Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Political
Imperative ? Not":
Should the user pay?
This has been a
question often asked but never satisfactorily answered.
A long-time
neighbour has paid property taxes on their home for over forty years. They are
childless. And yet a large portion of the tax they pay goes toward the cost of
education. Is this fair?
What about the family four houses over with four
children, all in university now. Their property taxes are about the same as
those of the childless couple. But their four children travelled through the
public school system, each for 13 years, counting kindergarten. So they received
a huge benefit in comparison to the neighbour. Is this fair?
A similar
question can be applied to municipal facilities, be they soccer fields, swimming
pools, parks and roads. Is it possible to assess a user fee for these? Would
such fees be fair?
It seems that this is a question without an equitable
answer.
*******************
There is an answer. Not equitable though.
For a number of years the Province has been absorbing increases in education taxes Their intention was to reduce the burden of taxes for education . In response to demands from municipal politicians. It means the Province has complete authority.
No noticeable reduction in taxes occurred though because council is advised the intent was to leave more room for the municipality to tax for other programs.
It seems Councillors are all so well off they can't imagine taxes being a hardship. Doesn't matter how the assessment base grows or senior leels of government hand over as share of this and that, we just keep jacking the taxes up.
We are putting money into reserve funds so that people who live here twenty ,thirty or forty years from now won't have to pay as much in taxes for what it costs to maintain the facilities built for them by us.
There are user fees for most municipal facilities. Except when waived for people who make a request. Usually a group claiming to be special or a charitable or non-profit organization.
It means a higher total for the charity by the amount of the user fee or more money in the pockets of a non-profit organization.
Some groups pay no fees. The tennis club, lawn bowling club, men's soccer club.
The Legion is on the books as paying taxes. They don't. It's a transfer from town revenues to cover their regional and education taxes and forfeit our own share.
The Legion has two buildings on the property and they lease part of the parking lot for school buses which are privately owned.
The town bought a portion of their property from them a number of years ago to use for soccer fields.
Then somebody came up with the brilliant idea for a public private partnership to erect a bubble to accommodate soccer year -round.
Taxes on that are $50,000 a year for the twenty year term of the agreement which relieves the private operator of all taxes.
So the town pays those taxes as well.
An agreement with the Legion allowd access to the bubble across their parking lot. I hear they put chain across it to prohibit
access.
Now you know a bit more than you did before. Sometimes it seems you may be better off not knowing.
Monday 25 June 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I think Aurora needs a Property Manager/Registered Agent. He/she would simply work on the list of properties owned, leased or serviced by Aurora and bring ALL agreements up to standard. Some should be generating income, others less but the field has to be balanced. This hit and miss stuff going on now isn't working. It is pitting groups against each other.
And since I am not versed in Real Estate, I will just toss this idea up to see if anyone can use it. Some of the surplus staff at communications could make room for the new addition. Can't figure out what, if anything, they do.
The Town does not pay the taxes (except the York Region portion perhaps)that you cite. It simply writes off the receivable. However, it looks good for your cause.
Is it fair in the samples that one couple has not used the services of the education system and the other has not? Is it fair that you pay EI premiums but have never used them, but the fisherman in Nova Scotia goes on the dole every year when the season is over? Is it fair that you pay OHIP premiums (or your employer does on your behalf) but you have never been in the hospital, but you neighbour is at the doctor every week with some ailment?
Welcome to the Social society we call Canada. We all pay for the common good. Like it or not, whether you use it or not. It is there for you to use.
Post a Comment