A Comment to the Post:
“An illegal clause in the procedure bylaw discourages Councillors from attending meetings. It is there at her insistence.”
How convenient.
Would you be able to post the wording of this clause?
**************************************************
This story starts at the  beginning of the last term with the General Committee debate  on   committee appointments..
Councillors are asked to provide first,second and third committee choice  to the Mayor. Who works with the  Clerk  to accommodate members choices,  avoid scheduling conflicts and  submit a report to Council   for approval.
My choice  was  the Economic Development Committee.
I didn't get it.  Morris's  clique had  hogged the committees. Morris had three
I expressed my dis-satisfaction.
Morris said....." tough"......or words  similarly disrespectful, hostile and out of order.
I responded  ; "No matter.... Councillors are entitled to attend and participate at all meetings"
Councillor Keane enjoined.   He said ..."no, they are not"
I cast an inquiring look towards the Chair. He moved the meeting along.
In my previous incarnation,  standing committees were the order. Membership was three for the purpose of  a majority report to Council. Any member of Council had the right to attend and participate,   ask questions of staff, express an opinion, but not vote.
Committee recommendations  had to reflect a majority decision.
Since then and I am  still doubtful of  the new concept,. advisory committees have  taken the place of standing committees.  Committees  have more non-elected members than elected.  And  the  new clause in the procedure bylaw.
It qualifies a councillor's authority.
It states:
26.2      Councillor Members who are not Committee Members shall be entitled to attend all
         Advisory Committee meetings, including any in-camera portion of the meeting, and                     shall be entitled to speak ,  at a meeting upon recognition from the chair, but
         shall not be entitled to vote....
It seems  innocent . Rules of order require recognition from the chair to allow any member to speak.
But  this  clause  refers only  to a Councillor  who is not a member of the committee. It was Councillor Keane's reference when he challenged the right of  this  Councillor to participate.
To be continued.
Saturday, 31 July 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment