Is There A Public Right To Know? I Think So.

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "It's More Than Curiosity":  
"This is an interesting reaction. Guilt or innocence ?" 
How is this interesting? There is a definitive accusation being made that someone is guilty of prove their address. Otherwise they could be guilty of violating the eligibility for office.  
There are no accusations here.
Nothing can be farther than the truth. How can you make this statement with a straight face? 
You also stated that if someone knows something, they should tell the Town. Well, it seems like you know. Why don't you tell someone at the Town?
**************
I most certainly do make the statement with a straight face.
If the Councillor's new address is within the community,  eligibility to hold  office does not change. 
I do not know where the Councillor resides.
The onus is  not mine to provide information to the Clerk.
The onus is not the Clerk's  to inquire. 
Responsibility rests with the Councillor in question, to inform the Clerk of an accurate  change of address..
What I said was, the law provides,  a citizen  aware that  a Councillor  no longer resides within the municipality, has authority to  call upon the municipality to declare the seat vacant.
As a Councillor. I am not aware that has happened. 
I am aware the Councillor  sold  her home. .
No accusation can be made about that. 
The question is asked in the community and a statement  made,  the Councillor no longer resides within the municipality. 
Considering eligibility to hold office hinges upon the answer, I believe the question needs to be answered. 
It is not a private matter. 
It is the public's business.