby launch a defamation suit that the initiator eventually discontinued.

A gutless witless bunch, all of them.

Anonymous said...


I find human nature intriguing.

You can say virtually whatever you want because the BLOG is YOURS.

But should a commenter say the exact same thing he/she is removed by a blog administrator - you.

Now how does this make sense?

It really doesn't, but if you own the ball you own the game.

Sometimes I find you just a slightly little bit smug in your opinions of others, as if to say - "You can't come close my experience/ability/opinion."