Haven't gone away. I'm skelly-eyed from searching  for  budget references to   water used by various  town departments being  charged to  individual budgets.
I found reference to  fire  drills and fire-fighting. It didn't give amount used,  expenditure or source of revenue.
It was  in the paragraph referring to  "water loss"     Pshaw!!!! Do I look like an idiot?
I found  $15 thousand in capital works for a water carrier or tank truck. No reference to water  use.
The budget  has columns identifying   expenditure, previous year's cost,  increase  and  source of funding; be that  reserves, tax levy or part this and part that.
But there's nothing....Neither Nil,  Zip, Zilch or Zero.  Not that I can see.
I asked for help.  Didn't get it.
I  think about hundreds of thousands,  millions. maybe billions of  gallons of water used to create summer ice in a building with a metal clad roof.  I know it's hundreds of thousands of gallons a day. Every time I think about it the  flow grows.
There's a splash pad in the town park. Town swimming pools. Roads being  flushed  and mains  merrily swabbed.
There's the town hall with  toilets  gushing and  multiple hands washing.
All are tax supported.
Tax increase for 2010 shows at 2.8 per cent   Won't that look good on a campaign leaflet?
Water rate increase  on the other hand is  14%.
Water loss which includes, fire department  but no other town department, was increased from 8% to 12% for no  reason I can see.
$250.thousand was shifted from an expenditure against a capital reserve account to a  charge  on the  water rates .  Outrageous !!!!
Now....I have an admission to make.
I have always considered  water meters a  sly, sneaky, shifty, and thoroughly underhanded means of  removing  sewers from the tax bill.
Taxes were not reduced because of the shift. Perish the thought.  We just got an extra bill.
I  never appreciated a  storm sewer rate tacked on to the water rates.
Storm sewers are part of  road  infrastructure.They have nothing to do with water consumption.
Roads  and transportation are tax supported. Storm sewers keep our lots and roadways from flooding.
Ice arenas and swimming pools are supported by user fees....supposedly.
How can  the  fee be calculated without  all costs factored ?
I have heard arguments whether debt should be a factor.... water is never  mentioned.
I believe water rates are just a handy way for whoever is exercising  power to fondle the numbers fudge the  figures and fake the  fiduciary .
Gas  and electric companies and anybody else with a monopoly have to  justify their rates.
Why not the suppliers  of water?
Wednesday, 19 May 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 

1 comment:
Perhaps a bar chart in the Banner comparing water expenditures for the last ten years like the legal one the other day.
Of course it's the same issue, it's not the amounts that we need to know, our taxes tell us that, it's specifics about what the money is spent on that needs clarification.
I suppose in October when a few people are being run out of town they will just hum a tune and tell us they are leading a parade.
Post a Comment