I think the tedious,lugubrious process of election by Council in which candidates ,all but one, are publicly rejected, and humiliated , is a sham.
A Canard... A Charade... A Cabal.....A Cruel trick perpetrated upon those who accept the town's invitation and in good faith put their names forward to be considered for the vacancy.
I believe : 'tis a foul and pestilential deception calculated to lull the masses into believing ,all is bright and beautiful, open and transparent.
*********+*******************
Altogether now ...repeat after me.
Witches All
Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn, and caldron bubble.
2 WITCH. Fillet of a fenny snake,
In the caldron boil and bake;
Eye of newt, and toe of frog,
Wool of bat, and tongue of dog,
Adder's fork, and blind-worm's sting,
Lizard's leg, and owlet's wing,—
For a charm of powerful trouble,
Like a hell-broth boil and bubble.
ALL. Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn, and caldron bubble.
****************************
I do not accept staff advice that council cannot make an appointment to fill the vacant Council seat without going through the lugubrious process of publicly rejecting and humiliating all but one candidate in the phoney -baloney contrived election.
Richmond Hill used the format in December, we were told.
RIchmond Hill could have held a by-election in December.
After the election by politicians , controversy ensued. The winner ,it was said, was the Mayor's candidate of choice.
I believe that was probable and more than likely.
I aalso believe we are about to see it repeated in Aurora.
Staff advise we have until August 23rd to fill the vacancy.
An "election " followed by an Appointment Bylaw is planned for July 29th.
All wrapped up neat and tidy. No matter how many candidates are on the roster.
We are in summer recess. One meeting a month.
Why the hurry to fill a seat that will seldom be occupied?
Ah yes you might well ask. And therein lies a clue.
The Joint Operation Centre contract award will be on the Agenda of the August meeting.
Why is that important?
Because the estimate is almost $ 27 million.
The financing plan does not have unanimous approval.
If bids are substantially higher than estimates, someone on the yea side might get cold feet.
We are on the eve of an election.
Not optimum time to be dealing with a price tag of this magnitude.
Never a good time to approve a horrendous expenditure without full or close to full support of council.
Former Councillor Ballard was on the nay side
A Yea vote in the erstwhile Nay seat, improves the odds of project approval and public acceptance.
And might also provide support to a wavering Councillor. Safety in numbers and all that jazz.
So how might success be achieved?
Certainly not by leaving that vote to chance .
Marilee Harris is a candidate for the vacant seat. As a member of the Economic Development
Committee, the lady lays claim to the magic formula of the Strategic Plan, the document that cost $80 thousand and promises untold wealth and an "exceptional quality of life for all"
Sort of like Jack and The Beanstalk
Ms Harris is quoted as professing interest in what there is to learn in the waning hours of the current term.
By September 12th all ranks will be in election mode. Until October 27th , not much happening at the Old Town Hall.
My bet says Ms Harris already has the votes lined up for appointment to the idle seat.
A person who has never held public office. Has never competed in an election. May not even be known by many, may cast the deciding vote that plunges the municipality into mega millions of dollars of debt.
Friday, 18 July 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
She better not have = there are 2 highly qualified & experienced individuals who have placed their names forward. Either should be a slam-dunk.
Is this not how politics works?
First you go out and get the votes in your hip pocket and then you brazenly march in and dare anyone to take them from you.
Bob McRoberts is by far the best of the "candidates."
He has the credentials, he has the credibility, he has the experience, he is someone that most can say of him - "I trust him."
If this entire charade is about soliciting one more vote in favour of a $27million financing scheme, then I say to members of council - "Fie on you."
Why keep things simple when they can be made complicated?
By the way, what will this "temporary" councillor earn during the remaining life of this council?
Your tinfoil hat; always at the ready.
8:23
Might you be the individual who was planning the grand opening of that Heritage Park fiasco once upon a time ?
Actually, 09:06, I don't consider the Heritage Park project to be dead, only dormant. The promise of a new council, with the possibility of a few more progressive members, gives one hope.
The HERITAGE PARK is not just dead, but also buried.
Anyone with hope is an idiot unless they can fork out $10million plus.
"A person who has never held public office. Has never competed in an election. May not even be known by many, may cast the deciding vote that plunges the municipality into mega millions of dollars of debt."
Is it better that some with experience on council cast the vote to plunges the municipality into mega millions of dollars of debt instead?
15:02-"Progressive members?" You mean members who enjoy spending Aurorans hard earned money on pathetic projects that will put us in debt for a group of self entitled
individuals.
Post a Comment