So....last night, Friday, after family and friends left I read of the submissions by residents taking up Council's invitation to fill Council's vacant seat.
It's 2.30 Saturday afternoon. I just finished reading the last six.
I will read them a second time before Tuesday.
Collectively, they make an impressive and highly positive statement about life in our town.
The sincerity of the candidates cannot be challenged.
I have been pre-occupied by the process since it began.
I did not expect to be so moved.
It makes the task harder. Increases my feelings of unfairness to the candidates.
In terms of opportunity, the town has so little to offer and the candidates have so much.
Eighteen people accepted an invitation . Seventeen will be publicly rejected.
I cannot in good conscience believe that's a good thing.
Richmond Hill did it in December 2013. They had the option of calling a By-election.
Apparently their decision was not well received in the community.
Toronto did it in July. The city is governed by the City of Toronto Act.What they do is not always
comparable to how we do.
Aurora has not done this before. I continue to contend an election by Council is not
required to make an appointment.
Secret ballot is at the core of democratic principle.
My concern is not about political expediency.
It's about protection of privacy of the individual.
I see no merit in the process. In the absence of logic I tend to look elsewhere.
I may be wrong but in this instance I would argue the philosophy
"Perception is the reality"
Saturday, 26 July 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
The reality is that they knew what the process is when they signed up. The reality is that they're all adults - the other seventeen will be just fine.
14:47
I agree with you but Evelyn is also correct. It does not have to be this messy. A little more thought and maybe even some debate should have been involved.
I think I might ask how many Aurora council mtgs the individual has attended. It would have to be specific as they might have been regulars elsewhere.
17:32 "Attending" Council meetings in person is not required. Streaming, TV and agendas and minutes posted on line mean someone can be just as up to speed as someone who sits in the chambers.
15:57
Would you accept a correction to asking how long the individual has been following the meetings ?
Post a Comment