Sunday, 16 February 2014
Raw Meat on a bone or a monkey on a stick
Enough already with the rules , he said. "Give us raw meat on the bone"
I smiled . Raw meat on the bone, indeed.
D'you forget where you live ?
Imagine the cast ... who are the leads?
What is the theme ?
Romance...Comedy... Murder....Mystery .....Musical....Evil Intrigue ....House of Horrors ?????
Shakespeare?
Methinks,,,none of the above.
On Tuesday, we watched the final fizzle of a real estate scam to separate the Town from $11 million dollars, the price of three run-down properties touted by staff and consultants and Councillors as "jewels" and the investment opportunity of a lifetime.
The properties were at immediate risk of being scooped up by developers eager to get greedy hands on the investment opportunity of a lifetime.
Months of staff time , $25,000 for a consultant study , and something called the Probus Presentation have already been expended to sell the idea to the community.
Before that , the Mayor's endorsement was used to give the project credibility and entice others to do the same.
Councillors Abel and Humphreys allowed the Heritage Advisory Committee to be used to expedite the process.
President of the Historical Society allowed the status of that failing organization to be used as a front.
William Albino presented repeatedly on behalf of proponents who were never identified.
The clear objective was to use the Hydro reserve funds , just waiting for a use, to "save" the vintage properties from being pillaged by the private sector.
At this point, reason for backing away from the investment opportunity of a lifetime, is the inappropriate use of public funds. And the need for private partners to put up the money.
The motion on Tuesday was to defer the decision for ninety days while staff seeks private
partners to finance the project.
The Mayor said, the consultants said, public funds should not be used. There is risk.
The private sector should fund the enterprise.
Since when does the private sector take advice on investment from the public sector.
Who ever heard of such a thing?
I did not interpret the consultant's report same as the Mayor.
I did not hear it during the presentation to Council ,the previous Tuesday.
I did not interpret the report from special project manager in the CAO's department, as advice not to make the investment.
I heard the opposite from all of the parties.
The Chief Financial Officer, whose job it is to advise on the merits of investment was neither asked nor offered financial advice.
The project it seemed was A-Go.
Suddenly the brakes were applied.
The decision was deferred for ninety days. At the end of which we are close to sumer recess.
At the end of summer recess, we are into the next election.
A Lame Duck Council.
Effectively, the project is a dead duck.
If we have staff with sufficient time on their hands to seek out partners and private investment to invest in private property, as directed by Council, it appears .....we may have too many staff.
That meat is as raw as you're going to get, my friend.
But $11 million isn't chicken feed either.
Such a good thing it's no longer on the table.
Too bad another $50,000 or thereabouts was spent to accomplish nothing at all.
Can't think of a private business that could survive by throwing money at projects and hoping some thing might stick.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
25 comments:
The problem appears to be that the Mayor and head of Staff made ' a few phone calls " and found that there were ' expressions of interest '. No one bothered to say from whence these came or if there was any money to be provided.
Cut to the chase: There has been zero interest from public interests.
I'm still embraced in the soothing arms of love.
Expect this trance-like state to end overnight and then watch out, raw meat. I'll have a tremendous appetite!
This is nonsense. No one has even produced an independent assessment of the value of those 3 properties. One is only worth land value if a costly removal is done. Another has been on the market for years. If the proponents had been serious that would have been right up front.
If these houses are sold to the private sector aren't they still subject to the crazy promenade scheme and the historic building thing? So no one will be able to doing any but put these buildings in their former glory. So what would the town be protecting that the tools that are already in place won't do?
A wise Council wouldn't accept those places as a gift.
Oh, dear, did I say a Wise Council ? Silly old me.
Our HAC chairpersons did not do adequate due diligence into the scheme. Consequently, staff resources and taxpayers' dollars were wasted.
It would be nice if these two could understand their job is not glad handing and scheming.
That thing is Mayor Dawe's foot-ball.
He brought it to the game. He wanted it badly.
Like it or not, he is going to have to carry it into the elections.
Private business is always careful with their money.….It’s their money! Risks are taken…but again…It’s their money. Government has no business taking these risks. And with this heritage project…They have no business in participating in this real estate scheme. That real estate Joint operations building is a fail. It’s running at 30% over budget because of the grading and drainage concerns and the “design” is only 70% complete. They didn’t see this before they purchased it? Who put together the first budget amount?. Do you know what would happen in private business if this happened?? There’s a few councillors that work in the private sector or have run businesses…they should be asked that question. We could easily outsource some of these services that the Town provides. We've done it with other services. With some of these services being outsourced we wouldn't need a building this size. And maybe the hydro building could have been suitable. But hey…lets just spend money…Governments have a constant revenue tool that private businesses don’t have called “taxes”.
20:30 – They sure are subject to the promenade scheme and historic building thing! In fact private investors looking at other possible investments in Town are having a hard time with this study because the banks aren't looking to favorably at this study either. And that historical building thing is just pure hell to plan and navigate any type of development that can make a return on investment.
Dead duck? That sounds like wishful thinking.
I hope to be a regular visitor to our town's heritage park.
23:15
Please do tell! What will you be doing there?
