"Cowardice asks the question...is it safe? Expediency asks the question...is it politic? Vanity asks the question...is it popular? But conscience asks the question...is it right? And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but one must take it because it is right." ~Dr. Martin Luther King

Monday 20 January 2014

The Labourer is worthy of hers hire

I took poetic license with the the multiplying factor in  the last post. It should have been  six to eight times ....not eight to ten.

A couple of  immediate and predictable responses received....one  calling me a hypocrite ....the other that I'm ready to fight against every expense except Councillor salaries.

There hasn't been a fight and there isn't one now. 

These days, there's  very little that can't be talked  about

Why can't we talk  about what a Councillor should be paid without getting twisted out of shape?

Who should talk about it if not  someone who's had the experience?

Why should a committee  of residents , needing support from staff be superior.

Council still  has to make the  decision.

Why  do we  go through the ridiculous rig-a-ma-role  of  make the decision before an election so that we can  pretend  to be  deciding for somebody else.

What's that about?

A candidate once made council  pay a campaign issue. He said  they shouldn't get any.

People scoffed.

He didn't get elected. 

In another election,  a candidates said he was running for the money . 

 He didn't get elected. 

When  I brought up the issue  last week the Mayor said he agreed.

He discussed it with someone who had done a study, which  concluded since the job was part-time , a similar position should be selected and if the salary was $100,000. a Councillor should  receive half of that. 

The Mayor said he would support that  "for the next council"

Yeah right...I thought... you  didn't suggest the Mayor's  increase should  be deferred to the next term. 

Someone said  Markham  Ward Councillors are paid $65,000.

I noted  Markham  Councillors  also receive funds  to rent an office and two Councillors share an administrative assistant.  Calls  are taken and problems attended  on behalf of the Councillor.

An Aurora Councillor's salary is  around $25,000.  A flat mileage  payment  brings it  to $27,000.

No office, no administrative assistant ,no benefits , no life insurance or severance on retirement or defeat.

What is the job about ?

Meetings you know about.... like in a fish bowl.  Some function better in that venue than others.

Members serve on advisory committees and attend more meetings.

Responding  to calls from constituents and following up with whatever assistance is  required.

Attendance at community events. People  like to see an interest from Council.

I  respond to e-mails, phone calls  and write a blog post every day...sometimes more than one.

Criticism  goes with the job.  A necessary occupational hazard.  Nobody enjoys it. Neither are they compelled to be in office.

Despite a variety of opinion about how this or that Councillor performs,  it must be said,
Aurora Councillors. the only ones I know, are a conscientious group.

They attend meetings....come prepared....read the reports .. and participate.

They do what they committed to do , were elected to do ...they should be paid accordingly.

22 comments:

Anonymous said...

You have the one constant critic. It reminds me of that Sher. She used to label people & call them all sorts of names in the hope that something would stick. Never got elected to anything. Let it roll off your back.

Anonymous said...

for the responsibility and the criticism - the pay is pathetic.

in your next life, please become a full time writer- it is your gift and you would be rich.

(just invest in a good "spell-checker") lol

Anonymous said...

I would feel better if the mayor had put that in writing. It does seem a bit presumptuous of him. I do not believe that past mayors are asked for their suggestions. Is he so sure ? Just a bedtime thought . Take care.

Anonymous said...

21:13 – Ya just had to bring her name up! It’s been a while since that character has been talked about. Thanks a lot! lol

Anonymous said...

21:13
Richmond Hill has one just like her.
She's decided to run for council this term.

Anonymous said...

The agenda is a real piece of work. I wonder how long is going to be wasted on nattering about clear garbage bags when everyone in Aurora knows all the garbage goes into the same sections of the trucks.

Anonymous said...

22:34
When we lived in Richmond Hill, there was a Mayor who got himself involved with a development project. Things got so ugly that the TO press sent reporters out. Now, what was that guy's name ? I truly can't remember.

Anonymous said...

@ 12:25
Would that have been Al Duffy ?

Christopher Watts said...

22:34

There's some coverage of this in Wayne Lilley's 2006 book, which is available atthe APL
http://aurora.bibliocommons.com/item/show/77398085_magna_cum_laude

You can also skip that and just read it through this free link on GoogleBooks here, Al Duffy is highlighted:

http://books.google.ca/books?id=1a4zxcJS1FoC&pg=PA104&lpg=PA104&dq=al+duffy,+richmond+hill&source=bl&ots=ZbvvL1hOew&sig=bQX9_CsqcB1BLFsoz847MFxtaTI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=jNHeUqPNF6m52QXXyIDYAw&ved=0CFIQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=al%20duffy%2C%20richmond%20hill&f=false

Anonymous said...


If his name were to appear in my book it would be "low-lighted."

Anonymous said...


If each councillor were paid twice as much could the additional amount reduce equivalent staff cost?

Anonymous said...

13:48
Sounds right. He took quite a pasting as did a couple of our neighbours who were also involved. Although their hit was financial. I think Betty/ Bette - Stephenson a former health minister was also in the mix ?

Anonymous said...


Is Mayor Dawe still planning on providing a written outline of his function and responsibilities?

Anonymous said...

@16:20
The Auroran reported that he said he would do that ' in time '. I thought then he meant that year. Time's come & gone

Anonymous said...

If I detect a cautionary note here aimed at a certain individual, it's a waste of time. There is absolutely no interest there is reading Blogs. Good effort though

Anonymous said...

13:48 - It was Al Duffy. He now works for a developer! LOL

Anonymous said...

I found Mr Duffy. In 2012 he was spokesman for a developer in Simcoe.

Anonymous said...

It is almost 8:30. We have endured an advocate of clear garbage bags who loves the word ' Absolutely ' and are now into the thorny bus problem.
The evidence is clear. Councillors are not paid enough,

Anonymous said...

It is a good thing I didn't pay attention to Rogers. They list a Newmarket Council meeting for tonight.

Anonymous said...

Le Renard encore

Anonymous said...

I would like to add the name of another councillor who might have been reading you Blog, Evelyn. On the matter of the huge service centre, Cllr Pirri would appear to be paying attention. He might be a keeper.

Anonymous said...

It must give residents a warm & fuzzy feeling when, after an acrimonious debate & vote, at least 2 councillors [ fill in the blanks ] admit they had no idea what they had just voted on.