Last night  a glass with ice  was  on the table by my chair and a message from a  Nisbet Drive neighbour  was waiting for me when I got home.
"Tell your mother, we  all appreciate what she did for us tonight"
It  was nice. But it was little enough  I  was able to accomplish.
I told Council, Nisbet Drive residents  felt  they should have had an opportunity to comment on the changed  construction plans for their road.
Councillor Gaertner dismissed that. Residents had plenty of opportunity to comment,she said.
The Mayor advised   residents should come and see her and  Public Works Director, Simanovskis if they had a problem.
Mayor Morris is certainly right about that. One resident of Nisbet Drive went to see her and the Public Works Director  and the  road  design was promptly changed  to suit his  preference.
Along  his property frontage,  the sidewalk  loops and becomes a concrete pad six feet wide, abutting the travelled portion of the road. Not only that. The road itself  is to be  shifted over by three feet  to  take   the sidewalk even further from his property.
Neighbours opposite  will have three feet  less depth to their  frontage.
To satisfy  totally selfish and self-centred demands of a single individual,three  beautiful street trees, two of them with probably thirty years of growth, will be cut down  to be replaced by  the  concrete pad.
But apparently  that's  acceptable.  Because he took his problem to the Mayor. The Mayor  ensured  his every wish was granted. Like a  Fairy Godmother.
So chuffed was he with the success of his efforts, he boasted to  neighbours about how effective he had been  and how well the Mayor had taken care of his needs.
His success had been at  his neighbours  expense, but never did it occur to him the information might not be universally welcomed.
It's interesting to watch Mormac politics in action.
Little subtlety is involved.
By   summer's end  , the hybrid  sidewalk will be on the ground for all to see.
Visit Nisbet Drive now and see how it is. Council  awarded  the contract last night  with one vote opposed.
The trees will  be the  first to vanish. Go and see them  now in all  their glory of  spring foliage. Take some photos. Talk to  the neighbours. Give them an ear.
Next time a righteous Councillor expresses an opinion  about the value of a tree, know that  for the crock  it is.
I've been to a few gatherings lately.  In the company of   neighbouring politicians.
Aurora Council meetings  are being  viewed  far and wide.
Wednesday, 12 May 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 

4 comments:
That's for sure! I don't live in Aurora, but I read your blog faithfully. I can't believe all the shenanigans going on there. I've even watched your council meeting on the internet. Unbelievable!
I'm amazed there isn't some way to stop the destruction being caused by this dysfunctional municipal government. A few more months and it may all be over!
Trees on Vandorf were her crusade, trees on private lots have been her crusade. Trees on town boulevards, they get to go. What the hell is going on!! She needs to go and she needs to go NOW!!
Evelyn, I agree with everything you said, this is a foolish decision but I think you have been unduly harsh in your criticism of the resident who fought for it. All home owners are "selfish" about their properties. Although it is undeniable that the town owns a few metres at the bottom of everyone's property, it is only natural that we think of it as our own. We nurture and care for it as we do the rest of our lot and we are responsible for its aestetic maintenance. The resident did the right thing, he had a concern, went to the Mayor and fought for what he wanted. It is not his fault that council granted his request at the expense of his neighbours and fellow taxpayers. Although I agree that the Town has a responsibility to work with citizens for the betterment of all neighbourhoods, in the end it is up to the elected members to determine how best to utilize community owned property. It is them that must be held accountable for their decisions. No homeowner is objective about their own property or neighbourhood, that is job of their elected government. I think in fairness you owe him an apology. And it is council that owes an apology to his neighbours.
Luckywife
Let's hope!
Post a Comment