As long as that juicy fat Hydro Fund exists, there will be no end of bright ideas proposed to separate that money from the Town.
Meanwhile, the Heritage Disneyworld Study will join the Promenade Study in fulfilling its proper use as a dust collector.
It should have been clear to one and all right from the start that the requirement of private money would be a deal breaker.
Aside from $25,000 wasted, and the usual amount of council time that would have only been wasted on something else anyway, this hasn't been a bad deal for Aurora taxpayers.
Council can get off on a technicality by claiming they didn't officially kill the project.
So far at least, there hasn't been much of a call for a 'torches and pitchforks' rally against the Heritage Haters like there was for the Jazz Festival Haters and the Culture Haters.
Of course we'll have to pay attention next October to find out which foolish candidates want to resurrect this dud but all-in-all not a bad result.
So, that $33M and counting Hydro Fund is still there.
Any bets on the next idea?
The Aurora University?
NHL arena?
Aurora Opera House?
United Nations Headquarters?
International Airport?
C'mon folks - we've got money to burn!
Literally.
22:37
I have heard those councillors from the private sector or who owned businesses,
" In the corporate world, one ....... ..yadda, yadda,,,,,,"
They are able to transpose their ideas into the real world of high taxes & pissed-off taxpayers who resent the bells & whistles.
Certainly, the next hot potato will be the final price of the public works garage.
The Mayor and his Public Works Director should visit a few truck and coach garages to get the lay of the land. The Mayor is trying his best to assure us the proposed facility will not be modeled on the Taj Mahal". We certainly hope not but have concerns with the cost as currently reported.
One down and one to go , if 11 million was to much for them to swallow surely 23 million for a works yard will make then wretch
Tim:
You contend that the time & money wasted by Council was not a bad deal for Aurora.
My point would be that this is only because we did some hollering about the stupidity. It should not be up to us to ride herd on Council. It simply is not our job. Nor do most of us relish the constant need to be guardians of fiscal prudence.
Raw meat on the bone, if neither cooked nor properly stored begins to turn rancid and rots and fills with maggots.
That is an image I see before me. There are no qualified cooks and proper storage is lacking.
You have captured perfectly the chain of events and the players who deign to open their mouths without first thinking about what they want to say.
So when things are said they make no sense, 'Tis just the rambling of ignorance. What counts is that one has spoken, like a foolish remark in Hansard, something that is on the record that you can show the folks back home, that you do not sleep through the boring dreary sessions.
The town has some $34,000,000 sitting in the Hydro fund that even at today's paltry interest rate produces an annual income of over $1,000,000.
There are essential capital projects such as the repair to the Recreation Centre, $6,000,000 or thereabouts, the Joint Operations Centre (which some say is not essential if one uses other town-owner buildings and terminates a lease with the DOD, a measly $20,000,000.
Then there are the fairy tale projects, the Promenade Study for nearly $3,000,000, Library Square, Heritage Acres requiring the town to fork out $11,000,000.
Have you looked at the width of the sidewalks on Yongr Street south of Wellington? These would have to be nearly tripled in order to produce a pedestrian mall as pictured in the Promenade Study. What then happens to Yonge Street? Possibly it should be one way for a part of the day and then reverse for the remainder. What did a single narrow sidewalk cost on Industrial Parkway? Then multiply this by a factor of 10. No doubt the merchants on Yonge Street will not welcome with open arms months of noise and dust while access to their places of business is rendered nearly impossible.
Council should keep deferring these major projects indefinitely until the day that the light finally goes on in their brains - there is no way that we can do these.
Public-private is a joke. Do members of Council really believe that the provincial and federal governments are going to dole out millions of dollars to preserve three old houses? Do members of Council really believe that private funding will be found, eager to participate in a real estate scheme that will do nothing but roll in capital gains, the greater the longer the property is owned?
A flock of tooth fairies will arrive sooner than any government/private funding for Hillary.
And despite having no direction from Council the CAO and/or a surrogate produces a memorandum on strategy to be used while negotiating real estate purchases. This is too much. Council should give him a good hard smack on his underside.
Aurora is not being well served by Council and some senior staff.
@10:04
Couldn't agree more.
When it comes to spending, particularly discretionary spending, there is a general misunderstanding of the role of a municipal councillor.
And that is the mistaken belief that since they have been elected to make decisions, then they are free to make those decisions based solely on their own best judgement.
Even though the level of such thinking varies among individuals
It is of course, completely wrong.
An elected official's views and feelings are their own, they are not a substitute for the personal views and feelings of residents.
The clever Heritage Park group, just like any other special interest group, worked at exploiting councillors that think a majority committee or council vote represents a sufficient consensus view.
A majority decision made by 5 members of council cheered on by a group of 50 enthusiastic supporters may be technically legal but what about the moral and ethical duty to represent the needs and wishes of the voters?
As far as the Heritage Park goes, I have no idea who wanted this, or why, and I don't really care, but the fact they succeeded in getting council to waste $25K on a study the the Heritage group should have done themselves (with some of that private investment they kept bragging about), and nearly talked council into spending heaven-knows-what on a couple of ramshackle money-pit properties is frightening.
Also frightening is the realization that our council went this far with nary a hint of public consensus or participation.
Why wasn't the Heritage group required to produce a petition in support of their plan?
Were the words 'plebiscite' or 'referendum' ever uttered at the council table?
Was council not interested in having taxpayers share in the exquisite beauty of their Grand Vision?
Or were they afraid we wouldn't?
"Oh, if you didn't want a $20M Heritage Park why didn't you send us an email and say so?"
"Why didn't you come down to Open Forum and speak up, we're here every second Tuesday?"
Seriously?
"We have a great idea to spend $20M and since no one has showed up to say "no" we'll just assume everyone's OK with that?"
Why assume that?
Town Hall wasn't over-run with thousands of enthusiastic supporters saying "Yes".
Sorry - public consensus on discretionary spending is NOT decided on a "Negative Option" basis.
Tacit approval is not an acceptable substitute for direct public consultation.
You don't suffer public input - you seek it.
As far as I'm concerned, we only dodged this spending bullet - for the moment- because our council was overwhelmed by the amount of money involved.
Councillor, I think you should be reminded of the Mayor's lecture directed to you. He advised that he is running a business corporation of some X million dollars.
He has been in that mode for a while; ready and willing to take on all the tough business decisions. Direct the CAO to call some business folks and cut a deal on the heritage properties. Surplus the Clerk, as recommended by a consultant. Direct the treasurer to find some free money. Call the taxpayers in to an open house and get this truck/equipment garage under construction. No time to deal with trifling questions such as show me the savings from cutting the Clerk.
You have been speaking as have the citizens but he and his Deputy have been barely listening. I think you may see him slip back into municipal mode in the near future.
13:01
You are quite possibly correct. But I am certain that he is going to have a rough time of it. Left things far too late to remedy with ease. The last election was simply too easy. He believes that it always will be like that for him.
"Town Hall wasn't over-run with thousands of enthusiastic supporters saying "Yes"."
The opposite is true, as well. Apart from the solitary 'usual suspect' (Heard), where were the throngs of negative naysayers? Where were you Tim the Enchanter?
14:03
An invasion should not be necessary. It appears to have become the norm whether it be about trees, a stupid bus or this Heritage item of invisible merit. Council does not have the moral or maybe even legal right to spend millions from the Hydro Fund without consultation.
Real consultation as T the E has described.
@14:03
Where was I?
In my home where I live.
In my home where the Town mails a horse-choking tax bill to me every year.
In my home where I write the cheque for the money that the Heritage Park people want to spend.
In my home where I wasn't approached by anyone from the Heritage Park group anxious to tell me about their great $20M idea of which they expected me to pay half.
Not one phone call - not one knock at the door - not one mailing - not one flyer.
And why not?
If it was such a wonderful idea what could be easier than getting the Town behind it?
In my opinion your "where were you?" statement exudes the disingenuous bizzaro reverse-onus sense of civic responsibility nonsense that typifies the tactics special interest groups use in the attempt to advance their pet agendas.
The sad truth is that groups like the Heritage Park DO NOT WANT citizens sticking their oar in by asking uncomfortable questions or expressing disapproval.
Cheerleaders and supporters only please.
The equally sad truth is that not enough councillors realize I didn't hire them to be cheerleaders.
I hired a council that will ask uncomfortable questions on my behalf.
I am the boss.
The council works for me.
This isn't some chickenfeed hand out to a kids hopscotch team.
This is a multimillion dollar expenditure - and not for a 'need' either - but a 'want'.
In what workplace would it ever be acceptable for the employees to take it upon themselves to spend this amount of "mad" money and then dictate to the boss when and where the he may register his displeasure should he choose to do so?
You want to spend that kind of money you come to me and damn well justify it!
I don't go to you!
Unless of course the whole idea was to get this rammed through council before anyone realized what was happening?
What if this project turned into a $20M money-sucking white elephant?
Would that then be my fault because I didn't "do enough" to stop council from going through with it?
Would any councillor try that twisted logic at home?
"I can't believe you bought that new car, you know we can't afford it!"
"Well, I wanted it and you didn't tell me not to."
And would this be a good time to remind the "It's up to taxpayers to come down and get involved" crowd that a good number of taxpayers did exactly that when the last council debated by-election vs appointment after Ms. Marsh resigned?
I was there.
We waited patiently while at least three delegates took to the microphone and spoke in support of a by-election to much applause.
We waited patiently while it was pointed out that the council had placed so much value on the most important item that they placed it last on the agenda.
We waited patiently while they debated.
And then as they looked out over the crowd that was clearly in unanimous support of a by-election - we waited patiently while they voted 6 to 2 for appointment. ( Councillors Buck and Collins-Mrakas the Nays)
So much for the value of civic participation.
Stand and ye shall be heard.
Oh please.
To 14:03
The list of individuals you pounce on just grows and grows. Ugly stuff.
Admit it. Those demanding money from council turn up in numbers, stage their mob scene and leave. They have no real interest in how the town operates.
David Heard is not and never has been a Blog Stalker . He is right up there using his own name.
Post a Comment